Blaming America for Creating COVID-19 is Implausible – and Lets China Off the Hook

Was it the sorcerer or the apprentice?

There’s a new theory in the Covid origin debate being pushed by some people, namely that the virus was probably created in America by Ralph Baric’s research group at the Chapel Hill campus of the University of North Carolina – and sent to China from there.

It’s not plausible for many reasons. But it plays into the hands of the Chinese Government, who may be surreptitiously pushing it through their friends in the West to confuse the issue and distract from the evidence.

That evidence strongly suggests that there was indeed a lab leak but it was in Wuhan and it was of a virus assembled in Wuhan.

Ralph Baric did collaborate closely with the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), it is true, and he pioneered the synthesis of chimeric sarbecoviruses and testing these on humanised mice – which his Wuhan counterpart, Shi Zhengli, later began doing in her own laboratory but at low biosafety level. That much is on the record.

Baric has steadfastly refused to share his email correspondence and his university has gone to court to prevent its release. He has also refused to testify in open session before Congress so far.

This is a mistake on his part because it is now fuelling speculation that he created virus. He should reveal what he knows to clear the air.

Here are three reasons that it is highly unlikely that Baric made SARS-CoV-2 in a North Carolina lab.

First, sarbecoviruses do not exist in the wild in the Americas. The horseshoe bats that host them are only found in the old world. In order to work on SARS-related viruses at all, Baric has to import them or their digital sequences from China – in his case from Wuhan.

Where would he have got the backbone virus from to do the experiment? After all, the WIV and Baric were competitors as well as collaborators. Baric has admitted that the WIV would not have shared their most interesting strains with him, much less the novel lineage four viruses which they obscured in their 2019 paper.

Second, even if they did send him the information from which to assemble SARS-CoV-2, rather than doing it themselves, why on earth would he then ship the completed chimeric sarbecovirus back to Wuhan for testing? Or send the digital recipe for them to copy?

That would have been pointless as well as highly irresponsible. Baric may be guilty of encouraging foolish experiments and concealing his own role in collaborating with Wuhan, but there is no evidence for any of this.

Third, the notorious DEFUSE proposal for inserting a furin cleavage site into a sarbecovirus for the first time in 2018 stated clearly that the work would mostly be done in Wuhan, because it could be done at a lower biosafety level there to save costs. (A shocking revelation in itself.)

An early draft of the proposal even includes an exchange in which Baric is told he won’t get to do most of the work, and he protests at the low biosafety level used in Wuhan, saying it will “freak out” US scientists.

In our analysis of the origin of Covid, Alina Chan and I are often urged to speculate about exactly what happened but we resist going too far beyond the known facts. Expertise and funds went from America to Wuhan a lot: that much is a fact. Sequence information was sometimes shared. It is possible that synthesised viruses and sequences were whizzing back and forth too but we have no evidence of this for SARS-CoV-2.  For several years before the pandemic, the Wuhan team had been successfully genetically engineering sarbecoviruses and experimenting with these in the lab. They had surpassed Baric in the quantity of these experiments and, most importantly, had access to a still-secret trove of bat sarbecoviruses from the regions where SARS-CoV-2’s closest relatives have been found. Baric was the sorcerer, certainly, but it is far more likely that the accident happened to the apprentice.

First published on X. Matt Ridley is the author, with Alina Chan, of Viral: The Search for the Origin of COVID-19. Subscribe to his blog.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
GlassHalfFull
18 days ago

It is an “old” theory that SARS-CoV-2 was created in the US and deliberately released in China. It was most likely released into China from a US lab as an “economic” bioweapon to harm China financially with unforeseen blowback. The “accidental” escape from a lab theory is doubtful and a full blown economic attack by rogue elements of the US against China much more likely. Fortunately, Ron Unz has been articulating this view from the very start. Here are some of his bullet points. Over the decades America has spent $100 billion creating the world’s largest biowarfare capability. 1) In 2017 Trump brought on board Robert Kadlec, who since the late 1990s had been America’s leading biowarfare advocate. 2) In 2018 and 2019 mysterious viral epidemics devastated China’s poultry and pork industries, severely damaging China’s food supply. 3) From January to August 2019, Kadlec ran the Federal/State “Crimson Contagion” exercise in which our government officials practiced their strategies of protecting American society from infection by a hypothetical dangerous respiratory virus that might suddenly appear in China. 4) In late October 2019, 300 American military servicemen visited Wuhan to participate in the World Military Games. 5) In late October/early November, Patient… Read more »

Gezza England
Gezza England
17 days ago
Reply to  GlassHalfFull

Covid was loose in Wuhan during the military games as participants got infected and sick but not seriously so and therefore it was not detected in them as they needed no treatment. But at that time, mobile phone records have shown that there was an increase in activity at Wuhan hospital, as if they were treating an outbreak of something. Games participants noted that the streets were not that busy with traffic but assumed it was a front operation to look good for the games, but maybe it wasn’t.

GlassHalfFull
17 days ago
Reply to  Gezza England

Just imagine what the accusations would have been if Covid had originated in a US city just after 300 Chinese military personnel had been there.
The Chinese government back in 2020 had already accused the US of bringing the virus to China.
https://thediplomat.com/2020/03/chinese-foreign-ministry-spokesperson-implies-us-military-brought-coronavirus-to-wuhan/

Monro
18 days ago

COVID 19 is a severe cold with a 99.95% survival rate for ages 70 and under.

The COVID 19 average age of mortality is almost identical with life expectancy in Britain for both men and women.

JohnK
18 days ago

Another item on a long list of items designed in America, but made in China, perhaps.

john1T
18 days ago

How on earth is the theory that Covid was created in the US by Ralph Baric a “new theory”. It has been the leading theory amongst those who read the DEFUSE proposal when it was leaked in 2021. The Haslam Sachs analysis looks compelling to me.

transmissionofflame
18 days ago

Does “covid” even exist? Maybe, maybe not. I’ve not personally seen any evidence of it. Others say they have but a lot of opinions were flying around in that period on the subject.

Something I am surer of – a pandemic of lies, folly and evil certainly took place, which many organisations, countries and individuals were part of, for varying reasons and to varying degrees.

I think where “it” might have come from is of secondary interest and missing the point regarding some fundamental aspects of this sorry business (the greatest scam in history, while it lasted) to do with the social contract, personal freedom, the proper limits of state power, and what the hell life is all about.

RTSC
RTSC
17 days ago

Yes there WAS something. My cousin (male, age 58) died of it in 2021. He came back from a short holiday in Cornwall; he, his wife and daughter all got Covid. He died; they survived. All were unjabbed.

He was prob about 2 stone overweight, but not obese; had no co-morbidities. He was a professional photographer and throughout his adult life had spent a lot of time indoors and in his dark room. I therefore suspect he was severely Vit D deficient – which is why he succumbed and his wife/daughter didn’t.

transmissionofflame
17 days ago
Reply to  RTSC

Sorry to hear that. People, including doctors who post here, have described symptoms they felt were rare/ad not experienced before, and others say they have had “covid tests” that were positive. I certainly think it’s plausible that there was something novel, but there was a lot of hysteria and propaganda flying about. It’s hard to know what to believe.

lulu-b45
lulu-b45
18 days ago

Regardless, Baric knows what went on which is why he refuses to testify and his university protects his interests – imagine the law suits if they didn’t

marcusc
17 days ago

CIA everytime

RTSC
RTSC
17 days ago

It’s not a new theory. It’s a theory which has bubbled around in the background for quite a while.

The finger of blame was pointed very quickly at China/Wuhan; and then anyone who said it was an engineered virus was silenced (for a long time).

Why?

Ummm?

USA Media: This is a Chinese virus, cooked up in a Chinese lab

Pres Xi: If your media doesn’t stop blaming China, we’ll tell the world where it really originated and who was funding it.

Plausible?

Solentviews
Solentviews
17 days ago

You would think Baric would want to quickly clear his name if he were an innocent party. Strange he is refusing to say anything. Most innocent people don’t do that…..