News Round-Up
- “How the blinkered Covid inquiry ignored the true impact of lockdown” – Five years and £200 million later, the profound effects of Britain’s damaged economy remain an afterthought in the flawed investigation, say Gordon Rayner and colleagues at the Telegraph.
- “Baroness Hallett’s £200 million Covid inquiry failed to answer big questions” – On Covid there are two big questions, says Boris Johnson in the Mail: where did the virus come from and were the lockdowns worth the terrible price we paid? “Baroness Hallett’s hopelessly incoherent £200 million inquiry failed to answer either.”
- “Baroness Hallett has dodged the key Covid questions” – The long-running inquiry asserts that 23,000 lives could have been saved by an earlier lockdown but lacks the evidence to prove it, says Fraser Nelson in the Times.
- “To inquiry officials any notion that the lockdowns were worse than the disease is inconceivable” – The official inquiry into COVID-19 had made up its mind before it began, says Daniel Hannan in the Mail.
- “Errors, omissions and illogicalities galore at the Covid inquiry” – The investigation tells us much about what we already know but little about what we need to know — whether lockdowns work and, if so, are worth the damage, says Jonathan Sumption in the Times.
- “We’ll need good data next time or lockdown arguments multiply” – There’s too much we still don’t know about the true efficacy of the draconian Covid measures, says Tom Whipple in the Times.
- “The Covid Inquiry has ducked the most important questions” – The biggest lesson to come out of the first report of the official Covid Inquiry is what a mistake it was to hand to job to lawyers, says Ross Clark in the Spectator.
- “The Covid Inquiry Report: An unscientific whitewash of a monumental scandal” – The Covid Inquiry has delivered exactly what it was designed to deliver, and the rest of us should treat its conclusions with the scepticism they richly deserve, says Professor Roger Watson in TCW.
- “The real lasting lesson of the Great Covid Panic is that most of us don’t want to be free” – In the Mail, Peter Hitchens draws a depressing conclusion from the inquiry’s latest lockdown report.
- “Kemi Badenoch: Labour’s migrant reforms don’t go far enough” – Shabana Mahmood’s immigration and asylum plans look a lot like the Tories’ version, but Labour lacks the courage for crucial elements such as bringing Britain out of the ECHR, says Kemi Badenoch in the Times.
- “Believe it, there is such a thing as Mahmoodism” – In a Labour Party whose leader stands for nothing, the Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood is singular: a devout outsider driven by conviction politics, says Patrick Maguire in the Times.
- “Cadets face being marched from barracks as migrants move in” – Adult cadet instructors in Crowborough are considering suspending training as they do not believe they can ensure the safeguarding of the cadets when the 600 migrants arrive for housing in the barracks, a source familiar with the matter has told the Telegraph.
- “Pakistanis use holiday visa loophole to lodge record asylum claims” – Pakistanis are exploiting holiday, work and student visa loopholes to get to Britain and lodge asylum claims in record numbers, new data have revealed, according to the Telegraph.
- “Starmer would lose leadership contest to Streeting, Rayner, Burnham and Miliband” – Wes Streeting, Angela Rayner, Andy Burnham and Ed Miliband would all win a head-to-head leadership contest against Keir Starmer, polling of Labour members by LabourList reveals.
- “Keir Starmer attempts to brush aside coup claims” – The Prime Minister has insisted he is working “very closely together” with Andy Burnham despite fresh suggestions of a coup plot, as another Labour MP calls on him to quit, the Mail reports.
- “Business owners flee Britain before ‘doomsday’ Budget” – Business owners are leaving Britain for other countries as Rachel Reeves’s ‘doomsday’ Budget looms, says the Telegraph.
- “Don’t blame Trump. We’re the ones who falsely raised Ukraine’s hopes” – The US President’s cynicism was never in doubt, but why did Europe promise the world and then withhold it, asks Matthew Syed in the Times.
- “Here’s why delusional Europe won’t keep Ukraine in the fight” – What has been conspicuously lacking are actual transfers of sufficient hard cash and weaponry from Europe to allow Ukraine to prevail, says Owen Matthews in the Telegraph.
- “Trump is behaving precisely as he would if he were a Russian asset” – Trump’s Ukraine proposals are not peace terms, they are the exactions that a victorious power wrings from a conquered rival, says Daniel Hannan in the Telegraph.
- “Arm twisting won’t stop licence fee refuseniks – or the BBC’s demise” – Instead of shining a light through the fog of digital distortion which blights all our efforts to learn the truth, BBC News has become part of the problem, writes Andrew Neil in the Mail.
- “£1.5 billion package announced to help Britain switch to electric vehicles” – Despite the massive tax rises expected in the Budget, Labour is reported to be planning to announce a further £1.3 billion for the Electric Car Grant, along with £200 million to speed up the rollout of thousands of charging points across the UK, bringing the total investment to £1.5 billion, reports Sky News.
- “Is The Gulf Stream Really Collapsing? Debunking Another Climate Doomsday Claim” – In the No Tricks Zone, Pierre Gosselin debunks the claim that global warming could paradoxically shut down the Gulf Stream, plunging Europe into a new cold spell.
- “Solar panel companies shut down for ‘exploiting’ vulnerable pensioners” – Two solar panel companies have been shut down after “deliberately exploiting” vulnerable pensioners, reports the Telegraph.
- “Miliband says COP30 was ‘step forward’ despite lack of explicit fossil fuel plan” – Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said he “would have preferred a more ambitious agreement” at COP30 in Brazil, reports the Independent.
- “EV drivers to be bombarded with in-car adverts” – Drivers of electric cars are being hit with a wave of in-car digital advertising as vehicles’ large touch-screens become a route for brands to reach more eyeballs, says the Telegraph.
- “Puberty blockers to be given to children in NHS-backed trial” – A controversial clinical study will see as many as 226 children as young as 10 years-old who believe they are transgender be given gender-bending drugs, reports the Mail.
- “How CDC and FDA Defrauded the American Public about Serious Vaccine Harms” – In Brownstone Journal, Peter C. Gøtzsche explains how the American public was systematically misled by the very institutions they are supposed to trust.
- “BBC headlines ‘three times as likely to vilify Israel over Hamas’” – A study of BBC headlines since the October 7th attacks has found three times more were critical of Israel than of Hamas, reports the Telegraph.
- “Archbishop of York’s ‘genocidal acts’ charge against Israel is neither wise nor appropriate” – Given the Church’s history of antisemitism, the second-most senior Anglican bishop should have thought again before using an accusation that has the stink of prejudice, says Professor Nigel Biggar in the Jewish Chronicle.
- “Inside the fracturing pro-Palestine movement: Purges, paranoia and a far-Left revolt” – Jewish News reports on the struggle taking place within the wider anti-Zionist movement in Britain over who should be embraced and who held at arm’s length.
- “Junior doctors could get guaranteed pension of £125,000 a year” – Junior doctors have gone on strike demanding more money, but analysis of their pension progression shows they could end their careers very comfortably off, according to the Times.
- “It’s time to end the brutal blacklisting of Kevin Spacey” – Hollywood’s continued shunning of the great screen actor of the millennial age is cruel and stupid, says Brendan O’Neill in Spiked.
- “Killing female foetuses to protect women encapsulates what now counts as progress in the West” – Western ‘feminists’ are lending their support to the evil practice of killing female babies in the womb in order to seem ‘anti-racist’ and prevent communities being racially profiled, says Dia Chakravarty in the Telegraph.
- “Owner of the Daily Mail strikes £500 million deal to buy the Telegraph” – The owner of the Daily Mail, Lord Rothermere, has struck a £500 million deal to buy the Daily Telegraph with the aim of securing the future of the paper, but worries about media pluralism have been raised.
- “Trump has threatened to sue the BBC for deceptively editing his January 6th speech. Maybe he should also go after the German public broadcasters who did exactly the same thing” – Eugyppius points out that Germany public broadcaster ARD is guilty of the same sin as the BBC.
- “Bolsonaro arrested for ‘trying to escape’ before start of 27-year sentence” – Jair Bolsonaro has been arrested for allegedly trying to escape days before he was set to start his 27-year prison sentence for ‘plotting a coup’, the Telegraph reports.
- “Labour council bans couple from building flagpole for Union flag” – Labour-run Warrington borough council has banned a couple from erecting a garden flagpole from which they had planned to fly a Union flag, the Telegraph reports.
- “Brain worms and blue eyes: the RFK love triangle shocking America” – A book by journalist Olivia Nuzzi has unleashed a chaotic slew of revelations about her transgressive relationships with wayward politicians — and the US is hooked, says the Times.
- “Archbishop urges Reeves to back down on church VAT raid” – The Archbishop of York, Stephen Cottrell, has pleaded with Rachel Reeves not to hit churches with a de facto VAT raid on building repairs in her upcoming Budget, the Telegraph reports.
- “The CPS is desperate for a backdoor blasphemy law” – Clearly, the CPS wants to be able to continue to prosecute and convict anyone whose actions violate Islamic blasphemy codes, says David Shipley in the Spectator.
- “Britain’s free speech paradox” – In UnHerd, Jonathan Sumption argues the UK’s speech laws have become incoherent.
- “America’s tradition of public debate is under attack. Nothing exemplifies this better than the assassination of Charlie Kirk at a college campus event in September” – Watch DadSavesAmerica on X on the corruption of high school debate.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
With the notable exceptions of Hitchens and Sumption, lots of 2020 hindsight going on regarding “Covid”. Johnson in particular can jog on. Lord Young of Acton managed to suss out what was going on- why couldn’t the rest of them?
Johnson doing a nice bit of deflection in the article above, speaking like he bore no personal responsibility for any of it. As if he were just some hapless automaton, receiving orders from those subordinate to him and giving the go-ahead to unleash catastrophe on the country and misery on its populace. There were always options. If ever there were a fake patriot it’s Boris Johnson. And as for the Inquiry: Nobody needed psychic powers to see what an expensive shambles that’d turn out to be. We all called it from the get-go. Even if it were a different type of coronavirus, all they ever had to do was treat it like any other flu-like virus, much like Sweden, and all could’ve been avoided. But where’s the fun in that? No intensive PsyOp to terrify and brainwash the public, no obsession with and heavy reliance on PCR testing, no psychological manipulation by insisting everyone wear masks, and on and on it went. Boris Johnson, along with all the others in positions of authority that turned their backs on science so they could treat the country like one big unethical experiment should be on trial for crimes against humanity. Instead they’re… Read more »
Johnson – for whom I voted seeing him as the only chance of Brexit happening.
He completely buggered up Brexit and it still in reality has not happened.
Then the utter shambles of 2020, when no more died than in a bad flu year
Now he’s settled in a £3 million home in the Cotswolds. Reward for WHAT exactly?
For having been born to someone with plenty of cash in hand, perhaps?
While I’m no fan of him, I think he was conned into it by suffering from an infection (that might or might not have been Covid-19) that resulted in him being in hosp for a while. One of the workers (accidentally) released some info about his body weight. He was (and might still be) rather fat. I came to the view that he must have paid an upmarket tailor to disguise the fact, and it may be that, like many of us, he was vulnerable to all sorts of snags in the middle of winter. Political jobs like that are not good for you, at the end of the day.
Baroness Hallett’s £200 million Covid inquiry failed to answer big questions
‘…where did the virus come from and were the lockdowns worth the terrible price we paid?’
Two choices here…either Johnson is thick as mince…or he is attempting to deceive.
There is, in fact, only one question that requires an answer:
Why did Britain’s government spend £500bn on a common cold coronavirus whose patient mortality age, for both men and women, was above this country’s age of life expectancy?
This clusterfeck of an inquiry arrogantly refuses any attempt to answer that question
So is Lady Hallett as thick as mince as well…or is she attempting to deceive?
Or was she in it for the money.
Here in the Netherlands, our Inquiry is supposedly still ongoing. But it’s something I never see anything reported on in the news, so it’s like some mysterious thing which is presumably taking place behind closed doors with no updates reported in the press for the public. It’s said it should conclude late next year, but I fully predict it’ll be the same whitewash as the UK one and not a soul will be held accountable or seen to have been at fault.
In the meantime, Rutte hasn’t done too badly for himself over at NATO, has he? It’s just one revolving door after another for these untouchable f***ers, isn’t it?
I think we’re all supposed to just think:
“Phew, thank the gods we had all those experts in charge, making tough decisions based on their collective wisdom, professional experience and the available empirical evidence. I know we’ve never been locked down, forced to wear masks or stand 1.5m ( depending on country ) from each other before, or forbidden to visit elderly loved ones ( even if they’re on their death beds) or ban people from our homes either, but just think about how much worse things would’ve been if we hadn’t.”
Hallet is toeing the line, just like the rest of them. People like her can never be relied upon to be impartial and get to the heart of the matter because she’s a Covidiot, as corrupt and fond of authoritarianism as all the others. They will never concede any wrongdoing ( to put it mildly ) took place.
Yes, that’s exactly what we are supposed to think. The message is “if only we had locked down sooner and harder, all those deaths could have been avoided… next time we have to be more decisive!”.
The purpose of the “enquiry” is to normalize the idea that the government can impose total control on the population in order to save people.
Once that idea has been hammered in and the population has accepted it, they just need to manufacture a suitable crisis.
Trump is behaving precisely as he would if he were a Russian asset ‘No official texts…..Without documents, a substantive discussion is meaningless. The text of the ‘agreement’ of unknown origin circulating online is a document that Putin will never sign. ‘Therefore, it’s not even worth considering how to evaluate it from a Ukrainian point of view.’ Under no circumstances will Putin meet with Zelenskyy or negotiate with him…….That is why Zelenskyy did not throw the proposed text in the trash but formally suggested ‘working on it’ ‘Two idiots (Witkoff and Dmitriev) decided they could save themselves from a total defeat in hopeless negotiations by imposing their absolutely moronic 28-point ‘plan’ They agreed to do this back when Trump was imposing sanctions on Lukoil and Rosneft, meaning. Dmitriev’s side decided that the White House is full of complete fools who would fall for his latest ‘plan’ Weakening Ukraine is not in the strategic interests of the U.S. Neither is excluding Europe from the process, as the States want to pass the responsibility for the region’s security onto Europe in the future. To sum up: taking advantage of the political crisis, there will be many who want to shout ‘we are definitely being… Read more »
We are back talking about Hackney this week too!
https://www.buzzsprout.com/1268768/episodes/18226781-ep-66-hackney-town-is-going-down
This week we talk BBC Bias NOW vs THEN (Hello Jimmy Saville!) plus the current crime wave in Bournemouth, Lady London makes her first appearance, the history of two pilots plus Kulture Klub. ENJOY!
LEAVE US A ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ review.
Send us an email to: therealnormalpodcast@gmail.com
“The CPS is desperate for a backdoor blasphemy law”
Yes, but why.? Are they autonomous, or is someone giving them instructions.?
“Puberty blockers to be given to children in NHS-backed trial” No matter how good the NHS thinks its lawyers are, we all know this is setting the scene for a slew of future legal claims.
“Here’s why delusional Europe won’t keep Ukraine in the fight” – What has been conspicuously lacking are actual transfers of sufficient hard cash and weaponry from Europe to allow Ukraine to prevail, says Owen Matthews” No, what has been conspicuously lacking is ANY INVESTIGATION into the whereabouts of all the £billions Europe & America & the UK have ALREADY GIVEN to Corrupt Weasel Zelensky. Surely people understand that ZELENSKY WANTS WAR TO CONTINUE FOR YEARS, because that’s the only way he can cling to power and keep trousering all the cash laundered from Gullible Westerners. The Communist EU want war to continue so they can send Western Troops into the Meatgrinder to be maimed and killed, while installing The Muslim Army in the Western Barracks left behind. If Zelensky accepts peace on any terms, even the most favourable, he will be forced to hold elections, which he will LOSE. So he will keep whining and making excuses and difficulties and refusing to accept any peace deal, so he can keep trousering the cash and lording it over real Ukrainian Patriots. In contrast, neither continued war nor peace will make any difference to Putin’s grip on power in Russia. Not one… Read more »