Wes Streeting’s Inquiry Into ADHD and Autism Over-Diagnosis is Overdue
Hats off to Wes Streeting for attempting to address the obvious and sustained over-diagnosis of conditions such as autism and ADHD. The Times reports that:
Some 4.4 million working-age people claim disability or incapacity benefit, a rise of 1.2 million since 2019. Record numbers of young people are dropping out of the workforce and Streeting has warned previously that “overdiagnosis” mean too many people are “written off”. … Nearly one in four adults has a common mental health condition such as depression or anxiety, the NHS says. Some 8.9 million people in England are on antidepressants, up from 6.9 million a decade ago. Streeting has said this is “cause for concern”.
Professor Peter Fonagy, a Clinical Psychologist at University College London specialising in child mental health, is leading the review that will examine what is causing the rising demand for diagnoses.
As one who attempts to teach children who refuse to go to school, generally on account of one or more of these conditions, I am personally delighted that the Health Secretary is turning his gaze to an issue that I find is fraught with misunderstanding and overmedicalisation. Fonagy has said he is seeking evidence from “people with lived experience, and from clinicians working at the frontline of mental health, autism and ADHD services”. So here is my “lived experience” of working with such over-diagnosed but genuinely miserable children. My answer to the question “what is causing the over-diagnosis of autism, ADHD and other developmental difficulties?” is: a deadly concatenation of over-extended mental health diagnoses and genuine societal sadness, chiefly:
1. The NHS’s reliance on the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5). This diagnostic handbook is chiefly responsible for expanding the diagnostic criteria for a number of conditions from a narrow understanding to a ‘spectrum’ of disorder.
2. A co-ordinated promotion of mental health conditions by celebrities and industry. Will Professor Fonagy please find out if TikTok videos about pill popping and celebrities revealing ADHD diagnoses for instance, are funded by, or affiliated to, the pharmaceutical industry. How many of these mental health conditions are being confected and exacerbated by an unscrupulous backdoor global marketing campaign?
3. Negligent care from GPs and psychiatrists who diagnose and medicalise rather than address root causes. A 40-minute CAHMs appointment is deemed sufficient in many cases to establish whether a miserable teenager has autism, OCD, ADHD or similar. Melatonin is routinely prescribed by GPs rather than strategies given to stop sleepless teenagers using phones in bed, stimulants to ADHD children with no discussion about exercising or sleeping properly, and anti-depressants issued if children parrot lines learned on TikTok about suicide ideation.
4. Too much technology for children. Babies watching phones in pushchairs, toddlers being seated in cafes in front of an iPad, teenagers hooked on Minecraft and Fortnite, constant use of phones by children of all ages, EdTech in schools – all of it must stop.
5. Family breakdown. 51% of children are now born outside of marriage or civil partnership and nearly three million children are growing up in households without a father. Family separation causes deep misery to children. There is real emotional desolation being experienced by vast numbers of children, but this does not mean that they are suffering a neurological issue.
6. Parental incapacity. Many parents of over-diagnosed children are also addicted to tech and have limited capacity or ability to properly parent their children. By outsourcing parenting to a digital babysitter, parents have initially appreciated the ‘quiet’ but this backfires spectacularly at a later date. A massive public health campaign is required to make overuse of tech within the home – by all family members – as socially unacceptable as smoking next to a baby’s cot.
7. Demoralising new-builds. Those fortunate children who are able to escape the digital prison – and their own mental health issues – do so because they discover they can walk to a local shop or park or into town to work or socialise. This is known as ‘agentic living’ or ‘living with agency’. The current design of new-build housing estates makes it difficult for children to walk anywhere pleasant – a 45-minute walk through the housing estate and across a dual carriageway might take the child to a retail park if they are lucky. If the parent does not have the ability or finances to drive, and public transport is scarce, the child becomes stuck in a bedroom. Bicycles are stolen or deemed by tech-addicted parents to be too dangerous.
8. Lack of Youth Clubs. Paedophiles and drug dealers put paid to youth clubs, which once provided a third space away from home and school for children to congregate and have fun together. Youth clubs (paedo and drug-dealer free) must be revived and made appealing.
9. Existential despair. Though working with children in the lowest income bracket in the country, my ‘lived experience’ suggests it is not material poverty that causes mental health issues but a poverty of belonging and purpose. A listlessness has descended on generations of families whereby life is genuinely joyless and without meaning. Wes Streeting ought to delegate this aspect of things to the new Archbishop of Canterbury, Bear Grylls, or whoever steps up as the country’s next spiritual leader. There is more to this than mere low serotonin.
10. A shameful skills deficit at British schools. A child educated in the British state education system will leave school without having been taught how to make nutritious meals, how to do basic DIY, how to plant and grow vegetables, how to do basic plumbing or electrical work, how to maintain a car, how to sew on a button, how to build a fence, and so on. By focusing on academic and creative rather than physically practical skills, the education system has entirely ignored children – largely boys – who are good at building, making and repairing things. No wonder they feel hopeless.
Good luck Professor Fonagy and team!
Mary Gilleece is an education support worker and her name is a pseudonym.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
As with the rest of the NHS, they are trying to put complex cases in front of people with minimal training, so they can produce a diagnosis and get the patient onto a care pathway, with drug therapy and endless reviews. The boxes are ticked, the key indicators tick upwards and all is right with the world. So long as the capitation fees keep flowing and no-one asks too many questions, the wheels keep turning. Help the patient.? What an idea.? This is about treatments not cures.
‘Mary Gilleece’ for Health Secretary please.
Not one mention in the above article by Mary Gilleece about vaccines being one of the causes of autism.
HERE ARE A LIST OF STUDIES AND ARTICLES LINKING VACCINES ETC. TO AUTISM
https://classicrecords1.wixsite.com/the-sceptic/post/here-are-a-list-of-studies-and-articles-linking-vaccines-etc-to-autism
See the latest paper from the McCullough Foundation
McCullough Foundation Report: Determinants of Autism Spectrum Disorder https://share.google/9gjn8mOnXjWYnB0Qu
Yes, that was number 12 on my list.
Here is my lived experience with autism. Nobody had it when I was at primary school in the 60s or secondary school in the 70s. 2 boys in my primary school class had special needs. They both came from impoverished backgrounds (living in “prefab” estates that were common post war) and I suspect they were undernourished. Of course the vaccine overhead was much lower then.
The German general Erich Ludendorff was almost certainly a high-functioning autist. That’s pretty evident from his writing style and the way he treats and choses his topics. But then, he was living in a strictly meritocratic system with an emphasis on objectivity and demonstable excellence and not today’s buddycracy which keeps harping about “Merit! Merit! Merit!” while it’s actually built on (at least insofar software goes) people effectively socializing on IRC.
Claiming that vaccines must have caused autism is just another way to abuse autists because they sure deserve it (and everyone else does it as well)!
I’m trying to understand your post but cannot decipher what the points are that you are making.
The implied assumption of Boomer Bloke that autist equals functionally deficient human being for physical reason is as wrong as his implied assumption that it must be a modern fad which didn’t exists “before the 1960s”. Autists can fare very well in a system which judges them on what they can do instead of what everybody believes they must certainly end up becoming once given a chance to do anything beyond begging for change. A system which doesn’t do that doesn’t deserve to be called meritocratic (minor aside). The anti-vaxxers are absuing autists for the perceived benefit of their political goals. The abuse is real. But the supposed benefits of it aren’t, as there’s no discernible effect on childhood vaccination programs (as far as I know).
That was about it. I have no idea how “too densely interlocked” this still is.
Here is mine. A close relative aged four with two “normal” older siblings, both high-achieving and from a large, stable extended family with no mental health issues. The four year old, physically normal is unable to vocalise but makes a constant growl. He is still incontinent but making some progress with that. He is hyperactive and often destructive with disrupted sleep. He displays all the controlling symptoms of diagnosed autism and is clever in strange ways. The relentless strain of caring for a child like this cannot be overstated. He receives excellent parenting and good nursery care with an uncertain future. I have a completely open mind on vaccine damage, electromagnetic fields, and/or bad luck; all should be open for discussion. Being a bit odd or feeling down should not be treated as mental health issues because the real thing needs all the help it can get.
I agree. I am sorry that your relatives are under the strain they are, and I hope they get all the help they need. However I do not believe that everyone getting support from the state deserves it. I also think there is an ideological drive to make people dependent on the state, see the child support cap in the recent budget for example, as a means of redistributing cash and creating public sector jobs, and I think there are too many vaccines.
This “real thing” will probably never become anything except someone who’s dependent on 24×7 care. This obviously ought to be provided, however, people who can function socially, including economically, with some help (be it only being fair to them despite they’re “a bit odd” — that’s a grave crime, insofar the majority of mankind is concerned) technically deserve this help more because there’s something to be gained from that.
Miraculously, the ‘benefit’ cap disappears if there’s someone with a disability in the household. This is likely to be worth about £1,000/month. What chance there’s a link?
The daughter (in her 30s) of a friend has just been diagnosed as autistic. She works in the NHS and is now the equivalent of a ward sister (I have no idea what they’re called now). She is the mother of two autistic children who both receive special schooling. Everyone is delighted she’s been diagnosed as apparently she’s always felt autistic and the diagnosis is extremely important to her. I imagine there may be a financial benefit to the family if there are three of them in the same household. I don’t know her personally so have no idea how her autism presents. I am a bit puzzled about it all as she successfully trained as a nurse and gained promotion.
I can believe that many of these are ‘real’ conditions, in that they would benefit from some kind of treatment.
But it should not be the job of the State to diagnose its population with a condition picked from an ever longer list, then pay for the treatment (which might be benefits to allow the person to stay at home and not work).
Personally, I have come to believe that I might have a mild form of inattentive ADHD, but a bit late for me now as I’m almost 50 (and in any event I feel its got better as I’ve aged, and I can hold down a job). But I do wonder if I would have benefited from some kind of treatment when I was in my teens. Oh well.
Me too. I had a laser like, obsessive focus which I could never harness for anything useful like school or work. Luckily it seems to have mellowed as I approach 70 which just means that I have a lot of unfinished projects because I no longer have the focus to complete them.
It is hard to believe that 9 million people in the country are on antidepressants, and very sad. Looking at the picture of Streeting, I wonder what the contributory role of Botox and facial fillers might be.
Read ‘The psychopath test’ by Ron Johnson.
Funny and quite revealing.
Unless things have changed in the last few years, I don’t think she is right about GP prescribing.
When I was in practice, we were all very concerned about the rise in psychiatric diagnoses in children, especially, at the time, ADHD. I recall coffee room discussions about the trouble being stored up for the future by the excessive prescribing of Ritalin.
We were not diagnosing these children (even referrals were often from schools), but were issuing prescriptions based on specialist diagnoses and requests to prescribe. It would have been very difficult to refuse to issue a prescription.
so please, just for once, don’t blame GPs.