Overhaul Equality Act to Save £10 Billion on “Bloated” HR Departments, says Think Tank

The Equality Act and other invidious diversity rules should be overhauled to save Britain £10 billion a year on “bloated” HR departments, a study from Policy Exchange has said. The Telegraph has more.

Policy Exchange, a Right-leaning think tank, said growth and innovation are being stifled by campaigns for inclusion and equality, as companies hire staff to pursue political ends rather than serving customers.

Britain’s HR sector has grown by 83% since 2011, expanding more than five times as fast as overall employment over the same period.

It means 1.6% of the workforce is now employed in human resources, far above America’s 1% and double the EU’s 0.8%. This translates into more than 200,000 workers, with incomes estimated at £10 billion per year.

Zachary Marsh, at Policy Exchange, called for the most damaging rules to be culled to boost the economy.

“If the Government is serious about growth, it should start by getting its own house in order and scrapping burdensome equality, diversity and inclusion rules and guidance that has created a mass of shadow regulation that businesses feel obligated to follow,” he said.

It follows growing concern on the British Right that regulations aimed at reducing discrimination have come at the expense of growth.

Iain Mansfield, the Director of Research at Policy Exchange and a co-author of the report, said the total cost is likely to be significantly higher, with the total impact on the economy “several times the direct costs”.

“These include such as anti-meritocratic hiring and ‘positive action’ schemes, the diversion of focus away from delivering for consumers towards regulatory compliance, and the overall impact of making the UK a less attractive place to invest and do business,” he said.

The report found that legislation has been supercharged by excessive regulation, a series of legal rulings and campaigns by activists.

This includes rulings which take the requirement of “equal pay for work of equal value” and apply it to different types of jobs.

Birmingham City Council paid cooks, cleaners and care staff – who were predominantly female – less than bin collectors and road workers, who are more likely to be men.

In another long-running case, workers are seeking as much as £1.2 billion from Asda for paying warehouse staff who are predominantly men more than shop floor workers who are largely female.

Worth reading in full.

The report calls for “systematic and comprehensive reforms to put business back in the driving seat” including:

  • Extensive reform of the Equality Act by repealing the Public Sector Equality Duty, removing the clauses that permit “positive action” and tightening up the rules on equal pay to prevent abuse.
  • Abolishing all EDI requirements in public procurement.
  • Directing every regulator to review their guidance and revise and repeal all elements that promote EDI activities beyond core duties of non discrimination.
  • Scrapping all regulatory requirements for identity-based targets on boards.
  • Abolishing diversity requirements in advertising, broadcasting and other regulated industries.

How very sensible.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JAMSTER
JAMSTER
1 month ago

Restore the name Personnel to all these wretched “HR” departments. It’s just yet another ghastly Americanism import, designed to destroy our language. When I started work, Personnel departments were relatively small and run by a Personnel Manager who knew his job was to support Management and the Board by managing staff matters & admin. The wretched legion of modern “HR” departments regard it as their role to IMPOSE their decisions and beliefs onto Management and justify their existence with endless box-ticking garbage such as DEI, ESG and all the rest of the anti-production efficiency woke gibberish.

EppingBlogger
1 month ago
Reply to  JAMSTER

I agree but I note that management, especially of big companies, refuised to pout up any resistance to wokery. Often new rules were negotiated on HR and other regulatory issues with trade associations. These were captured and realised they would need more staff and greater status.

When objectionable new rulkes came in too rarely was any complaint made to the trade associations and very rarely indeed was that passed on to the government.

Mogwai
1 month ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

”I agree but I note that management, especially of big companies, refuised to pout up any resistance to wokery.” Precisely. A significant detail which many refuse to acknowledge, in their haste to focus exclusively on HR departments instead, as if an HR manager could ever outrank a CEO, Chief Constable, or other leader of an organization when introducing and implementing company policy. There’s been many notable examples, plenty of which have been featured on this site over the years. An obvious one being the RAF, and the irony with this particular example is that it was a female head of recruitment that resigned due to her unwillingness to go along with her boss: Sir Mike Wigston’s ”positive discrimination” woke DEI targets that unlawfully disadvantaged white men. Tell me again how this nonsense is allegedly ”manufactured and pushed by women”, because evidence to the contrary is all around and will forever refute this bogus assertion; ”Initiatives to increase the numbers of women and people from ethnic minorities in the RAF led to unlawful positive discrimination, an inquiry has found. The head of the RAF has admitted some men were discriminated against. The internal inquiry was sparked by the resignation of a… Read more »

Grim Ace
Grim Ace
1 month ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Women started it and there are plenty of male feminists and beta boys who cave in to this bullshit because they are either leftists, or because it is fashionable, or because they have no choice or risk losing their job.
Mike Wigston had a choice, handed down by a feminised, beta, Tory government: implement this socialist bull, or be sacked. He could have resigned, but didn’t.

Mogwai
1 month ago
Reply to  Grim Ace

”Women started it..”, so says the spokesman for the resident Misogynist Society. Because women will always be the villains of the piece, according to you lot, won’t we? Men must never ever be held accountable for their actions or poor decision-making. Not when there’s a woman in a subordinate role to scapegoat.
Please feel free to provide some supporting evidence for that claim at your earliest convenience.

Meanwhile, is Chief Constable John Robins one of your ”male feminists” too? Maybe he became demasculinized when his wife asked him to load the dishwasher;

”A police chief has doubled down on his “racist” recruitment policy demanding the legalisation of “positive discrimination” against white British applicants.
Chief Constable John Robins has regularly pushed for the law to be changed to favour ethnic minorities in West Yorkshire Police – urging other forces to follow suit across the country.”

https://www.gbnews.com/news/police-chief-racist-recruitment-policy-positive-discrimination

Grim Ace
Grim Ace
1 month ago
Reply to  JAMSTER

HR ia a feminist job designed to allow female demands and psychology into the workplace. Woman should be under the control of men at work. Almost all surveys find that women prefer to be led by males. Unsurprisingly given that this is the finale biological psychological programme.

Mogwai
1 month ago
Reply to  Grim Ace

To work in HR is it a prerequisite that a woman must be a Grand Master of Jedi mind control? Voodoo? Well there must be some way she’s able to have the male gaffer by the short and curlies, exerting her wicked, feminized willpower so she can enforce her influence, right? 😮

Just Stop it Now
1 month ago
Reply to  JAMSTER

“……run by a Personnel Manager who know HIS job…..” You don’t see many male HR managers these days. In fact I always used to think that its such a wet job for any red blooded male to want to do.

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
1 month ago

It needs to be repealed not modified.

Grim Ace
Grim Ace
1 month ago

Its a feminist and socialist poison to business and getting a job done. I attended an international meeting to discuss training requirements for workers at sea, and it spent hours talking about being nice to workers and bullying and harassment- and the only reason this is on the agenda is because women are at sea, in very small numbers (which generates lots of angst for the females who, typically, want an easy life foe the same pay as men).
Women are a direct burden on any industry where male physical and psychological strength, resilience and grit are required. Get them out of manly jobs.

Mogwai
1 month ago
Reply to  Grim Ace

😂🤣🤡
I take it you’ve not had much luck with the ladies, then…? Can’t for the life of me understand why..🤔

RTSC
RTSC
1 month ago

It doesn’t need overhauling. It should just be scrapped.