If English Literature Courses Are Going to Be About Gay and Green Grievance Studies We Might As Well Pulp Them Now

When I was studying English Literature at university a full quarter of a century ago now, in the period just before the reforms of the Blair regime really had time to work their cultural poison, I remember talking to a fellow first-year undergraduate who informed me she was about to drop out. Why? Because she hadn’t realised an English Literature course would involve reading so many books. At school, she said, her teacher had read them all out loud for her. In what she called “a funny voice”. Sometimes even whilst “doing the actions”. Hope they weren’t reading Lolita.

Twenty-five or so years later, thanks to Instagram, YouTube, TikTok and a thousand other similar portents of Anti-Christ, we increasingly seem to be entering into a post-literate era in which the presence of students like the above on English Literature courses may now almost be the norm, not a comic aberration. Perhaps this growing 21st century distaste for books – at least for proper ones, not children’s books like Harry Potter, Sally Rooney and suchlike – helps explain why, as the Sunday Times recently reported in a tone of abject despair, the number of undergrads choosing to study English Literature has plummeted by almost a fifth in just five years, going from 49,000 to 40,000 since 2019.


To read the rest of this article, you need to donate at least £5/month or £50/year to the Daily Sceptic, then create an account on this website. The easiest way to create an account after you’ve made a donation is to click on the ‘Log In’ button on the main menu bar, click ‘Register’ underneath the sign-in box, then create an account, making sure you enter the same email address as the one you used when making a donation. Once you’re logged in, you can then read all our paywalled content, including this article. Being a Donor will also entitle you to comment below the line and access the premium content in the Sceptic, our weekly podcast. A one-off donation of at least £5 will also entitle you to the same benefits for one month. You can donate here.

There are more details about how to create an account, and a number of things you can try if you’re already a donor – and have an account – but cannot access the above perks on our Premium page.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

20 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dave Summers
Dave Summers
2 months ago

Surprised there isn’t a class based interrogation of The Faerie Queene: after all, Marx and Spenser were made for one another.

spud
spud
2 months ago

That’s the learned professor’s list of books? No wonder the girl looks so blank. I’ve got 5 glorioius grandchildren all in their 20s and I’m extraordinarily relieved that they’ve all survived education almost undamaged.

MajorMajor
MajorMajor
2 months ago

English Literature courses and similar subjects are easy options. Anybody with average intelligence can write an essay on any book without even reading it. You only need to have an opinion.

Try maths, physics, engineering. A subject where your work is objectively measurable. Whether or not the bridge you designed will stand or collapse is most definitely not a matter of opinion.

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  MajorMajor

Just to add, the latter are actually useful.

Mrs.Croc
Mrs.Croc
2 months ago
Reply to  MajorMajor

Not for long though. There is a movement afoot to decolonise maths!

harrydaly
harrydaly
2 months ago
Reply to  MajorMajor

Write one then?

harrydaly
harrydaly
2 months ago
Reply to  harrydaly

If you do, I promise that I’ll see to it that it gets published on a substack that occasionally gets in TDS or its News Roundup — one that’s in the latter today.

harrydaly
harrydaly
2 months ago
Reply to  MajorMajor

Come on, Major Major, write your essay and send it to harry1daly@gmail.com. It’s easy you know.

For a fist full of roubles

Not being at all literary, I am still trying to work out whether this is a spoof.

Tonka Rigger
2 months ago

The main takeaway for me was the fact that Professor Batchelor researched for her third book with someone called “Manushag”, which tickled the peurile nerve in me. Yes, I know, I’m in my late 40s and should really grow up.

The standard of written English in general is absolutely woeful these days. It’s a shame for such a historically literary nation.

RTSC
RTSC
2 months ago

“Where are all the Darkies in Dickens?”

Where they were ….. in their own countries.

That’s me cancelled …….

disgruntled246
disgruntled246
2 months ago

When my daughter was choosing her A levels in 2018 she considered English lit. The only bits of the syllabus the teacher told us about consisted of books around ‘the immigrant experience’. No Austen, Dickens, Shakespeare, Hardy. I’d expect those to make up the bulk of the syllabus. When I studied languages for A level and later university the courses were rammed full of Racine, Sartre, Goethe, Schiller, Heinrich Boell.
Fortunately she chose History instead (which obviously presented its own challenges, seeing a lot of what she was studying as ‘history’ was what as an older parent I’d lived through).

Climan
Climan
2 months ago

English Literature is for entertainment purposes (that was why it was written and sold to paying customers), not a subject worthy of academic study. Teach children that it exists, but don’t force it on them, and don’t indulge those who want to waste many years studying it.

i can hear the wails rising like a pipe band warming up: “it teaches the meaning of life”, “it helped me to code”, etc. If that really is the case then please distill these life lessons, so that the rest of us don’t have to wade our way through umpteen books.

its raining all day today, so I’m going back to bed with a good Trollope.

disgruntled246
disgruntled246
2 months ago
Reply to  Climan

Historically humanities subjects were a gateway into professions such as accountancy because of the analytical skills they taught.
Now certainly English is just indoctrination.

spud
spud
2 months ago
Reply to  Climan

Never mind Pharma’s meds – keep taking the Mozart and Trollope.

transmissionofflame
2 months ago
Reply to  Climan

I love books and think that “literature” teaches us much about life, helps us to understand things – ourselves and other people – as well as bringing enormous pleasure. Studying “literature” – as opposed to reading it – always seemed to me like a good way of ruining it, but I guess we’re all different.

Norfolk-Sceptic
Norfolk-Sceptic
2 months ago

I haven’t had time to read many fiction books, as I’ve led a rather eventful life.

I didn’t mean to. It just happened. I think I was born into one of those books like War and Peace, luckily without a hot war or physical violence, or much peace either: but very eventful. 🙂

transmissionofflame
2 months ago

Even better! Make your life your own novel.

harrydaly
harrydaly
2 months ago
Reply to  Climan

“worthy of academic study”? Academic study is the measure of what is worthwhile?

harrydaly
harrydaly
2 months ago

If Steven Tucker weren’t so young a man, he’d know that things were already going wrong with ‘English’ — ‘theory’ starting to supplant criticism — at least thirty years before he did his degree. In evidence, see, e.g., https://dukemaskell.substack.com/p/in-praise-of-the-contemporary-critic.