On Right-Wing Reshuffles
Everyone is now looking at the fractured but exploding Right, and we see Badenoch’s competent and adjusting Conservative party, Farage’s rising and agglomerating Reform party, Lowe’s acclaimed but minor Restore Britain party, and various other parties, such as Ben Habib’s Advance UK, and less respectable ones such as the Homeland party. Everywhere there are splinters and factions, and of course reactions, as in the comical shifting sideways (like the Welshmen at Sports Day in Decline and Fall) of some conservatives into The Case for the Centre Right territory now occupied by Amber Rudd and the others who want to keep conservatism out of populism (whatever that is: it is a code word) and so have formed Prosper UK.
- Prosper!
- Advance!
- Reform!
- Restore!
What is going on with all these two-syllabled imperatives?
To read the rest of this article, you need to donate at least £5/month or £50/year to the Daily Sceptic, then create an account on this website. The easiest way to create an account after you’ve made a donation is to click on the ‘Log In’ button on the main menu bar, click ‘Register’ underneath the sign-in box, then create an account, making sure you enter the same email address as the one you used when making a donation. Once you’re logged in, you can then read all our paywalled content, including this article. Being a Donor will also entitle you to comment below the line and access the premium content in the Sceptic, our weekly podcast. A one-off donation of at least £5 will also entitle you to the same benefits for one month. You can donate here.
There are more details about how to create an account, and a number of things you can try if you’re already a donor – and have an account – but cannot access the above perks on our Premium page.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
You excluded the Heritage Party!
David Kurtens Party I think .
Yes, just what Britain needs, either an Ethnic African Jamaican Kurten, or an Ethnic African Nigerian Adegoke, or an Ethnic Indian Pakistani Habib, or an Ethnic Egyptian Muslim (Laila Ahmed El-Meleigy Cunningham), or an Ethnic Indian Sri Lankan Muslim (Mohammed Zia Yusuf), to represent the Indigenous British People as their Leader on the world stage. Not.
That’s a tum-ti-tiddly-tum-tum…. I think.
Or it might be an I-tiddly-I-Ti… once can never be sure.
Reform are plagiarising all of Advance UK’s policies
You cannot plagiarise common sense and principle.
Yes, Pakistani Coat-tail Rider Habib has reportedly been shrieking against Rupert Lowe, calling him a “dictator”, because Rupert Lowe had the steely determination not to be forced into alliances with Habib or any other party or Third World Ethnic, but to stand up for the Indigenous British People.
Rupert Lowe is the only one who had the courage to tell young White Men that’s there’s nothing wrong with being White, or Male, or Straight.
Despite my doubts about Farage and Reform, they are the only party capable of disrupting the uni-party, so they will have my support for the time being
I don’t think it’s possible to have a party that can satisfy the dreams and desires of the entire population, especially as society is not cohesive at the moment. I think we need radical change which judging from the history of the UK is possible. The Catholics and Protestants eventually found a way, although it was always used by certain sects for political gain. A way was found and it was very successful, largely due to not having to adhere too much to outside religious influence. I think this was the thrust of Reform’s recent press conference in which they started to flesh out their way forward. I found it quite encouraging because they are trying to find a way forward that is tough enough without being too authoritarian.
The only way to have a party that satisfies even one person’s dreams is to start your own. Compromise is always necessary if you want to win. Division will without doubt confirm the continuation of the uniparty. Remember Farage is the man who brought us out ofthe EU, he is definitely not uniparty.
I agree though Farage does come across as a person who likes doing stuff whereas what I think we need is someone who wants to undo stuff. We shall see, hopefully
Is ‘undoing stuff’ not also ‘doing stuff’..?
Yes indeed
I just have the feeling that the urge to replace stuff with other stuff will be too great
People go into politics to make a difference, not to be low key caretakers
But I’m a crackpot and in a tiny minority even here
I think he wants to.do both.
It does seem to me that the Conservatives are still conservatives. As the left have changed the political position towards the left the Cons have not shifted it back to where it was and as you say have avoided politiking in a real sense. so the last thing we need is Cons. We quite definitely need to change the Overton window and move it in a direction that I hesitate to call right. Things have changed dramatically since the postwar period, but going back to those days is simply not possible. We definitely need a decent health service but to me it’s really a matter of how it’s structured and delivered. Unfortunately it was ill conceived at birth and like all state controlled entities has fallen under the jackboot of left wing politics. Quangos have been a disaster in that they are a product of authoritarianism and seem to be politically aligned and unreformable. Unfortunately we need radical change to how the country is governed and that will mean a painful transition. Decisions will have to be made that the left will use to further demoralise the country, it’s what they do, they have nothing else to offer. But if… Read more »
NO they conservatives are not still conservatives. They morphed into Labour Lite. It was a so called conservative that gave us the Net Zero Amendment in 2019. —-A proper Conservative like Thatcher who never have indulged in such self flagellating harm. ——They are realising some of their mistakes now but not fast enough and not hard enough and will never form a government with the overgrown school girl (Badenoch) in charge, who sounds like a sixth former in the high school debating society.
I used the dictionary definition of Conservative, not an ideological definition.
This is a political item on the Sceptic. if you are going to talk about Conservatives it will be assumed by most people you are referring to Politics. Because “conservative can mean “not liking change or anything new”, or “dressing unfashionably”, or “a guess that doesn’t overestimate”——This article is a political one so when you talk about the Conservative party you should be referring to the Political meaning of the word, not about whether someone dresses in way out clothes or not, or any other definitions you will see in the dictionary.
Well the politics and meaning you used are in more or less the same but I did say ideological not political. There is a difference you know, perhaps you should consult your dictionary.
But the proof in what I said is easy to demonstrate. During the atrocious New Labour years they passed lots of very bad laws and when the Cons were in power they did not change them back. They were maintaining the status quote by being conservative. One of the most awful things they did was to oppose university fees when Labour introduced them, in fact Labour relied on votes of Scottish MPs to push through fees in England. Labour did not introduce the fees as far as I can see. But when the Tory/LibDems came to power they use this piece of legislation to start charging students. So they kept things as they were and still are. The were being Conservative in maintaining and enacting existing laws of the day instead of having the guts to repeal them.
The left know that bribes get votes. People don’t want principle when they can vote for FREE STUFF. —-“Oh look if I vote Labour I will get sick pay from day one” and so they stick an X in the box accordingly.
Sadly that’s true. The problem Labour has is that it has already run out of other people’s money.
I like Rupert Lowe. I appreciate his willingness to be unpopular by speaking his mind about Islamism and by conducting his own enquiry into the rape gangs. I’m not convinced he’ll be in any position to challenge the next election, but if it looks like he really can then I’d consider giving him my vote.
I think he’s far more authentic than Farage and Reform. Lowe’s stance on these topics is forcing Reform to mimic some of his policies, but I wonder if they’d go as far as he would.
Lowe wants to reverse all illegal migration, remove all financial incentives, get the leechers and foreign criminals out, freeze almost all legal routes in, get rid of any who actively hate us, reassert our ancestral claim to this country and tell those who object to jog on.
I think it would be fierce but I’d love all that to be done.
The author makes a good observation. I’d rather not have become so overtly political but since the torment of lockdown it seems they’re constantly goading me to react.
I too find Lowe more convincing than the others. Getting rid of people who actively hate us sounds good but seems impractical unless they are here illegally or are here on a visa that can be revoked if they commit serious crimes.
It is an appealing fantasy, but one which ignores the practicality of delivering such change.
Only Rupert Lowe has insisted that Restore Britain’s electoral candidates will NOT be politicians (I think he should ban lawyers as well), but will be ordinary Indigenous British people from all other walks of life.
He really does intend to “Restore Britain” and Parliament to what Parliament was for centuries: not composed of lawyers and politicians and Third World Ethnics, because political parties did not even exist until the 17th century, before which local people chose respectable citizens from all walks of life to represent their local and regional interests in Parliament.
Restore Britain’s membership has now surpassed 80,000, only a couple of weeks after Rupert Lowe announced it as a political party.
And news just today on Rupert Lowe’s website says their membership is now well over 90,000, and heading toward 100,000.
The Tories lost 8000 party members soon after Olukemi Olufunto took over as leader, and have about 123,000 members now.
Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party has about 153,000.
The Liberal Democrats were reported to have only 60,000 last year.
Reform says 270k+ on their website, although they seem to have turned off the counter
Exploding Right? More like a few dead birds felling off.
“… we see Badenoch’s competent and adjusting Conservative Party..”
What you mean “we” Paleface?
You may see that, but others see the same old passel of shysters with a new frontman/woman.
Someone who says it as it is. But as it seems that you persevered beyond “… we see Badenoch’s competent and adjusting Conservative Party” a synopsis of the rest would be appreciated.
I was tempted to stop reading at that point
In all of this Farage has denounced ‘ethno-nationalism’ which is where we English want to live in a country that is English and not full of invading colonisers. And he makes no mention of remigrating the scum back where they came from but has this dumb idea that the monoculture areas in all our cities and large towns will magically integrate.
Indeed though I doubt he thinks that integration will occur, he just chooses not to tackle that issue because he thinks it might lose him more votes than it gains him or it’s just too difficult (and it’s certainly not easy).