Marmalade to Be Renamed Under Starmer’s EU Reset
Marmalade is to be renamed “citrus marmalade” under Sir Keir Starmer’s EU reset as Labour continues to unwind Brexit freedoms in a bid to boost trade. The Telegraph has more.
The breakfast favourite will have to be sold and labelled as “citrus marmalade” as a result of Labour’s planned food deal with Brussels.
The name change is required under a proposed reset agreement with the EU, where Britain will adopt the bloc’s food regulations in a bid to boost trade and reduce red tape for British exporters.
Brussels has relaxed its labelling rules since Brexit, meaning its legal definition of marmalade has widened to include other non-citrus fruits.
Before Britain left the EU, European regulations incorporated into UK law meant only preserves made from citrus fruits could be sold as “marmalade” in shops. Other kinds of fruit spreads had to be named “jam” or equivalent terms in other languages.
The special commercial status for marmalade stemmed from pressure by Britain in the 1970s when it sought to protect the unique status of the famous preserve made from bitter Seville oranges.
According to popular legend, a Spanish ship carrying Seville oranges took shelter in Dundee Harbour in the late 18th century. Trader James Keiller bought the cargo and his wife, Janet, created a new type of jam, distinct from the thick, solid pastes known before.
It was recognised as the first commercial brand of orange marmalade. While the original James Keiller & Sons company ceased to exist in 1992, the brand name has been used by other manufacturers over the years.
The British hold on the name ‘marmalade’ has, however, been a source of friction with other countries. Spain and Italy, for example, commonly use ‘mermelada‘ and ‘marmellata‘ for spreads made from other kinds of fruit, such as plums and figs.
In the face of a backlash in 2004, the EU agreed to relax the rule for producers selling fruit preserves at farmers’ markets in Austria and Germany.
A German MEP who had been pushing for a change after Brexit said in 2017 that the naming rules were “contrary to German linguistic tradition”.
Now Brussels has updated its rules to allow all EU countries to market non-citrus spreads as “marmalade” from June.
However, citrus-based preserves will have to be distinguished as a separate type of marmalade and sold using the new legal name “citrus marmalade”.
The new name was already set to take effect in Northern Ireland this summer, under the 2023 Windsor framework deal that sees the province align with EU food laws.
But the UK Government has now revealed the updated marmalade decree is among 76 updated EU food-related laws that will also apply in England, Wales and Scotland if its wider food deal is agreed.
A timescale for the rule change has yet to be finalised, but it is likely to take effect by mid-2027, when the wider agreement with the EU will be implemented.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
See my comment in the round up comments from 3 hours ago. I am beyond furious. Will anyone in this bad dream excuse for a government stand up for the UK – ever? Will be at our local WI market next week stocking up on excellent home made MARMALADE.
Whenever I make marmalade it is and will always be labelled marmalade. Next year I might re-badge it as British Marmalade to avoid confusion with EU fakes.
In German, Marmelade is a generic term for fruit preserves created by cooking fruit pieces and sugar together. Because of EU regulation created on British behalf, German laws had to be changed to prohibit this use and use the synonym Konfitüre for anything not made from oranges instead. German Kirschmarmelade (cherry jam) is not “fake” just because traders from the UK used the EU to force it to be renamed Kirschkonfitüre in the past. Further, the word itself is actually Portugese and means qince puree.
That EU countries would continue to mutilate their national languages because of British trademarks after Britain left the EU could hardly be expected.
Interesting. Thanks for the alternative viewpoint.
There is nothing totalitarian about regulating what we call marmalade.
Nothing at all. It’s all part of the democratic process….
Let me see, we elect an MP with a first past the post system which almost guarantees he didn’t get a majority of votes, who then is part of a headcount of MPs that allows a party to form a government, that then has the power to make treaties, which impose the wholesale application on all of us of regulations drawn up by unelected bureaucrats from other countries.
That’s democracy at work right there. The pride of western civilisation.
What will happen to the expression “marmalade dropper”? Nothing is safe.
Wonderful expression. I just found out that the US equivalent is “muffin-choker”.
😳
Ah, but you see, renaming marmalade as “citrus marmalade” proves how wonderfully superior the EU is to Britain. And it doesn’t prove that the EU is insanely bureaucratic. No, not at all. Not in the least.
And after all, what better use of our rulers time! Our people are being stabbed and robbed, and our children raped by the morally superior people the government is importing, so of course we should devote time to renaming marmalade. Thank God for the EU …
Whilst forcing a label change is unwelcome, surely the bigger question is why Starmer thinks he can ignore the result of a referendum?
Because the people who voted for Brexit are, according the Left, a “trash people” who are scheduled by history to be exterminated. Since they (we) voted incorrectly, our votes can be ignored.
Good point.
Because no one can stop him. His own party wont remove him. We can demand a general election, but he does not have to give us one. We have to wait until we can vote again. Then try and fix the wake of destruction he has left.
But he has set a lot of precedents. If he can drastically change the very fabric of this country, votes for 16 year olds. Removing trial by jury. Then the next party can just be as bold, or even more.
I think we should have a referendum on the retention of the name ‘marmalade’, pure and simple. Otherwise we risk the erasure of the episode of Her Late Majesty discussing marmalade sandwiches with Paddington Bear. It goes right to the heart of what it means to be British.
He’s a Socialist. Democracy is just a useful term to pretend it’s not tyranny.
Great news as this will recruit even more support for Reform.
Hang him from a gibbet at Tyburn! Starmer is the epitome of a treasonous traitor!
Who will be the first to order Brown wool? Prevalent in my younger years, I didn’t even know what it meant!
Burro means butter in Italian and donkey in Spanish.
By trying to rename marmalade Starmer is clearly an ass.
Just wait: Starmer will shortly announce that he won’t put up with this sort of petty European bureaucracy. Shortly after that he will announce he has wrung a concession out of the EU that the term marmalade may continue to refer to the orange preserve the British put on their toast at breakfast.
See: Yes Minister – Emulsified High-Fat Offal Tube (Sausage).
As with all things, every time, the devil is in the detail.
The wording of the directive actually changes nothing:
“Citrus marmalade” is a mixture, brought to a suitable gelled consistency, of water, sugars and one or more of the following products obtained from citrus fruit: pulp, purée, juice, aqueous extracts and peel. In the product name “citrus marmalade”, the term “citrus” may be replaced by the name of the citrus fruit used.
So Orange Marmalade is here to stay.
An example as pointed out by Dr Richard North of another “Euro Silly” story – a hare running across all the media.
In line with his conceding to the too many and demanding EU regulations that attempt to control all things on earth, when will Starmer’s name be officially changed to ‘suppository’ to correctly identify his longstanding, grovelling attempts to ingratiate himself up the backsides of the EU?
A clear demonstration that Two-Tier intends making us a colony of the EU.
Will it stop at marmalade?
As the country falls apart, at least we know what his priorities are
This story is just total nonsense sparked by the Far Left BBC and picked up by every ignorant part of the legacy media without actually bothering to check the source material such as the regulations as to what this actually means. This pattern is common when it concerns the EU and something we have been spared since we left other than the usual suspects talking about the UK rejoining ‘THE EU Customs Union’ while failing to know that it is for EU Members only.
For a proper article on this try https://www.turbulenttimes.co.uk/news/eu-affairs/media-here-we-go-again/