National Trust Bans Volunteer After He Pointed Out Spelling Mistakes
The National Trust blacklisted a volunteer, banning him from volunteering, after he pointed out spelling mistakes on its website. The Telegraph has the story.
Andy Jones, 71, a volunteer at the trust for more than a decade, sent a dossier of thousands of misspellings and factual errors to the charity’s Director-General in the hope that they would be corrected.
After sending a strongly worded complaint to his local branch, in which he criticised the trust’s Director-General for not responding, he was told that his comments were “not in line with our organisational values” and was banned from volunteering at any of its sites.
His case is the latest example of the trust dismissing or suspending volunteers over claims that they do not meet its “culture” or “values”.
Earlier this year, more than a dozen volunteer gardeners on the Isle of Wight were suspended after managers claimed that some of their behaviour did not align with the trust’s “inclusive culture”.
The separate cases appear to be examples of the organisation’s pursuit of a progressive culture, which has included exploring properties’ links with slavery and colonialism and asking some staff to wear rainbow lanyards.
Responding to the cases highlighted by the Telegraph, Restore Trust, a pressure group comprised of members and supporters of the organisation, accused the charity of “disciplining or sacking volunteers for their opinions”.
Mr Jones volunteered for the National Trust for 14 years, first at the Woolbeding estate, in West Sussex, and later at Hindhead Commons and the Devil’s Punch Bowl in the Surrey Hills. His roles included everything from gardening and burning waste to dealing with membership queries and offering guidance to visitors on walks.
Last year, on his own initiative, he reviewed the trust’s web presence and created a dossier of the mistakes.
These ranged from typos such as “toliets” and “permanant” and grammatical errors such as “take a peak” to misspelling the name of the pre-Raphaelite artist Lucy Madox Brown as Maddox Brown.
In November 2024, he sent the dossier to Hilary McGrady, the trust’s Director-General, who is from Northern Ireland, in a politely worded email asking if she would “be so kind as to forward this to whomsoever has the authority and resources to address these errors”. Ms McGrady was awarded a CBE for “services to heritage” in the King’s New Year Honours.
Mr Jones received no reply and sent a follow-up email in January 2025, part of which said: “I sincerely hope my work is helpful to the National Trust.” Again, he received no response.
Frustrated, he quit as a volunteer at his local site. He sent a strongly worded email to his manager, part of which said: “Still no reply, acknowledgement, let alone thanks from the Oirish [sic] Dame on over 400 hours spent on her crappy not fit for purpose webs–te.”
A manager responded: “I was really disappointed by the language contained within your email. These comments are not in line with our organisational values.”
She said his relationship with the trust had “irreversibly broken down” and that “we will no longer consider you for any future volunteer positions at any of our places”.
Mr Jones admitted to the Telegraph that his comments were not appropriate but claimed that he was stressed at the time as he was suffering from stage-two prostate cancer.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Responding to the cases highlighted by the Telegraph, Restore Trust, a pressure group
comprised ofcomprising members and supporters of the organisation, accused the charity of “disciplining or sacking volunteers for their opinions”.😎
Yes, it’s as petty as that. These so-called powerful women don’t want men pointing out mistakes. This is because however powerful these women get, they are unable to debate and see the most innocuous remarks as a personal attack. As a woman, I have worked with enough of them to see how their psyche works. Unfortunately, it appears to be an ingrained female thing.
Goodness, don’t tell Mogwai 😉
Spelling is racist!
English is racist because it’s the language of the colonizers. To decolonize the indigenuos people of the United Kingdom, it’s therefore necessary to replace it with a carefully constructed better language created by combining selected Arabic and Maori words which will make hate speech impossible by omitting words which could be used to express it and end transphobia by dropping the notion of sex altogether. The government has made a binding committment to achieve this by 2060 and thus, turn the United Kingdom into a clean language and freedom of speech superpower!
Clean language superpower, lol. Write to your MP and suggest it – could become a Labour election slogan.
That’s a Labour guy (Matt Rodda) and I fear he might like the idea and miss the implied reference to 1984. I actually wrote to him once after the HoC had formally approved the COVID-prevention superpowers of the government to suggest that parliament should now vote to dissolve itself permanently as it had just agreed to letting the government do whatever it wants forever, anyway. Unfortunately, this suggestion was never implemented. It could have saved quite a bit of money!
Yeah I suspect a lot of them don’t do irony.
I thought it was the language of the colonised – the first inhabitants post-last Ice Age, the Brythonic Celts, colonised by the Romans, Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Viking Norse, Normans – and lately the Afro-Caribbeans, sons of Allah and the former Raj. Innit?
And then, for example: shampoo, bungalow, jodhpur, numnah, guru, karma, pyjamas – Hindi; tea, ketchup, typhoon, gung ho – Chinese; alcohol, zero, orange, lemon, cotton, sugar, coffee, admiral, sofa – Arabic; Zebra, chimpanzee, safari, jumbo, banana, zombie, juke (as in juke box), yam – African.
So will English be decolonised of these words, I wonder?
Even looking beyond the influence of obvious colonizer languages such as Latin, French, German and Norse, English has far more words from Hindi and Arabic than the 20 or so token words that survived from Welsh / Brythonic. The language of these islands is not just colonized but denied.
2026 will be the first year this century that I won’t have been a member of the National Trust.
I bailed out about 5 years ago when it was becoming clear that they were apologising for and almost ashamed of our heritage.
This is Environmental and Social Governance (ESG) weaponised. —–It is the geopolitical tool to align things that should happen at National Level with ideologies defined by those who sit above the Nation State.
I joined a few years ago so I could vote, not that it did much good!
My mother gave me life membership years ago when it was a gift to be valued. A couple of years ago I cut my membership card in to small pieces and sent it to the membership department at ‘Heelis’ explaining that I no longer believed that the Trust was for people like me. I received the reply that the Trust is for ‘everyone’. There then followed a rather absurd process to remove me from the mailing list which would have been amusing if I hadn’t been so mad at the lot of them.
National Trust bans wrong-age, wrong-gender, wrong-ethnicity volunteer. That’s inclusivity for you. Another institution marched through, abjectly surrendered and taken into captivity.
and consequently destroyed.
“his comments were “not in line with our organisational values” and was banned from volunteering at any of its sites.”
Values such as illiteracy and institutional retardation?
A concerned, loyal, longstanding volunteer takes the trouble to offer his services as a proofreader (normally requiring a fee) in order to help the NT and is subsequently ignored. Twice. By any standards this is the height of bad manners and in view of that, Mr Jones is remarkably restrained. The National Trust has displayed high-handed arrogance and appalling rudeness by not replying to correspondence from a volunteer. We should not fail to note that these are its lamentable values and they bring shame on the whole organisation.
Absolutely. Round us the NT have just started using apps only for their car parks. Thus excluding a vast proportion of their members and anyone else who doesn’t fancy downloading intrusive software on to their personal phones to pay a £2 parking fee. The National Trust need to be smashed to atoms.
Only white supremacists care about grammar!
mandem bumbaclat road man ting seen?
…
“Mr Jones admitted to the Telegraph that his comments were not appropriate…”
His comments seem to be precise and appropriate.
‘National and Trust’ is clearly an oxymoronic organisation.
I sympathise entirely with Mr Jones, but it’s a little unfortunate that in his letter to Hilary McGrady he mistakenly uses an objective-case compound relative pronoun (“whomsoever”), where the subjective-case (‘whosoever’) is required. No matter, the dolt at the other end of the message won’t notice.
Poor show to kick someone when they’re down. He kept his criticism private at first, after all and with cancer he probably doesn’t feel all that brilliant. I agree, no one at the NT would have noticed – until now.
We cancelled our membership for a number of reasons. Excessive pay of the chief executive trough. The constant support of fake climate change. The fact that volunteers don’t even get free tea or coffee or bottled water as a small token for working in the house and gardens
“Not aligning with our values” is one of those ESG excuses which really means that unless you play our game you are dangerous and will be ostracized, banned or removed. Pointing out “Spelling Mistakes” will likely be viewed as “racist”
Or, worse “Elitist”
It’s far more important to the National Trust to continue its campaign to destroy British heritage than deal with justified complaints about misspellings and inaccuracies on their website.
The spelling and grammatical errors indicate the low educational standard of those writing the text and those supervising.
Not a surprise. Nor is the fact that poorly educated minds are easy prey to woke absurdities.
So is the main bit they didn’t like the CEO being referred to as Oirish rather than Irish?…