Germans Vote for Even More Deindustrialisation

In 2011, Angela Merkel idiotically accelerated the German nuclear phase-out just a few months after her coalition passed legislation that would’ve slowed it down by 12 years. Because of an earthquake and a tsunami that happened 13,000 kilometres away in Japan, Merkel suddenly decided that Germany needed to abandon nuclear power as soon as possible, although the Federal Republic knows neither tsunamis nor earthquakes and not even the Japanese drew this drastic conclusion from the Fukushima disaster.

Merkel’s real motivations were, as always, tactical: she hoped to deny the surging Green Party a winning electoral issue in the Baden-Württemberg elections that year. So we can call her move a twofold failure: the Greens won over 24% of the vote anyway, which was just enough to form a coalition with the Social Democrats and force the CDU into opposition. And today, citizens of a denuclearised Federal Republic must live with a declining economy and ongoing deindustrialisation, thanks in large part to having some of the highest electricity prices in continental Europe. It was a multi-dimensional fractal fuckup, what Merkel did in 2011. We’re still paying for it.

Even many in Merkel’s own party claim to recognise these past errors, which makes it all the more maddening that the CDU keeps making them. Yesterday, Baden-Württemberg elected a new state parliament, following a long and dismal campaign in which the CDU under its genuinely stupid lead candidate Manuel Hagel…

…did everything in its power to make itself impossible to differentiate from the Greens under a vastly more intelligent and capable Cem Özdemir.

Hagel and his CDU sought for months to banish politics from this election entirely, fearful of alienating clueless Baden-Württembergians who might just cast their vote for the deindustrialisers if the Union didn’t let them scratch their conscience sufficiently. In the end, however, Greens outmanouvered the hapless Hagel, capitalising on a seven year-old video in which the CDU man spoke with slightly lascivious undertones of a “doe-eyed” girl he met on some high-school visit ages ago. A far more significant slip-up – one that hardly won any notice outside of alternative media – showed Hagel on another school visit attempting to explain the greenhouse effect to a bunch of bored seventh-year students. Hagel, a hopeless climatoid who supports the energy transition in a German state where Mercedes-Benz and Porsche are fighting for survival, explained why we need to stop all meaningful competitive industrial activity this way:

Between the earth and the sun is the atmosphere, and when it gets thinner and thinner, the sun gets hotter and hotter. And the reason for this is emissions, CO2, and so on. And that is the greenhouse gas effect. All right?

Yesterday evening, the bill for all of this humdrum imbecility came due. The Greens emerged as the winners, if barely, with 30.2% of the vote – just a few points down from their historic high of 32.6% in 2021. The CDU improved over its last showing but managed to underperform even the most pessimistic forecasts, with a mere 29.7%.

Yesterday’s election results, compared to 2021 (faded bars).

Thanks to a slight edge in direct mandates, the CDU and the Greens will enter the state parliament with 56 seats each, but that may not matter too much. The CDU has asked the Greens if they might split the Minister Presidency between them, with Hagel and Özdemir each serving two and a half years, like two little boys taking their turn on the bicycle. Özdemir has said no, because “we are adults”. In truth Özdemir is poised to become the next Minister President of Baden-Württemberg in yet another cursed Kiwi coalition.

This was a predictable outcome, and nevertheless it is astounding. The Greens and the CDU are the undisputed architects of German decline, and yet the prosperous voters of this beautiful southern state have sent both of these terrible parties back into the Landtag with an enormous mandate to do more of the same. This is proof number 5,234,345 that deep and lasting prosperity has the power to do what few other forces can, namely turn millions of otherwise sensible intelligent people into walking retards. Alas, there seems to be no way to de-zombify the voters without making them massively poorer.

Hagel and all 12 of his braincells are bitter about his failure to best the Greens, although his chances of achieving the Minister Presidency have only been dashed because the Union refuses even to contemplate any coalition with the no-longer-Right-wing-extreme Alternative für Deutschland. A clear if purely theoretical majority exists for a Union coalition with the Evil Fascist Nazi Hitler Party, as the latter has nearly doubled its share of the vote since 2021. This is largely down to the rapidly shifting political preferences of actual workers and net taxpayers:

The worker vote in Baden-Württemberg has split overwhelmingly for the AfD.

Even contemplating such a coalition is forbidden of course, and nowhere so much as in Baden-Württemberg. It is also forbidden to point out that the mere possibility of a CDU-AfD coalition would give the CDU enormous leverage over the Greens in coalition negotiations, because in a world without firewalls the CDU would have two potential coalitions partners, whereas the Greens would have no options beyond the Union. In coming decades everyone will look back upon the firewall as one of the most ridiculous and self-destructive tactics ever pursued by any Western political party anywhere, for any reason.

There are silver linings here, of course. Note what a drubbing the Social Democrats have taken. They almost didn’t make it over the 5% hurdle for parliamentary representation at all, and they are left calling themselves the “only democratic opposition” in the Stuttgart Landtag (according to the SPD, the AfD is not a “democratic” party so it doesn’t count). This is a party full of crazy people on an express train to the land of total political irrelevance. They’re going to do a lot more damage before they get there of course, but there can be little doubt that that’s where they’re headed.

When they finally arrive in this grey pointless liminal space, they’ll get to meet the market-liberal FDP, the junior partners of Olaf Scholz’s failed traffic light coalition. These are the guys who signed off on every last catastrophic thing the Scholz clown car did, from extended mask mandates to extreme vaccine mania to destructive home heating ordinances. Happily, in doing so, they also signed their political death warrant. The FDP was once uniquely strong among the wealthy voters of Baden-Württemberg, but it has been chased out of the state parliament after bleeding more than half of its support since 2021. The FDP is slated to be voted out of Rheinland-Pfalz next, on March 21st; then out of Sachsen-Anhalt on September 6th; and finally out of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, on September 20th. After the next round of state elections in 2027, only Hessen will still have any FDP members in the Landtag at all, and that is simply because the next election Hessen will not happen until 2028.

This article originally appeared on Eugyppius’s Substack newsletter. You can subscribe here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

20 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
varmint
1 month ago

The once Economic Powerhouse and envy of the world after the war, Germans were the most prosperous in Europe. Their efficiency, and work ethic saw then achieve a standard of living that suddenly hit the buffers when along came the phoney planet saving agenda that had politicians in a tizzy. Then emerged the “energiewende”, and all good Europeans had now to pretend to save the planet with no cost/benefit, no facts, no reason and no evidence. As someone once pointed out—-“People go mad in herds, and only recover their senses slowly one by one”.
—-The Germans (and the British) will only recover when they wake up to the pseudo scientific fraud that was never about the planet in the first place. It is simply eco socialism emanating from the UN and WEF that states that we in the wealthy west consume too much and must make do with LESS of EVERYTHING. Tragically we have a Political Class that are fully aligned with this absurdity that is plunging millions into ENERGY POVERTY.

sskinner
1 month ago
Reply to  varmint

“Take away the energy-distributing networks and the industrial machinery from America, Russia, and all the world’s industrialized countries, and within six months more than two billion swiftly and painfully deteriorating people will starve to death. Take away all the world’s politicians, all the ideologies and their professional protagonists from those same countries, and send them off on a rocket trip around the sun and leave all the countries their present energy networks, industrial machinery, routine production and distribution personnel, and no more humans will starve nor be afflicted in health than at present. 

Fortunately, the do-more-with-less invention initiative does not derive from political debate, bureaucratic licensing, or private economic patronage. The license comes only from the blue sky of the inventor’s intellect. No one licensed the inventors of the airplane, telephone, electric light, and radio to go to work. It took only the personally dedicated initiative of five men to invent those world transforming and world shrinking developments.

Herein lies the unexpectedly swift effectiveness of the design-science revolution. Despite this historical demonstrable fact, world society as yet persists in looking exclusively to its politicians and their ideologues for world problem solving.”
Buckminster Fuller

varmint
1 month ago
Reply to  sskinner

The biggest problem with politics is POLITICIANS. It isn’t so much climate change that causes us problems, it is climate POLICIES.

transmissionofflame
1 month ago

Vote CDU, get socialism. Vote Conservative, get socialism. Either some of the bien-pensant middle classes need to start holding their noses and voting for the “far right”, or the natural base of the “far right” – the white working working class – needs to be mobilised in much larger numbers. Trump managed the latter.

RW
RW
1 month ago

You’re misunderstanding this. In this election, the bien-pensant (urban) middle classes will almost all have voted for the Greens, if only because this means the subsidies for their rooftop solar installations will keep flowing, and all of the CDU seats came from fielding successfull constituency candidates in rural areas. Farmers et al. are naturally conservative and will have voted conservatively because of this, which means will have voted for the (CDU) constituency canidate which has always represented them.

That’s Germany’s engineered “democracy” at its finest, see other comment about voting system. I’d be willing to risk a bet that Hagel was already selected as first minister candidate because a talking parrot could outperform him left-handedly.

transmissionofflame
1 month ago
Reply to  RW

Well there’s not much hope for anyone voting Green. Hard to believe that none of the urban/suburban middle class vote CDU but maybe they are even more far gone than in the UK. Nothing stopping the farmers voting AfD.

RW
RW
1 month ago

What stopped the farmers – AfD will usually have come second in these constituencies – from voting AfD is that they’re CONSERVATIVE. That is, they want to keep things as they are. The same CDU guys has always represented them. The same CDU guy will always represent them. That’s how this stuff works in rural areas. I was born in a constituency where the same FDP guy always won. But usually, it’s CDU.

The attached image shows the results by constituency. It’s instructive to contemplate how parliament would have looked if the British voting system had been used. But surely, is Much More Democratic™ in this way.

y
transmissionofflame
1 month ago
Reply to  RW

Thanks. Either the farmers are dense/not paying attention or happy with the status quo. That’s democracy.

RW
RW
1 month ago

I could try to create a blinking CONSERVATIVE for yet more emphasis. This means no changes unless they really can’t be avoided. And the system has been designed to take advantage of this.

They also had election in the GDR, the democratic German republic, which – mysteriously – also always prodcued the intended results. The methods to achieve this were a bit more blunt but everybody in this state could always have voted against the state party. So, they must all have wanted communist rule all the time, right? But there was an revolution to get rid of it in the end which suggests that communist rule was not that popular after all.

transmissionofflame
1 month ago
Reply to  RW

Yes but by voting for Fake Conservatives or even real conservatives and allowing Greens to win they will get LOTS OF CHANGES whereas voting for the AfD would most likely mean things stop changing so much or maybe go into reverse. So my earlier point stands as far as I am concerned. They are either happy with the way things are or they are dense, or just too lazy/don’t care.

DDR would most likely have had Russian tanks had people started voting for the “wrong” party in too large numbers, and I think people knew that.

RW
RW
1 month ago

The GDR voting system worked such that the National Front produced a unified candidate list and people could cross out candidates they didn’t want. But this would have required them to go to the voting booth to do that while the officials were watching instead of just publically folding the ballot paper and putting it into the box. Which wouldn’t have been a wise thing to do if they were ever planning to get a car or to continue getting their car repaired (one example of many).

That’s also how people in the GDR called this — they didn’t talk about them going to vote but them going to fold¹. At least privately.

¹ Wir gehen falten instead of Wir gehen wählen.

transmissionofflame
1 month ago
Reply to  RW

Ah I didn’t know that – thanks. I never asked my DDR relatives about voting, and I am not sure I would want to ask them even now. They got very upset when I suggested that the “covid” restrictions were somewhat tyrannical.

RW
RW
1 month ago

I didn’t mean to say vote for the conservative candidate but vote conservatively, namely, for the guy which has always been their constituency MP. That’s a personal decision and not a political one. One can argue that this isnot the most intelligent thing to do, given the outcome but the outcome is what the system was designed to deliver. If voter behaviour changed, so would the system. At least, that’s my conjecture.

transmissionofflame
1 month ago
Reply to  RW

You may be right that the system would be changed. I hope we find out.

RW
RW
1 month ago
Reply to  RW

To add this: If the voting system had been FPTP, the outcome would have been:

CDU – 56 MPs.
Greens – 13 MPs.
AfD – 1 MP.

But the actual outcome was

CDU – 56 (Humiliating defeat!)
Greens – 56 (Glorious victory!)
AfD – 35 (Democracy barely rescued!)
SPD – 10 (Who?)

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 month ago

While Mauel Hagel’s explanation of the greenhouse effect is comically poor, the term itself is a misnomer. A greenhouse does not get hotter because of the sun’s energy getting in and not getting radiated out again. It gets hotter because the glass stops the warm air rising away (like it would in the open) through convection. This is why in household greenhouses the temperature inside is often regulated down simply by opening a roof window.

CO2 in the atmosphere does not place an impenetrable cap over our lands like a greenhouse roof would. The effect of visible light being absorbed and the energy re-emitted as IR is not unique to a greenhouse.

I realise the term greenhouse effect is now common parlance and I’m unlikely to prevail in renaming it but surely GCSE level physics could explain what people mean and what the difference is?

RW
RW
1 month ago

So, the CDU won 5.6% and came out 0.5% behind the Greens which lost 2.4% and that was an absolutely humiliating defeat of … the CDU? I’d call that a spectacular performance of the CDU, especially considering that Hagel is a barely sentient idiot who drools on TV about female teenagers he met during a school visit while his wife at home is watching.

RW
RW
1 month ago

Noteworthy: The voting system of Baden-Würrtemberg was specially re-engineered for this particular election. Specifically, they adopted the former (abolished by the Scholz-government) federal voting system where every voter has two votes, one for a constituency candidate and one for a party list. All constituency candidates which won will get a seat in the Landtag. Insofar this means a party gets more seats in this way than its 2nd vote vote share would allow, the other parties get allocated additional seats so that the percentages match again.

That’s the theory. In practice, the rural areas of BaWü will (almost) all have voted for their custom CDU constituency candidates. This means the number of successful CDU constituency candidates will have exceeded its second vote vote share and all other parties thus got to piggyback onto it, especially the Greens. All of this was well-known before the election.

An expertly designed voting system always delivers the planned results.
[sarcasm]

Gezza England
Gezza England
1 month ago

If only Germany had a media that pointed out the stupidity of the Energiewende and how Net Zero will is destroying the state’s industrial base, destroying jobs, bankrupting cities like Stuttgart, making the people poorer every year this goes on. But then we don’t have that sort of media either. At least GB News tries but yesterday a guest on Martin Daubney’s show would take the final step to say that Mad Ed is lying about cheaper renewables and Daubney could only say we need to transition more slowly as opposed to asking why we need to change at all.

sskinner
1 month ago

“Stupidity is a more dangerous enemy of the good than malice. One may protest against evil; it can be exposed and, if need be, prevented by use of force. Evil always carries within itself the germ of its own subversion in that it leaves behind in human beings at least a sense of unease. Against stupidity we are defenceless. Neither protests nor the use of force accomplish anything here; reasons fall on deaf ears; facts that contradict one’s prejudgment simply need not be believed – in such moments the stupid person even becomes critical – and when facts are irrefutable they are just pushed aside as inconsequential, as incidental. In all this the stupid person, in contrast to the malicious one, is utterly self satisfied and, being easily irritated, becomes dangerous by going on the attack. For that reason, greater caution is called for when dealing with a stupid person than with a malicious one. Never again will we try to persuade the stupid person with reasons, for it is senseless and dangerous.”
Dietrich Bonhoeffer