The Nutty £4 Billion Scheme to Pipe Carbon Dioxide 120 Miles That Risks Asphyxiating Those in its Path
Only a complete eco-nutter would want to compress carbon dioxide to dangerous asphyxiating levels and then run it through a three foot-wide near-surface metal pipe costing at least half a billion pounds, along a 120-mile path near human conurbations strewn with subsidence-causing, uncharted, ancient mines. At a hopefully intact end, the highly pressurised CO2 is then tipped into a former gas hole in the Irish Sea where over time it is likely to escape as the numerous mining caps start to fail. Add in another £4 billion for the whole pointless and potentially dangerous carbon capture project, and it is all in a day’s spending for the Miliband-led lunatics. Small change, of course, for the lying (‘wind is cheaper than gas’), dishonest (‘grid will be 95% renewables in 46 months’ time’) freaks involved in a political attempt to wreck the British economy on the pretext that ‘settled’ science says we should all freak out about the gas of life.
The Peak Cluster CO2 pipeline is in early planning and public consultation stages, and it aims to take the gas from four cement and lime factories in Derbyshire and Staffordshire. It will run through Staffordshire, Cheshire and the Wirral and connect to an offshore storage site in depleted gas reserves under Morecambe Bay. The pipeline is said to be the world’s largest cement decarbonisation initiative, capturing three million tonnes of CO2 a year. This amounts to just 0.00008% of global emissions, or if you prefer fractions, 1/1,266,667. The effect on any global temperature movement can fairly be said to be unmeasurable. In total, the sinister, hard-Left Net Zero minister Miliband plans to spend over £20 billion of borrowed state money to capture equally miniscule amounts of CO2 in a number of other sites over the next 20 years.
But at least impoverished UK taxpayers can sleep easy in their beds knowing they are leading the world in exciting new green technologies.
Here is the route map for the pipeline of potential death.

The pipeline will be put in a trench about three feet from the surface, although more tricky laying will be need across roads, watercourses and railway lines. A number of above-ground inspection installations are promised, while block-valve stations for the high pressure steel pipeline will be mostly buried. The route is designed to avoid densely populated areas but it does pass through the outskirts of several towns and villages. Areas on the pipeline route are likely to be Chapel-en-le-Frith, Macclesfield, Cranage, Tarporley, Picton, Ellesmere Port, Willaston and Leasowe in the Wirral.
The technology for moving gas around at pressure is well understood. Natural gas sometimes escapes and this can be problematic in a closed space. But natural methane gas is lighter than air and quickly disperses in open areas. In normal dilute quantities, CO2 is a harmless, non-toxic gas breathed out by humans. But it is heavier than air – nearly three times the weight of methane – and in still, windless, open air conditions it sinks like a stone to the ground, displacing oxygen, and quickly suffocates any trapped humans and animals.
If carbon capture and storage was fracking for gas, it would have been banned years ago. Pumping pressurised, suffocating gas across populated areas and tipping it into rock cavities possibly compromised by prior drilling holes might be considered slightly more dangerous than the largely invented ‘earthquakes’ said to be caused by fracking that are equivalent to someone falling off a chair. The true horror of CO2 asphyxiation was shown on August 21st 1986 with a sudden high pressure release of magmatic CO2 from the bed of Lake Nyos in Cameroon, killing all living beings in the surrounding villages, including 1,746 people.
This was a freak occurrence and would not happen on this scale with a rupture of the Peak Cluster pipeline. But danger on a smaller scale remains, particularly if the infrastructure is not expensively maintained to the highest standards. Needless to say, supporters of the scheme are downplaying any risks. The promoters make their safety claims, but they also hint at the large wasted costs needed for a project that is a massive wealth destroyer: “We will ensure rigorous monitoring mechanisms are in place along the CO2 pipeline. The operation of the pipeline will be monitored continuously, and block valves will be used to safely shut down the pipeline should the need arise”.
But local opposition to the pipeline is steadily growing. A Change.org petition launched last month to stop the project, noted that a CO2 pipeline in Satartia, Mississippi, ruptured and this resulted in asphyxiation and hospitalisation of 50 people, with many suffering ongoing health issues. The accident in 2020 was caused by a weld failure in a 24-inch pipe after heavy rain caused soil movement. About 6,000 tonnes of CO2 were released, and this could have been twice that amount if a proposed 36-inch Peak Cluster pipe had been used. Other local concerns have been expressed about the construction impacts on habitats, farming land and watercourse damage. Labour Wirral councillor Mark Skillicorn observed that “Wirral should not be treated as England’s carbon dioxide dump”.
The biggest danger is probably a pipe rupture in the middle of a still night next to human habitation. Sadly, that is a possibility in areas full of unknown old mines. In July 2024, a three-foot sinkhole suddenly appeared on the A6015 Hayfield Rd. Subsequent investigation linked it to a collapsed old mining culvert about 15 feet below the surface.
The sinkhole, which took a number of weeks to repair, is located about six miles from the proposed path of the Peak Cluster pipeline.
Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor. Follow him on X.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I really *really* hope that in the future Milliband, Starmer and anyone else responsible for authorising the colossal waste of taxpayers’ money on such projects are imprisoned because of them.
This project is utterly pointless. Worthy of ridicule.
Just seeing them held responsible would be a start. Those you name are only the current priests of the warmest religion.
The Climate Change Act was passed with only opposition from five MPs so you can see that all the old parties and almost all their MPs are also responsible.
Sadly the Tories would probably have given it go ahead too had they been elected to office. Two crazy cheeks of the same ar@e!
There is someone on the Lockdown Sceptics subreddit who has land affected by this
Anyone who wants to know some first hand details should pop along and ask- just post in the daily chat
My family comes from Cambridgeshire where I was born. An enormous solar farm is being built all around on first class land.
Locals who were keen on green policies now don’t like this type of green.
Lovely county from what I have seen of it – crazy to think it’s now filling up with bloody “liberals”. I moved to the Home Counties from London to get away from them and they are pursuing me.
My friend also works for the wildlife trust in that area. Going to be watching this one with interest.
Our local wildlife trust is one of the few charities I still give money too. I expect they are hopelessly woke at the top but they do actually do some useful work looking after some lovely spaces in my area.
Are our Political Class really brainwashed into thinking CO2 is as dangerous as having to go to these absurd and extreme lengths? Or what is really going on here? We in the UK emit 1% of the worlds human emissions of CO2, yet for some reason we are to pretend to save the planet harder and faster than every other country. Is it because we are not really world leaders in anything anymore that we have this self flagellating need to be important planet savers, and everyone else will follow along like little Corgi’s? ——We stuff concrete in gas wells, we spend billions on carbon sucking machines, we ration energy via smart meters, we coerce car companies into selling EV’s or they get fined, we force heat pumps on people, we lecture and cajole and brainwash children in schools. Are we out of our minds? —-YES. There is no climate crisis. The IPCC recently said “Worst case scenario’s from our climate models are very unlikely to occur”——–The whole thing is an eco socialist SCAM
Alas, at least half the population of this country are so dimwitted and gullible, they think there is an issue to redress, you know who they are, they are the ones who …. Banged pots and pans, extended arms, erected Perspex sheets, wore a thin paper mask, stood slightly further apart, think asylum seekers are wonderful, love multiculturalism, vote Lib Dem/green/labour, drive a battery powered eco disaster, put solar panels on there roof, think windmills will give us cheap electricity and probably think there are more than two genders and mentally unwell men in dresses are really women…. Sadly, the re-education of these virtue signalling naive cretins is not possible as the supporting cast appear to actually want this country to collapse into a third world slum, an no, they don’t have a coherent reason….
Yep—–But most people are too busy with work and family life to investigate every issue. They think the TV news and assorted Media are doing that for them. They are ofcourse sadly mistaken. Mainstream Media are bought and paid for and exist as the Propaganda Wing of the Global Government people at the UN and WEF who use irrational fear of a a climate apocalypse as the excuse for control of wealth, resources and YOU. ——-When you speak to friends and family you will see that no matter what you say to them, they have already decided what is true because it has been repeated endlessly on their Telly. I recall one time saying to a few relatives that Polar Bear Numbers have increased 5 fold in the last 50 years and they all turned to look at me as if I were from Mars. The “climate crisis” has been embedded in their brains and there is no shifting it. This is the power of propaganda where facts evidence and reason play second fiddle to REPETITION.
I’m sure it’s pure coincidence but it does seem to coincide with the increase in University education as brought in by Blair !!
Here’s evidence that deindustrialisation has been the establishment’s policy for 50 years.
Thanks for that—-Looking at it now. It has been obvious though for a a very long time what is going on in the new Technocracy.
The seventies and eighties was a troubling time. We had the destructive union canons to the left of us and the City banking cartels to the right of us.
A raving Marxist like his father, red Ed is using capitalism to destroy capitalism. Money is being poured into hare-brained moribund schemes to bring about the downfall of the Capitalist state.
Crony capitalism rather than capitalism?
Ooh.. Ed Moribund. I hadn’t thought of that one!
Non-solution to non-problem – certifiable state-sponsored insanity.
They are not bothered about anything or anyone other than destroying our economy & health
This is exactly the kind of thing that Ed would do.
Powerful first paragraph, impressive.
If these cement and lime factories prduce so much CO2 as to make this project worth while, they must burn a lot of fuel. When rising fuel costs drive them oveseas, or out of business, then what for the pipeline? Money well wasted!
I was suprised that we still had any cement and lime works in this country.
Sorry, I am now completely confused by these morons. I thought the CAN bill that the greens, Milibrain and the limpdums are so keen on calls for the end of the use of hydrocarbon fuels. That being the case, surely what they want to do is bulldoze these evil monstrosities not pipe the CO2 somewhere else. Which is it, numbnuts, stop producing it or sweep it under the carpet? You can’t campaign for both. Alternatively, you could just get the hell out of the way and let British industry prosper and become competitive
The pipeline should be rerouted via North London where Miliband lives.
Or, through his constituency! After all it was his constituents that gifted this lunatic in our midst.
Well, you never know, but there could be one or two crooks tapping into it to, err, improve the performance of their greenhouses! Cheaper than making your own, they might observe.
CO2 from fossil fuels has enabled large increases in plant growth. If it is stopped, there will be starvation.
You can be pretty sure that in a few years time, when the narrative changes to “we need more CO2 to support endangered plant life”, the owners of this heavily subsidised, captured CO2 will only be too happy to provide it at premium prices.
I can’t sign the petition because it supports the narrative that CO2 is a dangerous gas and suggests alternatives to its capture, all totally unnecessary
It’s a shame we don’t have a specific rule that any MP who is a lunatic is required to stand down from his seat.
I am a Wirral resident and this green grifter cash cow is certainly testing the net zero commitment of some fellow residents. Interesting to see the amount cash offered to landowners to allow the lunacy on their patch. We also have a 27 hectare solar farm planned for an area of outstanding beauty. The green lunacy is starting to become apparent to folk who thought it wouldn`t affect them.
This is horrific, not just the cost, but potential deaths, never read anything so ridiculous., they really do want us dead.
Utter lunacy. The UK should never have closed the mental asylums for the criminally insane, Miliband and those similarly complicit for example, to spare the country from all these idiotic schemes to no realistic benefit to the sane population.
The atmosphere and the oceans are in (local, dynamic) equilibrium. The oceans can hold at least 200 times as much CO2 as the atmosphere. Any CO2 Crazy Ed extracts from the atmosphere will quickly be replaced from the oceans. Similarly, as we add our 35 billion tonnes to the atmosphere each year, so the same quantity is dumped from the atmosphere into the oceans. The 700 billion tonnes of man-made CO2 (presently replacing natural CO2, not adding to the atmospheric content) is roughly equal to the amount we have added over the past 25 years.
[The true situation is highly nuanced, but the vast amount of money being wasted will not enable Crazy Ed to affect the atmosphere in the way he claims.]