BREAKING: Britain to Get Islamophobia Tsar
Britain is to get a new “anti-Muslim hostility tsar” under plans to be outlined by the Government on Monday, which will also include a new definition of Islamophobia. The Spectator‘s Tim Shipman has the details.
The Spectator has been leaked a draft copy of ‘Protecting What Matters’, a document outlining Labour’s new cohesion strategy which is to be unveiled in a cross Government push next week. The 47-page paper features a crackdown on extremism and names Islamists as the biggest threat to community cohesion. It also outlines fresh demands that new arrivals in Britain seek to integrate and speak good English, described as a “fundamental basis for participating in society and an expectation of those who wish to call the UK home”. It states: “Those who come here must make a genuine effort to integrate into and engage with our shared way of life.” The last census found that more than a million people could not speak English well or at all.
The report states clearly that Islamists are responsible for three-quarters of the police’s counterterror workload and 94% of all terror-related deaths in the past 25 years. The plan also rejects calls, predominantly from British Muslims, for blasphemy laws in the UK.
Following the case of the religious studies teacher at Batley Grammar school, who was forced into hiding after showing caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad, the document promises to “stand against those who try to intimidate, threaten and harass others because they are offended by so-called “blasphemy”. We do not recognise blasphemy law in the UK.”
Further powers will be established to close extremist charities and suspend trustees with “unspent hate crime convictions”, to “strengthen monitoring” of non-violent extremism in universities and to exclude hate preachers from the UK. As part of this, there will be rules to ensure that “public bodies do not confer legitimacy, funding or influence on extremist groups”.
But the plans will also raise alarm bells on free speech by outlining new rules to tackle “divisive content” and “ensure trusted news sources are prominent”. Critics fear these measures will be used to silence critics of Islamists or even TV channels like GB News which some Labour people view as too Right-wing. …
The creation of a “special representative on anti-Muslim hostility” is likely to give a prominent platform to an activist voice. Their job will be to “champion efforts across the UK to tackle hostility and hatred directed at Muslims and those perceived to be Muslim”.
Alongside that is a new definition of anti-Muslim hatred, which has been watered down to avoid defining Muslims as a race, but which will still condemn “the prejudicial stereotyping of Muslims, as part of a collective group with set characteristics, to stir up hatred against them, irrespective of their actual opinions, beliefs or actions as individuals”. Critics think this will create a blasphemy law by the back door.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Starmer doesn’t have the first clue about protecting what really matters.
The only thing that matters to starmer is his job as PM.
Actually it looks like a move to try to save Labour’s arse, after all the Muslims defected to the Green Party at that by-election.
It’s a barefaced electoral ploy that attempts to benefit the Laboir Party at the expense of the entire country (except Muslims, onviously)
Precisely! My first thought was: how about a teenage, white girl, anti-rape gang Czar?
Problem, reaction, solution.
“Cohesion strategy”. They can’t protect our borders, keep law and order or provide the necessary conditions for us to generate affordable energy, or fix potholes for that matter. Who on Earth ever thought that a government of this country would need a “cohesion strategy”. I don’t want or need a government or anyone else to explain to me how to “cohese”. But that’s what governments do now – create problems with unwanted action and then tell us that the solution to these problems is more government action. And people buy it.
Good points! And what the heck is “Divisive Content”? I guess it means anything that resists the Communist “Cohesion Strategy”, as you pointed out.
“But that’s what governments do now – create problems with unwanted action and then tell us that the solution to these problems is more government action. And people buy it.”
See also:
A cynic might argue that one of the true purposes of the Online Safety Act was to at least undermine VPN use.
That photo of Pakistani Muslim Fanatic Mahmood with a rag on her head depicts her more truthfully than all her other media photos without it. She’s like a government-appointed Alligator chosen to be the lifeguard at your local children’s swimming pool.
Over 9,000 crimes reported at UK churches in just three years | National Churches Trust
… but no “Christianophobia Tsar” has ever been proposed by the Unholy Muslim-Marxist Alliance taking over the West. All their focus is on ONE HOSTILE, MURDEROUS, ALIEN CULT, and forcing everyone in the West to submit to it, ignoring all other religions. And they have never explained why…
Spot on. I am Christian. Open season on people like me. They don’t arrest Muhammdans when they say men with penises are men. They will if you are Christian. We are the most persecuted group in the world. 5000 Black Nigerian Christians murdered every year by Muslims. Black Lives Matter unless they are Christian.
The Caliphate Cometh.
This will ‘mutate’ into mandatory Arabic-Mein Koran-ass in the air-lessons for the Sheeple.
Yes, and you’d think that Nigerian Christians in the West would be speaking up about these massacres, especially those in positions of power like Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke, but… crickets! She prefers photo-ops at British Army bases of her riding around in tanks and pointing a rifle at point-blank range at the chest of an Army cadet. But then he was a White Man, so the press said nothing. You’d never see her pointing a rifle at the chest of an Ethnic African or Muslim cadet now, would you?
Because of the cult net zero. Islam is a theocracy considered to hold tenets that are “green”.
“History demonstrates that Islam does not simply coexist with other cultures when it achieves dominance; rather, it replaces them. The Islamization of formerly Christian nations was not an overnight process but a gradual shift through migration, conquest, and social pressure. Today, Western nations must consider the lessons of history as they grapple with the consequences of large-scale Muslim immigration. The decline of Christianity in its historic homelands serves as a warning: cultural transformation is often irreversible.”
https://www.christianactivities.com/islams-takeover-of-nations-a-historical-perspective-its-relevance-to-the-west/
Are there any Spurs fans out there who might feel a bit of ‘anti-Muslim hostility’ come on when seeing this? I didn’t have a problem with them having a drink of water and scoffing a date, which takes all of 30 seconds, but this is definitely taking liberties, in my view. Isn’t this what mosques are for?
”MORE BAD NEWS FOR SPURS FANS. A “HISTORIC FIRST” CALL TO PRAYER BLARES OUT AT TOTTENHAM HOTSPUR STADIUM JUST NOW. Another venue colonised this Ramadan.”
https://x.com/sirwg202110/status/2029996415057842294
Who decided to rent it out for the purpose? Is the stadium privately owned?
It’s majority owned by an investment group called Enic, apparently. Makes you wonder if the Muslims approached these guys or if it was the other way around. Also what did they do in previous years for their Iftar if this is a “first”? Didn’t Windsor Castle do similar last year, also the House of Commons? They’ve certainly gotten well established and comfortable in recent years, haven’t they?
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/c75q6zwpz6ko
I find that caterwauling racket offensive.
Did they play ‘Jerusalem’ first, I wonder?
https://youtu.be/rTOCKLfClwk?si=tx7oJ-ZwAUwGJXYe
Shouldn’t it be an Islamophobia shah?
Or Islamophobia Sultan.
Will it be illegal to say our ancestors regarded this odious religion as the work of the devil?
There are plenty of books referring to the infidel – must they be burned?
A phobia is an irrational fear. Islam tells its followers to kill those who will not submit, it’s entirely reasonable to fear this mediaeval cult which has never had an enlightenment because it claims to be the final revealed word of its deity.
Why do we need someone who wants to prevent us defending ourselves against people who want to kill us?
In this case I would hardly call it an irrational fear, especially if you are a white schoolgirl.
Seems a bit extreme.
What’s the difference between a Tzar and a Caliph?
A Tsar is a Russian Christian who is slaughtered along with his entire family by Communists, and a Caliph is a Muslim who sends troops to Balkan Christian villages to kidnap blond children as sex slaves, the little boys forcibly circumcised, and some forced to be janissaries, while others are forcibly castrated to become his harem guards, and the little girls are imprisoned in his harems.
Neither sounds very good.
I am puzzled by this British government. They could not create more antagonism if they tried.
Mahmood said that “English” is not a racial category but a civic/national identity, meaning anyone who belongs to and participates in British society can be English regardless of ethnicity. Starmer telling Muslims that they are the face of modern Britain.
This has now created a bit of an issue on X with people posting their pictures as the face of modern Britain and their English ancestry.
There is no English Parliament. There is no English Passport. There is no English national anthem. “English” is an ethnicity.
The civic identity is “British.”
“Too Right Wing”?——–But isn’t right wing politics legitimate? —-The Leftist Political Class think we should all be Liberal Progressives and want to de-legitimise and even criminalise right wing thought, opinion and world view. ——-We are only to have Government Approved opinions and thought and social media will be trawled, people silenced, banned and even arrested for thought crimes in a supposedly FREE COUNTRY. We now arrest more people for “words” than Russia and China do. ——This is a diabolical disgrace.
No Jewphobia tsar? No Old White Guy tsar? No Hinduphobia tsar? No Black Problems tsar? No Disabled tsar?
Then the proposed new cohesion strategy must fail as division is baked in from the start.
I presume they’ll also be creating an anti-Jew hostility Tsar …. to be based in Aston, Birmingham/
Oh, and an anti-British hostility Tsar to deal specifically with Pakistani-Muslim hostility towards young, white, working class girls. Actually, they’ll need at least 50 of them ….in all the towns cities where the rape gangs have been allowed to operate for decades.
So once again protecting a cult that is abhorrent to our culture and laws, this pathetic “government” firmly believes we are all stupid, and it can do what it chooses, I rather suspect it will find out it cannot, they also refuse to put a stop to pakistani nationals coming to this country, why?.
Its not cohesion strategy, its a forced adhesion strategy
It is a pity the Complete works of Shakespeare has not been adopted as our bible. This would never have happened.
Will they be as effective as the Antisemitism Tsar? Who is that by the way, never seen or heard from them, but there is one.
Anti-Semitism goes through the roof so we get an Islamophobia Tsar: ‘Protecting What Matters’ – it is clear what does and does not matter to this gov’t.
Anti-Christianaphobia Czar next?
‘Protecting What Matters’
Starmer’s backside?
And here’s a crucial bit that the government tried to conceal in this “Social Cohesion” document: Flying a Union Jack flag is branded a ‘tool of hate’ in Government’s leaked ‘social cohesion’ strategy | Daily Mail Online “Flying English, Scottish and Union Jack flags has been branded ‘tools of hate’ in a leaked draft of the Government’s new social cohesion strategy.” Welsh dragon flags weren’t included, apparently, but people must understand that the Unholy Muslim-Marxist Alliance isn’t upset by ANY OTHER FLAG EXCEPT ENGLAND’S. The England Flag is the real target: Muslims hate it because it was the flag of the Crusaders, and Communists hate it because it is flown from Church of England towers. They’re going to hate it even more when they find out that the England Flag is The Banner of the Lamb: JOHN THE BAPTIST, THE TRUE CHRIST, non-identical twin brother of Jesus the Forerunner, both born to their mother E-lizabeth at Ein Karem 2000 years ago, before newborn E-zus (there was no “J” in ancient Hebrew) was stolen by the Impostor calling herself “Virgin Mary”, who smuggled him seven miles away to Bethlehem, so she could claim he was born in the City of David, and… Read more »