Trump Dumps IPCC and UN Framework Convention on Climate Change
The Trump administration today published the details of 66 international organisations that the USA is to withdraw from. Among these 66 are the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). These are the twin mainstays of the global climate agenda, which the USA has been a major contributor to. This is without doubt a radical departure from politics-as-usual, following the collapse of federal grant-making schemes under USAID, prompted by DOGE investigations. This will impact many policy domains, but it is climate that is perhaps highest up the political agenda.
There is little doubting the impact this will have within the USA and globally. Of the 720 government-appointed authors to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report, 74 were American, according to Green Blob lobbying group CarbonBrief. The UNFCCC is the parent organisation of the infamous COP meetings, the most notable of which was Paris in 2015, which set the terms of the current policy framework. In his first term, Trump pulled the USA out of the Paris Agreement, only for that decision to be reversed by Joe Biden as soon as he assumed office in 2021. On re-election, Trump again pulled the USA out of the agreement. And now he has gone much, much further, dissolving the relationship with the process altogether.
To read the rest of this article, you need to donate at least £5/month or £50/year to the Daily Sceptic, then create an account on this website. The easiest way to create an account after you’ve made a donation is to click on the ‘Log In’ button on the main menu bar, click ‘Register’ underneath the sign-in box, then create an account, making sure you enter the same email address as the one you used when making a donation. Once you’re logged in, you can then read all our paywalled content, including this article. Being a Donor will also entitle you to comment below the line and access the premium content in the Sceptic, our weekly podcast. A one-off donation of at least £5 will also entitle you to the same benefits for one month. You can donate here.
There are more details about how to create an account, and a number of things you can try if you’re already a donor – and have an account – but cannot access the above perks on our Premium page.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Love it. Leave the UN, the WHO, the IMF, the terrorist org NATO and every other globalhomo-Communist mafia.
66 is just the start – make it 6666.
666 would seem a more appropriate number!
NATO is not part of this list. NATO is our only defence against an increasingly aggressive Russia, China and Islam. Why did Sweden, a long time neutral country request to join NATO? The UN, WEF, WHO, CCP, EU are almost indistinguishable in their intent which is to push for global governance and the removal of Western sovereign nations and using methods to destabilise western nations as described by Yuri Bezmenov.
“The concept of national sovereignty has been immutable, indeed a sacred principle of international relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation.”
UN’s Commission on Global Governance
Mark Carney now heads NATO and wants to electrify its vehicles. I just hope Russia Iran and China have sufficient charging points.
Do you not mean Mark Rutte? Although many of these people are indistinguishable from each other I’ll grant.
Rutte is a WEF Hitler Youth graduate but not sure about Mark Cuntney.
Canada and NATO. Wow.
NATO is a bureaucracy – it can defend nothing.
Russia is not “incresdingky aggressive” that’s the Western propaganda schtick to justify militarisation, conscription, and distract from the complete ruination Western Governments are inflicting on their people who have turned against them and all become “Far Right”.
I couldn’t agree more.
The .most consequential president in my lifetime, let’s hope he manages to see out his term and pass the baton to a suitable successor.
We didn’t realise how fortunate we were to have RR and Mrs T working in unison for the betterment of their respective nations. Giants of yesteryear, head and shoulders over the political pygmies of today.
That’s because most people aren’t fully aware of the extent to which they live under a series of mob like protection rackets.
These supranational international organisations are just protection rackets. Pay to protect.
Breaking away from these international protection rackets makes all the sense in the world for Trump who is the ultimate mobster and who clearly carries himself with the intention of being the godfather of all godfathers. For him there is only one protection racket, and that is the United States of America.
True, but at least citizens of the USA are in a clearer position now. There’s always a tradeoff if you give someone else power to exercise on your behalf, but at least they know who has that power – and it’s someone they can remove every 4 years. A step in the right direction.
This is exactly the point, and precisely why the British electorate finally heeded Tony Benn’s comments about the EU.
I say “Trump” because he’s the face of the mafia. I know many people are going to balk at this, but I don’t think Trump himself is actually calling too many of these shots.
To me it’s increasingly clear that the US ruling establishment has been reassessing its relationship with the rest of world for some time and, in view of harsh cold geopolitical realities, has decided on a significant change of course.
Which isn’t to say that there isn’t formidable opposition within the US establishment against this change, but for now those pushing for a change have the upper hand.
As I see it, Trump is their man, their salesman, the politician who marshals the support of the population and goes out to bitch slap leaders around the world. And at the same time is the lightning rod for all the opposition, hatred and disdain from the resisters.
As in Britain and everywhere else, the population in the US don’t really chose anything. They get what has been decided for them. At least that’s what I see.
I am not sure there’s any way to know for sure, without being able to see into Trump’s mind or be present for all of his interactions. You may be right.
On balance, I think the USA and the world in general are better off with Trump than with Harris or some RINO. Still a long way from ideal, but my ideal world is not a vision supported by many.
Whether that is true or not, my point is that it’s not really the US electorate deciding.
They decided to elect Trump – that’s all they can do. Trump is surely doing different things to what Harris would have done – for whatever reason. So voting made a difference.
True..and then others decide whether the election is stolen or not.
He is. But he’s not doing the things he decides. He is doing the things the establishment has decided to get done. Or more accurately the faction within the establishment that is getting its way. And that faction got their guy elected. Out of two options….which people have been gaslit into believing is actual choice.
With respect there has to be an element of speculation in your assertion. It’s plausible but I don’t think we can be certain exactly what forces are pushing in what direction. I think
it’s equally plausible that he is a thorn in their side. After all, there has historically always been a limit to what people can get away with, sooner or later
I think there is an Important difference between politicians and non politicians- Trump is an outsider, and he views stuff s an American patriot rather than as a member of the swamp.
And that is a good thing.
That’s exactly what they want you to believe. That and also that it represents the actual choice of the people of the country.
Not just one but many mafias.
Tomorrow’s headline: “Ed Milliband has announced an extra levy on electricity prices to increase our contribution to the IPCC now that America has withdrawn. ‘Britain will now be the world leader in saving the polanet,’ he said.”
Don’t give the institution escapee any ideas.
This week’s Good News.
ABCNews.go.com lists them.
Has he pulled the USA out of the WHO yet?
Yes
Withdrawing The United States From The World Health Organization – The White House
Fantastic— along with the other 66 corrupt gangs!
Uplifting news for a Friday. Anything that brings this appauling grift to an end has to be appauded.
I agree, although the words “beware of what you wish for” resonate in my mind. What comes next is very uncertain.
But bring it on, I guess, because I know I definitely don’t want the technocratic, global government hellscape they have been preparing for us.
Great news. Makes the heart sing but it’s just a pity it has taken him a year to make these withdrawals. Should have happened in January 2025.
It’s the best news of the year thus far, but, like Iran, the MSM are giving it only minimal coverage. Farage should promise the same.
Only if and when the UK ruling bureaucracy decides to align with the US.
My guess is they are waiting to see if it definitely goes that way before following.
The problem, of course, is that if they do, that will be the end of the UK as anything resembling a leading global power, something that hasn’t been the case for over 200 years.
For now the UK establishment looks to be operating on the assumption that the anti-globalist movement can still be suppressed.
Time for the rest of the world to demonstrate how great they are in the face of these evil, evil actions by the Literally-Hitler that is Donald Trump! Save the Planet! Protect Granny! Denounce the US!
Watch out, some people might not realise you are being cynical. They might think you mean it. —-I have had that a few times when I tried to be funny.
I am not trying to be funny.
I am funny.
wink
The only major western leader to call time on the climate change eco socialist agenda masquerading as concern for the planet. Trump realises what this scam is. The plundering of wealth from rich countries who are now supposed to price their own citizens out of using energy by forcing them to use expensive unreliable wind and sun and ditch affordable, reliable fossil fuels because the UN and WEF say we have all used more than our fair share in becoming prosperous. ——Meanwhile we are governed by phony planet saving UN arse lickers.
“EU-UK Withdrawal Agreement” passed by Johnson; weakened by Sunak’s Windsor Treachery.
It’s why you cannot believe a word which Badenough and Coutinho say about the Net Zero Insanity. They cannot advocate ditching it because THEY are responsible for it.
Would Farage ditch the EU “deal” in order to scrap Net Zero? I think he might.
You have a point. The entire Net Zero fraud needs to go. The Conservatives are simply saying they will slightly water it down. They seem to think saving people 150 quid a year deserves a medal. That is only about 3 quid a week on most electricity bills.
That’s the way the uniparty works. By slightly modifying an unpopular policy they attempt to claim political virtue while leaving the basic mechanism intact.
Yep—–That is why I refer to them as “The Political Class” or “The Establishment”. ——–They were all in on the Net Zero Scam —–In 2019 it was waved through parliament with no debate, no discussion of cost benefit and NO VOTE. It was a climate COUP.
Sadly, it would take a revolution to extricate the UK from the UN and its tentacle organisations. Our deeply embedded political class is intensely wedded to the idea of globalisation and the erosion of national sovereignty. The reason is that the UN is a substantially British project dating back to WWII, which can trace its origins back further with the League of Nations in the aftermath of WWI in the 1920’s. You only have to look back on the works of prominent thinkers such as H.G.Wells in the 1930’s and Bertrand Russell in the 1950’s to see how these ideas developed. As this (possibly paywalled) article sets out, the UN was formulated by a committee working in the Foreign Office in 1942: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/10/24/80-years-united-nations/ The article also reveals that the Rockefellers, who provided the land that the present UN headquarters in New York is built on, were in on the project right from the outset. All the subsequent climate grift logically follows: https://www.itia.ntua.gr/en/docinfo/2035/ Even before then, in The Shape of Things to Come (1933), Wells was aware that his Utopian ideas for global government were at risk from being hijacked by American business interests, but being an idealist wedded to Socialism, he… Read more »
The League of Nations was a US-project and the US president of that time (Wilson) was already in favour of this kind of United States of the World (To end war!!1) before WWI. It got continued by the unholy troika Roosevelt, Churchill & Stalin after WWII.
NATO is a spent force that has out lived it’s usefulness, it is toothless and more concerned with climate change than secure sovereignty of nation
It wasn’t in existence leading up to the ww2 and yet nations picked a side without it and no doubt would do again
These days, where do you see the blue caps patrolling areas of conflict?
Bound to make the NGO’s very angry. China thought they had America caged in like they do the UK, Canada, and Europe.
How will Net Zero be scrapped without repealing the Climate Change Act?
Very easily. The actual legislation that creates the Net Zero target is a Statutory Instrument. May issued an SI to change the target to Net Zero and so another SI can be issued to take to target back down. Without looking, I suspect the CCA includes the common passage ‘the Secretary of State may [indicating the task is optional] make regulations’ which occurs in a lot of legislation which if no regulations are made means nothing actually changes despite an Act of Parliament being made.
One of the fairly few actions of the Trump administration I consider 100% commendable and worth imitating. In an ideal world, all these long-ossified supranational structures which have long since been captured by left-wing and far-left activists and politicians (Marxism was always supposed to be the recipe for saving all of the world in unison) to further their political agenda would go away. There was international cooperation prior to all of this. Ambassadors of governments would meet for conferences to discuss supranational policy on sufficiently important, global topics. These would negotiate treaties their government would then ratify (or not). The notion that we should really have something like the United States of The World, complete with international laws and international organizations taking over formerly entirely domestic issues like health or education policy (Your pre-teen daughter must be taught ANAL SEX, that’s crucially important for her mental health! and other such chestnuts of UN aparatchick madness) goes back to an idea of the lunatic Woodrow Wilson (General Max Hoffmann, Der Krieg der versäumten Gelegenheiten, p. 169¹) and it’s high time to abandon that, alongside the preposterous notion that all of the world can neatly be divided into regions under limited control… Read more »
Wilson was the bankers’ choice. Everything else follows.
https://x.com/i/status/1978218226757575145
For all its talk of ‘justice’, for example, billionaires and their NGO grantors converge around UN institutions like so many flies around shit.
Tut! No need for vulgarity.
Way to go!