Poet Launches High Court Challenge Claiming She Was “Cancelled” by Taxpayer-Funded Arts Magazine Because She Held “Problematic” Gender-Critical Views
A taxpayer-funded arts magazine has “cancelled” a poet for her gender-critical views. The Mail has the story.
Lawyers representing Abigail Ottley have filed papers accusing Arts Council England (ACE) of failing to properly investigate her complaint against the Aftershock Review (TAR), after a poem she submitted which had been confirmed for publication was then rejected because of the poet’s “social media presence”.
Award-winning Ms Ottley, 73, believes biological sex is immutable and entirely separate to “gender identity”. …
The pre-action letter from law firm Conrathe Gardner alleged that Ms Ottley also endured an abusive marriage with a “cross-dresser who sought to pass as a woman”. This encouraged her to hold “gender-critical views especially in regard to the need for women to have safe and single sex spaces”.
It continued: “While Ms Ottley has used her social media accounts to re-tweet posts by high profile campaigners for women’s rights and single sex spaces, which she considers are invaluable for women’s safety privacy and dignity, including for example J.K. Rowling, this is not and cannot be a lawful reason to refuse to publish Ms Ottley’s poetry.”
Miss Ottley, a former teacher from Penzance, Cornwall, accused ACE of “failing to investigate the matter with proper rigour”.
She said: “On social media I have simply re-tweeted messages from gender-critical people whom I support, who believe that a man is a man and a woman is a woman.
“I am tired of women like myself having to self-censor to avoid being ‘silenced’ or ‘excluded’.”
The pre-action letter said ACE’s decade-long ‘Let’s Create’ strategy is underpinned by four investment principles including inter alia “Inclusivity”. It added: “Here inclusivity cannot possibly mean ‘inclusivity’ of only those whose opinions we agree with, it must be inclusivity of a diversity of lawful ideas: including gender critical ones.” …
The magazine publishes “poetry shaped by survival, identity and lived experience” and aims to celebrate “new and established voices looking at the aftershocks of experience”.
Ms Ottley submitted work for TAR’s first issue and was informed on September 18th that a poem had been selected for publication.
But on October 14th the poet was informed that her prose had been withdrawn by the publication, following an “internal review”. An email went on: “In light of concerns raised about your social media presence, we’ve decided not to proceed with publishing your work in this issue. As a trauma-informed and inclusive publication, the Aftershock Review has a duty of care to ensure our contributors and readers feel safe and respected. This decision reflects our commitment to those principles and is final.”
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Award-winning Ms Ottley, 73, believes biological sex is immutable and entirely separate to “gender identity”. …
Sex is ONLY biological
I doubt anyone believes sex is mutable
What they claim to believe is that being a man or woman can be defined by some means other than sex
Your gender is the same as your sex unless you are a foreign language such as German or Latin with has a neuter. In many areas we have male and female and possibly a ‘gender bender’. Trying joining 2 bolts together or 2 nuts, 2 electrical plugs or sockets while a gender bender is either 2 males or 2 females.
You’d be surprised (or more likely not). The beeb article about the Tumbler Ridge shootings quoted the police as saying the sick fk “…was born as a biological male who approximately six years ago began to transition to female”. So the police really didn’t get it and the beeb didn’t correct it.
I don’t think everyone thinks about this topic in high resolution. Their definitions are woolly and they’re trying not to get cancelled themselves.
I rather think the police don’t for a second think you can change your “biological sex”. People tallk about “preferred pronouns”. That seems to me a massive giveaway. If they thought you could actually change sec then the pronouns are not “preferred” but simply accurate. Beyond a tiny number of actual nutcases the whole thing is a big windup exercise.
They are, mostly, not pronouns at all. See the dictionary definition of the word “pronoun”.
If the poem itself was deemed acceptable, then her personal views should have no bearing on the matter.
I detest this grievance archaeology.
When society was at the village scale and there was no social media, your cancellation/exile for disobeying the norms of the village was understandable if not necessarily just. You’d probably be able to just go about your life somewhere else.
Now there’s a semi-permanent record of your utterances for people to trawl through.
I’m a child of the 70s and I’m so glad my early life was conducted entirely offline. I don’t post anything on social media now. It’s not an entirely benign medium and the societal impact has been massive.
How odd, no News Round-Up… did nothing happen yesterday? 🤷🏼
ESG (Environmental and Social Governance) the tyranny that no one voted for but everyone must align with ——or you will be removed from all of Polite Society.
Denunciation as a tool for political repression. And they say Nazi Germany “could NEVER happen in England!”