The EV Car Crash

With the ban on the sale of new petrol and diesel cars less than four years away now, there remains one seemingly insurmountable obstacle: nobody wants to buy electric cars.

Last year, sales of EVs achieved a market share of just 23.43%. Newly released figures for last month show this fell to 20.6%. The Government has set a target this year of 33%, rising to 66% in 2029.

Once petrol and diesel cars (known as ICE vehicles, short for Internal Combustion Engine) are banned in 2030, zero emission cars must make up at least 80% of the market, with the rest filled with hybrids. However, the latter will also be gradually phased out by 2035. Zero emission essentially means battery-electric, although hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles would also qualify.

To enforce the switch to EVs, the government introduced the ZEV (Zero Emission Vehicle) mandate. Motor manufacturers who fail to hit their ZEV target for the year must either buy credits from manufacturers who have exceeded targets or pay a fine of £15,000 for every car below target.

There are certain allowances available, but these are not significant. The only other option open to manufacturers who fall short is to carry forward their deficit, in the hope they are in surplus in a year or two time. Understandably, this has been likened to taking out a payday loan!

The first year of the ZEV mandate was 2024, when the target was 22%. Actual EV sales that year only reached 19.6%, leaving an effective shortfall of 47,000 cars. At £15,000 a time, that means a fine of around £700 million. The Department for Transport will publish its full analysis next month, which will list surpluses and shortfalls by manufacturer and the actions they have taken to comply, e.g. pay a fine, buy allowances or carry forward.

Last year, EV sales increased to a share of 23.9%, but this was still well below the target of 28%. Motor manufacturers it seems are building up massive deficits in EV sales, which sooner or later will have to be paid for.

Worse still, most EV sales go to fleet and business sectors, driven by generous tax breaks. It is estimated that only about 10% of private buyers go for electric.

The reasons are well known. EVs cost much more to buy, and most models don’t have the range that drivers need. On top of that, buyers face massive losses when trading them in because second hand prices are so low.

But there is one other factor which is often overlooked.

It is reckoned that four in 10 households don’t have off-street parking, so cannot easily charge at home. Using a public charger means that running costs would typically be triple those of a petrol car when fuel duties are excluded. That is, I should point out, if you can actually find one on the way home from work that is not already in use.

Local councils such as my own have already made it clear that trailing cables across the pavement is not permitted and that enforcement action will be taken. Where then will EV drivers be able to charge their cars?

There are plenty of fine words from central and local government about installing more public chargers. But the simple reality is that there will never be enough – local councils don’t have the money, and it is not their job anyway to waste taxpayer money in this way.

Cardiff City Council are a case in point. It is estimated that there are about 200,000 cars in Cardiff, about half of which don’t have access to off street parking. The City Council has just announced plans to install 80 new EV charging stations, plugged into lampposts outside residents’ homes.

The plan won’t make the slightest difference when there are 100,000 cars which all need charging. But it will create real difficulties for the poor beggars who happen to live next to one and will have to find somewhere else to park. The thought of all the other motorists on the street competing to get to that lamppost first every night and the aggro which will undoubtedly follow is frightening.

It is hard to avoid the conclusion that the objective of successive governments and council planners all along has been to force us out of our cars and onto public transport.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

37 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John Kitchen
John Kitchen
2 months ago

EVs were never aimed at ordinary people. They are a means of clearing the roads for the benefit of important people.

Marcus Aurelius knew
2 months ago
Reply to  John Kitchen

But those pig- sorry, people are more equal than we are, John.

Purpleone
2 months ago

All the motor manufacturers should have aligned and told the government to f*** off at the start, instead of being swept along on the waves of ESG BS.

What would the government have been able to do if they had – nowt…

Marcus Aurelius knew
2 months ago
Reply to  Purpleone

There’s still time. These fines will just go unpaid. Victimless crimes.

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 months ago

Yes. If a car manufacturer can’t make a profit trading in the UK then why would they bother to pay any fines before pulling out?

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 months ago
Reply to  Purpleone

I foresee more and more unregistered or false registration cars.

Freddy Boy
2 months ago
Reply to  Purpleone

Exactly but the bosses must have sold out or been bribed !

Purpleone
2 months ago
Reply to  Freddy Boy

Agreed – desperate for a little gold ESG pin to wear from higher powers…

JXB
JXB
2 months ago
Reply to  Purpleone

Corporatism: economic model in which bodies are formed by representatives (bureaucrats) of the State, private capital (big business), and organised labour (unions) to plan and control various sectors of the economy to meet the higher interests of the State.

This gives the players power = bribary and corruption.

This economic model – corporazione – was invented by Mussolini who said it best describes Fascism.

It is the model upon which the EU is based, and all so-called democratic, free market, Western economies – called the technocrat model by some, and sometimes called crony capitalism. It is the antithesis of free market capitalism, and of course has its roots in the Communist system of Party aparatchicks and workers’ councils deciding things.

The representatives of the auto industry were certainly promised huge subsidies to get them on-board and to socialise the risk whilst privatising profits. Unfortunately, adverse economic circumstances have become so bad, the gravy has dried up and the auto industry is left holding the wrong end of a very shitty stick. Good.

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 months ago

Miliband and his ilk intend that owning a car will be an elite-only privilege. And soon at that.

EARLGRAY
EARLGRAY
2 months ago
Reply to  soundofreason

I wonder which type of car Miliband drives (or is driven about in)? I also wonder which type of car all MPs drive. If they are passing laws for the plebs to obey then it is only right that they set an example.

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 months ago
Reply to  EARLGRAY

No. Because they are of the elite in their opinion.

From Miliband’s point of view SoR and his family do not need a car and so should not have one. However he is a politician and Minister and should therefore have Ministerial cars at his beck and call and a personal car. When SoR really can’t catch a bus on his own he can have a mobility scooter until he opts for the final kindness vaccination.

Art Simtotic
2 months ago

Henry Ford must have seen the EV car crash coming a century ago…

“…A market is never saturated with a good product, but it is very quickly saturated with a bad one.”

Sepulchrave
Sepulchrave
2 months ago

Of course, the real objective is to reduce the use of private motorised transport by 75%, the idea is for the plebs to walk, cycle, or take the bus.

WEF_The_Urban_Mobility_Scorecard_Tool_2023.pdf

Art Simtotic
2 months ago
Reply to  Sepulchrave

The sort of guff that’s always stuffed with noddy imagery lifted off powerpoint. Pull-down menu thinking abounds.

Freddy Boy
2 months ago
Reply to  Sepulchrave

👍

RTSC
RTSC
2 months ago
Reply to  Sepulchrave

Which takes no account of the fact that, outside cities and very large towns in the UK, public transport provision is dire: bus routes meander through villages, taking forever, and are inconveniently timed for people to get to work and rail routes don’t take people where they need to go.

Tonka Rigger
2 months ago

The whole EV project was conceived as a plan to destroy the motor industry in the West. Any competent engineer could see these things were never going to be a real solution, even if it was genuinely intended to cut supposedly apocalyptic CO2 emissions (itself a part of the larger agenda). It goes hand-in-hand with broader authoritarian measures whose overall aim is to restrict personal liberties, including freedom of movement, and usher in an all-seeing surveillance state watched over by facial recognition and AI algorithms. No freedom of movement, no freedom of speech or private communication and no freedom of assembly to protest. Such a system is thus impervious to dissent, disregarding of democracy and aimed solely towards keeping an elite class and their preferred 1%/99% societal structure in perpetuity, regardless of the wishes of the 99%.

The above sounds like the plot of a dystopian movie, but look around at the bigger picture. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, etc..

Art Simtotic
2 months ago
Reply to  Tonka Rigger

Indeed – a modern-day version of the Norman Conquest, a Doomsday of legislation, surveillance and algorithms.

For a fist full of roubles

Of course, the Sinclair C5 EV had emergency pedals for those flat battery moments.

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 months ago

moments?

Tyrbiter
Tyrbiter
2 months ago

I’ve only ever seen one single C5, it was abandoned on a roundabout in Hampstead in mid-1985.

As for the pedals, they were necessary in the vast majority of circumstances.

DontPanic
DontPanic
2 months ago

The government is currently spending taxpayers money on adverts to convince us to buy EVs, just as it has spent money to get us smart meters. In addition EVs get subsidised purchase price, subsidised road tax, subsidised public charger installation and subsidised electricity (in the form of no fuel duty). Despite this almost no one wants one . Yet still the Labour Party is on its zealot led path to destroy the motor industry and the oil and gas industry.

myk
myk
2 months ago

The mechanics at my local garage, who work on ICE cars only, tell me they are busier than ever as people are keeping their old cars for longer

Jimbo G
Jimbo G
2 months ago

Are these laws or ‘regulation’? Who would vote for such proof that the UK is being run by philosophically barren, economic illiterates.
This not just delusion; its a civilizational suicide note and precedent that ought to lead every MP, Minister being forced at gun-point to read Hayek’s Road to Serfdom and Rand’s Atlas Shrugged.

varmint
2 months ago

Everything GREEN requires COERCION, BRIBES and MASSIVE SUBSIDY. ——There is no FREE MARKET for anything GREEN. It is entirely government and their phoney planet saving ideology that drives it all.

Covid-1984
Covid-1984
2 months ago

As always with the Covid-19 hoax and others…follow the money 💰

Rusty123
Rusty123
2 months ago

Its absolute suicide for the country, all done deliberately, some people seriously need locking up, no company is going to pay someone to produce a vehicle, that they are then going to be fined for, fgs, get these lunatics out, destroying the UK

SimCS
2 months ago
Reply to  Rusty123

I would be happy seeing insane Millibrain suitably detained, fed an insect diet, and provided with zero hydrocarbon fuelled energy, services or products.

mike r
mike r
2 months ago

The problem is a substantial population increase coupled with an increase in mobility has meant an increase in demand for roads and other infrastructure which was not planned for. So instead gf building more roads, motorways and car parks, they are trying to get us to not use cars. Might be feasible in large cities, but elsewhere just not practical. But this is a pattern with nearly all “extreme weather” and “climate change” scenarios. At the back there are politicians that have not done their job and provided infrastructure, so they blame “climate change”. No. It’s failed politicians that’s the cause.

SimCS
2 months ago

Millibrain’s problem, and our salvation, will be that he and Labour will be wiped out in the 2029 GE. The new govt can simply cancel these mandates & supposed fines. It’s true though, why the motor mfrs didn’t collaborate and just say “no” strikes me as pure cowardice.

The Contemptible
The Contemptible
2 months ago

It is hard to avoid the conclusion that the objective of successive governments and council planners all along has been to force us out of our cars and onto public transport.

This.

RTSC
RTSC
2 months ago

The Fascists are slowly realising that whilst they can ban people from buying an ICE car, they can’t make them buy an EV.

Unstoppable Force ….. meet Rock.

Are the Fascists really prepared to completely destroy the economy in order to try and force EVs on everyone in order to gain complete CONTROL?

Well, are you ….. Punks?

RTSC
RTSC
2 months ago

I live in a small, very old, west country town. I estimate that 80% of the properties in the town do not have private parking. Parked cars line many of the streets and, obviously, you cannot guarantee parking outside your own house … or even within, say 100 ft of it.

The council has slowly installed a few charging points in the town car parks. I reckon, overall, there are about 20.

Funnily enough, EVs here are a very uncommon sight.

Sparrowhawk
2 months ago

Q: “What’s the difference between a conspiracy theory and reality?”
A: “About six months”

Here’s why all this Net Zero nonsense is happening (in the West only of course! China runs over 1,100 coal fired power stations and is building 100s more around the world as we speak. India & other countries of the Global South are following suit…)

https://rumble.com/v2sy0pk-documentary-unsustainable-the-uns-agenda-for-world-domination.html?e9s=src_v1_s%2Csrc_v1_s_o&sci=2bf24b8e-0abe-4709-8701-21cb04b12d7b

China’s coal programme:
https://www.npr.org/2019/04/29/716347646/why-is-china-placing-a-global-bet-on-coal?t=1579949224074

https://www.mining.com/chinese-companies-build-700-coal-plants-outside-china/

sharon
sharon
2 months ago

If EV vehicles were so great, they’d be flying off the shelves (so to speak). The fact they’re not and that punishment has to be used to ‘encourage’ sales speaks volumes!

They deserve to fail!

Old Brit
Old Brit
2 months ago

More suicide from our bossy moronic government