Reeves Breaks Manifesto Pledge as She Raises Taxes by £30 Billion

Rachel Reeves is to breach Labour’s election manifesto pledge as she raises taxes by £30 billion in her Budget, according to official forecasts accidentally published before her speech in the Commons. The Telegraph has more.

The tax burden will hit a new all-time high of 38.3% of GDP by 2031 as the Chancellor puts up taxes by £29.8 billion by the start of the next parliament, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR).

The documents showed the Chancellor will raise £8.3 billion by freezing income tax thresholds for another three years until the 2030-31 financial year.

The document also confirmed that a new tax raid on £2 million houses would go ahead, a £4.7 billion raid by scrapping National Insurance relief on pension contributions above £2,000 and the end of a long-standing freeze on fuel duty.

There will also be a £2.1 billion increase in taxes on income from dividends, savings and property as well as a £900 million hit from limiting capital gains tax relief.

Andrew Griffith, the Shadow Business Secretary, said: “This budget process has been a fiasco from start to finish and the unprecedented leak of the OBR’s report is just the final embarrassment.”

The OBR documents showed the Chancellor has raised her Budget headroom to £22 billion while also raising the bill for sickness and disability benefits by £109 billion by the start of the next Parliament.

The cost of servicing the national debt dropped sharply and the pound rose as the leak showed that borrowing is projected to fall from 4.5% of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2025-26 to 1.9% in 2030-31.

In a chaotic leak before the Chancellor addresses the Commons, it was reported that debt would rise as a share from 95% to 96% by the end of the decade.

Eir Nolsøe summarises the headlines thus:

  • Personal tax thresholds will be frozen until end of decade, raising £8 billion. This will pull 780,000 more people into paying the basic rate of income tax and create 920,000 more higher-rate tax payers.
  • National Insurance on salary-sacrificed pension contributions will bolster the public coffers by £4.7 billion.
  • Increasing tax rates on dividends, property and savings income by two percentage points, raising £2.1 billion.
  • A new mileage-based charge on electric and plug-in hybrid cars from April 2028, at around half the fuel duty paid by petrol drivers. This will raise £1.4 billion.
  • A reduction in writing down allowances in corporation tax that will cost firms £1.5 billion. These allowances allow big companies to deduct a percentage of the value of certain items from their profits each year.
  • An overhaul of gambling taxes that will bring in £1.1 billion while changes to capital gains tax reliefs on employee ownership trusts raising £0.9 billion.
  • The trailed ‘mansion tax’ will hit owners of properties over £2 million from April 2028. It will be implemented as a council tax surcharge and raise £0.4 billion a year by the end of the decade.
  • Borrowing to fall from 4.5% of GDP in 2025-26 to 1.9% by 2030-31.
  • Meanwhile, debt as a share of GDP will end the decade at 96% of GDP, up from 95% this year. This is two percentage points higher than anticipated in March and twice the debt level of the average rich country, according to the OBR.
  • The fiscal watchdog predicts growth will be 1.5% on average a year until the end of the decade, a downgrade of 0.3 percentage points from March. The OBR blamed this on a weaker outlook for productivity gains.
  • Welfare U-turns and ending the two-child benefit are poised to cost the taxpayer £9 billion a year by the end of the decade.

Reeves defended her choices, saying there would almost be £22 billion of headroom in the public finances as a result of her Budget.

I said there would be no return to austerity, and I meant it. This Budget will maintain our investment in our economy and our National Health Service. I said I would cut the cost of living, and I meant it: this Budget will bring down inflation and provide immediate relief for families. I said that I would cut debt and borrowing, and I meant it: because of this Budget, borrowing will fall as a share of GDP in every year of the forecast.

Our net financial debt will be lower by the end of the forecast than it is today and I will more than double the headroom against our stability rule to £21.7 billion – meeting our stability rule and meeting it a year early.

These are my choices. Not austerity. Not reckless borrowing. Not turning a blind eye to unfairness. My choice is a Budget for fair taxes, strong public services, and a stable economy. That is the Labour choice.

Follow the Telegraph‘s live coverage here.

James Baxter Derrington says the Budget “has broken the deal the Labour Party made with the nation and breached its manifesto”.

The extension of the income tax threshold freeze – Rishi Sunak’s invidious invention – is a direct increase in the taxes that working people pay, to the tune of more than £8 billion. Every penny of this will be swallowed up, not by improved public services for us all but by increased benefits payments to a select few. In fact, it will barely cover half of that cost.

For a Chancellor so dedicated to targeting those with the “broadest shoulders”, she has picked one of the most regressive taxes possible. This stealth tax will not target the wealthiest but disproportionately affect those working desperately hard on lower salaries. A party founded on the principle of supporting the working man has just betrayed him.

Continuing in the spirit of prioritising state reliance over rewarding work, Reeves has slashed the amount employees can put into their pensions via salary sacrifice schemes. Don’t worry about funding your own retirement through prudent saving, this government is keen to create a generation of pensioners reliant on the state.

The Telegraph highlights that Reeves has now raised taxes by £70 billion across her two Budgets, more than seven times the £8.5 billion mentioned in the manifesto. Meanwhile the national debt will rise to £3.5 trillion by 2031, more than double the £1.6 trillion before the pandemic (on the measure of public sector net debt excluding the Bank of England, the metric used under the Conservatives) as Rachel Reeves’s borrowing mounts up.

The Office for Budget Responsibility has also said that estimated costs for asylum accommodation are more than triple the amount previously thought. From the Telegraph:

The forecast said that demand for asylum accommodation had grown and is “expected to cost £15.2 billion over the next 10 years, revised up from the Home Office’s previous estimate of £4.5 billion”. 

Nick Timothy, a Conservative MP, said: “Labour said they’d smash the gangs, stop the crossings and close the hotels. 

“Now they plan to more than triple accommodation spending for illegal immigrants.”

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

28 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DiscoveredJoys
DiscoveredJoys
4 months ago

Did the accidental publication benefit any of Labour’s rich supporters?

Gezza England
Gezza England
4 months ago
Reply to  DiscoveredJoys

Sell oil and gas shares and house building shares and then buy then all back at a cheaper price.

Gezza England
Gezza England
4 months ago

You have to admire Rache the Incompetent’s hopes of still being around come 2030-31 on top of saying she will still be haunting us in 2 years time. Come the next election she will probably be back looking for a job in complaints although given she was forced to leave the last time she worked I am not sure who would want her. Known for lying on her CV will not help.

Tonka Rigger
4 months ago
Reply to  Gezza England

She’ll be off to some position within the EU, some quango or “charity”, no doubt.

EppingBlogger
4 months ago
Reply to  Gezza England

I anticipate the changes to regulations will mean there are fewer jobs in complaints so she can whistle. Also, given Reform’s need to get a grip on the HoL there won’t be a job there either.

Oh dear, never mind, how sad.

Tonka Rigger
4 months ago

The destruction of the UK and the gross misapplication of resources continues apace. This budget erodes personal ambition, and doubles down on penalising those who have taken personal responsibility for their own futures. Were I a potential investor into this country I would be looking elsewhere.

The end of this shower cannot come soon enough.

Bill Bailey
Bill Bailey
4 months ago

I see she is still blaming Brexit and of course everyone else. But the truth is that all of the opposition parties at the time did their level best to damage negotiations. They were all briefing the unelected communists in Brussels on the best way to damage the Brexit negotiations.

Then there was the lockdown which contributed in a big way to the long term hole in borrowing and of course they would have kept us all locked up for much longer.

Then as soon as Labour got into power they proceeded to do just about as much as they could to damage the economy by taxing veryonebin sight despite their promises not to do so.

So the people to blame are the government.

EppingBlogger
4 months ago
Reply to  Bill Bailey

In my view there should be a Royal Commission investigation into communications between Remainers and the EU so we know just who said waht, what was promised and how much cash contribution there was to funds.

Western Firebrand
Western Firebrand
4 months ago

A question, if I may, rather than a comment.

Please can I ask whether there’s a succinct precis of why the Liz Truss/Kwazi Kwarteng Budget was such a disaster (as reported), or what it would have achieved had it not been sabotaged?

transmissionofflame
4 months ago

Depends who you believe. Some say it was because they cut taxes without cutting spending, others say it was sabotaged by something or other that the Bank of England was doing, the exact nature of which escapes me.

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
4 months ago

The smart money is that the Bank engineered a minor crisis which they were able to blame on her. She committed the unpardonable by trying to think for herself.

transmissionofflame
4 months ago
Reply to  Jack the dog

I would not trust the BOE with anything

John Kitchen
John Kitchen
4 months ago

The Critic magazine has quite a few interesting articles about Liz Truss and her so-called disastrous budget. Worth having a look. The most interesting I think is How the Bank broke the Government from dec-jan 2023. At the heart of the problem was LDIs which are supposedly a “clever” and “safe” way of funding a pension scheme. In fact they are only “safe” until interest rates or inflation go up for any reason. This causes a disastrous situation where pension funds scramble to sell government bonds because the price is going down, which causes the price to go down further, and so on. So LDIs turn out to be very unsafe. What seems to have happened is that the Bank (which owns vast amounts of government bonds) spotted that the LDI situation which they had tolerated was starting to turn pear-shaped. So they started selling government bonds before the price fell. Speculators joined in, then the pension schemes joined in. Eventually the BOE had to stop the rout by turning round and buying lots of bonds. All blamed the mess on Truss’s budget which happened at the same time. I can see two main possibilities: 1. The BOE was trying… Read more »

transmissionofflame
4 months ago
Reply to  John Kitchen

Thanks for that.

Western Firebrand
Western Firebrand
4 months ago
Reply to  John Kitchen

Yes, thank you.

Mogwai
4 months ago

Crikey, did anyone see this clip from Kemi going full ‘scorched earth’ on Reeves in Parliament? I wonder if she’ll complain about misogyny now, lol….She’s getting a lot of criticism in the comments but I thought it was ace;

”Look at Rachel Reeves’ face. The Chancellor looks like she just watched someone die infront of her.

Whoever wrote Badenoch’s budget response speech deserves a pay rise. Utterly brutal.”

https://x.com/Con_Tomlinson/status/1993681540614701174

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
4 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Kemi was on fire, brilliant.

Smudger
4 months ago
Reply to  Jack the dog

But she and her government are as culpable as Labour for the mess we are in. Pure theatrical directed at the unthinking.

Cotfordtags
4 months ago

I seem to recall from my A level economics that one of the ways to reduce the ability of an economy to grow was to raise taxes, taking money out of the pockets of people to reduce their ability to spend. That being the case, surely an increase in taxes will result in a reduction in GDP. With the increase in actual debt being forecast, how will she achieve a reduction in debt to GDP (which Governments for years have been lying by saying it is a reduction in debt – it isn’t). Finally, how do we stop these mendacious shysters using the word investment when talking about their spending. Investment produces a financial return on the money which Government spending doesn’t.

Mogwai
4 months ago
Reply to  Cotfordtags

Yes but this is Jeremy Clarkson like you’ve never seen him before. I did like the ending…😆

https://x.com/MinistryofWit/status/1993661355082289176

Cotfordtags
4 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

That is brilliant, even better than the Crewkerne Gazette 🤣🤣🤣

EppingBlogger
4 months ago

The ban on salary sacrifice for personal pension saving is pure anti-private sector nastiness. People in the private sector do not know how much they might earn year-by-year because personal bonuses and corporate results based bonuses are not predictable. Personal costs are predictable and rising.

For t hese reasons alone it should be a neutral issue for government whether workers save more or not. We cannot be sure of saving every year.

Of course, Treasury and tax payer “charity” employees can be assured of a final salary pension and regular income come what may. For those of ius who live and work outside their bubble life is very very different.

transmissionofflame
4 months ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

The salary sacrifice changes are also sneaky because it’s not a front page headline tax increase but still affects probably millions of people, I imagine quite substantially in some cases.

David Jones
David Jones
4 months ago

As far as the budget goes I get very frustrated with the approach.
It reminds me of movies when a police officer walks into a house in the dark and goes from room to room with his torch and I think ” just put the bl@@%& lights on! “

With the budget I think as we all owe about £40k per man woman and child as national debt “ just put the bl@@%& income tax up!”

How else would we pay all the money back that was wasted paying people to do nothing over the covid shutdown. 

Myra
4 months ago

I have always been more of a saver than a spender, especially as I am determined not to be beholden to the State and want to be able to make my own choices as much as I can.
My savings are now hit by inflation and more tax on interest and dividends. what kind of message does this send?
Whilst continuing to support and expand the welfare State?

marebobowl
marebobowl
4 months ago

What a load of hogwash. In my 28 yrs of living in the Uk, prosperity is not a word anyone could use to describe the UK. A slow, downward spiral into the abyss. Not sure why the able bodied continue to live off the state. Anyone know?

varmint
4 months ago

Why does this twerp always have a smirk on her face? Does she think she is some kind of celebrity on the red carpet with her silly red briefcase?

JXB
JXB
4 months ago

Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. Rachel from Account and Starburger assume there will be no push-back, no change in behaviour to nullify their brave efforts. There will be. And for anyone too young or with poor memory, we are living through a re-run of the 1960s/70s and the ruin Labour’s spend, spend, spend, tax, borrow, print money, policies caused. From Adam Smith’s “Theory of Moral Sentiments”. “The man of system, on the contrary, is apt to be very wise in his own conceit; and is often so enamoured with the supposed beauty of his own ideal plan of government, that he cannot suffer the smallest deviation from any part of it. He goes on to establish it completely and in all its parts, without any regard either to the great interests, or to the strong prejudices which may oppose it. He seems to imagine that he can arrange the different members of a great society with as much ease as the hand arranges the different pieces upon a chess-board. He does not consider that the pieces upon the chess-board have no other principle of motion besides that which the hand impresses upon them; but that, in the… Read more »