Refrain from Speculating
We know that they are lying, they know that they are lying, they even know that we know they are lying, we also know that they know we know they are lying too, they of course know that we certainly know they know we know they are lying too as well, but they are still lying. In our country, the lie has become not just moral category, but the pillar industry of this country.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
A funny thing happened Wednesday morning. Checking the Telegraph website, I noticed a curious headline: there was a “very serious incident” afoot at De Montfort University in Leicester. Wondering what this serious incident was, and immediately forming some suspicions, as one does in times like these, I clicked on the headline and was taken to a live news update feed. Here is what I learned:

What was rapidly becoming clear, as you can see, was that there had been an incident, presumably at 6pm on Tuesday, i.e., the previous day. And it had been serious. Very. There were no clear details or specifics about it whatsoever. But, undoubtedly, it was a very serious incident.
I scrolled down:


Bus diversions. Road closures. But no details to confirm. What was now incontrovertible was that there really, truly was an incident happening. Or which was now over. Nobody was quite sure about that. But it was an incident which – have I mentioned this? – was very serious. I scrolled down a bit further:

The incident, I learned from this, had been witnessed by students and staff. And – in case there was any doubt about this – it was a serious incident. A very serious one. Serious enough to affect entrance to Leicester Royal Infirmary. All very serious and incident-ish, as I’m sure you’ll agree.
I continued my downward scrolling:

It was still a very serious incident, you understand. Indeed, I want to go out on a limb and stress to you, lest there be any confusion, and I mean literally any confusion whatsoever, that an incident had happened and that it was very serious. But it was now clear to me that, as apparently is sometimes the case with very serious incidents, by late morning the day after it had happened nobody had any idea yet what the incident had been.
Roads closed, buses diverted, restricted access to hospitals, all the result of an incident the nature of which was still a complete mystery.
I switched to the BBC. Surely our national broadcaster, which we all fund individually to the tune of £174.50 a year, would have more accurate information?

Aha! According to the BBC, a “person had been taken to hospital” Now, that is a very serious incident. But what was that person taken to hospital for? Note the time provided. The incident had in fact happened at 5.03pm on Tuesday. It was now 11am on Wednesday. A person had been taken to hospital, which undoubtedly was very serious for him or her. But details had still yet to emerge, a mere 18 hours later. I scrolled down the BBC feed:

It certainly does sound scary. I mean, very serious incidents which result in a person being taken to hospital are pretty scary. It wouldn’t make me feel safe either. And whatever had happened, it was certainly sad to know about, regardless of the area one was from. And we can surely agree that, whatever had happened, it would have been good if every one of the unspecified number of people involved in the incident, about which we know nothing other than that it was very serious, had been okay.
I then scrolled up to the top of the BBC feed:

The local MP’s thoughts were with those affected by what had happened, but she did not know what that was. There were no details. And, more importantly, although the incident was serious, and though police cordons were in place, it was important not to speculate.
In Britain in 2026, you see, one must not speculate. One must refrain from speculating about very serious incidents that happen in the news. Very serious incidents happen from time to time, and you must not wonder what they are.
Later, I learned that an 18-year-old man has been arrested on suspicion of murder and is currently in police custody in Leicester, and that a man in his early 20s has died from stab wounds.
But we must refrain from speculating any further. Because in Britain in 2026, when a man stabs another man to death in the middle of a city centre in what would still have been daylight, one does not speculate about who they were, or why it happened, at all.
Dr David McGrogan is an Associate Professor of Law at Northumbria Law School. You can subscribe to his Substack – News From Uncibal – here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Until your penultimate paragraph, I’d assumed this was a case of a transphobic micro-aggression. But it’s the weekend now, and nobody has been imprisoned, so that’s clearly not the case.
Bear in mind the ethnic make up of inner Leicester, but we do know now that it was a man wot dun it!
One of those men. Tut.
STOP SPECULATING
I also noticed the “very serious incident/no information” feed from the DT and I think we can all draw a rather obvious conclusion as to why that would be.
Personally I suspect that if the very serious incident had happened in, say the middle of “disgustingly white rural England” a great deal more information would have been made available very quickly.
So the continual exhortations not to speculate would have been unnecessary. And the relief, not to say glee, from the various Authorities would have been very obvious.
It’s worse than that -the police have removed what little info they gave
https://www.leics.police.uk/news/leicestershire/news/2026/february/police-launch-murder-investigation-after-man-stabbed/
An unspeakable event not to be discussed in front of the children or servants, but only by their superiors.
I wish they’d had the same attitude in the winter of 2020 and downplayed the serious incidents from coronavirus infection. How different things would have been.
Clearly there are some serious incidents our masters want us to become hysterical about and others they’d rather we didn’t even know about
Something else for the Home Secretary to think about, in her plan to standardise the police forces? The MSM coverage of recent, similar events that have happened in Chippenham, and in Bristol, was more open than that described here.
I was also puzzled, given that Leicester is a city where previously there has been friction between two religious groups. If you don’t want us to speculate tell us the known facts. A stabbing on a city street is just about normal in these unpleasant times so naturally we are expecting much worse.
Stop noticing!
This is just the Establishment trying to stop the natives getting restless while they are race-replaced.
“Khaleed Oladipo, a 20-year-old student at De Montfort University, became the victim of a fatal stabbing, leaving a community in shock and grief.
Oladipo, a passionate football enthusiast from London, was in his second year of studying cybersecurity. His family described him as a beloved son, brother, uncle, boyfriend, and friend, emphasizing his deep-rooted love for his family and football.”
(https://custommapposter.com/article/tragedy-strikes-de-montfort-university-student-stabbed-in-leicester/2824)
A Nigerian, according to another source.
“Harper Dennis, 18, has been charged with murder and carrying an offensive weapon in public following the death of 20-year-old Khaleed Oladipo near De Montfort University in Leicester.”
(Daily Star)
This particular regime tactic, like so many, is starting to backfire spectacularly. Overreach born of desperation and/or arrogance/overconfidence. Like “Covid”.
If it was a simple case of one man on another, why was it necessary to shut off the streets etc?, and why have we heard nothing else? But plenty of distraction with Epstein.
Makes you wonder what they are too frightened to let us know. Now how’s that for speculation?
“I mean, very serious incidents which result in a person being taken to hospital are pretty scary”——–Scary to who? Maybe some people get easily scared, but ofcourse if all we get told is that something “serious” happened then we have no way of knowing if we should feel scared. ——When this kind of thing happens and no information or limited information is given it leads people to believe that there is a lot about whatever this “serious incident” was, that officialdom are reluctant to inform the public about because of political considerations. —In other words they are hiding something. This has often been the case when “race” or “gender” is at the heart of a “serious incident”
If we speculate about this do we risk imprisonment?
If I were to speculate about this- oh crap
In this country it seems one wrong word or sentence in the eyes of the authorities and it is off to the Ideological Gulag with you. We arrest thousands of people for something they said. —-How utterly pathetic what we have become.
Speculating on the risk of imprisonment may result in imprisonment
Is the statement that the university is comforting the witnesses another way of saying that they have been locked away so they cannot say what they saw of this”very serious incident” to the press, friends or relatives?
Everyone assumes the police are up to something or trying to cover up something, but to be fair it may just be their usual incompetence, pomposity and overreach.
Liz Kendall is as stupid as the police in not realising that when you tell people to “refrain from speculation” they immediately start speculating. Where do they find these people?
Well well
https://www.leics.police.uk/news/leicestershire/news/2026/february/police-launch-murder-investigation-after-man-stabbed/
The article has been removed
You are speculating that it has been removed.
“A man”
Three men stabbed/slashed at a Surrey railway station, we know they were men and their ages. One man has been arrested, we know his age. Two male suspects are at large – ages unknown – police appeal for information.
Let’s refrain from speculating about why apart from ages and sex those involved have no other characteristics about, oh I don’t know, ethnicity, religion, for example or why the attack took place.
“It is believed that the violence involved two groups who were not known to each other and is an “isolated” incident, the force said.”
So an isolated incident , not a very serious incident. Move along now.
Do we need their permission to speculate over why they don’t want us to speculate?
Leicester police must be led by a complete nut job?
Why would they be any different from other police services?
Most people would speculate that one or all involved had no family here at the time of the Battle of Waterloo.
Britain is near collapse. Much more of this type of governance will be its final straw. Farewell UK, it was nice knowin’ ya
If people are not told what is happening they will speculate. But I’m just speculating!
Coulter’s Law
good job there is no speculating allowed or people would be questioning if the phrase Allahu Akbar was heard at all..
Was the MP Liz Kendall told what the incdient was? Presumably the answer if “of course”. In which case I would ask “Why could she be told and not us”?
These cheap sarcasms aren’t at all fair to the British Bobby. He’s not lying. Quite the opposite. We all know what he is saying when he says ‘Don’t speculate’. He’s saying, ‘Some black — or at least dark brown — bloke, probably a Moslem, has just decapitated or stabbed or blown up someone or someones, probably non-black or non-dark brown, possibly Christian or, more likely post-Christian, while shouting “Allah Akbar”.’ If David McGrogan only knew his Wittgenstein he’d pay attention not to the (dictionary) meaning of the words ‘Don’t speculate’ but their use.
The link to the https://www.leics.police.uk/ website leads to a 404 page not found. How all very mysterious.
It’s also very peculiar how little info can be found online re the fatal stabbing by a 15yo boy near the Wheatsheaf Pub, Ewell, before Christmas, or the emergency services closing down parts of Carshalton 2 weeks ago following a knifing. So much for leafy Surrey middleclassness.
Speculation fills the void