HOPE Not Hate Political Organiser and Former Labour Councillor Pleads Guilty to Child Sexual Offences
According to a report on BBC News yesterday, a former Labour councillor, Liron Velleman, has pleaded guilty to child sexual offences. That’s the same Liron Velleman who in 2022 gave evidence to a House of Commons Committee scrutinising the Online Safety Bill where he was described as a “political organiser” for HOPE Not Hate.
A Labour councillor who sent and requested lewd videos to someone he thought was a 13 year-old girl has pleaded guilty to child sex offences.
Liron Velleman, 30, was a councillor for Barnet in north London when the offences happened between 3rd and 10th December 2024. He resigned in April 2025 without explanation.Velleman, of Finchley, north London, used the handle “Tim Graham 95” to send the messages, Highbury Corner Magistrates’ Court heard. Unbeknownst to him, he was actually in contact with a decoy officer from the Metropolitan Police.
The prosecutor asked for the case to be committed to the Crown Court for sentencing as he said it was too serious to be dealt with at the magistrates’ court.
Prosecutor Zahid Hussain told the court on Tuesday that Velleman sent online messages asking to see the girl in her school uniform, how old she was and if she was at home alone.
He sent a video of his penis and asked to see her in her underwear.
Velleman previously pleaded guilty to two charges, one of attempting to engage in sexual communication with a child and another of attempting to cause a child aged 13 to 15 to look at an image of sexual activity.
In 2022, a man named Liron Velleman appeared as a witness before a House of Commons Committee scrutinising the Online Safety Bill, where he was described as a “political organiser” for HOPE Not Hate.

The reason I’m bringing this up is because a couple of weeks ago, HOPE Not Hate ran a ‘story’ on its website saying my “association with Epstein’s circle” needed to be “scrutinised” because, as per the latest batch of the Epstein files, I sent two emails to Ghislaine Maxwell, one in 2001, the other in 2002, six years before Epstein pleaded guilty to child sexual offences. This was in spite of the fact that I told the ‘journalist’ writing the piece – Patrik Hermansson – that I’d never met Epstein, never spoken to him, never emailed him, never traded messages with him, never been to any of his homes, never been on the Lolita Express, never been to Paedo Island, etc, etc. Nevertheless, according to HOPE Not Hate, the fact that I’d emailed his ex-girlfriend twice, 25 and 24 years ago, meant I now needed to be investigated.
According to the pro-censorship lobby group’s own logic, shouldn’t all its employees and volunteers, who have a much closer link to this convicted sex offender than I ever did with Epstein, now be investigated?
According to a recent screenshot from HOPE Not Hate’s website – which seems to think it’s a news publishing site, describing the Director of HOPE Not Hate, Nick Lowles, as “Editor”, Liran Velleman is still a “contributor”, alongside “Patrik Hermansson”. Doesn’t this mean that Hermansson, not to mention Lowles, are in the “circle” of a convicted paedophile? I’m not suggesting they’ve also committed child sexual offences, just that the smear tactics they’ve used against me could just as easily be used to attack them.

The phrase beginning “people in glass houses” springs to mind. It really beggars belief that HOPE Not Hate should run this smear story against me – still prominently displayed on its website – knowing that a member of their “circle” had just pleaded guilty to child sexual offences.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
He literally looks like the night club pervert in any 80s crime show 😂
“Hope Not Hate” is an organisation of ferocious haters (anglophobes and anti-whitists) which resorts to Orwellian language to describe itself.
Is being a pervert a prerequisite for being involved in the Labour Party, in a sort of: “You don’t have to be a sleazy sex pest creep to work here, but it helps” kinda way?🤨
We need to do some research on the Tories, just to give a fair comparison and eliminate any bias.
This stuff seems to be a Far Left thing with Dementia Joe seen sniffing children on the few occasions he was allowed out in public. And we have the freshly enobled Labour peer found guilty.
I agree with you. TTK has some questions to answer over his ability to seemingly ignore anything and everything connected to paedophiles/paedophilia. What’s in his closet?
Guido has a great clip of Ayesha Hazarika on Times Radio today wondering what’s happening with the nonce detector in Downing Street….. Good on her for not faffing around the issue like just about everyone else.
HnH are no different to the NCCL and the loathsome PIE, all derivatives of the Fabian Society.
Oh come on!
Love is love, surely?
(Gah!)
Nice!!
Birds of a feather…. It seems like all those conspiracy theories of years gone by have come to fruition.
For people who must believe they are smart they sure don’t give much thought to not being caught, perhaps he can’t wait to go to prison, looks like he will do well in there
Rape not Hope
Remember: Good causes attract the worst people. It’s their cover, how could such virtuous, people ever do anything bad? Jimmy Saville immersed himself in charity and exhaustively promoted good causes. All a smoke screen
I met Jimmy Saville several times, late 60s, at Leeds Uni – he seemed a nice guy. What does that make me?
A year or so later I was given a wonderful smile by Diana Dors – was she after me, or just a nice person?
You’re very honest. Yes, Savile was the devil incarnate. He fooled you as many.
Not me though. Perhaps not having a television had shielded me from the glory which surrounded him, and left me free to use my basic instinct when I first watched him in City Square in Leeds at a sporting event. He absolutely repulsed my 14 year old self.
I first heard the name when I failed to answer a question in a regional Boy Scout General Knowledge competition.
“Television: who will fix it for you?”
My fellows in the audience groaned and all shoulders sank. Of all subjects…!
Afterwards, I asked my father who he was. He told me briefly and that he thought there was something not quite right about him.
Definite Peter Sutcliffe vibes.
Fair enough but am I the only one left wondering why TY was emailing Maxwell?
Is it compulsory for Labour representatives to be perverts or friends with perverts?
Perhaps someone should ask Two-Tier at the next PMQs.