Ed Miliband’s Most Brazenly Dishonest Claims Yet
Ed Miliband’s Department for Energy Security and Net Zero has just announced the results of the new CfD auction, in what must go down as one of the most blatantly dishonest and arguably fraudulent Government press releases in recent years.


Britain has taken a monumental step towards ending the country’s reliance on volatile fossil fuels and lowering bills for good, by delivering a record-breaking offshore wind result in its latest renewables auction.
The results deliver the biggest single procurement of offshore wind energy in British and European history – confounding the global challenges facing the industry – a major vote of confidence in the UK’s new era of energy sovereignty and abundance.
The Government inherited the fiasco of the previous government’s failed Auction Round 5, in which not a single offshore wind project was secured. The last auction round, AR6, got the industry back on its feet. Now this auction round, known as Contracts for Difference AR7, has secured a record capacity of 8.4 GW of offshore wind which will generate enough clean electricity to power the equivalent of 12 million homes. The ground-breaking result puts Britain firmly on track to achieve its clean power mission by 2030.
These results show offshore wind is cheaper to build and operate than new gas. In new figures published today using the LCOE industry metric, the cost of building and operating a new gas fired power station is £147 per megawatt hour. By contrast, the results for fixed offshore wind in today’s auction were £90.91 per megawatt hour on average – or £65.25 in the commonly used benchmark of 2012 prices – 40% cheaper than the cost of building and operating new gas.
This auction will unlock around £22 billion in private investment, supporting around 7,000 jobs, bringing growth and good jobs to all regions of the country – and particularly to the country’s industrial heartlands. Clean power is also essential to tackle the climate crisis, the greatest long-term threat the country faces.
Below are the successful schemes:


Let’s start with the big lie:
Price for offshore wind agreed at 40% lower than the cost of building and operating a new gas power plant …
These results show offshore wind is cheaper to build and operate than new gas. In new figures published today using the LCOE industry metric, the cost of building and operating a new gas fired power station is £147 per megawatt hour. By contrast, the results for fixed offshore wind in today’s auction were £90.91 per megawatt hour on average – or £65.25 in the commonly used benchmark of 2012 prices – 40% cheaper than the cost of building and operating new gas.
There are the “new figures published today”:

The PDF analysis contains this table – I have highlighted the relevant column for Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (CCGT) technology:

The data annexes confirm that the cost of new CCGT is estimate as £109 per MWh at 2024 prices – but this includes £41 per MWh for carbon tax, which is not a “cost” at all but a Government imposition. (It relates to the Emissions Trading Scheme, which could be torn up tomorrow, if the political will was there.)
The Government claim that offshore wind is 40% cheaper than gas implies a cost of gas power of about £150 per MWh. That is a fake claim, even if you allow for carbon costs.
The simple reality is that the real cost of new gas power would be £68 per MWh, around a quarter less than these new contracts for offshore wind. Of this, fuel costs account for £45 per MWh.
The second lie concerns the use of “2024 prices”, on which the “90.91 per MWh” price for offshore wind is based.
It has probably occurred to you that we are now in 2026! Since 2024, CPI has risen by 4.5%. As CfD strike prices are index linked, that “£90.91” has already risen to about £95 per MWh.
The wholesale price in Q4 2025 was £74.44 per MWh, according to the Government’s Low Carbon Contracts Company. Offshore wind will therefore be subsidised to the tune of £20 per MWh at these prices.


Indeed, the Government admits as much, because the AR7 published results confirm that subsidies could top £1.9 billion a year by the time all the schemes are operational. These subsidies will have to be paid for 20 years, and index linked.

Then we come to the third big lie.
The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) is comparing new offshore wind with new CCGT. The true comparison however should be with existing CCGT, as we already have under-utilised CCGTs. It is generation from these that new wind power will replace.
As we have already paid for all of the fixed costs anyway, the only cost of producing additional electricity at CCGTs is the fuel cost, which as we have seen is around £45 per MWh. That means the cost of sourcing power from these new wind farms will be about £50 per MWh dearer than the gas power they are replacing.
We are tight on CCGT capacity and will need to construct new plants if older ones close as expected. But – crucially – we will have to do that anyway, whether we build new wind farms or not as gas will remain our back-up for intermittent renewables for the foreseeable future.
What Miliband wants is to spend tens of billions building offshore wind farms in addition to paying for that new gas capacity. It will not “lower bills for good”, as the presa release blurb states. It will raise bills yet further.
First published on Paul Homewood’s blog, Not a Lot of People Know That.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
This will catch up with Millibrain one day. When he looks around for support there will be none.
He possibly doesn’t grasp that he is also killing the Labour Party stone dead. Most people will eventually realise that wasting £Trillions in taxes for no observable reason is pure madness. Especially as virtually no other country is following.
They will also see a reverse Robin Hood operation in process, with an ‘elite few’ filling their pockets, while their fuel bills rocket. Some MPs in Labour probably understand this, but still cannot stop the madman.
What a mendacious shyster he is. I wonder if anyone in this appalling government believes a single word that he says.
You’re assuming that any of them are able to do simple mathematics and understand how these lies were constructed. Like Nelson they may have put the telescope to their blind eye.
Don’t forget we need to factor in a potential war which our warmongering leaders seem to desire. The first target of an enemy would be to target windmills at sea as well as LNG carriers. I wonder if dozy Ed has thought it through!
He is an incredibly hard necked imposter, but remember that NET ZERO is now THE LAW.
We have forced ourselves to do all of this crap by passing the NET ZERO amendment back in 2019, and it was waved through Parliament with no debate or vote or cost/benefit analysis. —–So what does this mean? It means the Political Class are all in on it, not just Miliband.
Miliband is not the Climate and Energy Emperor. If he disappears in a cloud of dust on Friday afternoon NET ZERO is still enshrined in law.
Yet another priceless photo from the Daily Sceptic’s “Millipede Collection”. 🙂
That is all.
This makes me feel a little uneasy. There’s something really creepy about this man…
There’s certainly something really gormless about him!
As Paul says, that “40% cheaper” is an *outright lie*. Surely government can’t get away with blatant lies in official statements.
It needs someone to call them out on it in a public sphere and for the captured media to report it.
Which won’t happen as they know what’s good for them…
Once the lights go out for good, we’ll need to find some alternative use for all those lampposts.
Ideas?
I’ve got some large pliers too, they’re great for tasks that require squeezing things.
Best stock up on piano wire although our farming friends could turn with some baling twine.
Nail him to a wind turbine blade and leave him there
It’s official – clean power really is dirty lies.
Why does he never allow himself to be cross examined and made to justify this ruination of our landscape and coastline? Because he knows he’s incapable of providing any justification for this madness.
Let’s try amd make this very simple……maybe simple enough for Mad Ed to comprehend.
You have to drive to work, there are no alternatives, you must buy a car. Opposite are two garrages one sells EV’s the other ICE cars. Both vehicles have to take u 50 miles each way.
U check them both out……the EV’s makes a lot of fancy promises. and is a lot cheaper….the ICE car is more expensive…..no brainer you buy the EV…but just as you are about to pay, the salesman coughs and says you will have to buy the ICE, as well as the EV, as the EV only works on not very windy days, on windy or no wind, it wont start, nor will it run at night….hence the ICE…..
How can Mad Ed ever claim a cost advantage, for renewables, he really should be under protection.
Is it a cult?
The government can always make sure that gas will be more expensive because they have control over the taxes they levy on it.
Excellently concise.
I’m nicking that sentence.
Red Ed is buying his next, highly lucrative job, in the Global Eco Quangocracy with OUR money. Just like Alok Sharma did.
He’s not stupid; he an authoritarian Socialist who enjoys having the power to dictate to “the peasants” and the ability to wreck other people’s lives.
He knows exactly what he’s doing.