Why Zack Polanski’s Parka Should Shame Us All
While we cannot judge that Zack Polanski is a wally just because he permanently wears a parka, we can probably agree he looks grim. Is he really Prime Minister material? Style wise, is this the look we want representing Britain on the world stage? After the shameless corruption and treasonous activity carried on by men in suits and Hermes’ ties, perhaps this is indeed a more honest alternative. And in any case, Polanski, with his parka and poor dentistry, is an accurate reflection of our sartorially rundown nation.
And I say this as one currently wearing jeans and a hoodie. Urgh.
At her northern Secondary Modern, Mum was taught ‘A History of Britain through costume’. Children recorded the dates and important information about different eras before colouring-in images of medieval villeins, Georgian rakes, Victorian industrialists and so on. If such teaching materials still exist, I can picture the next chapter: The Second Dark Age 1997-present. Images will be drawn of late-stage Elizabethans and Caroleans dressed in prison chic tracksuits, baggy jeans, fleeces, anoraks, popstars in sportswear, special advisers in non-ironed shirts and baseball caps, the Archbishop of Canterbury in wide-fit rubber-soled footwear. Pictures of leaders in costume would include Mothin Ali in his cross-cultural mix of Bangladeshi lungi and leather jacket, and a gap-toothed Zak Polanski in his parka. A friend saw a dishevelled women outside a Westminster coffee shop recently and reached into her bag to give her a £5 note she keeps to give the homeless. She realised just in time that this unfortunately dressed person was actually a member of the House of Lords (Baroness Coffey). Just like the Mitchell and Webb sketch where two Nazi’s suddenly wonder whether they’re the bad guys, we British will look at ourselves and wonder: are we all actually poor peasants?
There are two main explanations for the general shabbiness of current attire. The most obvious is the sad decline in wealth and ambition. Britain is now a poor country, we have to rely on cheaper fabrics and generic design rather than plush materials and bespoke dress. 22% of the working age population in Britain does not work. There’s no point in dressing up for anything if there is nowhere to go.
The other explanation is that there is a determined national demoralisation campaign afoot that seeks the great uglification of Britain. Our tastes, and indeed the tastes of our tribe, are not self-generated, but rather decided from on high. When I buy a slouchy pair of jeans, I am no more freely choosing my own clothes than the teenage boy who insists on £300 Nike trainers. Meryl Streep as the supercilious magazine editor in The Devil Wears Prada explained this brilliantly to unfashionable PA Anne Hathaway:
You think fashion has nothing to do with you. You go to your closet and you select, I don’t know, that lumpy blue sweater, for instance, because you’re trying to tell the world that you take yourself too seriously to care about what you put on your back. But what you don’t know is that that sweater is not just blue, it’s not turquoise, it’s not lapis, it’s actually cerulean. And you’re also blithely unaware of the fact that in 2002, Oscar de la Renta did a collection of cerulean gowns. … And then it filtered down through the department stores and then trickled on down into some tragic Casual Corner where you, no doubt, fished it out of some clearance bin.
The memo has not yet been sent from on high that all of Britain deserves to wear elegant clothes. Trend forecasters such as WGSN and Peclers Paris predict miserable ideas about “comfort being non-negotiable” and “formal dressing continuing its post-pandemic fade with ongoing interest in sustainability and regenerative fashion”. As such ideas trickle down to the high street, this means in practice: more drawstring trousers, anoraks, clothes made out of plastic, sweatpants and oversized hoodies. Polanski’s parka chic looks set to remain for the foreseeable.
Many brave clothes horses successfully rail against this neo-peasant chic, including Peter Hitchens in his braces, the always immaculate Michelle Dewsbury in her red lipstick, and no doubt all the readers of the Daily Sceptic. We should draw sartorial strength from them. And indeed, the popularity of Poldark, Bridgerton and Downton Abbey is in part thanks to the gorgeous costumes and a collective yearning for more appealing dress. I can’t be only woman who longs to be corseted up and dance with a man in tight breeks and buckskin boots?
Bijan Omrani wrote a rousing piece last year encouraging us to dress well: not just for ourselves but for the country. Let’s turn over a page in the ‘History of Britain through costume’ and banish the Polanski parka aesthetic. We shall reclaim the trilby from George Galloway and the covert coat from Farage. Peter Mandelson however, can keep his pink rollneck.
Joanna Gray is a writer and confidence coach.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I am more concerned about Polanski’s attempt at an unholy alliance between faux-eco communism (the eco is faux, the communism is real) and pandering to sectarianism, but yes to quote the incomparable Ian Dury
“Every bit of clothing ought to make you pretty
You can cut the clothing, grey is such a pity
I should wear the clothing of Mr. Walter Mitty
See my tailor, he’s called Simon, I know it’s going to fit“
“Why Zack Polanski’s Parka Should Shame Us All”
Why Zack Polansk
ParkaShould Shame Us All !It’s not new, didn’t Michael Foot famously wear a shapeless donkey jacket to the Remembrance Sunday service during his tenure as leader of Her Majesty’s loyal opposition?
He did, but at least he had collar and tie on.
His tie was not usually properly tied, as I recall.
It was more like a duffel coat, although one not particularly styled for the occasion.
Have you ever seen a green donkey jacket?
A couple of years back, Mrs and I had an invite to a local community thing, a gala dinner event. The RSVP was ‘Evening wear’, so I turned up in dinner jacket and black tie, to find everyone else in sweat pants and joggers. The sartorial codes appear to have changed quite a lot. Evening wear is now what you wear every evening to watch telly while drinking Carling for a can.
At such events the ladies always look great but many of the men look trash.
The ladies almost always bare as much flesh as possible, while at least the men are all decently covered.
I still think all the male news presenters and weathermen should have an “Equality Day”, wearing their shirts open to the waist, or one shoulder bared, or skin-tight trousers slit up the sides, in protest at the double standards forced upon them.
Don’t you mean David Paulden? If it’s good enough for Tommy……
Funny, isn’t it?
Every time the BBC mentions Tommy, they immediately add his original name. The implication being “this despicable guy is hiding his real identity behind a new name”.
With Zac Polanski? No such implication, apparently.
By the way, his face…
Sometimes I wonder about physiognomy. Boris looked like the bullshitting buffoon. Theresa May like a straightlaced schoolmistress. Starmer like a permanently constipated dalek. David Lammy… well, let’s just say not the sharpest knife in the drawer. Rayner like a woman who has been round a block a few times. Zac Polanski… I don’t know, there is no accounting for taste, and I don’t want to spell it out, but it’s not a pleasant thought.
I once made this point here and someone pointed out he’d changed his name legally, whereas TR hasn’t.
I refer to ZP as the boob-whisperer. He’s a dreadfully unserious individual who doesn’t deserve to get the attention he’s currently receiving.
In a recent Spiked ? article he was called “hypnotits”
Tit wizard would be a more fitting description and he is definitely a crank.
Absolutely well said. In fact I couldn’t remember his real name and had to look it up.
nothing wrong with wearing active wear….
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYRENWT8lz8
Shameless hussies.
Absolutely brilliant. Worth forwarding and not recently filmed either. The slide has been happening for a while for sure!
As one who wouldn’t recognise Baroness Coffey in an identity parade of our legislators or the homeless, I have to thank providence that I’ve never been moved to hand over fivers to random members of either category. Obviously the homeless, even the illegal immigrants among them, are far more deserving, while the legislators habitually fill their pockets at my expense without a blush.
“Is he really Prime Minister material?”
Is Starmer or any of the rest of the buffoons in the Labour Party.
Nobody asking our permission for them to be Prime Minister is Prime Minister material.
If I were King, I would make it so that you don’t even know you were on the ballot until the day you’re told you got the most votes. And you would not be allowed to refuse the position, but you would be allowed to spend half of your time on your normal job for the duration of your term in power.
But then I will never be King, and I would not want the power anyway. I hate telling people what to do.
Anarchy is not for everyone.
He looks like a homeless person to me.
Railing against practical parkas, the author lauds “the always immaculate Michelle Dewsbury in her red lipstick” as a sartorial example to us all. Really?
She is immaculate in a sort of way, can’t deny it. Who is she, should I have heard of her?
Edit, it’s Michelle Dewberry. Author take note.
Just imagine one of her male fellow GB news presenters appearing in public in a similar outfit as above. Eamonn Holmes, or Jacob Rees-Mogg, for example. This shows the appalling double standards of public dress deemed acceptable for males and females in the UK, and everywhere in the West.
I remember years ago, a famous French chef who divorced a beautiful young English woman said that the moment he saw her walking down the aisle towards him in church wearing a designer wedding dress with both sides cut away above the hip, exposing her bare flesh to all, like some kind of swimsuit, his heart sank, and he knew he had made a terrible mistake.
Is she advertising the fact that her outfit came from TKMaxx?
He looks like our village ne’er-do-well who at the age of 30 plus still rides a kids BMX.
It does make me wonder at the mentality of those who voted for him to be leader.
There was a great comment from the public on Infowars:
“Never argue with a moron. People watching will not know who is whom.” 🙂
Is this about the man also known as David Paulden?
I thought the herd wore grim greys and boring black because Primark and other low priced outlets sourced from China where the party appears to dictate what people wear and a few thousand more on a production run of millions could be relabelled for the UK market. I regularly wear my bright red Montgomery Duffle Coat (or Orange or Kelly green or Yellow or Paddington Bear Blue I bought them all) and have lovely ladies approach me in John Lewis in Oxford Street to say how fabulous and cheerful I look
So agree that the decline in standards of dress is depressing. When you look at old film of interviews with ordinary people in the street – up until the late 60’s, I would say, they were all smartly dressed- ties, jackets, hats, gloves, proper coats, proper shoes. I don’t think my grandmother left the house without a hat until 1973! My father always wore a shirt and what he called, a sports jacket, leather shoes- and usually a tie! Slightly breaks my heart looking back at how ‘correct’ they were always careful to be.
I have a picture of my Uncle and my Father on Angmering beach in 1960s suited and booted complete with waistcoats whilst us kids in the background are donning swimming trunks and building sandcastles!
Being a retiree from John Lewis (38 years service) I despair at the lack of suits and ties once worn by male Partners and the elegant blouses and skirts that were worn by female Partners. This is of course a reflection of modern society, slovenly, ill disciplined and corrupt.
Don’t worry, there’ll be a backlash eventually and everyone will start looking ‘smart’ again, in whatever guise smartness comes at the time.