What Peter Mandelson Should Learn From the BookTok Generation
The final downfall of Peter Mandelson has been hailed as a falling away of the Boomer Generation – the last gasp of the complacent generation that squandered nationhood and family life in favour of the warring wraiths of globalism and one world socialism. While some are fearful of what follows, and predict a future of One Battle After Another style ICE deportations, I am more optimistic, largely because a significant portion of young adults are becoming a generation of autodidacts. Young men are – hallelujah – rediscovering the joy of reading.
You might have noticed small piles of White Nights by Fyodor Dostoevsky by the tills in Waterstones. This marketing is in response to the recent BookTok trends of young men recommending decent books to each other. A few weeks ago my son began reading East of Eden then asked if we had a copy of The Count of Monte Cristo. His friend had lent him White Nights and he’d read it in the bath one evening before passing it on to another friend. Agog at this burst of intellectualism, I learned (almost with relief) it was not self-generated but thanks to recommendations from Jack Edwards, Shaan, ReadwithMarcus and others on TikTok.
There is a useful word sehnsucht, which describes a yearning or wistful longing for something, that I think explains what might be happening here. In all the fuss about AI, we overlook the fact that human brain is still the most complex organism in the known universe: there are untapped wells of genius and illumination within all of us, and therefore a sehnsucht for more than has been offered thus far by years of British schooling. At present our Year Six son has as his class book Hidden Figures, a laudable but tedious book about the female black mathematicians at NASA. The older teenage boys currently devouring good books will have gone through an English curriculum that has prioritised broader voices over literary content and gradgrind reading theory. And yet the sehnsucht remains.
Plato has a lovely theory about knowledge that he deems to be rather recollection. In Meno he suggests that true knowledge is not acquired through empirical experience or teaching but is instead the soul’s recovery of innate ideas encountered in a pre-existent state before birth. We’ve all had that wonderful intellectual thrill that comes with suddenly understanding something. There are truths that are so obvious that when we hear or read them it is as if we knew them all along. I expect this is what these book worm young men are discovering. Reading White Nights they will recognise the truth of heartbreak and isolation so exquisitely rendered by Dostoevsky, realise it is a universal human experience and as such cannot be remedied by deconstructing hierarchies/mental health awareness week/medication or similar. The problem with a lot of recent literary and artistic offerings is that they don’t ring true: the confection of the plot or characterisations are false and therefore so too are societal responses to them (see Adolescence).
If young men – and hopefully young women – are enjoying well-written books about family life, what it means to be a good person, how to navigate hardship, truth, lies, temptation and extortion, rather than artificially confected false morality tales they are force fed at school, then so much the better. A new renaissance may yet get going.
Equipped with more reliable guides about what it is to be a good person than mere #anti-racism or #greenactivism, young readers will be better able to see exactly what sort of behaviour and character plays into the morality tale that is Peter Mandelson for example.
The Brothers Karamazov is doing the rounds amongst young readers on BookTok and these keen young men might recognise Peter Mandelson as the ‘new man’ that so worried Dostoevsky. Dimitri Karamazov is beset with worries about what will happen to people if “God is driven from the face of the earth”. He cries to his brother Alyosha: “How is he going to be good without God?” Dimitri panics that the ‘new man’ will show his “love for humanity”, rather than by love of God, instead by “the extension of civic rights, or even of keeping down the price of meat… but [the new men], without a God, are more likely to raise the price of meat, if it suits [them], and make a rouble on every copeck”.
And look! There, in a mere work of literature, is virtuoso insight into godless ‘new men’ such as Mandelson and Epstein and the whole post-war international order: hypocritical progress politics as a corrupt cipher for personal virtue.
Let’s hope this movement of readers of the classics grows. Perhaps Mandelson will join in and get himself a copy of The Count of Monte Cristo.
Joanna Gray is a writer and confidence coach.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I was amazed to discover that one of our boys just read The Mayor of Casterbridge.
I think I’ll suggest ‘The Way We Live Now’, because despite it being written 200 years ago, it perfectly describes the way we live now.
“The final downfall of Peter Mandelson has been hailed as a falling away of the Boomer Generation”
Perhaps it has somewhere. Not in my world. I think all this “generation” stuff is silly. I suppose I am a “boomer” (I had to look it up). Nobody I know in the real work talks like this or talks about this stuff – maybe that’s a “boomer” thing.
Mandelson was/is a dodgy geezer among dodgy geezers, doing dodgy geezer stuff, just like people with similar characteristics since the dawn of time. He will be/has already been replaced by more dodgy geezers. Human nature etc.
Seconded. Once again, when people just state “generation”, they’re resorting to the use of generalisations and tarring a huge amount of people with the same brush.
I feel I’m in the minority ( on here, certainly ) with my tendency to focus on individualization as opposed to dealing in stereotypes. I’ve never been a fan of categorising people just to simplify matters. It means your argument will be riddled with inaccuracies.
It’s why I’ve stopped referring to ‘Left’ and ‘Right’, with regards to political views, which has become a bit of a pet peeve of mine. Life, and people, is/are far more nuanced and complex than just sticking people in one bucket or the other. I refuse to play along with anything which is deliberately divisive: e.g black/brown vs white, male vs female, English vs non-English etc.
You are right in many ways but the old saying, “birds of a feather flock together”, springs to mind. When considering the environment that Mandelson came to prominence and the people he associated with it seems to me to be self evident that he and his acolytes are indeed birds of a feather. So look at his contemporaries in the Labour Party, Blair, Brown, Campbell, Prescott, Straw; I could go on but I think you may get the picture.
Yes he’s as dodgy ( had to replace the old descriptive ) as a nine Bob note ! Utter vermin ! along with most of his ilk stinking up the corridors of so called power .
Spot on Mogs ( as usual 😉)
Correct, I’m a ‘boomer'(just) but I will not be tared with the Peter”underpants” Mandy brush!
#metoo
As my mother would have said of Mandelson – “he’s a wide boy.”
That is a person who generally keeps just, but only just the right side of the law, is wholly on board with breaking the law if he can get away with it and who sees every encounter as a money-making opportunity and one who would sell his own mother for a fiver.
Yes, Rupert Lowe was talking about him on one occasion, as I recall it was to do with a football club they were both supporting/involved in. He said that Mandelson was always on the lookout for freebies.
👍👍
I think this is largely an American thing. European boomers growing up amongst the wreckage of the second world war did not have the same formative experience that American boomers did. Of course, in all Western countries boomers largely embraced social liberalism.
However, the seeds of the destruction of our nations – debt and immigration, did take place under their watch. I suppose they were in charge during the ‘gradually’ phase, and we are now entering the ‘suddenly’ phase of societal collapse.
That said, the political ruling class is now largely drawn from Gen X (Starmer and Farage are as old as Gen X get; Kemi is as young as they get), and it’s not like we are doing any better.
Your observation regarding the difference between the USA and European experience seems logical.
But civilisations have been waxing and waning since they started. I just don’t think it’s helpful to categorise people by some arbitrary criteria like age.
Babyboomers didn’t grow up among the wreckage of the second world war (not that much wreckage existed anywhere outside of Germany, anyway) because they’re the children of the people who had to cope with it. They’re the first post-war generation and – that’s very important point – their parents were old enough that they didn’t get traumatized as small children by this war (like mine, especially, my father). They’re thus in every respect a privileged generation as they grew up in a society people who had learnt from the war had designed for themselves. And they chose to destroy it. The communist babyboomers at least who were central to the great social changes of which originated in the 1960s and 1970s.
“Hidden Figures, a laudable but tedious book about the female black mathematicians at NASA”
I wonder why the writer thinks it is “laudable”.
Why is that not on my reading list?
I have a lifetime supply of books to read, have just finished some Dostoevsky, this “Hidden Figures” thing I don’t think I’d get round to even if I live to be a thousand years old.
😀😀😀
Tsundoku:
積ん読(つんどく) — when used affectionatelyLiterally, 積む (to stack) + 読む (to read).
While it can be neutral or teasing, in literary and book-lover circles it’s often explicitly praised as:
Japanese writers frequently talk about:
It’s not about neglect — it’s about abundance and future possibility.
I have a twin towers of books on my bedside table….
Well I don’t think I am literary though I am a book lover. I am the opposite- I want to finish everything NOW. That said it’s handy that I have a lifetime worth of books inherited from my parents that are probably worth reading.
Also good that the selection is theirs not mine so it forces me to be more open.
They made a film of the story, by the same name about three talented mathematicians at NASA, who also happened to be black women. It was an inspiring piece, with a background of civil rights, and petty racism. It wasn’t a bad film, in the way that those preachy, anti-white films usually are. The real story was that people can still achieve, despite hurdles put in their way, if they are bright enough and determined enough. They might have had to jump an extra hurdle or two, but they didn’t collapse and blame the world for their failure. For that at least we should be grateful.
It’s the preachiness that I can no longer stomach
The preachiness just brings out the ‘F’ monster in me nowadays.
The real story was that people can still achieve, despite hurdles put in their way, if they are bright enough and determined enough.
That’s a story the mediocrity which is spread over everything like mildew really likes to tell to itself because it justifies excluding people who aren’t properly mediocre from any chances of ever doing someting. It’s perfectly ok to blame people for what they’re doing or preventing because they’re responsible for it. They just don’t particularly like this.
I am not so sure about “warring wraiths of globalism and one world socialism”. They seem to have a lot in common, especially benefits for the elites, avoidance of democracy and accountability and group think.
One begats the other and visa versa.
I’m going to try “White Nights”. I hadn’t heard of it and I have never read anything by Fyodor Dostoevsky until now. It’s quite short and hopefully I will be able to get through it. Thanks for the recommendation.
I find it interesting that I’ve just started re-reading books I read as a young man, A tale of two cities, Hard Times, Germinal.
Even Dreams Memories, Reflections by Carl Jung is on order in paper form, staggeringly this would indicate Jung’s writing on the “Collective Conscious” are coming into play, perhaps there is an awakening occurring…. I do hope so!
Nice to hear this. I have also seen our son with lots of classics lately.
Joanna is always worth reading in the DS but I would further add that not just young adults but all adults should read more. I dislike reading fiction in my late 70s but have taken to reading over the last 6 years (since the Covid debacle), only biographies and it has been fascinating. I have ranged from Prince Albert to Moore’s Margaret Thatcher but the most interesting have been Sebag-Montifiore’s the ‘Romanovs’ and currently Juan Chang’s ‘Mao’. They are both lengthy tomes but what they tell us about the current thinking of Putin and Xi is fascinating and suggests ‘it was ever thus’, so I would say it is never too late to start reading.