News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

34 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tonka Fairy
25 days ago

“British Muslims are five times more likely to have a positive view of the Iranian regime”

In other breaking news: Pope revealed to be following Catholicism. Scientists observe bear defecating amongst trees.

pjar
25 days ago
Reply to  Tonka Fairy

It does raise the question: “If they’re supportive of the regime, why are they here and not there?” 🤷🏼

David101
25 days ago
Reply to  pjar

Why are they not there? Exactly! That pretty much sums up the complete blind ignorance of those in the West who actively support the evil of the Islamic Republic… pampered activists who can’t even begin to imagine the reality of living under the conditions of Iran under the Ayatollah.

Sepulchrave
Sepulchrave
25 days ago
Reply to  pjar

To take over.

JXB
JXB
25 days ago
Reply to  Tonka Fairy

… Sun rises in the East.

pjar
25 days ago

Tractors descend on High Court for family farms tax battle

I can’t help feeling this might be resolved quite easily if they made it compulsory that the recipient was obliged to continue farming the land involved and paid an IHT tax penalty on any land sales hon a sliding scale of 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 years?

EppingBlogger
25 days ago
Reply to  pjar

No. The government wants two things. More tax and to drive out smaller farmers. It wants big corporate owners and more land for solar.

Tonka Fairy
25 days ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

EVERYTHING in this corporatist system is design to push out the “little guys”, giving complete control to giant corporations who are friendly with the government regime.

It is closer to facism than it is to free market capitalism.

huxleypiggles
25 days ago
Reply to  pjar

The purpose of the tax is to destroy British farming given that the industry is the backbone of the country. Much of our heritage and history is buried in the farming industry. And as farms are broken up and sold the globalists move in such as Gates, Fink and the rest. Control the food supply, control the people.

pjar
25 days ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

It’s hard not to reach such a conclusion Hux… round my way Dyson seems to be hoovering up most of the land. Allegedly, his income from subsidies rivals that from his business?

Free Lemming
25 days ago

Peter Thiel infuriates Vatican by claiming Antichrist is coming

The Antichrist has been emergent for at least 65 years. It started with the destruction of the family and has accelerated its mission through technology. Five years ago I would have laughed at myself for saying this, but I now truly believe it. I can’t explain it, but I’ve felt something coming into existence.

DiscoveredJoys
DiscoveredJoys
25 days ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

You can argue that we collectively generate archetypes – an ideal example of a type; a quintessence. The archetypes are not real, not concrete, but given enough examples we unconsciously generate an explanation, a master pattern.

‘The Devil’ fell out of common Christian views some time ago but how else are we to explain the repeated examples of stuff going to shit? And so the Antichrist, not real, not concrete but an unconsciously generated ‘explanation’. An explanation that can influence real world activities.

Heretic
Heretic
25 days ago
Reply to  DiscoveredJoys

That’s a very interesting viewpoint. Did you know that the Test of a True Atheist is the same as the Test of a True Christian?

Atheists declare that they don’t believe in any deities, but just ask them if they will openly denounce and insult Satan/Shiva/The Devil, and watch them backpedal and make excuses for refusing. Many “Christians” will react in the same way, as if they are still controlled by Primitive Occult Voodoo Superstition.

transmissionofflame
25 days ago

Kemi Badenoch has branded Donald Trump’s attacks on Keir Starmer over the Iran war as “childish”, reports the Mail.”

But it’s not childish to point it out…

Heretic
Heretic
25 days ago

Fake Opposition Nigerian attendee of the Davos World Economic Forum defends Fake Opposition British attendee of the Davos World Economic Forum in the British Parliament, clearly demonstrating not only the existence of THE UNIPARTY, but also the involvement of the World Economic Forum in SELECTING BRITISH PRIME MINISTERS.

The Imbecile Tories need to give her the boot.

JXB
JXB
25 days ago

Isn’t Trump doing her job for her?

transmissionofflame
25 days ago
Reply to  JXB

Yes

EppingBlogger
25 days ago

I agree with almost everything Tim Stanley said there. Except we should not give undue attention to pressure groups. He mentioned two: palliative care and disabled groups. I would oppose this bill on my own analysis and not because of even despite lobbying and pressure group views.

huxleypiggles
25 days ago

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15653691/Badenoch-blasts-childish-Trump-Iran-war-rant-Starmer.html

This useless Nigerian needs to learn from Mr Trump and start doing her job – Leader of the Opposition.

Dinger64
25 days ago

“Consultants at LCP Delta predict that electricity prices will rise both this year and next because of a global squeeze on supplies of gas”

if only we’d had our own supplies of gas and oil…err!

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  Dinger64

If only there was some way of putting a tower on the land, but leave off the propellors, and connect it to a pipe that went into the ground. We could even give it a friendly name like Derrick.

Heretic
Heretic
25 days ago

Brilliant!

JXB
JXB
25 days ago
Reply to  Dinger64

Gas generated electricity, wholesale = ~ £70 per kWh.

Wind generated, wholesale = (Contract for Differerence) £128 per kWh which compensates for intermittent supply, therefore intermittent revenue stream.

That’s why electricity prices keep going up because of the CfD price – a guaranteed price irrespective of market price, so if market price were say, £70, a wind company would get £70 plus a subsidy from the grid of £58 – cost passed on to consumers.

As more windmills are built, competition increases supply increases when the wind blows and market prices fall, which means CfD prices will have to increase to compensate or the wind companies would go bust.

Domestic gas retail price 10 years ago, +/- 5p per kWh, today +/- 6p per kWh.

Electricity 10 years ago, retail, +/- 12p per kWh, today +/- 28p per kWh.

If gas prices are so affecting electricity prices, why aren’t they affecting gas prices?

Net Zero = insanity.

Dinger64
25 days ago

“Rising global temperatures ‘eroding’ the world’s ability to exercise”

Obviously the amount of people dieing from heat as apposed to the cold (10 – 1) just isn’t enough so they’ve come up with this bunkom!
I’m amazed the Telegraph has come up with this pile of shyte, you could have expected the Guardian to create such Bull…t but the Telegraph!? Shame on you Sarah Newey

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  Dinger64

The Telegraph comes up with an immense amount of rubbish, these days. It appears to be gammon central, and I speak as a person often accused of gammonhood.

Heretic
Heretic
25 days ago

Starmer faces pornography revolt from female MPs

Pornography is Satanic Poison for the human soul. ABOLISH IT WORLDWIDE.

JXB
JXB
25 days ago
Reply to  Heretic

You mean like drugs were abolished… how’s that working out?

Heretic
Heretic
25 days ago

Why Britain pays more for power than almost any other developed nation

Treasonous Privatisation is the reason, allowing foreigners to own and control our public utilities for their own profit.

In the Netherlands, water, electricity and gas networks are all publicly owned – and it’s ILLEGAL to privatise any of them!”

st27
st27
25 days ago
Reply to  Heretic

Well, yes. Privatising something which isn’t amenable to competition is something only a deranged Thatcher-doctrinaire would do. But it takes a deranged New Labour doctrinaire to gurn at us (Blair) or frown at us (Starmer), do absolutely sod-all about this, but tell us that it’s just fine now because the Government is Nice.

JXB
JXB
25 days ago
Reply to  st27

The purpose is private capital is risked by individuals who have a choice whether they risk it or not, instead of using public capital and placing it at risk, taken from taxpayers who have no choice, and also funded by debt the bill for which is dumped on the taxpayer. Note: the problem with our water/sewage companies is Ofwat which caps prices. More money is needed for improvements to infrastructure, but that can only come from: profits from revenue stream, additional investments, debt. Restricting prices, thus revenue, thus profits means not enough is available to reinvest, is not attractive to investors, encourages debt. It is well understood, capping prices below market rate = shortage of supply. Water/sewage is a natural monopoly (industries where high fixed costs and infrastructure duplication make a single provider most efficient) so it attracts strict regulation, but it is not truly privatised if it is still de facto run – via Ofwat – by useless civil servants and clueless politicians. France, by the by, has mostly private water companies and even privately operated toll roads (and no Road Fund Tax), AND… a health system that is over 50% private provision, and has a healthy private insurance… Read more »

Heretic
Heretic
25 days ago
Reply to  st27

Exactly! We were all promised that the privatisation of publicly owned utilities and transport would result in huge increases in efficiency and huge decreases in prices from the competition instead of “monopolies”, and we would all live happily ever after. It was all a lie.

Remember how Labour promised to start re-nationalizing everything, which is why many people voted for them?

JXB
JXB
25 days ago
Reply to  Heretic

Better to have Kier Starmer and Rachel accounts owning and running them? Public utilities are run for the profit of those who use them. If there was no profit to users, they wouldn’t use them would they? The profit the providers get is a ”thank you” for providing the money to fund the useful utility and also thanks for not having to pay the capital and running costs out of our taxes. State-run utilities are capitalised out of taxation and public debt – money borrowed from those horrid foreigners for their own profit which is the interest they get paid out of your taxes. So consumers pay three times for State-run utilities, once via their bills second time via their taxes to cover running costs, third time indirect taxation to service the debt. If the Dutch are too stupid to understand that, serves them right. Since State-run things are in competition with all other State-run things and other “public services”, and money available in the Treasury is limited, it is a matter of politics which gets the most funding this budget round, which is never enough. People who think State-run things are better than private either weren’t alive when the… Read more »

Heretic
Heretic
25 days ago
Reply to  JXB

The British National Health Service worked just fine when it was only for the British People who paid into it, before the Communists turned it into the International Health Service for Birth Tourists & Foreign Scroungers, still paid for by the British People.

It’s the same as if the government told you that all your neighbours, and the population of your entire town, were now legally able to claim on your house insurance for any damage to their own houses, and you would still have to pay for it.

Most developed nations have publicly owned utilities and transport, and I am old enough to remember when it all worked well here in Britain, before Thatcher’s admiration of Reagan led her astray in emulating him. She’s also the one who declared that Britain had “too many dentists”, and closed down the three largest dental schools in the country, with disastrous results.