There Will Be Benefits to Living in a Post-Literate Society
Are you aware a great many young people now live fully functioning lives with scant need to read or write? While there is panic in some quarters about the perils of living in a post-literate world, I’m rather more sanguine. I suspect instead the move away from the intellectual narrowness of credentialed book learning may mark a return to those eternal principles we’ve recently forgotten: truth, goodness and beauty.
First, let me explain how a post-literate young person successfully navigates life with bare minimum reading or writing. If something needs to be known, Generation Alpha (those born post 2013) and the younger members of Generation Z (1997-2012) will either Ask Alexa within the home or their phones outside. Voice activated software is used, the answer is spoken by Siri, Bixby or plain Google. Young people speak into the bottom of the phone and then place the phone at right angles to their heads to listen to the response. ‘What time’s the last train from London to Guildford? Where’s my driving instructor? Is Nandos still open?’ Voice-notes, photographs and emojis are sent rather than typed-out messages.
Helpfully, voice-activated tech is becoming more widely adopted to support longer forms of work. Essays are dictated into phones and then transcribed onto the required document. In spite of all that time that poor old Gove spent on teaching children fronted adverbials, the truth is spellings and grammar are of absolutely no consequence in daily, and increasingly, school life. I once tried to suggest to a child whose transcribed text was riddled with spelling errors that if he clicked on spell check these could be rectified, and he said passionately, “Honestly, no-one cares. It’s fine.” Even intellectually motivated young women like Rose and Dani, the bright young things who host Foidcast, embody this casual relationship with the written word by using only lowercase. Writing and reading accurately is just not really a thing anymore, even amongst the brainy. It’s all ideas, vibes and scenes. Those of us who do love reading will equally have adopted more auditory based ways of learning, turning to audiobooks and podcasts as pleasant ways of imbibing ideas.
Such is the rapid month-on-month adoption of voice technology that the LSE (in conjunction with Jabra, a wireless tech firm no less) has predicted that when Generation Alpha enters into the workforce, voice AI will be the default way of working. Joy of joys, it trumpets, no-one will ever need to read or write an email again. We speak and listen three or four times faster than we read, thus our auditory and visual-dominated future will transmit complex information far more efficiently than via screeds of text; just look at the popularity of the FT’s graphs shared on X.
And yet such interesting shifts have caused panic from the great thinkers of our time. Niall Ferguson suggests if we stop reading, Barbarians will reign supreme. The latest PISA scores show the OECD average dropped by 10 points (from 487 to 476), the largest consecutive-cycle decline ever recorded. James Marriot worries we won’t be able to continue as a civilised society with only the intellectual apparatus of a pre-literate society.
Using old-fashioned reading, I have learned Britain only reached almost complete literacy after the 1870 education act. Previously 1-15% of the population was able to read between 1000 and 1500 (and yet our glorious cathedrals were built), shifting upwards to 25-25% by 1700, 60-70% by 1850 and then 97-99% by 1900. I’m not suggesting we all aspire to live as empty-mindedly as Keir Starmer, who proudly does not dream nor have a favourite book, but I am optimistic about society’s mass return to functional illiteracy and a return to a visual and oral world, for it presents a future where we are less likely to be tricked by wicked yet intellectually persuasive ideas. Just think what this means for art: no more explanatory notes to explain the vapid ugliness. How much harder will it be in a visual world to convince people wind and solar farms are good for the environment? Zack Polanski’s unfortunate teeth will put more people off him than his ludicrous policies.
The popularity of ‘the ick’ is the most obvious expression of this instinctive revulsion to something obscene. Imagine, Cher-like from Clueless, non-literate people will be presented with a design for yet another modernist hellscape, grimace and say: ‘As if!’ That the Pirelli calendar 2026 once again features beautiful women demonstrates the reviving triumph of instinctive beauty over physically disquieting, but nimbly-argued, trans and body-positive movements.
In terms of education, the results could be transformative for society. Children could learn skills again through doing, through copying, through ritual, rather than through books or soul-destroying EdTech. And the academic elite who can properly grapple with the classics, science, philosophy and all the rest of it, can do so in peace and excellence. Our other senses will re-activate and we will once again elevate visual beauty and moral intuition above wicked but cleverly-argued theory. Let’s see. And listen. And for now, read what Plato famously has Socrates warning us about in Phaedrus:
If men learn this [writing], it will implant forgetfulness in their souls; they will cease to exercise memory because they rely on that which is written, calling things to remembrance no longer from within themselves, but by means of external marks. What you have discovered is a recipe not for memory, but for reminder. And it is no true wisdom that you offer your disciples, but only its semblance, for by telling them of many things without teaching them you will make them seem to know much, while for the most part they know nothing, and as men filled, not with wisdom, but with the conceit of wisdom, they will be a burden to their fellows.
Joanna Gray is a writer and confidence coach.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Pictures, or it didn’t happen.
Oh, wait…
The trouble is that it’s likely to be just the same one entity that answers everything.
Will there ever be doubt or will certainty reign supreme?
And ultimately – as we’ve seen even now, certainties may well be controlled by elites, one only has to look at medicine/vaccines/covid/lockdowns
Those in control didn’t burn books in the past for fun –
China Qin Shi Huang,
The Reformation
Germany 1930’sWW2 (and still trying) and this time round its the freedom of the ‘net that’s the target.
Just don’t tell the author of this piece that I asked Alexa for that list.
Interesting, but I must live in a different world as all I see are children, including adult children, asking their parents to sort out every problem for them, not AI. It is why they have no practical or problem solving skills because they do not need them.
Interesting point, except that I believe the parents themselves are consulting AI to solve their kids’ problems for them!
So you reckon it’s a ‘can’t be arsed’ vs a ‘can’t’? Could be right… it’s too easy to be lazy
A very interesting article, caused me to think a lot. What is intelligence? I just did a test yesterday, 68 yrs old and the brain is getting old too, I thought. IQ 124, the main tests are visual and cognitive. Well, the old noggin seems to be functioning better than expected.
It seems Joanna might be on to something.
Another good piece by Joanna
Can a ‘society of functional illiteracy’ be described in an emoji or other such hieroglyph or pictogram? Give it a go, Joanna! This isn’t to say that the Gen Zs and Gen Alphas will develop as lesser beings or have a truncated life compared to the literate. But they will be very different. Bronze Age children didn’t have tech developed by the literate. Nor were the glorious cathedrals designed by the illiterate stonemasons. And in the medieval churches, wall paintings were used to convey the biblical text to the illiterate lower classes by the literate clergy. But such pictures lacked the beauty of the text. It was in its poetical language that the King James Bible had its power to move. The gruesome wall paintings of the Last Judgment only cowed the peasants. It’s true of course, as C S Lewis put it in word pictures in several of his Narnia novels, that revolutions are not created by the talking carthorses. The treason of the educated is one that is uniquely their own. Universal literacy did stop the scribes being a superior class. While being functionally illiterate may democratise the Gen Z and Gen Alpha youth, they will have to… Read more »
“We speak and listen three or four times faster than we read…”
But not think four times faster.
A podcast or a text? For me if the podcaster/youtuber is asked to write the same subject as text it will be much shorter than the spoken version where they are too verbose and I get bored.
I usually have them on 1.5 speed
Ditto. Sometimes even faster!
Exactly.
Some people can speak really well as if they’d written it. Most of us can’t. Most of us if we want to express clear, ordered thoughts need to write it down and probably have a few attempts before we are happy with the final version. Less formal communication has a place but cannot replace formal communication if we are to live in an age of excellence.
Not sure about the quoted sentence either…
I’m not so sanguine.
Being able to articulate a complex nuanced concept, full of coulds, whys and wherefores, requires a command of the language that cannot be attained through the visual and audible.
Like satnav blunts your innate navigation abilities and calculators stunt your mental arithmetic. In 1984, the oversimplified Newspeak was intended to make it impossible to articulate complex topics.
If chatgpt gives you an answer, have you really done anything worthwhile? Can you critique the response you receive?
I enjoy hearing Jordan Peterson speak precisely because of the way he constructs complex ideas; something I don’t think he’d have achieved without burying his nose in books.
Without an extensive base of human literature, including all the great works of great authors, science literature, material generated by human journalists and so on, ChatGpt would have nothing to base its knowledge upon in the first place. Therefore there will come a time, assuming the LSE’s prediction Gen Z’s default way of working will be “voice AI”, that no new ideas are possible and outdated dogma simply continues to be regurgitated.
If we get to the stage where “computer says yes” is the only acceptable answer, then I think we’ll be in quite a lot of trouble (if we aren’t already)
Interesting twist of irony that the author finishes the piece with a quote extracted from a dialogue between Plato and Socrates – two of the most erudite philosophers and wordsmiths the world has ever seen! Moreover, if she is so sanguine about the prospects of the deterioration of our linguistic pillars of civilization, then why was the above article written with such eloquent use of the English language, without any visual or auditory elements (the emphasis on which is supposedly going to free up young minds of the future from the constraints of language)? I would argue the opposite: namely that our ability to generate entirely new innovative ideas REQUIRES the sophisticated use of language, because language shapes the way we think. And when our thinking is dominated by recourse to merely sensory input combined with primitive grunts and an unthinking devotion to the gospel of AI, the same old dogma will continue to circulate and stagnate. Would NASA have been able to land men on the Moon in the above scenario? Probably not, since AI would have stated in no uncertain terms that it was impractical and too expensive, since nothing of the sort had been achieved before. The… Read more »
What I think is a typo, ‘screeds of text’ made me chuckle. I was at a supplier event the other week and several of the key presentations, on AI no less, had multiple typos, even 2 different typos of the same word on one slide… and no one batted an eyelid. I did – I pointed it out and said it’s not good enough, why didn’t you use a spell checker, let alone your lovely AI, and it got a laugh if nowt else…
I’m 100% gen x and have worked in environments where attention to detail is an important indicator – if you can’t get simple stuff right, what else are you doing a half arsed job on we can’t see? But then again perhaps I’m the relic now (still not going to change!) 😉
What was the typo at the presentation you saw, out of interest?
Funnily enough I can’t, which perhaps indicates if it matters or not (it does to me yes, we have a beautiful language, let’s not mangle it too much) – something beginning with P I think! It struck me as it was wrong in the title, then differently wrong in the first para then right in the last para… I thought, ‘that takes some doing’.
I’m one of those lovely, special (!) people who can spot a typo leaping out of 500 words in front of them in 5 seconds flat… it’s weird, and sometimes useful – must be reason I can scan docs at high speed as well.
At a guess I’d say the multiple authors of these presentations were largely gen z or later, so perhaps they don’t care, even when their office app puts squiggly lines under it… just seems lazy and sloppy to me.
While Plato certainly employed a quasi-fictional Socrates as a vehicle to express his own ideas, scholars generally agree that this passage was largely true to the beliefs of the historical Socrates. As far as we know, Socrates never wrote anything.
Pleasingly hopeful! But I wonder how long people will put up with tech nanny. It’s not going to be long before the revolutionaries start chucking Alexa in the bin. And if that doesn’t happen first, it’ll be all these data centres going at half speed because a Great Storm will take down all the wind turbines and uproot all the solar panels.
And by the way, if I had shares in Nividia, I’d be selling. Turns out AI just isn’t that good.
And who controls what tech nanny is allowed to tell you, or not?
Books and other published materials have an annoying (to some people) habit of not changing their contents depending on the fad of the day…
I’m sure we can blame the Apprentice for starting the habit of people speaking into their phones without using headphones – it was sort of required for the show, but my word it’s everywhere now…
You are seriously suggesting that getting all our information from siri or Google is a step forward?
I do not share your optimism.
This is either an outburst of gadget fascination by people who still believe the internet is exciting new technology or – seems more probable to me – simply a not particularly well disguised ad.
Frantic attempts to sell voice-controlled software for 45 years notwithstanding, I’m still amazed how fluent many people, especially young people, can type on their phones.
Besides, the cornerstone of oral culture is memorization. And I don’t quite believe people will go back to memorizing books full of knowledge instead of just looking it up on demand.
But a nice try. Hope it pays.
PS: Do you realize that “Alexa” (etc) is a 24×7 surveillance device which records absolutely every sound and sends that to remote data centers for analysis as the software necessary to make sense of this can’t run on better toasters?
Not much reason to worry about “government surveillance” etc when you’re life-streaming all of your private life to unselfish entities like Google or Amazon which probably even have a clause that they own the copyrights to these recordings somewhere in their intentionally unintelligible service contracts.
Thank you for reminding us what these “convenient” devices also do.
1) Now phone-addicted Gen-Z are losing the ability to use computer keyboards, experts fear – so, how fast can YOU type? | Daily Mail Online
2) Touch Typing May “Unclamp” the Brain and Promote a Flow State | Psychology Today
3) Handwriting activates broader brain networks than typing, study shows
4) Deliberate Dumbing Down | Official Website of Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt
5) What will happen to the “Post-Literates” dependent on AI when the electricity supply goes down?
5) What will happen to the “Post-Literates” dependent on AI when the electricity supply goes down? Nothing because they don’t exist. This is just an attempt to sell a real bunch of the same old crap people have been trying to sell for the past +40 years (at least) which is, was and will always remain hampered by the fact that what they have isn’t a solution for a problem which doesn’t exist in the usual way – by terror marketing¹. Which is itself a strong sign that the crap is really useless because if it had any uses, it’s purveyors would point at them instead of trying to exploit our fears. NB: I’m actually beyond tired of this because I positively hate it when people are trying scare me into buying something and I would love nothing better than force an AI snakeoil salesmean to eat AI, drink AI, dress in AI and sleep in an AI for six months or so, that is, starve to death naked out in the open for want of everything except his own product. ¹ Make people afraid to miss out on something terribly important because “it’s the unavoidable future because all teenagers… Read more »
Glad it’s not just me wishing this on people pushing AI tech as the second-coming… sure it’s neat for some limited use cases, but not much more that that
Well, it’s an opinion I suppose
May I just comment on a couple of points raised. “First, let me explain how a post-literate young person successfully navigates life with bare minimum reading or writing.” I know a few of these ‘post-literate’ young people and I would not call then ‘post-literate’ but ‘barely-literate’. I would dispute that they are successfully navigating life. i have found that many cannot hiold a reasonable conversation – that is, talking to another human being and putting together coherent sentences. I was talking recently to someone who had a Masters Degree in English Literature and she had not heard of Alexander Solzhenitsyn. Secondly, “I once tried to suggest to a child whose transcribed text was riddled with spelling errors that if he clicked on spell check these could be rectified, and he said passionately, “Honestly, no-one cares. It’s fine.” I am finding this attitude more common as each day passes. Words and sentences are the building bricks of a language, the means of communication and mutual understanding. So, why is this lackadaisical attitude towards words and language becoming so prevalent? Someone said these words to me just the other day when I pointed out a couple of spelling mistakes, “No-one cares”. This… Read more »
Hear, hear! Well said.
I think that she writes some of her articles in the hope of pleasing her teenage children, like the parents who try to be “friends” with their kids instead of “parents”.
I can see the point in describing Greek society in the time of Homer as pre-literate. But I’m not convinced there’s any meaningful distinction between a post-literate society and an illiterate one.
In the translation of the Phaedrus I quote in my book, https://www.hughwillbourn.com/book, we have ‘And as for wisdom, your pupils will have the reputation
for it without the reality: they will receive a quantity
of information without proper instruction, and in
consequence be thought very knowledgeable when they
are for the most part quite ignorant.’ I draw attention to the words “without proper instruction”. It would be pleasant indeed to share your optimism about secondary orality. My current pedagogical contact with 20 year olds suggests your optimism is unfounded.
It can’t be true of someone like Joanny Gray, but my reaction to anyone who resorts to the absurd expression ‘in terms of’ probably doesn’t read much – nothing worth reading, anyway. There’s certainly an appeal in imagining kids, unable to read or write, somehow acquiring skills merely through copying, and what the author unreflectingly calls “ritual” – and indeed it’s happened in the past – but will it happen again? Nah, not without the complete destruction of The Tech, the disappearance of phones, TV, computers etc – and a new generation completely unaware of the former existence of such things. In other words, a post-catastrophe rebirth of humanity, with all the gruesome hardship that that implies. Post-meteor strike, post-biblical flood – that sort of thing. Youngsters – and many oldsters – have learnt that they don’t need to learn; why, without some apocalyptic event, would they suddenly attempt any task that required endless repetition and the slow connection of synapses, when they still have a device in their back pocket that simply gives them the answer to all their problems? Sorry – jejune, ridiculous nonsense.
Sorry, Ms Author, rude of me – not “jejune, ridiculous nonsense” – I don’t really agree with one or two points, is all. Apologies.
You were right the first time. Freedom of Speech.
Reading is essential to inculcating the culture and history which have formed and informed Britain for generations. Kids no longer know who Winston Churchill was – many are functionally illiterate. This is resulting in a brainless, uncultured youth, open to facile indoctrination – eg by gender and climate activists – without the intellect to question what they are told. This is disastrous. Education is at the core of our society, and essential to maintaining its culture and stability. Eroding this – via AI etc – will result in disastrous degradation. That this has started is already evident.
“… intellectually motivated young women like Rose and Dani, the bright young things who host Foidcast,embody this casual relationship with the written word by using only lowercase” … poof — What’s so casual about them, when they continue to divide word from word by spaces C’mon, let all intellectually motivated young women do the job of being casual properly, and write scriptio continua, like everyone before the seventh century AD?