Miliband’s North Sea Crackdown Seems More Senseless Than Ever
As war in the Middle East sends energy prices soaring, Ed Miliband’s North Sea crackdown faces mounting criticism, even from his usual green allies, say Matt Oliver and Jonathan Leake in the Telegraph. Here’s an excerpt:
Ed Miliband and Donald Trump have never been political bedfellows. But on the North Sea, it is no longer just the American President who is at odds with the Energy Secretary.
As the war in the Middle East convulses global oil and gas markets, Labour’s crackdown on home-grown production is facing mounting opposition from all sides – including from people once sympathetic to Miliband’s Net Zero cause.
The Government’s ban on new drilling licences and its swingeing windfall tax have been blamed for crippling the UK’s domestic industry while also reducing tax revenues and pushing up carbon emissions.
It’s a self-inflicted blow that is now prompting opposition from surprising directions – leaving Miliband looking increasingly isolated.
Among those advocating a “drill, baby, drill” approach are not just Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader and Nigel Farage, the Reform leader, but also Sir Tony Blair, the former Labour Prime Minister – who has described the current position as “climate theatre”. …
In recent weeks, even green energy evangelists – such as the bosses of Octopus Energy and wind farm trade body RenewableUK – have backed greater North Sea production. …
The Energy Secretary insists that boosting domestic production is pointless because it cannot make a “material difference” and won’t bring down household energy bills. “Our reliance on fossil fuels is costing us,” he said in a recent interview.
Trump has attacked Britain’s strategy, saying the UK is making a “big mistake” by turning its back on the North Sea.
Yet at the heart of the debate are also questions about energy security, tax revenues, jobs and carbon emissions, issues that experts say have been relegated in the name of dogma.
After the outbreak of war in Iran plunged global energy supplies into chaos and with Britons facing up to the prospect of soaring household bills, Miliband’s personal crusade seems more destructive than ever.
About 75pc of the UK’s primary energy still comes from oil and gas (70 million tonnes of crude oil and 65 billion cubic metres of gas) and this will take time to undo, with most of the existing demand stemming from transport and gas heating.
But even if the UK gets close to Net Zero by 2035, it will still consume nearly 40 million tonnes of oil and 30 billion cubic metres of gas.
Yet one key difference will be where it comes from. Over the next decade, imports are expected to rise steadily as domestic North Sea drilling finally runs out of steam.
By 2035, a scenario sketched out by the National Energy System Operator suggests two fifths of our gas supplies will probably come from Norway.
The other three-fifths will be split more or less evenly between domestic production and foreign shipments of liquefied natural gas (LNG), which mainly comes from the US, Qatar and Australia. …
Iran’s attacks on energy facilities in the Gulf are making matters even worse. The Iranian regime hit Ras Laffan this week, a large Qatari facility that produces around a fifth of the world’s supply of LNG, with missile strikes.
Saad al-Kaabi, the Qatari energy minister, said the attacks knocked out roughly 17% of the Gulf state’s export capacity and warned the impact would last up to five years.
Yet LNG is not a straightforward substitute for domestic gas.
It is both more expensive and results in higher carbon emissions. The carbon footprint of North Sea gas is probably around 15% lower overall, according to analysis by the website Carbon Brief.
Many experts and industry figures argue that producing more oil and gas at home would, ironically, be better for the planet.
Between now and 2050, the North Sea’s output is expected to fall by about two fifths, down from 3.6 billion barrels to just 2.1 billion barrels, according to investment bank Stifel.
That is a direct result of the Government’s crackdown. Its tax – known as the Energy Profits Levy – was introduced in 2022 after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The current 38% rate means total tax for the sector is 78% – which many producers say is unsustainable. …
EnergyUK, a trade body, has warned that household bills could jump by £250 a year from July as a result of the Iran war. It has urged the Government to “immediately step up efforts” to support those who would struggle most when energy costs rise.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Makes sense for net zero goals.
Is that a joke?
“urged the Government to “immediately step up efforts” to support those who would struggle most when energy costs rise.”
Given that government’s do not have any money whatsoever the above statement is a shabbily concocted request for increased taxation.
That should do it.
They are “stepping up efforts to support those who struggle most…….”——But it is their absurd energy policies that is causing this impoverishment. They think that offering the poorest a few quid off their bill is them being the cavalry riding over the hill to save them.
The only thing this Government is good at is spin and dishonesty. They’ll make sure their generosity is trumpeted from the rooftops, while trying to ensure that no-one mentions that fact that they could alleviate much of the financial pressure by ditching their Net Zero taxes and restrictions.
Miliband either is a psychopathic lunatic or he is an ignorant, incompetent fool. I am inclined to think the former.
What is more difficult to understand is Starmer, and Rachel from accounts who don’t stop him.
Asylums, sadly, usually house more than one psychopathic lunatic.
Or is he serving a different (puppet)master?
One that might profit from the decline of the UK hydrocarbon industry, perhaps?
Or is he just plain evil?
The Iranian conflict proves conclusively why giving up the use of hydrocarbons is completely insane – just like Ed Miliband.
People “on the right” seem to struggle to understand sicialost collectivists like Miliband.
They aren’t persuaded by evidence or arguments against their collectivist pipedreams. They have an attachment to their model of society that resembles religious fervour. And so they dismiss any objections as lack of faith, moral deficiency and respond with even more zeal.
You can’t persuade them to be reasonable. They have to be beaten down.
Apparently oil tankers are being held at sea near the coasts of Belgium and Netherlands not being allowed to unload. Waiting for oil prices to rise further? Profiteering?
Am I missing something?
The current increase in petrol prices will lead to an increase in tax revenue. It would be very simple for any government to reduce tax and as such the impact of higher prices.
Don’t hold your breath…
Red Ed is applying for his next, highly lucrative role, in the Global Eco Quangocracy for when he is kicked out of Parliament – just like his “CONservative” predecessor, Alok Sharma.
He will sacrifice all our remaining manufacturing industrial base and hundreds of thousands of jobs in order to secure his own future.
Self-interest in operation and nothing is going to make him change policy.
When you put CO2 emissions FIRST and everything else LAST this is the result. Net Zero is enshrined in law and even as we destroy our Industrial Base and force millions into energy poverty, the Miliband’s of this world (and there are thousands of them) will adhere strictly to the law they waved through Parliament in 2019 with no concern for cost/ benefit and NO VOTE. —–We are being governed by United Nations lackeys whose only concern is COMPLIANCE, and to hell with every other consideration
Miliband is a fantasist, one the most dangerous kinds of people.