News Round-Up

https://twitter.com/DavidDavisMP/status/2013293712822935974?s=20

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

39 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
pjar
2 months ago

As I understand things, the reason (or excuse) for putting off elections is that they’ll have to be run again in 2 years when things are re-aligned, and councils can’t afford the ‘double whammy’ of another election in that timeframe?

Which, in a nutshell, demonstrates just how useless our civil servants are. Surely, the very first question you’d ask is: “when are the elections, so we can dovetail the new with the old?” rather than impose them in the middle of a cycle… it must be nice, spending other people’s money.

transmissionofflame
2 months ago
Reply to  pjar

Indeed. Another approach would be to question the whole thing – if we are so poor that we can’t afford two elections instead of one, maybe our focus should be on spending less and being more efficient in our current form, rather than a reorganization that will just shuffle responsibility around rather than fundamentally remove any. In fact my understanding is that there will be MORE duplication because a lot of the County Council responsibilities will be pushed down to super-sized district councils. It would have been a lot easier to just absorb all the district council functions into the CC.

pjar
2 months ago

Yes, upon reflection, the very first question should, of course be: “is any of this really necessary at all?”

transmissionofflame
2 months ago
Reply to  pjar

My contact in our County Council told me just now that the CC favours creating TWO Unitaries to replace the CC and the many DCs, but the current DCs favour MORE than two. Well they would, wouldn’t they… And apparently someone has done some calculations and worked out that Labour stand a better chance of winning at least one Unitary if there are more of them, so guess what the Secretary of State is going to choose. It stinks.

JXB
JXB
2 months ago
Reply to  pjar

Could it be Reform UK controlled councils might ask that very question and conclude, No.

This would scupper Labour’s plan to reduce local control over no longer local authorities, and its preferred plan to strengthen Labour control of bigger chunk of the Country, no matter who is in central Government in future.

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 months ago

Councillors arguing for delaying the elections from a cost-saving perspective are handing a huge propaganda ‘stick’ to their opponents. They want to cancel elections to save money but they are pissing money away on ideological projects.

transmissionofflame
2 months ago
Reply to  soundofreason

I hope it backfires on them!

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 months ago

Yes. We need to take note of every occasion they claimed a delay would save ‘x thousands of pounds’ and throw that in their faces every time they spend as much or more.

EppingBlogger
2 months ago
Reply to  soundofreason

Reorganbisation will mean there is no continuity of comparison on finances. The costs will rise and service levels fall but no accounts will be available for years. My DC was two years in arrears with its audit so no one knew the right numbers when the last elections were held.

EppingBlogger
2 months ago

That is what is happening in Cambridgeshire which has gone from being three counties when I was younger to a single one and that absorbs all district councils as well. I overheard employees talking together and they are rubbing their hands with glee at the status and pay rises to come, just in time for their retirements.

transmissionofflame
2 months ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

I can’t see any money being saved any time soon, and a massive loss of focus where leadership and other senior officers are navel gazing instead of doing real work.

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 months ago
Reply to  pjar

Delaying the elections because the council is in the middle of a difficult project suggests that they don’t trust the people to choose the right councillors for the job. They think that the new/replacement councillors might want to do things differently and that that would be wrong and anti-democratic. It’s outrageous arrogance.

Do the people in the area want a Unitary Authority at all? Do they have a choice in the matter? Shouldn’t they be able to influence the formation of the authority?

When the councils do eventually become part of a Unitary Authority the representation on that authority will reflect the make up of the abolished councils. The election delays are intended to prevent the people’s current choices affecting the new authority.

transmissionofflame
2 months ago
Reply to  soundofreason

I am pretty sure very few people have a clue this is happening, beyond those already politically engaged. I’ve not seen any consultation coming from our councils.

EppingBlogger
2 months ago
Reply to  soundofreason

We have not seen any consultation yet in Essex because the structure has not yet been determined by Labour and merger plans are not complete.

EppingBlogger
2 months ago
Reply to  pjar

Much of the cost is an annual running cost regardless of elections. The department in the District Council has to maintain electoral lists, voting places and ballot boxes and it has to keep staff trained in case there is an unexpected by-election.

I wonder how elections will be run after local government re-organisation. Will district offices be closed and jobs moved to the county town miles away. Where will the local count take place. No information about such basic issues has been published locally and I suspect it is because they don’t know.

Monro
2 months ago

NATO crisis deepens as Trump demands Denmark cede Greenland to the United States Greenland has had a representational office within the Danish Embassy in Beijing since 2023. ‘Economic independence is the precondition to political independence: Greenland has to develop a self-sufficient economy first. Given Greenland’s economic structure, the mining industry would be the most promising to achieve economic independence, with fishing and tourism as two other pillars. China, a deep-pocketed investor with a huge consumer market, could play a key role in the development of Greenland’s three industries, particularly considering that other major economies’ growth more or less came to a halt in recent years. Cooperation with China could bring in enormous income for Greenland and substantial benefits to its residents and communities and could propel the process of its economic independence. The potential economic opportunities in Greenland are undeniably enormous and attractive to China’ https://polarresearch.net/index.php/polar/article/view/7706/14453 Greenland sees Chinese investment as key to its independence. Chinese investment elsewhere has had political strings attached. That is quite clearly not in the interests of the U.S. One of the key industries in which Greenland seeks Chinese investment is fisheries. That is a threat to both North American and European fisheries. It will… Read more »

Monro
2 months ago
Reply to  Monro

‘Key findings PRC leaders see the Arctic as important to achieving the PRC’s overarching strategic objectives, including the following: • Sustaining economic development. Authoritative PRC writings describe the Arctic’s abundant energy and mineral resources as important to China’s economic development. They also note that Arctic shipping routes would drastically reduce the time and distance—and therefore shipping costs—of transporting goods between Northeast Asia and Europe and North America. • Defending national sovereignty, security, and development interests. People’s Liberation Army (PLA) strategic thinkers have noted several reasons that the Arctic is important to China’s security objectives, including the deterrent value of deploying nuclear missiles to the Arctic and the fact that Arctic shipping routes offer potential alternatives to the Suez Canal, Panama Canal, and the Strait of Malacca, all of which are potential chokepoints. • Reforming the global system to align with PRC interests. PRC leaders seek to restructure the international system in ways that suit China’s interests and afford it great power status. PRC policy statements describe the Arctic as part of the “community with a shared future for mankind”—a community in which Beijing hopes to play a leadership role. Although China’s military is not currently active in the Arctic, the… Read more »

Monro
2 months ago
Reply to  Monro

What does Putin’s Russia make of President Trump’s Greenland gambit?

Oh!

“If Trump annexes Greenland by July 4 2026, when America celebrates the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, he will go down in history as a figure who asserted the greatness of the United States,”

Rossiyskaya Gazeta.

Maybe Russia doesn’t want China dominating Greenland either?

Maybe President Trump and Putin cooked this up together…you know…Ukraine for Greenland kind of thing?

Surely not! Impossible!

Hmm…

EppingBlogger
2 months ago
Reply to  Monro

Not sure why there is a problem. If Trump or the Danes were to get in touch with Starmer he could tell them how to give away territory without consulting the residents and pay the nbew owner a dowry for the privilege.

JXB
JXB
2 months ago
Reply to  Monro

China… the benign benefactor who will want nothing in exchange.

China wishes to build an empire – that doesn’t have to be by military conquest.

The British Empire was not established by military conquest.

Lockdown Sceptic
2 months ago

Monday Morning Windlesham

photo_2026-01-20_06-08-21
transmissionofflame
2 months ago

Councils have been urged to heed consultations on 20mph zones after majorities have opposed them”

The corner of my town that I live in recently adopted a 20mph zone. There was a “consultation” which I responded to (opposed it). I don’t know what the consultation results were, but the live survey of drivers indicates that very few support it because almost nobody keeps to 20mph. Bear in mind our little corner isn’t on the way to anywhere so almost all the cars driving on our roads belong to residents.

pjar
2 months ago

We have them in our local town (I suppose most everyone does these days), and the only result seems to be that those who would drive past the school doing 50mph in a 30mph zone, are now doing the same in a 20mph zone…

EppingBlogger
2 months ago
Reply to  pjar

Apparently certain sections of the population have unreadable or false number plates.

JohnK
2 months ago

And quite a few 20 signs have been mounted where they are essentially useless, given that most people would not be much more than that without them. A long way back, there were road design standards for new developments that required deliberate structures that would reduce max speeds, if the overall area was supposed to limit it to 20. The current snag is trying to plonk it onto roads that do not have features that automatically enforce it.

transmissionofflame
2 months ago
Reply to  JohnK

We have those square humps and all they do is lead people to use the road space in unnatural ways. In general, very few people drove stupidly in our neighbourhood before the 20 signs arrived, and probably those same people still do – the only problem point is a bend with parked cars and poor visibility, that requires caution, which most people exercise but some don’t. If anyone wanted to solve driving issues in our area, they could have simply addressed that by taking away one or two car parking spaces – everyone has a drive anyway. But it was about being SEEN to be doing something. Communist Green Councillors in the Home Counties. God help us.

Dinger64
2 months ago

Who the f#ck really cares about Greenland?..it’s a fridge freezer with 55000 inhabitants clawing a living from it and im sure if asked they wouldn’t be all that worried about American ownership,they would probably get better looked after!
There are no official rights of ownership to Denmark or anyone else for that matter, it’s certainly not worth falling out with the US over

Dinger64
2 months ago
Reply to  Dinger64

Not many ever view the earth map from the top! Greenland is the perfect natural battleship to launch attacks on any country in the northern hemisphere
If invaded by Russia or China all the America’s and Europe would be under far greater threat than we are now!

Dinger64
2 months ago
Reply to  Dinger64

Northern hemisphere

Northern_Hemisphere_LamAz
DiscoveredJoys
DiscoveredJoys
2 months ago
Reply to  Dinger64

Britain used to be considered by the Americans as an aircraft carrier moored off the coast of Europe. Maybe Trump no longer considers the UK to be a reliable partner. Trump certainly doesn’t want Russia or China to dominate Greenland and become a hostile aircraft carrier moored off the coast of the USA.

JXB
JXB
2 months ago
Reply to  Dinger64

They got Home Rule in 1979, so can choose as they wish. They also left the EEC/EU, so their supposed sudden attachment to “Europe” is odd.

Dinger64
2 months ago
Reply to  JXB

In the same vain, why isn’t the Danish owned west indies being mentioned in the mainstream? Oh.. slave labour! That Denmark carried on for 15 years after Britain abolished slavery! That really doesn’t fit with the European agenda, shinning a light on Denmarks slavery history, is Denmark being asked to pay reparations for their involvement in the slavery triangle?
The Danish West Indies were a Danish colony in the Caribbean from 1672 to 1917, consisting of the islands of St. ThomasSt. John, and St. Croix; they became the U.S. Virgin Islands after Denmark sold them to the United States for $25 million in gold, partly to prevent German acquisition during World War I. Their economy was built on slave labor for sugar, rum, and cotton production before slavery was abolished in 1848, after which the islands became a financial burden, leading to the sale. 
Imagine what this knowledge would do if highlighted against the current situation with Danish owned Greenland in the western media! Shit..fan

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 months ago

Pious Europeans fall short on Net Zero

“We are now undertaking the most expensive energy transition in the entire world,” Merz said. “I know of no other country that makes things so expensive and difficult as Germany.”

Oooh! Sir! Sir! I know!

For a fist full of roubles

Of course Trump may want Greenland as a launch point for attacks against Russia or China. it is the old NATO(US?) ploy of moving up to Russia’s border.
Just saying.

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 months ago

From the northern hemisphere map above, Alaska looks a better bet for attacking China (without over-flying Russia too much) – and the USA already has that.

Myra
2 months ago

To the DS team:
the like/dislike symbols (not the numbers) have disappeared on the primary comments (not the replies). I have not changed anything my side, so maybe a glitch your end?

Myra
2 months ago
Reply to  Myra

I think you may have already sorted it… does now appear on my comment.

soundofreason
soundofreason
2 months ago

Shamima Begum ‘could be free in days’

Yep. Free to go anywhere her Bangladeshi passport will let her.

EppingBlogger
2 months ago

Why is it so slow to access DS these days. Is there a problem with the server.

See Burnham at https://order-order.com/2026/01/20/burnham-attracts-only-100-viewers-for-economic-vision-speech/ He said “We can’t stay where we are, we are in a rut,” and said “bottom up devolution” is required for growth.” It is difficult to see how “bottom up devolution” can work when elections are cancelled for millions of people. I suppose he means devolution to councillors and quangos, not the people.