News Round-Up

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

30 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Monro
1 month ago

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwyk4lz4e3eo ‘Only the Russian government had the means, motive and opportunity” to use the poison while Navalny was imprisoned in Russia.’ ‘The UK, Sweden, France, Germany and The Netherlands are confident that Alexei Navalny was poisoned with a lethal toxin. This is the conclusion of our Governments based on analyses of samples from Alexei Navalny. These analyses have conclusively confirmed the presence of epibatidine.’ The statement noted that the neurotoxin is found in poison of dart frogs in South America and is not found naturally anywhere in Russia. ‘Russia claimed that Navalny died of natural causes. But given the toxicity of epibatidine and reported symptoms, poisoning was highly likely the cause of his death. Navalny died while held in prison, meaning Russia had the means, motive and opportunity to administer this poison to him.’ The five countries said that Russia had repeatedly shown disregard for international law and the Chemical Weapons Convention, noting that in August 2020 they condemned the use of Novichok to poison Navalny. They also referred to the use of the substance in Salisbury in the UK which had led to the death of a British woman. ‘These latest findings once again underline the need to hold… Read more »

Monro
1 month ago
Reply to  Monro

https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2019-01/news/russia-blocks-consensus-cwc-conference

Russia, joined by China, introduced a draft decision that would have postponed the beginning of investigations until after an open-ended working group had reviewed the decision to start investigations. The Russian effort failed by a vote of 82–30.

Russia and Iran then fought to amend and vote down the 2019 OPCW program and budget. The program and budget is typically agreed by consensus in the OPCW Executive Council meeting preceding the conference of states-parties.

‘We should be under no illusion as to why we have not reached consensus,” the United Kingdom said in a statement Nov. 30. “A very small minority who have used, or defended those that use, chemical weapons have obstructed our efforts.’

‘In July 2024, the OPCW conducted its first technical visit to Ukraine, confirming the presence of RCAs on the battlefield in November 2024.The Netherlands and Germany…concluded that Russia’s use of chemicals against sheltering Ukrainian soldiers had become ‘standard practice and commonplace’. Their report noted that Russia released chemicals through modified and improvised munitions, such as using drones to drop light bulbs and bottles filled with chemicals.

The Ukrainian Ministry of Defence has reported over 9,000 incidents of banned chemical use by Russia.’

Talltone
Talltone
1 month ago
Reply to  Monro

This is the Daily Sceptic so I’m calling you out on the absurd official Skripal narrative. Here’s just one of several independent assessments of that inept MI5 psyop. The Navalny case may also be taken with a substantial pinch of salt. https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2021/04/pure-ten-points-i-just-cant-believe-about-the-official-skripal-narrative/

Monro
1 month ago
Reply to  Talltone

Your reference is not really authoritative, is it; particularly when Mr Murray says: ‘I do not know what happened, I only know what I do not believe…’ On the other side of the argument: ‘The December 2025 Dawn Sturgess Inquiry report concluded that the 2018 Salisbury Novichok poisoning of Dawn Sturgess was a direct result of a Russian assassination attempt on Sergei Skripal, with Vladimir Putin likely approving the operation. The report found the attack was “unsurvivable” and the Russian state responsible for the fatal, collateral poisoning.’ ‘The results of analysis by the OPCW designated laboratories of environmental and biomedical samples collected by the OPCW team confirm the findings of the United Kingdom’ ‘…the toxic chemical that intoxicated Mr Charles Rowley and Ms Dawn Sturgess…displays the toxic properties of a nerve agent, is the same toxic chemical that was found in the biomedical and environmental samples relating to the poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal and Mr Nicholas Bailey on 4 March 2018 in Salisbury. https://www.opcw.org/sites/default/files/documents/2018/09/s-1671-2018%28e%29.pdf So by all means call out Dstl Porton Down, OPCW and the Right Honourable Lord Hughes of Ombersley…but, given that Lord Hughes has been a lawyer for fifty six years, you’re going to need a bit… Read more »

Monro
1 month ago
Reply to  Monro

Navalny? He was administered more than a pinch of salt…he even found out himself who actually poisoned him the first time: ‘During the 49-minute conversation “Maxim” (Navalny) presses Kudryavtsev (FSB) for details of how Navalny was poisoned: ‘N: And on which piece of cloth was your focus on? Which garment had the highest risk factor? K: The underpants. N: The underpants. K: A risk factor in what sense? N: Where the concentration [of novichok] could be highest? K: Well, the underpants. N: Do you mean from the inner side or from the outer?.. K: Well, we were processing the inner side. This is what we were doing. N: Well, imagine some underpants in front of you, which part did you process? K: The inner, where the groin is. N: The groin? K: Well, the crotch, as they call it. There is some sort of seams there, by the seams. N: Wait, this is important. Who gave you the order to process the codpiece of the underpants? K: We figured this on our own. They told us to work on the inner side of the underpants. N: I am writing it down. The inner side. Ok… Do you remember the underwear’s… Read more »

Talltone
Talltone
1 month ago
Reply to  Monro

You are persistent, I’ll give you that, even though you base your arguments on official narratives. Here’s another link if you care to look and I can provide more. An enquiring mind should seek out as many sources of information as possible, even if they are outwith the confirmation bias comfort zone. https://off-guardian.org/?s=skripal&submit=Search

Monro
1 month ago
Reply to  Talltone

If you are on here, then you are supposed to be a sceptic.

Yet your first reference, a credible ex diplomat, says he doesn’t know what happened in Salisbury. That gets us nowhere.

Your second reference simply says ‘The Skripal “poisoning” was obviously bullshit’. This is not evidence. It is an unevidenced assertion.

But we are ‘sceptics’ so, let us say that we trust none of the sources on either side of the matter. What to do? We must simply look at the balance of probabilities and let the readership here decide:

‘By comprehensively cataloguing credibly reported poisonings since the 1920s…Collated data show that the number of incidents is far higher than commonly realized…the rise in suspected poisonings in post-Soviet Russia…is attractive to Russia’s intelligence services primarily because it offers a discreet way of silencing those who may threaten the new elite and the status quo.’

 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10736700.2023.2229691

Talltone
Talltone
1 month ago
Reply to  Monro

The second reference leads to 147 search results. Have you even bothered to scroll down the list?

Monro
1 month ago
Reply to  Monro

Yes. There is not one shred of credible evidence. How could there be?

And the balance of probabilities is heavily weighted against you.

So, for heavens sake, open your mind and engage brain…

Monro
1 month ago
Reply to  Monro

Example of nonsense presented as ‘evidence’:

‘…had the Skripals come into contact with it on the door handle of Mr Skripal’s house…They would either have died within a few minutes of coming into contact with it…’

In fact, ‘as any fule kno’, ‘skin contact rather than inhalation…is a slower method of entry into the body than inhalation, which allowed more time for intervention before the dose became fatal.

This is basic GCSE chemistry stuff, a two minute google search…

Both the Skripals and Navalny were immediately treated with Atropine. Atropine prevents immediate death from respiratory failure. Nerve agents work by blocking an enzyme called acetylcholinesterase, which leads to muscle failure. However, if a person can be kept alive, the body will eventually regenerate this enzyme. 

Monro
1 month ago
Reply to  Monro

Why were the Skripals immediately treated with atropine? They were immediately treated with atropine because the on site diagnosis was one of an overdose of harmful chemicals.

Navalny? Because it was blindingly obvious to everyone in Russia that he was a prime target for poisoning by the kleptocracy….

NeilParkin
1 month ago

Pressure mounts on King’s brother to face full police probe into evidence he exploited trade envoy role to help paedophile Jeffrey Epstein

After being heavily punished for accusations never heard in a court, Andrew should have a chance to make his defence. I cant help thinking that the ‘pressure is mounting’ in order to keep much more pressing matters off the front pages.

pjar
1 month ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

I doubt if Andrew has the humility to take any advice on the matter but, after being undone by his arrogance in the car-crash Maitliss interview, I would counsel him to plead the fifth… but yes, the Epstein List is a sackful of squirrels.

NeilParkin
1 month ago

British Museum under pressure to return Benin Bronzes after top UK university agrees deal to transfer more than 100 African artefacts

Just because my neighbour does something stupid, doesn’t mean that I have to do it too. On second thoughts, send them all back. The President can sell them on the black market and buy a new Rolls Royce or something.

transmissionofflame
1 month ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

As Sir Desmond Swayne put it in the HoC when a question of his regarding lockdowns was answered with “Well, everyone else is doing it” – “HERD STUPIDITY”.

As I have said before, let’s send it all back. We have enough things of our own to study and celebrate – many of which are around us in the form of glorious buildings built hundreds of years ago. I am sick of hearing about Africa. There are a lot of Africans in Africa, I think we can let them do all the talking and thinking about Africa.

ComradeSvelte
ComradeSvelte
1 month ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Should we be charging Nigeria storage costs?

EppingBlogger
1 month ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Back to whom.

Dinger64
1 month ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Send them back and be done with it! I’m sure I’m not alone in thinking not many people give a flying F about what happens to this copper and tin scrap!

Jon Garvey
1 month ago

Is Labour trying to cover up the full horror of the grooming gangs scandal?

Given that they could probably be stored on a memory stick the size of your thumb, deletion can scarcely be “because they’re no longer needed.” But it’s hard to think of any positive reason why it’s a bad idea to keep them as a public record of public trials paid for by the public purse and punishing, or exonerating, members of the public.

Nowadays, though, we’ve got used to exhibitions of autocratic power without accountability.

DiscoveredJoys
DiscoveredJoys
1 month ago
Reply to  Jon Garvey

“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.”
— George Orwell, 1984

EppingBlogger
1 month ago

it is long overdue for the Governor and top management at the BoE to be replaced. The current lot think they are a pressure group or news service.

They are not delivering the price stability they were charged with.

transmissionofflame
1 month ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

They join a long list of people in public and private institutions who seem to be frustrated priests or politicians or social workers who think the main point of their job is to fix the world as they think it ought to be rather than providing the goods and services that they are paid to provide.

Dinger64
1 month ago

“Destanee Aiava has announced her retirement from tennis at 25, saying it has a “racist, misogynistic, homophobic and hostile culture”

Oh dear, how sad, never mind!

Not good enough to win so the racist dummy goes out the pram!

NeilParkin
1 month ago
Reply to  Dinger64

At a highest ranking of 147 in the world, perhaps you are right about it being something other than racism and misogyny holding her back. I have in mind a black woman, Venus Williams, who dominated womens tennis for more than 10 years.? I also recall Billie Jean King, a lesbian who did the same in an earlier generation. Doesn’t look to me like race or sexuality is a hurdle to success.

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 month ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Let me get this straight in my head… So, I should hold the stick bit and wave the stringy bit at the ball?

I reckon I could win!

Old Arellian
Old Arellian
1 month ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Yvonne Goolagong too and she was Australian.

transmissionofflame
1 month ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Serena (Venus’ sister) won even more but your point is well made. Martina Navratilova is married to a woman. Also Arthur Ashe, Gael Monfils, Michael Chang, various Indian doubles champions, Coco Gauff, Daria Kasatkina (lesbian).

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 month ago

Tennis is racist, misogynistic and homophobic, says Australian player” – Destanee Aiava has announced her retirement from tennis at 25, saying it has a “racist, misogynistic, homophobic and hostile” culture, according to the BBC.

‘…and I’m not good enough’.

Edit: Dammit. I didn’t see Dinger64’s comment above.

Baldrick
Baldrick
1 month ago

A lot of vaccine distrust these days. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99jyexve1jo