Sajid Javid Tells Care Home Workers to “Get Jabbed or Get Another Job”
The Health Secretary has doubled down on the ‘no jab no job’ policy for care home workers, following reports that more than half of care homes could be forced to sack staff because of the rule, saying that those who refuse to get vaccinated against Covid should “get out and get another job”. Dismissing the views of those who have chosen not to get vaccinated, he said ‘refuseniks’ simply “cannot be bothered” to join in with the roll-out. The Telegraph has the story.
The Health Secretary said he is not prepared to “pause” the requirement for care home staff to be fully-vaccinated by November 11th, amid concerns significant numbers of staff are reluctant to receive the vaccine.
The Government announced their decision to make vaccination compulsory for care home workers in August, a controversial move that sector and union leaders warned could lead to a “mass exodus” of staff.
Mr. Javid told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: “If you work in a care home you are working with some of the most vulnerable people in our country and if you cannot be bothered to go and get vaccinated, then get out and go and get another job.”
He added: “If you want to look after them [care home residents], if you want to cook for them, if you want to feed them, if you want to put them to bed, then you should get vaccinated. If you are not going to get vaccinated then why are you working in care?”
Christina McAnea, Unison’s General Secretary, said: “Vaccination remains the way out of the pandemic. But coercing and bullying people can never be the right approach.”
Boris Johnson has defended the move, saying it was “only reasonable” to expect workers in a position of care to be vaccinated.
The Prime Minister said: “I think that it’s only reasonable to expect people who are entrusted with the care of elderly and vulnerable people to be inoculated against a disease which is particularly harmful to elderly and vulnerable people.”
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
That’s another inhuman scumbag who needs to be remembered, and never forgiven.
These attitudes are unforgivable.
They all piss in the same pot and will all fit on the same gibbet when the time comes.
Your solution is too humane. I think they should be cut down before death and quartered. Let him smell his own entrails before he goes into eternity.
Who does he imagine is going to replace those who leave? There’s a massive problem with recruitment anyway because of the nature of the job. But Savage Jabber would never get his hands dirty doing a job like care work.
Quite – hard work for shit pay with often unsociable working hours. People aren’t exactly going to be queueing up for the jobs, are they?
This situation – and lorry drivers – demonstrates very well the theories set out by the anthropologist David Graeber in his essay (and later book) ‘Bullshit Jobs’, where he argues that (with a small number of exceptions) those jobs which are most necessary to society tend to be little valued and paid badly, whereas the opposite is true and many highly-paid managerial jobs are so unnecessary that hardly anybody would notice if they disappeared.
Would any of us notice if Savage Jabber disappeared?
As in the nearly 50% of NHS employees who are “managers”?
They don’t intend to replace them. The propaganda telling us the jab is working has been misread by the gullible. The jab is working because it’s beginning to kill people so there will be no need for careworkers.
The next adverts to go out will be for cremation staff. When will people start to understand this is a depopulation agenda.
At this rate we will all be dead before the depopulation kicks in.
I’d like to see that sociopath put to work in a care home, wiping people’s arses, feeding them, cleaning up after them, trying to give them some quality of life when their level of functioning is often incredibly poor. Not to mention all that bloody ppe they have to wear and regular lateral flow tests. And cope with the constant loss of residents, and deal with the relatives. He wouldn’t last a shift. Weren’t these the same essential workers who were being clapped last year, now branded as lazy and irresponsible? Go fuck youself Javid.
Hear hear.
Would you be happy with him on the other end of your arse?
Maybe he would be better employed digging out cess pits with no mask.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Javid is a muslim. Muslims have no regard for the lives of infidels. Read the Quran. The CCP have no regard for the lao bai xing. It is no coincidence that there are many of that faith in our Parliament
You are speaking of fundamentalists here. All Muslims I know are tolerant and lovely people. I’m also concerned that if we fall into the trap of dehumanising the other, we are playing a game that some in power wish us to play. Javid’s faith, whatever it is, has nothing to do with what he has just said. Matt Hancock would have said exactly the same, as would any other government minister.
Completely untrue. Yes I’ve read it. As I have most of the major religious works. No, I’m not a Muslim.
If you’re able to quote any passage from the Quran to support your statement please do so.
A Christian I know has a Muslim friend who sometimes buys pork for her/him despite not eating it, among many other favours. Plenty of Muslims who behave jolly decently.
Now this I agree with
Amen sister!!!!
Absolutely.
And, the clever-dicks always engineer the language to the n’th degree. I despise it. Here, we have the decision of all these people (doubtless arrived at after considering all implications) not to have the jab trivially described by Javid as ‘not being bothered’. What a piece of work!
If you look at s.45 of Public Health Act 1984 – you will see that it is not permissible to mandate ANY medical treatment, and this includes VACCINATION.
It’s the law.
The government made a ministerial decree to mandate it for care home workers weeks ago – but secondary legislation cannot over-rule primary legislation….so what is going on?
I think, a load of bluff. They appear to be attempting to meet some externally set quota for reasons that are unclear. But they’re going to run into the law, which as you say clearly protects us from forced medical procedures. I’m not sure why anyone needs to lose their job. anyone could just say they are taking medication (which is private) and there’s been no research into drug interactions, this is stated on the Cominarty leaflet. We don’t have to take this so-called vaccine, no matter what they say and coercion is illegal.
coercion is illegal in order for them to get you to take the vaccine, but these workers are not being forced to take the vaccine, they are being told to comply with the request to get vaccinated or else you will lose your job….not the same things at all. They can try their luck in an unfair dismissal tribunal if they like, but suing the government won’t work.
That appears to be a distinction without a difference.
Threatening health care workers with the loss of their jobs, if they DO NOT take an experimental biological, in trial until 2023 is coercion. Actually, it is worse than coercion, it is illegal. This experimental biological has been given Emergency Use authorisation, NOT APPROVAL. Two extremely different things. Read the literature.
Lawyers decide what is legal. And you can be sure they would not be making these outrageous statements without having taken expensive legal counsel beforehand (using your tax money no less) and ensured they have the judges in their pocket (also using your tax money).
Ahem, and what do Judges do?
Sadly you are right. It becomes a prerequisite for the job. Simple as that. It’s completely immoral and downright wrong but true coercion would be a difficult win in law.
You are probably correct, but no human rights lawyers are interested in taking a case against the Government or protecting the rights of British citizens. Too much vested interest in keeping the British establishment happy
https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/stop-coerced-vaccination/
That’s the ghastly reality, we now live in a country where can not get justice anymore. Our legal system and judges are no longer working for us.
THIS is the law – F145C Health protection regulations: domestic (1) The appropriate Minister may by regulations make provision for the purpose of preventing, protecting against, controlling or providing a public health response to the incidence or spread of infection or contamination in England and Wales (whether from risks originating there or elsewhere). (2) The power in subsection (1) may be exercised— (a) in relation to infection or contamination generally or in relation to particular forms of infection or contamination, and (b) so as to make provision of a general nature, to make contingent provision or to make specific provision in response to a particular set of circumstances. (3) Regulations under subsection (1) may in particular include provision— (a) imposing duties on registered medical practitioners or other persons to record and notify cases or suspected cases of infection or contamination, (b) conferring on local authorities or other persons functions in relation to the monitoring of public health risks, and (c) imposing or enabling the imposition of restrictions or requirements on or in relation to persons, things or premises in the event of, or in response to, a threat to public health. Javid is not telling them they must get vaccinated,… Read more »
AFAIK the *person* who mandates the vaccine is also *personally* responsible/liable for any injury resulting from it. They cannot hide behind the ‘corporate’ or govt.
As this criminal or tortious act took place in London, might not it be in Dame Dickshit’s very best interests to go and arrest the titular head of the Government for a breach of the PHA84?
Forgiveness has nothing to do with it. Certainly he should be removed from government, and probably from what I’ve heard face prosecution. However if he later repents and someone chooses to forgive him (and for Christians for one, this is a requirement of their beliefs), that is neither here nor there. And I’ve always thought that this “sub human” business is a dangerous road to go down. Being human for the most part that you are capable of both great good and great evil, and dehumanising people has been demonstrably disastrous in the past in places such as Tasmania. Doesn’t mean I’m not angry about what he’s doing to old people and the young though.
A wise post. Going down the ‘sub human’ route, while tempting at times, is extremely dangerous. And it works both ways. To the other side we are sub human for refusing the stab.
We must try ourselves to rise above what the other side is sinking in to – let them sink in the slime of evil by themselves, and drown in it.
But I don’t think I could ever forgive him – except perhaps if he showed true contrition and attempted to make amends – for example by blowing the lid on the Johsnson government and medical establishment.
He is following government policy that has near universal public support. When will people on here notice we are in a tiny minority? Right but nobody cares.
“When will people on here notice we are in a tiny minority? Right but nobody cares.“
How is that knowledge supposed to change how we should behave here?
It’s a bitter truth that we live in a world in which mass opinion has been manipulated by massive fear propaganda, to a possibly unprecedented degree. In which all our institutions have thereby been subverted and rendered part of the problem instead of providing any protection. That those few of us who have resisted have been infinitely outgunned from the start by the sheer resources poured into pushing panic and authoritarian solutions.
Pretty sure Hugh recognises that. Pretty sure he cares about it. How should that knowledge change what he wrote, here, among (mostly) friends and allies)?
Your error is to assume that you are among “friends and allies”. Any newcomer from the public who sees these extreme comments will be instantly turned off by their extremism. In that sense by venting off “among friends and allies” you are shooting yourself in the foot and acting against the cause you claim to care about. But perhaps you care about something else entirely.
“Your error is to assume that you are among “friends and allies”. ” My comment to which you claim to be replying referred to Hugh, not to me. Try to be accurate if you are going to shoot off passive aggressive “corrections” to commenters. “Any newcomer from the public who sees these extreme comments will be instantly turned off by their extremism. In that sense by venting off “among friends and allies” you are shooting yourself in the foot and acting against the cause you claim to care about. But perhaps you care about something else entirely.” This is an old debate common to every single political movement in history. The argument about what level of robustness becomes counter-productive, versus what level of “moderate” apologetics becomes demotivating and tedious collaboration, is as old as the hills. Every individual has his own preferred approach to a particular issue. But for sure I’m not going to take a lecture on the appropriate level of reasonableness from your comment handle, which has seemed to lurch in a bipolar fashion from reasonable discussion to aggressive angry attacks on fellow commenters, without seeming restraint or consistency, and which must be assumed to be in use by… Read more »
“However if he later repents and someone chooses to forgive him (and for Christians for one, this is a requirement of their beliefs), that is neither here nor there.” Yes, you’ve made that point before and I agree it is a valid one. However I stand by the position that the right approach now is to emphasize not forgetting and not forgiving, understanding that this is a political point. Personal forgiveness imo is different and separate from political forgiveness. The latter is the potential problem my approach seeks to resist – the tendency of politicians to get away with “moving on” when people have started to forget the harm they have done and become concerned about other issues. That’s in part how the party led by Blair, for instance, was re-elected in 2005, after the Iraq monstrosity. The former is something personal, and dependent on genuine repentance and remorse – highly unlikely to be honest in a politician, but possible. And if it occurs, Christians as you say are required to respect it – personally. But even Christians are not required to support the remaining in office of someone who has committed gross misfeasance in office (such as invading Iraq… Read more »
Still, I think they could easily be conflated.
Certainly it is wise to be prudent, and I would not want him back in government even with genuine repentance, firstly in case he relapsed, secondly because many, including his victims, would not trust him and would feel it an insult given what happened to them. You do of course get people who profess repentance but in reality are more concerned about getting their punishment reduced so certainly I agree it is important to be careful.
I would go further and stress again that the important thing at the moment is to emphasise the importance of not forgetting and not forgiving (politically), precisely because, as you must be aware, the overwhelmingly most likely outcome is that the likes of Javid (and most of the rest of the Guilty Men of the 2020-1 coronapanic disaster) will go on to long political careers in which other issues will determine people’s attitudes towards them.
Blair was reelected, and dragged on in office for 4 years after the Iraq abomination. Eventually he became too toxic and was shoved aside, but how many of all those who willingly collaborated with his war of aggression in the 2003 cabinet paid any price for it?
Brown became PM after Blair. Prescott, Straw, Hoon, Blunkett all remained in office and were largely unhindered by their involvement in the greatest war crime and foreign policy blunder of modern times.
My desire for these perpetrators and their crimes to be remembered might reasonably be viewed as quixotic, but not, I think, uncharitable or unChristian..
Really well said. The dehumanisation of the other is precisely what the powers that be want us to be mutually engaged in, so they can divide and rule. Twas ever thus.
The provocative language they use is fully intended to elicit reactions as you can see in comments from the dimmer posters on this web site. Because any violent reactions will serve as confirmation for those holding the real guns to claim they have proved their case and to allow them to crack down further. You must always take into account what the majority of the public believes, and not take any steps which will make it easier to turn them against you.
Bastard Bastard Bastard !!!!!!!
It is not reasonable.
It is Fascist.
It is vile.
“Seem to remember reading in Private Eye some years ago that Sajid allegedly lent his name and was added as a partner to one of his brothers businesses, in order to give credibility in order for the company to obtain financial backing. Once the financial backing was received he immediately resigned. Probably not illegal if true, however highly unethical.”
“A little googling unearthed this summary:
https://evolvepolitics.com/new-tory-housing-secretary-sajid-javid-was-director-of-his-brothers-11m-buy-to-let-property-firm/
He was director for one day, 22 May 2005.”
“Cannot be bothered” is a vile presumptuous thing to say. How do we get these people as our “leaders”? Pick them I guess…
Sadly the “Health Secretary” doesn’t seem to be very bright. If the “vulnerable” in the care homes have been “vaccinated” and so “protected”, why do the carers need to be “vaccinated”? And if the “vulnerable” are still able to be infected despite their “vaccination”, what stops the care workers becoming infected at a future time after being “vaccinated”? A lot of muddled thinking as the Government pursues an evil agenda; and mandating people to be “vaccinated” with something which might do them harm is indeed evil.
don’t try bringing logic to religion, one must have faith.
A lot more logic in my faith than in this shambles.
These are people that have been made to pay the ultimate price to stand up for a matter of principle. Saying “can’t be bothered” makes me beyond angry. We truly are in the midst of evil.
Yes, makes my blood boil.
When I read the ‘can’t be bothered’ bit, I could hardly believe what I was reading. I still can’t get my head around it!
In fact, Javid should apologize. It is fucking disgraceful.
Seems to be a similar thing to what they are telling “unvaccinated” footballers. They have this whole narrative constructed around people being “vaccine” hesitant. I don’t know if it actually occurs to them that people may be making principled, well-reasoned decisions not to take experimental gene therapy drugs.
You can be sure they are very well informed about the true concerns and are taking those into account while spinning their narrative. This derisive narrative is quite obviously not addressed to the supposedly “hesitant” unvaccinated. Rather, it is addressed to those who have already made the “right” decision – to strengthen their political support and to preemptively destroy any future resistance, which they are fully aware will come when the third round of boosters gets mandated.
You can say what you want, but these demagogues are not dumb, and even if they personally were, they have great resources of very clever manipulators behind them. That is also why everything is going according to their plan so far, not yours.
You can be sure they are very well informed about the true concerns and are taking those into account while spinning their narrative.
Yes, they full well know the reality but they just spin, spin, spin. And knowing that they do know exactly what the score is when coming out with the blatant spin is what really pisses me off.
I don’t know, from what Christopher Booker has said, the “bubble of groupthink” thing can be quite powerful. And people knowing they are being held by kidnappers against their will doesn’t seem to prevent Stockholm syndrome.
In the end, only they know what they are thinking.
M thoughts precisely when I read that comment. It’s the sheer arrogance and casual dismissal of any notion that there are many legitimate medical and civil rights reasons for people to resist being coerced into taking this vaccine. And he knows this darn well which makes his dishonesty and sheer lack of compassion all the more despicable.
My thoughts also – but you expressed it better than my attempt.
Of course it turned out that Tim Yeo, who was an influential voice on energy policy, also had a financial interest in wind turbines, so it’s perfectly possible there is a similar situation with Jabit and the pharmaceutical industry who we know try and influence politics by various means (including posing as philanthropists).
Absolutely agree! His comment is nothing short of heinous. They are ALL culpable now. Their time will come.
I get the feelling that Stabit Jabit is a bit of a vile presumptuous person.
The first group of people to be vaccinated was the elderly and vulnerable, including those in care homes. Care workers must have witnessed many frail people die shortly after being injected. Care workers know how people die, naturally, and recognise those in their care who are in their last week or so. Having witnessed a cull, with residents suddenly keeling over, they are not so likely to want to roll up their own sleeves.
Good point.
The care home elderly were probably disposed of (or murdered) by Midazolam which appears to precede mortality
‘Sadly the “Health Secretary” doesn’t seem to be very bright’…………..You can add the entire government to that observation with their low IQ scarecrow leading the way!!
Ah another engineered crisis
Exactly. Plan B won’t be implemented unless the health care services are under strain.
A good way to ensure that is to fire a large number of staff.
I concur.
Care home closures = overwhelmed NHS = winter lockdown.
Plan B was always their goal.
Send for the midazalam.
Exactly that. Cases and hospital admission is collapsing and the modelling has been found to be way out again. So like you say, they have to find another way to put a strain on hospitals.
Ah.
Everyday they manage to say or do something even more stupid or dangerous than they have managed to date.
even at weekends .
And standing up to the nonsense we have random members of the public and some footballers.
Funny old world.
Vaccination. Castration. Sterilisation. Amputation.
The fascist creed.
Here’s my reasoned and cogent response: “He’s a fucking Cunt”
I’m afraid I can’t agree with such a positive description of this piece of slime. He is, at best, an Evil, twisted, heartless, conniving, fucking cunt!
I really can’t express how angry his words make me. He clearly has no concept at all what care workers do or the sort of people that perform this incredibly difficult role. His comments are far beyond ignorant and reprehensible.
Agreed; he sounds like a disciple of the “Biden” cult.
snap
You are too polite.
3.03 between the eyes is what they all deserve.
( WW 2 reference ).
I wonder what old soldiers would make of this ?
“We caught them, and we shot them, under Rule 303!“
They agree with it like 90% of the population
Hmm… I thought there was a staff shortage…
This was never about a virus.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/over-1-million-israelis-who-didnt-get-3rd-dose-to-lose-green-pass-on-sunday/
how long until the 4th dose is announced?
It’s scheduled for 5 months time. In Israel vaccinations have a 5 month life.
Javid is not “a force for good”.
Correction. “ You have looked after them, you have cooked for them, you have put them to bed, you have held the hand of a confused or dying person who did not have their family around them, you have tested yourself each week and self isolated when told to do so, you have worked for a pittance throughout the pseudo-pandemic. We clapped for you and you were our heroes. Now because you won’t take an experimental jab, instead of thanking you, we are going to have to punish you and the people for whom you care. You will lose your job and they will be deprived of your care”
Thank you to the wonderful carers who looked after my mother in law throughout 2020 until her death earlier this year. The family never asked you if you were jabbed, all we cared about was that you looked after her to the best of your ability. You loved her and she loved you. That is all that mattered whatever Javid says or does.
Utter madness.
Beautifully put Margaret!! I can sense your complete fury and I am with you. I have never been so angry about anything any government has ever done. It is the most wicked bullying.
The pressure to vaccinate children and deny parental consent takes the biscuit for me. Vile, nasty, greedy and utterly wrong.
My thoughts precisely Margaret though you expressed it more beautifully than I ever could.
It’s evil and the worst part is that most people can’t see that it is.
It’s made me despondent of humanity that the majority are not screaming about this. They really are just sheep being lead to the slaughter.
Arrogant prick.
This governments descent into modern fascism continues.
“When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.”. ― Thomas Jefferson.
This is a tyranncal government.
Why Life Jackets Should Be Mandatory! – YouTube
Sadly JP’s satirical parallels are all too accurate.
Amazing, I wonder if they will make him take it down, perfect video and perfect circumvention of NaziTube’s policies.
Care home workers worked through the whole of last year and at the height of the pandemic with no vaccines – it is highly probable the most contracted the virus and now have natural immunity – but this is the thanks they get from this tyrannical government that uses fear and threats to further its useless policies … get the jab or you will be sacked from your job.
Last years heroes – this years unemployed.
Thank you.
This government absolutely disgusts me.
and what disgusts me equally is the utter failure of the labour party, once the party of the workers, to stand up for the care workers
Today’s Labour party has nothing to do with working people any more. In fact, it’s a party which should have been disbanded a long time ago, when the need for it diminished with much-improved workers’ rights and conditions. Only the idealogically-confused left-wing middle-class without enough to usefully do, along with regional voting-tribalism keeps it going.
Labour cannot forgive the working-classes for getting above themselves – home ownership, foreign holidays etc, and worse – some of them even started voting Tory!
Well said
The recurring theme in this policy is that they are using blackmail with hostages (in this care the elderly people) to pressure other people into bucking under pressure. Yes, it’s extremely pathetic, and even more worrying that other people cannot see through such tricks.
You need to take this to protect the people who have already taken it.
If you don’t take it you are putting them at risk, even though they have taken it.
They can still can catch it and die, and you can still pass it to them, but you still need to take it to protect them.
Follow?
If both parties are vaccinated, the risk is lower than if only one party is. Technically, there is nothing illogical about it, it’s just extremely unethical to use such coercion on people who have already sacrificed a lot.
But Sajid, your ‘vaccines’ only offers SOME protection, don’t they?
So, some jabbed care workers will still transmit it, won’t they?
And if they do, some of the elderly and vulnerable will still die, won’t they?…even though they’ve been jabbed too!
That tired old soundbite is clearly bollocks, isn’t it? Everyone now knows it’s bollocks, those claiming it knows that everyone else knows that it’s bollocks, but the prevalence of doublething allows it to keep getting repeated, because hardly anyone will openly challenge it, even though they know it’s bollocks…
The way out of the pandemic is the same as with any other pandemic before – wait 2-3 years. Not that it matters now.
Sajid Javid: the best Health Secretary money can buy.
Yes, Mrs May, you were right about the ‘Nasty Party’ epithet.
My friend has quit her job as a care worker because of jab rules and has a new job. She worked in care for 15 years. Shit pay and felt under appreciated and the jab rule was the final straw.
God bless and protect her. She will be restored and vindicated. And compensated.
She should not have quit……….care workers must be patient and be fired.
That would be my advice.
Perhaps she has integrity and principles and is not a cynic…?
We all know what is going to happen this winter. Plan B will be implemented, “with reluctance”. Lol.
But, it’s the refuseniks who are causing us to do this.
Plan B doesn’t worry me too much, It’s Plan F- the Final Solution.
I really don’t know who angers me the most, the sheep or the bastards behind the fear porn diet.
Take no notice of the stats., trust in proven medical science eg herd immunity aka natural immunity. but the bastards are deleting/fact checking that.
They deserve to rot in Hell.
I sit by the river and wait for the corpses to pass.
If not in this world, then surely the next, justice will prevail.
Hope he can source more care workers for his sake. Is Cabinet and Parliament going to be just for double vaxxed MPs?
Sajid Javid has really bought into the approved narrative. Please someone buy him an immunology textbook. His experts are lying to him and he has so little knowledge he won’t see it.
Isn’t it Raab who had the great idea of letting prisoners out to drive fuel tankers? Maybe they can use criminals to staff the care homes too.
I wonder who will take the blame when the elderly swamp the NHS due to failure of care homes. You can bet your life they will try to blame people for refusing the vaccine, not Javid.
Wherever the blame ends up, there will be blood on his hands.
If these people cared about blood on their hands, they would not be taking offices. We’re just talking about sociopaths playing their favorite game, which is to amass power over other people and hurt them for personal pleasure.
Many Councils have a team of people whose job is to ‘support’ care/nursing homes in their region even if they’re private, and to manage the welfare of residents if/when something bad happens – it used to be they stepped in when a care home was at risk of being restricted or closed by the CQC. It would be interesting to see how they would respond to FOIs concerning their strategies for the sh*tshow that will kick off on 11th Nov (interesting choice of date dontcha think!)
Replacing medicine and science with witchcraft and authoritarianism.
Never ends well, but can last quite a while.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10654-021-00808-7
Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States
THE SCIENCE HAS SPOKEN. MASS VACCINATION HAS NO EFFECT ON REDUCING NUMBER OF “CASES”, ON THE CONTRARY..
From Telegram, Robin Monotti, Mike Yeadon channel
wow!
Listen to desperation in his quote. Trying imitate Biden are we with your “losing patience” stance? Oh, boo hoo! Just for the record Savage Jabbit, it’s those who HAVE BEEN BOTHERED to look into what this “vaccine ” does that had made them NOT WANT IT! As I pointed out in my comment in another article, they sent me a letter practically telling me their vaccine isn’t up to much!
We are losing patience too, Jabbit. Your time of reckoning can’t come soon enough.
You hit the nail squarely on the head there Helena. Every COVID vaccine sceptic with whom I have spoken is very well informed, whereas those in favour of vaccine mandates are usually very ignorant of very basic facts.
Correct…………….I find the Pro Vax lobby the thickest people on planet earth when discussing the subject. I should know because I used to be one!! That changed last year when I threw an ‘anti vax’ jibe at someone. Instead of being angry that person challenged me to research jabs and prove that ANY had actually worked. I found none of the major jabs had control groups involved, and were introduced a long time AFTER mortality for the disease had decreased naturally. A prime example is measles which in 1900 had a mortality rate in the UK of 1,250 per million. By the early 1960s when the widespread jab programme was introduced it was BELOW 5 per million, and subsequent decreases were negligible. As Edward Kass MD Ph.D said in the mid 80s ‘beware of giving credit to the wrong god’
Absolutely right about Measles. I read years ago that it was already on the wane when the vaccine appeared. My young children caught it one after the other but because I didn’t work outside the home i was able to care for them, and I’m satisfied that their immune systems are all the stronger from having had all the childhood diseases, the only exception being German Measles because of its own unique problems of infecting pregnant women.
I went to a homoeopath for a whooping-cough vaccine, and my kids were two of just a few who didn’t succumb to a local epidemic, even though they played a lot with children who went down with that virus.
Perhaps you mean very well misinformed. The very basic fact is that the vaccine significantly reduces chances of hospitalization in the period of several months after 2nd dose (contrary to analyses by our beloved Dr. Jones). Another basic fact is that adverse effects from actually catching covid-19 are about 100x more likely than adverse effects of the vaccine. Taken together these two basic facts, along with your age group, are enough to make an informed decision about vaccination.
Just following the script