News Round-Up

https://twitter.com/GBNEWS/status/2009726704646844442?s=20

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

24 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
NeilParkin
3 months ago

‘You’ve killed off any glimmer of hope’: the pub landlord’s letter shaming Rachel Reeves

She doesn’t care. She thinks she’s doing the right thing, and all her friends agree.

EppingBlogger
3 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

There is an east London borough largely occupied by her favoured friends whose creed denounces alcohol. There is a crummy pub there into which passers-by cannot see. Locals use it for drinking where their more rigorous coreligionists cannot see them.

NeilParkin
3 months ago

Why banning X would be harder than Labour imagines

It is said that a thousand years ago, King Cnut set his throne against the tide, and forbade the tide to rise and wet his boots. It did anyway. He spoke to his courtiers, “Let all men know how empty and worthless is the power of kings (and Prime Ministers…), for there is none worthy of the name.”.

JeremyP99
3 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Many many companies use X for support and advertising
Banning it would go down well with such eh?

NeilParkin
3 months ago
Reply to  JeremyP99

Not to say the dribbling emotions of the left. How long could they survive without calling strangers Nazi because they hold a different opinion.

NeilParkin
3 months ago

Petition: Cancel the clinical trial into puberty blockers & safeguard vulnerable children” 

Signed. They are treating our kids like lab rats. It is a disgusting and shameful spectacle.

NeilParkin
3 months ago

Will Ayatollah Khamenei step down? Most potent protests yet put him on brink

Invariably, revolutions produce something worse than what came before. I hope not in this case. A moderate, secular Iran would be quite an improvement for the World.

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
3 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Look at how Poland Hungary, Czech Republic recovered after throwing off communism.

I would be cautiously optimistic that the Persian people a historic great nation with a vast and ancient cultural heritage could do the same.

MajorMajor
MajorMajor
3 months ago
Reply to  Jack the dog

There is a difference though.
The countries you mention did not embrace communism, it was forced on them. Their population reluctantly accepted the reality: they were under Soviet occupation and they were unable to break free. In the case of Hungary and Chechoslovakia the Soviet Union had to intervene militarily to stop them from breaking away from the communist system (1956 and 1968), this almost happened in Poland too.
All these three countries had strong (although imperfect) democratic traditions. So as soon as the Soviet Union became weak enough, they broke away. Nobody wanted to remain in the communist system.
Iran… not sure. There seems to be a strong Islamic element to their culture; whether a country like that can really become a secular society, I don’t know. We can only hope.

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
3 months ago
Reply to  MajorMajor

There is some truth to that IIRC zoroastrianism originated in persia which was also intolerant of non believers, but up to 1979 they had developed a pretty nice country.

So yes, it could go either way but unlike many places I think there is some reason for optimism.

JeremyP99
3 months ago
Reply to  MajorMajor

Islamism was forced on Iran at the revolution.

JXB
JXB
3 months ago
Reply to  Jack the dog

Yes they threw off Communism and jumped into the jaws of the other arse-cheek, the Fourth Reich, the rival Socialist enterprise (Corporatism, aka Fascism) which elevates the State above the individual, centrally plans and controls the economy, and silences all dissent.

The same bunch running the Governments of those places continued to run the Governments once democracy had broken out. Nothing changed, just the name.

Monro
3 months ago

Trump sick of ‘tiresome’ Putin

President Trump is a businessman, a very experienced businessman. Emotion is unhelpful in business.

Trump’s realpolitik surpasses the fiction of international law

‘The lesson of Trump’s Venezuelan adventure is that the US will secure resources by force if needed’

Putin and Xi Jinping, their rather board game approach to international affairs, has given President Trump the opportunity to, himself, play ‘Risk’ without much of the risk bit.

Putin holds less of Ukraine now than he did four years ago. Xi Jinping has a few more sand castles in the South China Sea. The United States controls the oil market in the Western hemisphere.

I certainly wouldn’t bet against the U.S. getting Greenland as well.

For a fist full of roubles
Reply to  Monro

It is what bullies do – get their way.

JeremyP99
3 months ago

You think Denmark could defend Greenland, which is strategically HUGELY important to the security of the Northern Atlantic.

What’s happening is that Trump if forcing Denmark to get real — and if that means more American military bases, it will happen.

BTW, who did Trump “bully”?

JohnK
3 months ago
Reply to  Monro

“getting Greenland” is about money, and the extraction of minerals of various kinds. Militarily, they are already there, in a similar fashion as they are here in Gloucestershire – after all, they used RAF Fairford for their recent oil tanker operation in the north Atlantic.

Monro
3 months ago
Reply to  JohnK

As I say, President Trump is a businessman.

He clearly believes that, if the U.S. must pick up the tab to defend Greenland because Denmark, Britain (who ‘stands with Denmark’) will not, then the U.S. is entitled to some recompense in the shape of access to Greenland’s natural resources.

That seems to me to be in the interests of the population of Greenland.

It will, of course, be up to President Trump to make the Greenlanders some kind of an ‘offer that they cannot refuse’.

Free Lemming
3 months ago

Tony Blair’s sister-in-law sparks outrage after describing October 7th as ‘legendary’

I’m not in the slightest bit interested in what the creatures sister-in-law did or didn’t say. What I’m interested in is why MSM is not asking the question of why the creature has not been held accountable for the murder of hundreds of thousands of men, women and children, and the displacement of millions. That’s the investigation I want.

Jane G
Jane G
3 months ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

I’m not sure if it was an appropriate response but I couldn’t help laughing at the news of Blair’s sister-in-law’s conversion to the religion of “peace”.
If it embarrasses him – good, especially if that was her motivation. If not, then the evidence of lunacy in the family can only be another black mark against this clan.

JeremyP99
3 months ago
Reply to  Jane G

 news of Blair’s sister-in-law’s conversion to the religion of “peace”.”

Happened years ago. Do keep up!

JeremyP99
3 months ago

It is indeed a disgrace. But what else did anyone expect from the BBC. Who now really only talk to themselves and their own.

Jon Garvey
3 months ago
Reply to  JeremyP99

It’s one thing to silence opinions you don’t agree with. it’s quite another to silence news you don’t agree with.

EppingBlogger
3 months ago

A great deal of comment continues to echo around the internet and in dead tree media about the US capturing Maduro. I suspect it is more excitable because of TDS but I think it needs to be examined.

For as long as I can remember the US has insisted on extra territorial application of its laws in respect of matters impinging on US interests in their country. That has been the basis of their requests for extradition of people elsewhere facing allegations which would not be crimes in their own countries.

Furthermore the US did not recognise Maduro as a head of state but an imposter dictator. Accordingly their arrest and arraignment of Maduro are unexceptional other than the skill and effort needed to secure the arrest.

Leftists here complaint it is against international law. In which case can someone justify the arrest of Graham Linehan at a British airport on charges relating to activities done outside our jurisdiction on a server also outside.

Jon Garvey
3 months ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

Hmm… you’re asking questions. Obviously a Putin Stooge.

There, that’s answered the question.