One in Eight UK Children Reported as Disabled by Parents. It’s a National Calamity
The recent news that one in eight children are now reported by their parents as being disabled ought to prompt an immediate national inquiry into what on earth is causing a large proportion of the population to sicken. That millions of children and young people are stricken with disabilities ought to be front page news every day until it is sorted out.
The Telegraph reports:
About 12% of children – or around 1.7 million youngsters – are now living with a long-term illness, disability or impairment, according to fresh figures from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP).
This has almost doubled since 2015, when roughly 7% of parents said their child had a disability, according to the department’s closely-watched Family Resources Survey (FRS).
It also comes amid a sharp increase in young people being diagnosed with behavioural issues as well as autism and ADHD.
Almost two-thirds of children with a disability had a “social” or “behavioural” impairment – by far the most common issue cited by parents, the FRS found.
The figures involved ought to terrify everyone for they reveal a population that is riven with ill-health and impairment. If accurate, a National Commission into ‘Physical Deterioration’ similar to the one conducted by Fitzroy in 1904 to find out what was causing the ill-health of young people is needed immediately. With such staggering levels of illness, there is no hope at all that our country will ever return to growth. The Telegraph continues:
The number of children with behavioural disorders who are eligible for disability living allowance (DLA) has almost quadrupled to 276,000 since before the pandemic. This total includes 10,000 children under five and 14 children who are less than a year old.
Roughly 16.7 million people – representing a quarter of Britons – now live with a disability. More women than men claim they have an impairment, though disability is more prevalent among boys than girls.
Scottish people are also more likely to say they are disabled than people living in England or Wales.
The figures show roughly 700,000 of children considered disabled are under 10. More people under 20 are also now in this category than Britons aged over 80.
I am appalled that no-one in politics is calling for an immediate inquiry into these dreadful illnesses destroying the health and chances of so many children. Sure Alan Milburn has been asked to look at the benefits system, but who is investigating the children themselves to find out why they are all so poorly?
The Fitzroy Report was commissioned after the Boer War when it had become apparent that large percentages of recruits were rejected from the Army physical reasons. The report sought:
(1) To furnish the Government and the Nation at large with periodical data for an accurate comparative estimate of the health and physique of the people; (2) to indicate generally the causes of such physical deterioration as does exist in certain classes; and (3) to point out the means by which it can be most effectually diminished.
It was thorough in its analysis and took a broad approach to finding out why children were failing to thrive. The commissioners examined such things as “cellar-based and back-to-back housing”, “the employment of mothers too soon after childbirth”, “white bread”, “abuse of tea”, “the desire for pleasure”, “hereditary taint”, “the universal preference amongst the women for factory over domestic life”, “the school system”, “incompetent care”, “parental ignorance and neglect” and “juvenile smoking”, for instance. In a foreshadowing of the current Ultra Processed Food debate, it reports:
A striking consensus of opinion was elicited as to the effects of improper or insufficient food in determining physique, and this factor was acknowledged by every witness to be prominent among the causes to which degenerative tendencies might be assigned, though in one or two cases its relative importance was thought liable to exaggeration.
These latest figures about the catastrophic ill-health of our nation’s children surely ought to demand an equivalent commission. After all, what prompted the 1904 Fitzroy Report is not far off what is happening with today’s Army recruits – growing rejection owing to feeble mental and physical health. In 2019-2020, 28.9% of applicants were rejected for medical reasons growing to 39.2% in 2022-3. Of these, 54% of medical rejections between 2020-24 were for mental health or psychiatric reasons.
This is surely terrifying stuff – our mentally enfeebled young are not fit to fight, to be in school or work. What on earth has happened?
Someone surely should be trying to work out what’s to blame. White bread? Juvenile vaping? Out of town housing estates with no public transport? Smartphones? Gaming? Parental ignorance and neglect? Perhaps others will take up my cry for a national inquiry and calls will grow for someone like Hillary Cass or Louise Casey to get to the bottom of it all.
Or perhaps such an inquiry would discover that actually there’s nothing wrong at all with these children. Instead it will become obvious that millions of healthy children and young adults are being used in an obscene financial grift by private health and education providers, mental health charities and a gullible welfare system.
Terrifying either way.
Mary Gilleece is an education support worker and her name is a pseudonym.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Many are vaccine damaged.
Certainly plausible
I also think that “furlough” did a lot of psychological damage – people got used to free money
But how does one abuse tea?🤔
By mixing it with milk while shouting names at it?
My guess would be: It contains caffeine. People are thus bound to believe that it causes nervosity/ anxiety, which are, in turn, misinterpreted as weakness.
3 spoonfuls of sugar. Teeth!
Maybe not vaccine damaged but lockdown damaged. Not required to socialise shy children develop extreme anxiety in social situations. Rather than helping them to adjust, they medicalised with an ‘ism and paid to wallow in their misery.
My child is disabled – gimme money £££££.
If you show me the incentives, I’ll show you why we have 1 in 8 kids with a label on them.
I think this should be abused instead of used. The children are just the fuel this machinery runs on.
While the Fitzroy report was useful, and broadly correct, and there may be valid modern snags that affect the physical health of some of them, a cynic might say that they are logical side effects of the benefits system. After all, why not claim from the DWP if there’s a chance of a payment?
If you create an incentive to be disabled, you’ll get more disabled people.
Socialist collectivists don’t understand incentives.
This is an interesting one as the Establishment argue two directly opposing points on this.
So many MORE people are “disabled” because of vaccines / pharmaceuticals/ food additives.
“No you crazy anti-vaxxer tin foil hatter! The numbers are just down to over diagnosis!”
Over diagnosis and people gaming the system are pushing the numbers up, it’s a scam.
“No you stupid far right selfish bigot! All these people are genuinely unwell and need our help!”
Personally, I think both are in play here.
Spot on.
I don’t suppose inbreeding has any effect on the progeny and probable uptake of benefits?
This is a calamity whether genuine or a consequence of our benefit system.
If it’s genuine, & I suspect the parent(s) & the kid themselves, believe it’s genuine, then what are we doing to remedy this before it bankrupts us?
If it’s due to the benefits system, then it’s going to bankrupt us!
Of course, no one’s looking into it because they all know it’s due to the benefit system but consecutive governments have proved incapable of doing anything about it.
It’s a calamity.
Oh how I agree, had many “debates” over this, its basically using your children for making money, yes there will be some who are genuine, but most are not, and apart from the financial cost, what about the future cost to these children, when they’ve been told they are ill?, even adults claiming its the reason for their behaviour now, and how do you diagnose a baby with adhd?…
Earning a very modest crust in the 2000s/2010s as a private tutor (Mod Langs), I constantly came up against the “Well I’m/he’s/she’s dyslexic” defence. Eventually I began to suggest to parents that the lovely offspring was either doing surprisingly well for a ‘disabled’ person or was just not up to the business of learning anything whatsoever. The phenomenon usually occurred when a student encountered a schoolteacher who refused to practise the spoonfeeding way of imparting knowledge, and actually expected students to make an effort in their own behalf. Crazy, I know. Suddenly, the resultant academic downturn was blamed on ‘dyslexia’, ‘ADHD’, ‘autism’… Nothing complicated about it: listen to the teacher (inflected verbs/adjectival agreement/the subjunctive/whatever), do the homework, pass the exam. Nothing wrong with most of them – they just need (to be helped) to belt up.
Wireless radiation from smart devices, Wifi and phone masts cause neurological, hormonal and other damage. The WHO and Govts. try to hide this info. See https://bioinitiative.org/ and https://phiremedical.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/2020-Non-Ionising-Radiation-Consensus-Statement.pdf
You’re no doubt right, but in most cases “Belt up!” will counter these things.
My wife was a Practice Nurse and she said that a lot of mothers wanted their child diagnosed with ADHD so they could get additional money on their benefits.
This is another example of why endless welfare is bad for people. It creates dependency, and becomes a lifestyle that takes away self reliance and turns whole swathes of people into parasites.
Exactly. Hear, hear!
And those suffering socially because of unconscionable lockdown.