Nike Slides Towards Disaster as Stock Plummets Following Woke Rebrand
Nike is sliding towards disaster as its stock slumps to its lowest level in a decade and sales are forecast to continue to decline following a woke rebrand that sent customers looking elsewhere. The Mail has the story.
Nike’s stock has slumped to its lowest level in more than a decade after the sportswear giant warned sales will keep falling through 2026.
Shares hit an 11-year low on April 1st, capping a brutal stretch that has seen the company lose around 75% of its value since shares peaked in 2021.Â
It is now worth under $68 billion – a third of the value of TJ Maxx.Â
The latest sell-off was triggered by a bleak outlook, with Nike forecasting sales will slump 4% this quarter – a staggering $500 million fall in the value of shoes, tracksuits and t-shirts.Â
The brand is being hit by a triple whammy: backlash to its more ‘woke’ image shift, a failed retreat from major retail partners in favor of direct-to-consumer selling, and a deepening slump in China.
The scale of the pressure inside Nike was laid bare in a recent all-hands meeting, where CEO Elliott Hill struck an unusually blunt tone with staff in a recording leaked to Bloomberg News.
“I’m so tired, and I know you are, too, of talking about fixing this business,” Hill said during the meeting. “I want to move to inspiring and driving growth and having fun.”
“You can’t just sit there and say everything’s great,” Hill said, referring to the investor call. “Frankly it needed to be different.”
For years, conservatives have criticised Nike for a shift toward ‘woke’ culture, pointing to partnerships with political activists such as Colin Kaepernick, who protested during the national anthem. The company also faced backlash over its company’s all-female Super Bowl ad.Â
Meanwhile, a major strategic bet has backfired. Under former CEO John Donahoe, Nike pulled back from wholesale partners such as Foot Locker and Dick’s Sporting Goods as it chased higher-margin sales through its own stores and website.
The move was meant to boost margins – but instead cost Nike shelf space and allowed rivals including Adidas, Hoka and On to gain ground.Â
And overseas, the picture is getting worse. China, Nike’s second-largest market, is expected to post another sharp decline, with sales projected to fall 20% next quarter after already dropping 11% in the latest period.Â





Worth reading in full.
All together now: go woke, go…
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
They had it coming and this is fully deserved. I wouldn’t dream of using Nike anymore after their lurch to wokeness.
They need years of eating humble pie in order to get ‘older’ customers to return. Didn’t they learn anything from Budweiser?
Dylan Mulvaney certainly gets around doesn’t he? A one man wrecking ball for Bud Light and Nike.
And he certainly doesn’t need a bra.
At one time, it seemed like Nike could do no wrong. Maybe they started to believe it…?
T’would take a heart of stone not to laugh….
I do enjoy the “go woke, go broke” stories, so uplifting.
“Go straight, go great”?
😀😀
The woke thing is one thing. The other is: if I need some sports gear, why would I pay twice the price to subsidise Nike’s patronising, “inspirational” marketing, when I can buy something decent for half the price?
“Just don’t do it.”
I don’t go around body-shaming people and when I see anyone at the gym who’s overweight, joining in the fitness classes and generally getting their sweat on, I inwardly applaud them because they’ve got off their arses and are doing the work required to improve their health and make changes. What I don’t particularly like seeing is sports brands using overweight models to promote their clothing ranges. Regular clothing *perhaps*, gym wear: nope. I actually don’t like seeing skinny minnies in this particular category of clothing either. I’m old-fashioned and I think the models used should actually be athletic and look aspirational, because that’s the image and message I think they should be trying to convey. You want the models to look like they’re actually active! If I look through a fitness mag I want to see low body fat and muscle definition which screams ”peak fitness/health/strength/inspiring body composition”. I do not want to see ‘skinny fat’, with toothpick limbs, visible bones but zero muscle mass, nor rolls of fat from somebody swaddled in lycra with legs like over-stuffed sausages. This goes for both men and women. All this ”body positivity” movement is just another way of embracing the fact… Read more »
The bogus nature of the ‘body positivity’ movement has been completely exposed by the relish with which they have embraced Ozempic and Mounjaro…
It’s like the marketing policy was taken over by the latest teams of the “The Apprentice”, totally clueless and should all be fired.
“Own the floor”
More like go through the floor!
The last picture would really put me off. M&S decided to use plus size models for its underwear and I was simply revolted (I don’t buy my knickers there anyway, but that’s besides the point). Put me off completely.
Then these guys might be more up your street. I wonder if this is what occurs at the old folks’ home when the staff are on their break.
*Disclaimer: no smuggled budgies were harmed in the making of this video*
https://x.com/i/status/2039406067856154921
“Own the floor” ? I hope that floor is well supported!
The quality of their products has also taken a nosedive.
Turns out that aggressively promoting “inclusivity” for small, highly politicised/promoted minorities alienates and drives away the vast majority.
Who’d a thunk it.
How could an international brand be so out of touch. Looks like they are paying the price. Budweiser continues to this day to struggle due to their misjudgment. Nike will most likely find it difficult to ever return to its status as great sportswear co.
Oh dear… isn’t there anything Mulvaney touches that doesn’t turn to sh1t?