Zohran Mamdani Becomes First New York Mayor Sworn in Using Koran

Zohran Mamdani has become the first New York Mayor sworn in using the Koran, the Muslim election winner taking the oath of office as the clock ticked past midnight on Thursday night. The Telegraph has more.

The ceremony was laden with symbolism.

As well as using Islam’s holiest book, the self-proclaimed democratic socialist chose a disused gilded age subway station at Old City Hall as the setting to symbolise the city’s ability to think big and as a nod to the workers who keep modern New York running.

“When Old City Hall Station first opened in 1904 — one of New York’s 28 original subway stations — it was a physical monument to a city that dared to be both beautiful and build great things that would transform working peoples’ lives,” Mr Mamdani said ahead of the ceremony.

The station was closed in 1945, its tiled arches, chandeliers and vaulted ceilings seen only by a handful of visitors each year.

New York law requires that a new mayor take over on January 1st. It has become traditional to take the oath of office at midnight, before a bigger celebration later in the day.

He will use three Korans throughout the day, including his grandfather’s for the midnight ceremony, according to the New York Times.

It represents the end of an extraordinary journey for the 34 year-old politician. He upended the Democratic Party to win its nomination before overcoming a lack of name recognition to win the election in November with a populist manifesto that focused on affordability.

He campaigned to create universal child care, make public buses free and to freeze rents on a million apartments.

His radical programme helped inspire a record-breaking turnout of more than two million voters. And his supporters propelled him to a 10-point victory over Andrew Cuomo, the former Democratic state governor running as an independent, and well ahead of Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate.

Read the full report here.

Writing in the Telegraph, David Christopher Kaufman warns that Mamdani is “every bit as bad as many New Yorkers fear”.

For both the slim majority of New Yorkers who voted for him and the near half of the electorate who opposed him, Mamdani’s entry into Gracie Mansion caps the most improbable political journey in modern American history.

How on earth did a man, barely 34 years old, with an Ozempic-slim resume and practically zero managerial experience, rise to lead the cultural and economic heart of the United States, if not the entire planet? And how will his populist, socialist, anti-Zionist worldview translate into governing a city of nearly nine million residents and overseeing a workforce some 300,000 strong?

The truth is nobody really knows. But the evidence of the months since his election victory in November isn’t promising.

Mamdani is sticking with his penchant for Trumpian showmanship, hosting a massive block party to celebrate his swearing in literally at the doorstep of City Hall. However, the festivities are likely to ring hollow for millions of New Yorkers nervous about what is likely to come next.

Some will have been reassured that he is retaining Jessica Tisch, New York’s popular police commissioner, a billionaire heiress and long-time public servant who, under Eric Adams, New York’s outgoing mayor, has helped usher in the largest drop in violent crime in New York City’s recent history. To most voters, keeping Tisch makes obvious sense, particularly given Mamdani’s own reputation for being soft on public safety.

Mamdani’s base, however, isn’t so happy. Last week, more than 3,500 public defenders and legal service attorneys released a statement demanding Mamdani send Tisch packing. Rather than laud ongoing NYPD successes, the Left-leaning group claims she has led a campaign against political protest – particularly when it comes to the violent pro-Palestinian demonstrations which have roiled New York City for the past two years.

So far, Mamdani insists that Tisch is here to stay. But few should be confident that he will stick to his word. The police commissioner’s fate – and the fate of New York safety – stands as the first test of Mamdani’s ability to face down New York’s increasingly fractious ‘progressive’ voters for the good of the city. My guess? Tisch will be out by springtime.

Mamdani’s other major challenge will be convincing New York City Jews – or at least the two-thirds who did not vote for him – that they need not be afraid. Again, the signs are not promising.

According to a late December Anti-Defamation League report, 20% of Mamdani’s administrative appointees have ties to anti-Zionist groups. Some have gone on record as describing Hamas’s October 7th attack as “justified” and “resistance”; others backed pro-Palestinian campus encampments. The fact that Mamdani has also appointed celebrity anti-Zionists such as actor Cynthia Nixon and YouTuber Ms Rachel to his influential inauguration committee is adding to the community’s feelings of unease.

Mamdani has insisted that he will prioritise combating antisemitism, boosting anti-hate violence programme funding by 800%. But he also intends to dismantle the NYPD’s strategic response group, whose specially-trained officers responded to the waves of pro-Palestinian protests, as well as mass-casualty incidents such as July’s Midtown Manhattan office shooting.

Worth reading in full.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

41 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
10navigator
10navigator
5 months ago

I replied to a comment in the DT which stated ‘Welcome to the Caliphate of New York” with ‘Soon to be twinned with Londonistan,’ a term coined by the excellent Melanie Phillips. My comment was removed. Touchy or what?

ComradeSvelte
ComradeSvelte
5 months ago
Reply to  10navigator

Perchance that fits nicely with the C in NYC….

Hound of Heaven
Hound of Heaven
5 months ago
Reply to  10navigator

I found unsubscribing permanently from the Telegraph solved the problem of unreasonable deletions by a censorious comment editor.

10navigator
10navigator
5 months ago

I did exactly that two years ago, then renewed recently when it was offered for a pittance. Leopards ‘n’ spots spring to mind.

Heretic
Heretic
5 months ago

Good move. Back in the days before the Telegraph and other mainstream media began charging for online access, they never bothered moderating or censoring comments of mine. They just deleted them all and banned me from ever making any more, like everywhere else on the planet, with the honourable exception of The Daily Sceptic.

Smudger
5 months ago

Hear! Hear!
The Telegraph lost its way during Covid and has never recovered any sense of integrity.

stewart
5 months ago
Reply to  10navigator

It’s worth remembering that, as a general rule, it’s truth that gets censored. Truth that officialdom wants to hide.

Brian the dawg
5 months ago
Reply to  10navigator

It’s the “Londonistan” their filters get triggered by I think

Hester
Hester
5 months ago
Reply to  10navigator

Sharia no doubt on its way in too.

RTSC
RTSC
5 months ago
Reply to  10navigator

You’re not allowed to use the word “Londonistan” in the DT. I got my first “3-day comment ban” shortly before Christmas.

Trouble was I couldn’t work out which of my comments had led to it, so I guess I’ll be permanently banned before long. And then I won’t be subscribing any more.

CrisBCTnew
5 months ago
Reply to  10navigator

The Koran recommends lying and deception to further Islam’s goal of conquering the world.

Islamic deception has various forms, they’re called taqiyya, kitman, tawriya, taysir, darura, muruna etc. It actually is obligatory to further Islam’s goals.

So Mamdani is swearing to deceive the public and further Islam. Hmmm.

stewart
5 months ago

Does the Muslim God consider breaking an oath a sin if it’s against an infidel or an apostate?

I’m pretty sure their scriptures state that lying and deception are totally fine if it helps advance Islam.

But perhaps a religious scholar can correct me on this.

jeepybee
5 months ago
Reply to  stewart

I was just writing something similar.

He’s swearing on a religious book which encourages deception against non-Muslims and which the majority of Americans don’t follow anyway.

He may aswell be sworn in using his secret little diary…

FerdIII
5 months ago
Reply to  stewart

Taqiyya. In war deceit is to be used. There are 2 houses. The house of War – Infidels and the house of the Muhammadans. The totalitarian-fascist book Mein Koran makes it clear that the House of War must be wiped out or converted.

A Moslem Communist running NYC 25 years after 9-11? Completely expected and another marker on Western decline and destruction.

MajorMajor
MajorMajor
5 months ago

Well, the people of New York elected him.
They will just have to live with the consequences.

FerdIII
5 months ago
Reply to  MajorMajor

Lots of vote fraud. Same number voted in this election as in the elections Giuliani won. Muslim pop has doubled since 9-11 to over 500 K. Foreign born as well is almost half the voting pop. Illegals vote in NYC, no ID required. 2 mn votes cast, the Muslm Jihadist won barely 1 million. 40% voter turnout…..Giuliani’s elections had 60% turnout. Usual crap in the US with the demon party and the deep state.

soundofreason
soundofreason
5 months ago

The USA is famously/notoriously secular. It does not matter what he swore his oath ‘on’.

Of far more interest would be to document what he promised: both the actual oath of office and his manifesto and campaign speeches.

transmissionofflame
5 months ago
Reply to  soundofreason

Nominally secular or at least non denominational but far more religious than UK and role of religion in public life is far greater. Also I think it is relevant culturally and for reasons stated by stewart and jeepybee above/below.

But agree that what he ends up doing is also important.

soundofreason
soundofreason
5 months ago

Nominally secular or at least non denominational

Yes. The US currency still bears the inscription ‘in God we trust’, I believe. There was a bit of a row when the Apollo 8 astronauts read from the Book of Genesis – a federally funded quasi-military mission with readings from Genesis? Outrageous.

If Mamdani had sworn on the Bible we’d have known he was lying. If he had been a Quaker would anyone have cared if he refused to ‘swear’ but insisted on ‘affirming’? I doubt it.

He’s apparently a Muslim and a Socialist. He’s made promises. These should be summarized (and analysed in detail) with a view to highlighting them as soon as he breaks his promises. He needs watching. I wouldn’t trust him as far as… well, whatever.

transmissionofflame
5 months ago
Reply to  soundofreason

All politicians break some promises- it’s a messy business and it would be impossible not to. I would say most politicians break most of their promises because they promise the unachievable or lie.
I know nothing about him but as stated his religion is significant because of what it teaches (as far as I understand it) regarding how to treat unbelievers.
It seems to me that Islam as practiced is not particularly compatible with our traditions. We shouldn’t even have to be having this discussion.

stewart
5 months ago
Reply to  soundofreason

 It does not matter what he swore his oath ‘on’.

If it doesn’t matter, why do they do it.
And the guy insisted on a Koran, not a Bible, so it obviously matters to him.

RW
RW
5 months ago
Reply to  stewart

Quoting from the 2nd Surah: And there are some who say, “We believe in Allah and the Last Day,” yet they are not ˹true˺ believers. They seek to deceive Allah and the believers, yet they only deceive themselves, but they fail to perceive it. There is sickness in their hearts, and Allah ˹only˺ lets their sickness increase. They will suffer a painful punishment for their lies. When they are told, “Do not spread corruption in the land,” they reply, “We are only peace-makers!” Indeed, it is they who are the corruptors, but they fail to perceive it. And when they are told, “Believe as others believe,” they reply, “Will we believe as the fools believe?” Indeed, it is they who are fools, but they do not know. When they meet the believers they say, “We believe.” But when alone with their evil associates they say, “We are definitely with you; we were only mocking.” Allah will throw their mockery back at them, leaving them to continue wandering blindly in their defiance. They are the ones who trade guidance for misguidance. But this trade is profitless, and they are not ˹rightly˺ guided. Their example is that of someone who kindles a… Read more »

Ben Bellak
Ben Bellak
5 months ago
Reply to  RW

nor of Allah.

MajorMajor
MajorMajor
5 months ago
Reply to  stewart

Indeed. How could it not matter?
Of course it matters.
Do you really think that being a Muslim will have absolutely no effect on his policies, choices and priorities?
It’s like saying “ah, but I’m sure the communists will protect private property”.
Nobody, absolutely nobody is unbiased. It is not possible to be neutral; just look at the glaring cases of injustice that our supposedly “independent” judiciary produces, or the “impartial” reporting that characterizes the BBC.
He will be biased. He will promote Muslim-friendly policies and put Islamic allies in key positions. He will channel money into causes he agrees with. He will implement “racial justice” measures.
You’ll see.

FerdIII
5 months ago
Reply to  soundofreason

Pull thy head out of thy ass.

Muslims and Communists are not secular.

They destroy, annihilate, impose.

JXB
JXB
5 months ago

New York – Rotten Apple.

Art Simtotic
5 months ago

A quarter century on from the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, New York City falls to a mayor sworn in on the Koran. You couldn’t make it up if you tried.

Tonka Rigger
5 months ago
Reply to  Art Simtotic

I don’t think the truth about that will ever see the light of day. Safe to say the “official narrative” has more holes than Steptoe’s socks.

FerdIII
5 months ago
Reply to  Tonka Rigger

Nuclear bomb or DEW weapon. Another CIA project. Muslims were there, they were involved, but the real story is far more sinister than the average American is even willing to contemplate.

Ben Bellak
Ben Bellak
5 months ago
Reply to  Art Simtotic

and Khan in London 20 years after 7/7…and people say the great replacement is a conspiracy theory.

Free Lemming
5 months ago

I’m caught between two thoughts: 1) we’re being deliberately driven into a panic-stricken frenzy by a prolonged and coordinated campaign 2) we really are at the gates of hell. The question I keep coming back to is this: why are MSM clearly fanning the flames? I know, without any doubt whatsoever, who these people work for, so what’s their end game? It’s obviously not peace, but is there a real threat that they’ve created, or is there a threat that they hadn’t factored in and now need to shine a light on, or is there no threat at all and they simply want to divide and conquer? Maybe a bit of each. What I know with 100% certainty is that our only way out of this is to remove the traitors that are playing us like a fiddle… but not remove them by strumming the strings of one of their many fiddles.

Hound of Heaven
Hound of Heaven
5 months ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

We are being played for sure and allowed to vent spleen like the valve on a pressure cooker – but no more. Impossible to read and very unnerving.

John Kitchen
John Kitchen
5 months ago

How could people vote for someone with such an evil smirk on his face?

RW
RW
5 months ago

If he calls himself a democratic socialist¹ and swears an oath on the Quran, he’s certainly a hypocrite.

¹ That’s usually a term communists use for themselves when they think openly declaring their Marxism wouldn’t be helpful. But considering that Marx called religion opium for the people, something the oppressors invented to distract the oppressed with shiny flim-flam, a self-confessed Marxist cannot honestly swear an oath on a religious book.

Heretic
Heretic
5 months ago

“The next day Buckingham Palace rang about his [Sadiq Khan’s] appointment to the Privy Council in 2009:

“You’re going to be sworn in before the Queen, what sort of Bible would you like?’

I said: ‘I swear on the Koran, I’m a Muslim’.

They said: ‘We haven’t got a Koran, can you bring your own?’

So I went to Buckingham Palace with my Koran and afterwards they returned it and I said: ‘No, can I leave it here for the next person.’

Gezza England
Gezza England
5 months ago

And on the left is the corrupt Soros-funded mortgage fraudster – who listed her father as her husband on one document – Democrat AG Letitia James, who just like Far Left ministers here, was quick to shout that nobody was above the law….except for Democrats when they break the law of course.

Curio
Curio
5 months ago

Quick search shows:

  • Shabana Mahmood MP: Currently the Home Secretary (as of September 2025), she notably took her oath on the Quran when she was sworn in as Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary in July 2024. This made her the first Lord Chancellor to do so, in a ceremony overseen by the first Lady Chief Justice, Dame Sue Carr, marking a number of historic firsts.
  • Naz Shah MP: The MP for Bradford West has also repeatedly sworn her allegiance using the Quran.
  • Other MPs: Several other Muslim MPs, including Yasmin Qureshi and Rehman Chishti, have been sworn in on the Quran.
  • House of Lords: Lord Qurban Hussain is another prominent figure who has taken his oath on the Quran in the House of Lords.
  • Lord Ali (Waheed Alli, a Labour peer in the UK House of Lords) also took his oath on the Quran.

Does anyone know why so much fuss about the mayor of NY and why all the above went under the radar?

RW
RW
5 months ago
Reply to  Curio

The people making the fuss care more about communist mayors of New York who claim to be Muslims than about members of the UK parliament or government?

RTSC
RTSC
5 months ago

That’s New York going down the shitter then …..

Crosby
Crosby
5 months ago

Does the Quran’s content matter when a devotee takes his oath of office on it? Infidels and Jews should be afraid of the new mayor’s loyalties and religious commitments for sure. And lying seems fine when it is for the cause https://jesustomuslims.org/reach-out/articles/doctrine-lying-islamic-jurisprudence .

Crosby
Crosby
5 months ago

ps the YouTube programmes by Robert Spencer, Jay Smith, al Warrack, Tom Holland, discussing the evidence for the historicity of Mohammed and the history of the editing of the Quranic texts are the start of what Christianity went through in the 19th Century scholarly analysis.