An A&E Nightmare That Exposes the NHS as Anything But the ‘Envy of the World’

Having written before for the Daily Sceptic about my experiences navigating the NHS’s labyrinthine systems, first with endless chatbot loops, then with layers of technological ‘efficiency’ that achieved anything but, I find myself once again compelled to document an encounter so absurd, so comprehensively inefficient, that even I, battle-hardened cynic that I am, was left genuinely stunned.

This time it wasn’t me. It was my partner, presenting with suspected appendicitis. What followed was a 48-hour odyssey through the NHS that would be comic if it weren’t so potentially dangerous, a saga I documented in real-time via WhatsApp to friends in Germany who watched in mounting disbelief.

Day One: The Pillar-to-Post Express

Our journey began at 2:30pm on December 10th at Enfield Chase Farm Hospital, where we mistakenly assumed there was an A&E department. There isn’t. What they do have is an Urgent Care Centre, where, to be fair, a doctor saw us relatively promptly and wrote scrupulous notes about suspected appendicitis before directing us to Barnet General Hospital, which apparently is the only actual Accident & Emergency department anywhere near us.

In the waiting room at Barnet, I met people who had travelled all the way from East London, specifically avoiding Enfield Middlesex Hospital because, in their words, it was “so awful” they would rather make the journey. Comforting.

By 5:18pm, I messaged my friends: “This is the emergency room,” accompanied by a photo of the chaos. “And I’m in a nice area (in theory).” What greeted us was something resembling a refugee camp more than a medical facility. At any time of day – and we were there for two solid days – the emergency room was completely overrun.

I’d estimate that at least 70% of the staff we spoke to didn’t have English as their first language. On one occasion, communication was so difficult I genuinely couldn’t understand what was being said to us about my partner’s medical care. This isn’t xenophobia, it’s a practical observation about delivering healthcare when clear communication is literally a matter of life and death.

The Waiting Room: A Study in Social Decay

Let me paint you a picture of the waiting room at Barnet General. People with bare feet propped up on the seats. Patients wandering about in pyjamas – and these weren’t people who had come down from wards, this was apparently their daily fashion choice for a hospital visit. Rubbish left everywhere. A complete absence of basic respect for shared space or fellow patients.

There was a tall, striking woman wandering around the place in very fashionable clothes, stinking of urine and muttering to herself; she obviously needed mental health support not hospitalisation.

 A Japanese gentleman sat in the lotus position on his chair, shoes off, talking to himself. At one point I counted no fewer than four police officers surrounding another patient. Security guards were stationed every five metres; I’ve never seen anything like it. You’d think we were in a prison rather than a hospital.

People constantly tried to jump the queue. The attitude of entitlement was breathtaking. And yet we’re constantly told by politicians how grateful everyone is for the NHS, how wonderful it all is.

I’m sick of politicians appearing on television gushing about how ‘grateful’ they are for the care they received, how ‘everybody was so nice’. Complete and utter rubbish. Perhaps if you’re a cabinet minister you get ushered into a private room. The rest of us get this.

The Evening Promise

By 9:31pm, still waiting for blood test results, I messaged: “Still waiting and the place is even more busy. Third World country. People in here in bloody pyjamas.” my friends in Germany could not comprehend how it could take so long to get anything done.

To be fair, the NHS did conduct comprehensive blood tests. But then came the pivotal moment. At around 9.30pm, the doctor told us, quite clearly and unambiguously: “Don’t worry, come back at 8am tomorrow morning and you’ll definitely have an ultrasound as they are closed now.” We went home exhausted but at least reassured that progress would be made.

Day Two: The System That Forgot

We arrived at 7:50am, as instructed. The emergency room was still nearly as packed as it had been the night before. When we finally got to a window after queuing for 46 mins, we were met with blank stares. They had no record of any doctor making any such arrangement.

Worse still, the system showed that the doctor from the night before had written that we were supposed to go back to our GP and try to book an ultrasound through him.

Our GP. Where you can’t get an appointment for three weeks if you’re lucky, and then the ultrasound itself would be scheduled weeks after that. By which time my partner could well have died from a burst appendix.

I insisted that we had been explicitly told to return for an ultrasound. This prompted a two-hour wait for a ‘senior doctor’ to come and speak to us.

When he finally appeared, he delivered what I can only describe as an extraordinary statement: “There is no pathway in this hospital to get an ultrasound when you walk in.”

No pathway? In an Accident & Emergency department? People must have accidents that require ultrasounds, surely? The whole point of A&E is that you don’t have a ‘pathway’ when you have an emergency.

The Phantom Appointment

This senior doctor, to his credit, was sympathetic. He managed, through what I can only assume was sheer force of will against the system, to arrange an ultrasound appointment for 4pm. (This was at 11:30am) – progress, finally.

At around 3pm, having been waiting all day, I thought it prudent to verify that this appointment actually existed. I walked around to the ultrasound booking desk. The woman checked her system. “Oh,” she said, “it’s been cancelled.”

Cancelled. Nobody had told us. Nobody had offered an alternative. It had simply been… cancelled.

I went through the entire saga again. Eventually, after much back-and-forth, they reinstated the appointment. 

The Wrong Scan

And then, after two days of waiting, after countless repetitions of the same information to every person we encountered despite the initial doctor’s scrupulous notes, after my partner actually fainting at one point with nowhere to lie down, we finally got into the ultrasound room.

Five minutes. That’s how long it took. The sonographer looked at my partner and said: “I’ve been told to scan your kidneys and urinary tract.”

“No,” my partner said. “I came in for suspected appendicitis. The appendix. That’s what needs scanning.”

“Oh no, I can’t do that. This is what the doctor requested. I can only do what’s on my sheet. If you want a scan for your appendix, you’ll have to go back to reception and start again.”

Start again. After two days. Do not pass Go. Do not collect £200.

We had told them, at every single stage, that this was suspected appendicitis. The urgent care doctor had written it down. We had repeated it to every nurse, every receptionist, every doctor we encountered. And yet somehow, after all that, the scan request was for kidneys.

If the sonographer had simply spent another five minutes, five minutes, looking at the appendix while my partner was already on the table, this entire nightmare might have had a resolution. But no. That would require flexibility. Initiative. Basic common sense. Instead, we were told to re-join the back of a queue that we’d already spent two days navigating.

The Economics of Stupidity

Here’s what infuriates me beyond the personal inconvenience: this approach costs the NHS vastly more money than simply doing things properly the first time. Two days of A&E resources. Multiple consultations with nurses and doctors. Blood tests. Administrative time. All to end up with the wrong scan and a patient told to ‘start again’.

God forbid someone with a more serious condition deteriorates while waiting for a system incapable of basic coordination. A burst appendix. A missed diagnosis. A preventable death. The cost, both human and financial, of this institutional incompetence doesn’t bear thinking about.

The NHS isn’t the ‘envy of the world’. I don’t know who’s envying this. What I witnessed over those two days was a system drowning under the weight of demand it cannot meet, staffed by people who, however well-intentioned some may be, are operating within a structure that seems designed to frustrate rather than facilitate. A triumph of confusion over logic at every single stage.

As I messaged my friend after the wrong-scan debacle: “NHS, ‘Envy of the world’.” His response: ‘Holy cr&p, no one knows who is doing what, you can’t be serious,” followed by stunned-face emojis.

Yes. Deadly serious. And that’s exactly the problem.

Shane McEvoy runs Flycast Media, a specialist financial digital marketing agency in the City.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

42 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JAMSTER
JAMSTER
3 months ago

You have not completed the story. Did your partner eventually receive a scan ? And, if so, how much longer did it take ? What did the scan show, was the appendix operated on and is she OK now ? Your description of the (initial) 48 hours of the saga is beyond horrific.

Purpleone
3 months ago
Reply to  JAMSTER

It is – however it’s been my and my families experience of our local A&E over the last 5-10 years as well. Truly shocking levels of crap processes and some equally crap staff. Last time we went all their systems went down, and a senior registrar lady stepped up and ran the A&E Process – she was amazing, and worth 10x different extra systems…

the difference is she was there in person, could make a judgement with her own eyes and experience appropriate and filter / feed the work needed to the right people. She’s was 100% clear this was a triage situation, told anyone there with a cold or something a gp could treat to go home and use that route etc – not ideal, but practical and the likely best thing for the patient vs waiting 2 days…

Western Firebrand
Western Firebrand
3 months ago

One of the main reasons that the NHS is so expensive to the public purse is having to compensate for medical negligence. I hope that this account did not need to go down that route.

NickR
3 months ago

Last year the NHS spent more compensating errors in childbirth than carrying out childbirth.

iansn
3 months ago

Welcome to Londonistan. At least in the Punjab you could bung the doc a wad and jump up the queue.

I tried to get an American friend seen 2 years ago after he fell down the escalator in Euston and injured his shoulder he would have paid what ever was asked to see the doctor and get it checked properly. GP, we don’t look at that sort of thing that’s for A&E. A&E, no point its more than 12 hours minimum, walk in centre come back in 4 hours when the doc might be around, after 4 hours they would be shut so that’s another no, go to a local private hospital, saw the reception, no docs working today they might be able to see you in 3 or 4 days, he was flying to Turkey in 2 days, so that’s another no.

If you are ill at the weekend you may as well just die and save anyone medical the trouble of looking at you because you will be lucky if a doctor will.

Tyrbiter
Tyrbiter
3 months ago

Anyone going to get this story under Streeting’s nose with some video cameras running? Because unless it’s on prime time with the immediate horror being widely shared then it’s just part of a continuous background of uselessness that is gradually becoming the norm.

transmissionofflame
3 months ago

Thanks for this.

Gosh, who knew that if you make something completely free then people will abuse it, not appreciate and have less incentive to try and avoid needing its services? I get the impression a lot of the customers are lonely/more than usually dysfunctional.

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
3 months ago

A free healthcare service staffed by 3rd worlders catering to 3rd worlders is a shithole – who knew?

JXB
JXB
3 months ago
Reply to  Jack the dog

The UK did have a national health service and subscription to it under the 1911 National Insurance Act. It comprised local authority run hospitals/services, voluntary sector and private. And before the 1911 Act forcing people to pay into the State scheme, 75% of the population had private insurance via local mutual, community schemes, trades unions, which were all managed locally so the money people paid was used locally for them – family, friends, neighbours – not for others hundred of miles away or who had paid nothing.

It was nationalised in 1948. NHS = Nationalised Health Service.

1948: 2 750 hospitals (most built pre-20th Century; 480 000 beds; waiting list 400 000 – 0.75% of population.

Now: 1 600 hospitals (most from pre-20th Century); 145 000 beds; waiting list 7 million – 11% of population.

Good innit?

Purpleone
3 months ago
Reply to  JXB

Government ‘optimisation’ (of all flavours…)

James.M
James.M
3 months ago

Today iatrogenic medicine is the third biggest cause of illness and death after heart and cancer disease. Modern 21st century medicine is not fit for purpose and the current allopathic medical paradigm needs to be examined since it is failing to provide genuine health benefits for the population. There needs to be some visionary leadership to implement root and branch reform. Unfortunately it is very unlikely to be forthcoming from the current Labour government.

Solentviews
Solentviews
3 months ago
Reply to  James.M

Unfortunately the public want tablets. Doctors who suggest otherwise get an ear bashing and also Big Pharma won’t be happy. Less is not more for them.

So tablets it is……:(

Arborvitae23
3 months ago
Reply to  Solentviews

It has been forever thus.
“Pink Pills for Pale People”!

Mogwai
3 months ago

This isn’t about the NHS specifically but they do touch on healthcare, and those who experience complications ( so that’d be specifically females within migrant families ) do seek medical help and will place a further burden on the NHS as a consequence. This new paper is doing the rounds, as it was featured in The Telegraph. It literally is a defense of FGM. The thing that stuck out for me is that there are 25 contributors to this paper and they’re overwhelmingly women. Mind blown! 😮 Female apologists for this barbaric practice, because they want us to take a sympathetic view of it, apparently, as god forbid anybody should mention ‘race’ at any point when discussing this topic. They even prefer we use the word ‘modification’ rather than ‘mutilation’. Here’s the abstract; ”Traditional female genital practices, though long-standing in many cultures, have become the focus of an expansive global campaign against ‘female genital mutilation’ (FGM). In this article, we critically examine the harms produced by the anti-FGM discourse and policies, despite their grounding in human rights and health advocacy. We argue that a ubiquitous ‘standard tale’ obscures the diversity of practices, meanings and experiences among those affected. This discourse,… Read more »

Ardandearg
Ardandearg
3 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

I have been trying to find words to express my revulsion for these weasel words. But I can’t.

Mogwai
3 months ago
Reply to  Ardandearg

I wonder if the 20+ female authors of that paper are the ”Refugees welcome!” type, who turn a blind eye to the increased sex crimes perpetrated by migrants, who would ignore the many girls hurt by Pakistani rape gangs, or who might stop a plane carrying migrant criminals due to be deported from taking off, or even the sort of women who defend paedophiles and wish to destigmatize their degeneracy as a ‘lifestyle choice’ and tell us to refer to them as ‘MAPs’.
Judging by their attitude to FGM I think it entirely appropriate to question their ethics across other contexts. These women are despicable traitors to their own sex and should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves.
If you haven’t already, the DM article I linked to below is well worth a read, written by GP: Dr Hoenderkamp.

RogerB
3 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Most of the authors of this paper don’t seem to be medical scientists so much as sociologist, lawyers, anthropologists etc. Maybe some real scientists could rip it to pieces (in a nuanced way, of course).

Mogwai
3 months ago
Reply to  RogerB

I think a response from specialists such as Consultant Urologists and Gynaecologists would be appropriate, as it’s these doctors women who suffer complications from FGM would be referred to. I only skimmed that paper because it’s lengthy but it had the unmistakable whiff of social justice baloney about it. How any woman ( or compassionate human being, full stop, but you’d expect women to be a bit more empathetic ) would minimise or defend girls from other cultures having their clitoris chopped off is beyond me. But the virtue signallers react like this purely because the emphasis is on ” other cultures”. And for the record, I’m totally against male circumcision too, and I think it’s only a relatively uncommon condition that would warrant that sort of surgical intervention. People who use religion or culture as a way of justifying the unnecessary mutilation of kids, who often go on to have various issues as adults, need their heads read. It’s not what caring, compassionate, humane adults do to society’s most vulnerable. I don’t even like seeing little babies with pierced ears. F**k your ‘cultural differences’ and sheep-like behaviour when it’s causing children unnecessary pain. And it is ‘mutilation’, not bloody… Read more »

Mogwai
3 months ago
Reply to  RogerB

Here’s a response to that paper from Dr Renee Hoenderkamp. Well worth a read; ”Many years ago, during my training to become a doctor, I worked in the obstetrics and gynaecology department of a busy east London hospital. The area served a large Muslim population. And that apparently innocuous demographic fact shaped some of the most harrowing medical experiences of my career – still seared on my mind decades later. Women repeatedly entered our hospital in chronic agony, unable to urinate properly and crushed each month by period pains so excruciating they were bent double. Many suffered repeated gynaecological and urinary tract infections which, as they aged, became increasingly dangerous and sometimes life-threatening. Childbirth, meanwhile, was its own horror show. For these women it was a brutal and perilous ordeal, often marked by prolonged labour, catastrophic tearing, haemorrhage, infection and a significantly heightened risk of death. None of this was mere misfortune. Instead, every one of these patients had been subjected to female genital mutilation (FGM). This barbaric practice involves the partial or total removal of external female genitalia such as the clitoris, or other deliberate injury to female genital organs – such as narrowing the vaginal opening – for no medical… Read more »

Corky Ringspot
3 months ago

Wish I could suggest that this sort of scenario is unusual. It’s not. There are many individuals working in hospitals who genuinely try to help, but they’re ineffective against an ideology-driven system which at the highest level can’t admit it’s lost the argument.

Solentviews
Solentviews
3 months ago
Reply to  Corky Ringspot

If they were genuinely trying to help, they would use more initiative and display some empathy. I expect lots are just clock watching in between chatting and looking an Youtube. Just what was going through the head of the sonographer?

Purpleone
3 months ago
Reply to  Solentviews

There is most likely a ‘more than my jobs worth’ element to – if the teams on the ground are this inflexible, it usually signals the levels above ‘leading’ them are less than effective. They’ve probably been bitten before – conform or die in big monolithic orgs, they don’t want free thinkers, they want people who do what they are told only…

Terry Morgan
3 months ago

This is what happened in ‘Third World’ Thailand on Sunday:
A 65-year-old English friend arrived here saying he didn’t feel well – dizzy, high blood pressure (he’d self-measured), tightness in his chest etc.
He looked OK to me but living alone he gets worried if things aren’t 100%. He wanted advice so we took him to the local public (government run) hospital that serves around 200,000 people – a fifteen-minute drive away – for checks.
After some note-taking he was redirected to A&E for more blood pressure tests. It was quite high, not dangerously so, but he was admitted into the emergency room for ECG, Chest X ray etc. The clean, well-equipped room was empty except for about four patients on trolleys and around ten staff Conclusion: nothing to worry about. Everything OK but keep checking blood pressure at home. He was in and out in one hour. Total cost was 600 Thai Baht (ca. £15) which included everything. And this was Sunday.

Hester
Hester
3 months ago
Reply to  Terry Morgan

Thailand has superb cancer treatment facilities in Bangkok, it is the polar opposite of the NHS.

Terry Morgan
3 months ago
Reply to  Hester

Indeed. I’ve always said the UK’s NHS could learn a lot from countries like Thailand.
The Thai population is similar to the UK’s so it’s not just “overcrowding”.
Another reason the Thai health service is so advanced is its use of volunteers. My wife being one of around one million such volunteers across the country.

Check this:
 https://www.supa71.com/village-health-volunteers-in-thailand-crucial-components-of-primary-healthcare/

Another matter is care of the elderly. In Thailand most old people still live with children and grandchildren. In UK, family breakdown and the “lifestyle” of those who might be expected to care for their elderly parents is dealt with by packing them off to a nursing home – a practice which I find abhorrent. My wife spends at least a day a week visiting our local old people and reporting in.
Whilst I’d love to see the NHS looking at alternative ways it won’t happen of course. For one, H&S Rules wouldn’t allow it and I can’t see the millions who sit at home living on benefits be willing to do anything without pay – a situation which is perverse seeing they are already being paid to do nothing.

Bettina
Bettina
3 months ago

You would have been quicker driving out to Cornwall. I took a friend to Truro A&E on Friday evening. Having dropped her at the door, she was called in by the time I’d parked the car. Thorough examination by a doctor immediately- diagnosed – came out with a dispensed prescription. The parking charge was for about 40 minutes. Waiting room had about 6 English people – fully dressed!

wryobserver
wryobserver
3 months ago

Just imagine how much worse it would have been if the “resident” doctors were on strike. Being an ex hospital consultant this sort of story makes me quite ill. The problem is that many A&E departments are filled with people who don’t need to be there, but are because the right places don’t exist any more. Next time make a bit of a fuss and indicate that you will be making a formal complaint.

RTSC
RTSC
3 months ago

15 years ago (so probably about 8 million 3rd world immigrants fewer) my sons was visiting his girlfriend in Oxford Uni and came down with acute appendicitis.

He was taken to John Radcliffe Hospital, arriving in A & E at about 3pm Friday afternoon. He was admitted and scheduled for an emergency op that evening.

It got postponed to first thing Saturday morning.

It got postponed to late Saturday morning.

It got postponed to Saturday afternoon.

At about 4pm, his appendix ruptured.

He was put on intravenous anti-biotics. The hospital proposed to operate Sunday morning.

After a stand-up row in the Ward, the operation eventually went ahead shortly after midnight.

The “reason” we were given for the original delay (ie Friday afternoon): a child needed emergency dental care under anaesthetic to have a tooth extracted.

He got pushed down the list and they kept pushing him down it every time a new “urgent” case appeared.

The hospital eventually admitted that it had broken its own protocols …. and a mealy-mouthed apology.

These days, I think he’d have been left to die.

CircusSpot
CircusSpot
3 months ago

I feel sorry for you both, but the area where you live has changed and you are no longer the majority. It is why the ‘indigenous’ are either leaving the Country or moving out to the distant Shires or paying for private care.
None of us asked for this and I do not know how we can change it now.

Climan
Climan
3 months ago

I can sort of understand why A&E don’t do ultrasound scans, they exist in 9 to 5 (not weekends and bank holidays) clinics, and can only be interpreted by staff with special training, it would not be cost effective to have such staff sitting around on the off chance that someone needs them.

A&E can access X-rays (mainly for possible fractures), as the results can be interpreted by general doctors and senior nurses.

Bill Bailey
Bill Bailey
3 months ago
Reply to  Climan

Having lived abroad for a few years I can say that on some occasions it is necessary to have specialist scanning carried out. But as an example if I visit a urologist I get a complete ultrasound scan on every visit, kidneys, bladder and possibly more. A prostate examination follows, then a urine sample is taken and checked for obvious problems.If anything is found then further detailed tests are ordered. I had to see a cardiologist, I had ECG and ultrasound scan and was referred for Holter procedure, which I had to make an appointment for, there was a delay in getting the appointment of about 4 weeks but any immediate problems had been ruled out. After the procedure the results were sent to my doctor within a week. Both of the above were walk in, I had to wait for a roughly an hour on each occasion but the examinations were carried out very quickly by very professional staff. All I did was show up, present my state medical insurance card and I was seen, no drama, no delays, just a well organised, professional system. I also have periodic lung tests, about every six months, I make an appointment… Read more »

Bill Bailey
Bill Bailey
3 months ago

I had to visit the emergency department in a large London hospital some time ago. I entered the hospital and found my way to the reception desk after struggling through a very badly signed maze of corridors. I asked for the A&E and was sent out of the hospital, struggled down a ramp and then up another, then found myself in a long queue and was triaged in a reasonable time. I was then sent to a small waiting room where people were packed in like sardines, the photo above looks like the Ritz in comparison. After several hours I was dealt with after witnessing nurses having to treat people in the waiting area. Then on leaving the hospital I found that the A&E was situated about 1 minute from the reception where I originally asked for directions. I’m familiar with the hospital and attended there on many occasions since childhood and it has been transformed into a complete dump. The A&E was upgraded under Blair and it looks like it was designed by a committee of utter morons. The NHS was reasonably functional when set up, but of course that was after the health service was nationalised, it’s taken… Read more »

jsampson45
jsampson45
3 months ago

Before ultrasound was invented, acute appendicitis was diagnosed by the Mark 1 hand on the belly.

Malcolm Barrett
Malcolm Barrett
3 months ago

And this is the same organisation that will deliver assisted suicide! The potential for errors is horrifying.

JXB
JXB
3 months ago

I worked in the NHS before escaping in the early 1970s. Called out from my bed at 3am to attend a young man with a bee sting in his hand. When I asked where exactly the bee had stung him, he replied: Oh man, I wasn’t stung by a bee, I was bitten by a butterfly. 6,30am man in A&E with back pains – had them for a couple of weeks. His night shift had finished and he passed the hospital on the way home and thought it more convenient than making an appointment with his GP. Early evening – busy. Patient with urinary tract infection – accompanied by three friends. Had seen GP and been prescribed antibiotics, but they weren’t working. How long had they been taking them? Since the day before. I could tell many more stories about my 4 years in “our” NHS. There is an extraordinary notion that there was a golden age of the NHS, that current problems are recent…. Tory cuts, etc… but they are chronic. The problem with A&E could be solved easily by introducing a £75 entrance charge. The wider problem with the NHS will only be solved when health care is… Read more »

varmint
3 months ago
Reply to  JXB

Yes but it isn’t FREE. We all pay for it with excruciating taxes.
But trust me my wife was a Sister in Intensive Care in the seventies and 80’s and it was way more organised and functional than today. The ward was run by a Matron, it was clean, there was procedure, there was efficiency —-OH and everyone spoke ENGLISH.

varmint
3 months ago

We don’t expect a Mercedes but we do expect more than a beat up old Polo

PRSY
PRSY
3 months ago

After reading all the horror stories, some balance. Cancer diagnosis, treatment and follow up, in my experience at least, is first class, well supported by a brilliant charity.

Hound of Heaven
Hound of Heaven
3 months ago

British hospitals shown in British entertainment look quite different. Anyone else noticed this? At least someone, somewhere knows what they should be like. Yes, please provide the outcome.

happycake78
happycake78
3 months ago

Much of this could be fixed, by industrial scale deportations.

jnik18
jnik18
3 months ago

The below,cut due to size, re the NHS, is part of a larger sketch about a minister and his aide titled Pardon Minister, still in draft form. The tale of a resolute minister in HMG who is part of the bureaucratic machine, dispenses his wisdom to his less indoctrinated nephew, who can't help himself, and tries to make sense of the insensible. Aide Sorry minister, but can you explain the policy of the NHS? Is it purely to do no harm, so instead of actually carrying out urgent operations and medical assistance for those in need, a system is operated to keep patients moving from pillar to post, never quite managing to see the qualified person whose job it is to effect a remedy to the obvious ailment. I mean, how is it that when patients have had an operation and are discharged, they are effectively dismissed, and attempting to contact the people involved to make a query for some later complications, is a lottery, whereby some people sitting in a back office peruse referral letters, and assign the patient to a department that is showing some space, even though that department is not equipped to deal with the ailment… Read more »

cboucherblue
cboucherblue
3 months ago

I had the proverbial 15 hours on a stretcher with our nhs. It was a stroke. But I survived.
September, in Koh Samui Thailand on holiday I decided to get an ultrasound and x-ray on my hand to assess state of inflammation / arthritis and take back to my UK consultant on next visit. Getting done on nhs is a pain. Turned up, saw doc straight away, scanned etc in 20 minutes and back for debriefing with doc in an hour. All was ok. £75!
In January, in Samui wackedbhead ECG, CT scan, full blood test, two doctor examinations. ECG and blood done at the same time! Two appointments here. Blood test results and scans back in an hour. Two hours in total in hospital. Super instant service. £350!
something is very , very wrong here. Ok, private but it was Thailand!