PE Teacher Who Told Migrants to “Respect Our Laws or Leave” Banned From Classroom Despite Being Cleared of Racism and it Being Recommended That He Keep His Job

A PE teacher who told migrants to “respect our laws or leave” has been banned from the classroom by the Department for Education despite an independent teaching panel clearing him of racism and recommending he keep his job. The Mail has the story.

Sam Everett taught PE at Haughton Academy in Darlington for two years while using a Twitter/X account to share his views on politics and current affairs.

His views included what some might regard as quite mainstream positions – including calling for the Navy to be deployed to stop small boats crossing the Channel.

Everett, from Middlesbrough, was open about being a teacher but did not mention where he taught. Despite this, someone worked out where he was employed and reported him to the school, prompting an investigation.

Everett admitted the Twitter account was his but denied that any of his posts were racist or sexist.

He was hauled before a Teaching Regulation Agency professional conduct panel – the body responsible for deciding whether teachers should be struck off – which heard the case over three days in January and February this year.

After hearing the evidence in full, the panel agreed with Everett that he was neither racist nor sexist and recommended he should keep his job, concluding that publication of its findings alone would be sufficient punishment.

Officials at the Department for Education then overruled that recommendation, concluding the panel had “failed to give sufficient weight” to the seriousness of his conduct – and banned him from teaching indefinitely.

Among the posts the investigation focused on were:

“Completely agree, if you don’t respect our laws, culture and way of life you should leave, nobody is forcing you to stay. We don’t go to other peoples countries and tell them they’re wrong for how they go about things.”

In response to a post saying “The law of Allah is superior to your laws”, he wrote: “Sick of hearing rubbish being spouted by these idiots. They can live in societies where their values are accepted, it isn’t here. Leave. You won’t be missed.”

In response to a Britain First post describing migrants as “illegal migrant invaders” approaching British shores, he wrote: “Deploy the navy.”

The panel found the posts offensive, noting it implied advocating the use of military force against unarmed people in small boats.

Everett said he had been unaware Britain First was a far-Right organisation when he replied.

Another post read: “There’s not an Islamist problem in our country according to some. How many times do we get called racists for being English? These people come from the most intolerable and barbaric places you can imagine and think they have more rights than us. Bore off.”

He also wrote that anyone who uses the word “comrade” “deserves to be shipped to Russia”, and when pro-Palestine protesters were picketing McDonald’s he wrote: “Feel like ordering 20 nuggets every time I see these idiots.”

In response to a post asking whether Eddie Izzard should be allowed in women-only toilets and changing rooms, he replied simply: “No.” The panel found this post did not cross the threshold into offensive conduct.

While the panel upheld a number of complaints – finding several posts offensive and concluding Everett had demonstrated a lack of tolerance – it stopped well short of branding him racist or sexist, and recommended against a ban.

Worth reading in full.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

31 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tonka Fairy
25 days ago

“In response to a post asking whether Eddie Izzard should be allowed in women-only toilets and changing rooms, he replied simply: “No.” The panel found this post did not cross the threshold into offensive conduct.”

Well thank heavens for that!

How is a simple “no” answer such a basic question as “should a man be able to use women’s bogs?” ever be brought up in a disciplinary hearing?

What a load of rollocks. I hope he finds a better job soon.

Gezza England
Gezza England
25 days ago
Reply to  Tonka Fairy

And why would it need three days at the taxpayers expense.

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
25 days ago
Reply to  Tonka Fairy

Sounds like a thoroughly splendid chap, in tune with the opinions of 75% of the nation.

Heretic
Heretic
25 days ago

“Officials at the Department for Education then overruled that recommendation…”

And who is in charge of the Department for Education, we wonder?

“Bridget Phillipson was appointed Secretary of State for Education on 5 July 2024 and Minister for Women and Equalities on 8 July 2024.”


AynRandyAndy
25 days ago
Reply to  Heretic

Imagine if the names and addresses of the senior ‘leadership’ team at the DfE were published and thieving lowlifes were able to take their pick of the property therein.

And the Police refused to act.

And the break-ins continued until there was nothing left.

EppingBlogger
25 days ago

This makes sense.

Politicians have been telling us all century that multi-culturalism is good. They won’t tolerate any alternative opinion.

Bettina
Bettina
24 days ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

Ah, but not English culture – that is verboten.

Mogwai
25 days ago

Bridget Phillipson is a member of the Fabian Society, along with god knows how many other Labour MPs, so no surprises there. I wonder who the trouble-making, spiteful git was who put two and two together and reported this teacher in the first place.
Anyway, what Sam Everett needs is some decent legal advice because he’s entitled to his own personal opinions, which were blatantly not offensive, and the fact he was sharing his views outside of his job, where he had an unblemished record and zero complaints made against him, should have no bearing on his ability to perform his duties as a PE teacher. What a disproportionate and unjust punishment and abuse of power from the Dept for Education. The fact they went over the school’s head in this matter just confirms this.

Tonka Fairy
25 days ago
Reply to  Mogwai

He needs to join the Free Speech Union!!

RW
RW
25 days ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Hear, hear.

soundofreason
soundofreason
25 days ago

In response to a post asking whether Eddie Izzard should be allowed in women-only toilets and changing rooms, he replied simply: “No.” The panel found this post did not cross the threshold into offensive conduct.

What a bastard – he agrees with the Supreme court’s decision of April 16, 2025.

For a fist full of roubles

Power seems to be going to the heads of our officials. Little Hitlers!

Hardliner
24 days ago

You’re right, the British public sector does have a whiff of Nazi Germany about it…grassing on neighbours and strangers, only one dogmatic view acceptable, hounding of dissent and/or difference, DEI and LGBT (Mein Camp?) still the presumed norm ….

Hound of Heaven
Hound of Heaven
25 days ago

“..would be sufficient punishment.” Punishment for what exactly? This is harassment pure and simple and the perpetrators need prosecuting.

Tyrbiter
Tyrbiter
25 days ago

Quite.

Gezza England
Gezza England
25 days ago

There is a simple rule when posting on X – do not use your real name.

Peter W
Peter W
24 days ago
Reply to  Gezza England

….until Digital ID comes along and then the government and its Quangos can trace you.

Mrs.Croc
Mrs.Croc
25 days ago

Well, this is one reason why I would never use such platforms.
however, sounds like a sensible and likeable person, far too good for the mess this country has become unfortunately.
schools overseas, especially in the likes of Hong Kong and Malaysia, and some schools on the continent would welcome him with open arms.
i hope he finds a good job soon!

thechap
thechap
25 days ago

And so another person in the UK loses their job over tweeting mainstream views.

We are run, at all levels, by traitors.

psychedelia smith
25 days ago

He would have received fairer treatment from the Khmer Rouge.

Tyrbiter
Tyrbiter
25 days ago

As long as he didn’t wear spectacles.

Matt Dalby
Matt Dalby
25 days ago

I fully agree with what he said, apart from deploying the navy to stop the boats, a few helicopter gunships would be sufficient but sadly am not at all surprised he was sacked.

Chris Kenny
Chris Kenny
25 days ago

Hes nowhere near as offensive as the shower persecuting him.

ellie-em
24 days ago

Tolerance – bah humbug.

Unfortunately, it is now frowned upon to just tolerate and / or be neutral. Indeed, neutrality is now seen as hostile. Unless one is actively supporting – visibly and vocally – something, one is branded as ‘anti’ and / or racist!

Rusty123
Rusty123
24 days ago

So, I remember a certain Starmer telling Trump how we have freedom of speech and it is sacrosant, well clearly that was yet another lie, he should be able to sue.

Peter W
Peter W
24 days ago
Reply to  Rusty123

Starmer never lies ….unless he’s speaking!

Peter W
Peter W
24 days ago

I’d rather have this guy teaching our kids than those woke, looking-to-be- offended tw@ts in the so-called education department!

RTSC
RTSC
24 days ago

Did he really expect his free speech to be protected by the tyrants in Government/Dep of Ed?

After all, they did SO well with the Batley schoolteacher.

Worcester1
Worcester1
24 days ago

Surely this is one for the Free Speech Union to take on?

varmint
24 days ago

So do the Department of Education think that migrants should NOT respect our laws? Or maybe they think they should only respect some of them, and if that happens to not be what their previous culture has been accustomed to then they should maybe just give those particular laws a miss?

Epi
Epi
24 days ago

Sounds like a tip top Cove to me!