Government “Withholding Data That May Link Covid Jab to Excess Deaths”
The UK Health Security Agency stands accused of a ‘cover up’ after it refused to publish data that may link the Covid jab to excess deaths. The public health watchdog argued that it could cause bereaved relatives “distress or anger” if such a link were to be discovered. The Telegraph has the story.
The public health watchdog has been accused of a ‘cover-up’ after refusing to publish data that could link the Covid vaccine to excess deaths.
The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) argued that releasing the data would lead to the “distress or anger” of bereaved relatives if a link were to be discovered.
Public health officials also argued that publishing the data risked damaging the well-being and mental health of the families and friends of people who died.
Last year, a cross-party group expressed alarm about “growing public and professional concerns” over the UK’s rates of excess deaths since 2020.
In a letter to UKHSA and Department for Health, the MPs and peers said that potentially critical data – which map the date of people’s Covid vaccine doses to the date of their deaths – had been released to pharmaceutical companies but not put into the public domain.
They argued that the data should be released “on the same anonymised basis that it was shared with the pharmaceutical groups, and there seems to be no credible reason why that should not be done immediately”.
UsForThem, a campaign group, requested that UKHSA release the data under freedom of information laws. But the agency refused, making a number of different arguments including that publishing the data “could lead to misinformation” that would “have an adverse impact on vaccine uptake” in the public.
UKHSA also claimed there would be a risk of individuals being identified, despite the request being made for an anonymised dataset. After a two-year battle, the Information Commissioner ruled in the UKHSA’s favour, backing its refusal to publish the data. …
Ben Kingsley, the legal director of UsForThem, said the way the UKHSA had handled the case “reveals a desperation that this data should not, in any form, see the light of day”.
He added: “It is perverse for UKHSA to argue that this data should not be released because the public could feel distressed or angry if patterns or correlations were to be identified.
“You have to ask yourself why it is that the public are considered incapable of handling this data. It reveals a patronising mindset, which also characterised the pandemic response – ‘do what we say, don’t ask any questions, we know what is best for you’.”
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
This exemplifies the attitude of the elites towards the public. It happens when rulers have grown too powerful and accountability has been lost.
Just like Britain really, thirty years in the making.
Thirty years? The pace of authoritarianism has certainly increased sharply over the last thirty years but you could also argue that the groundwork was laid after WW 1, or WW 2, or the ‘social contract’ after WW 2.
The UK Health Security Agency stands accused of a ‘cover up’ after it refused to publish data that may link the Covid jab to excess deaths. The public health watchdog argued that it could cause bereaved relatives “distress or anger” if such a link were to be discovered. Par for the course! The HSA took over the official ‘investigation’ of the 1988 Camelford water poisoning incident, almost 38 years ago, after public pressure forced it to set up a deliberately evasive inquiry. The original two mini ‘inquiries’ ridiculed the evidence of severe harm, claiming that sickness (and worse) distress and anger of people impacted by it were all down to hysteria. But the dead livestock didn’t read newspapers or watch TV, so they probably didn’t die of hysteria! I sat on the HSA Committee for ten years, as a ‘lay’ local representative, and walked out at the end, refusing to allow my name to be associated with its ‘findings’. Such positive action can destroy the credibility of these governmental cove-ups (see the Post Office scandal and the Rape Gangs fiascos). These so-called ‘watchdogs’ have no teeth, and can be ridiculed by standing up against them and disputing their conclusions. For… Read more »
Also, someone might be held accountable, can’t be having that!
Nothing to see here, move along please.
“It reveals a patronising mindset, which also characterised the pandemic response – ‘do what we say, don’t ask any questions, we know what is best for you’.”” Or you will be sacked from your job, your movements restricted and banned from travel and other recreational activities. That’s not patronising, that is totalitarian authoritarianism.
We can be 100% certain that if the “vaccines” showed any benefit at all, they would be shouting it from the rooftops. I expect the results are utterly dreadful, however you view them. The Govt cannot allow this to be seen.
Meanwhile they are still pushing them on the public. To quote Walter Scott “Oh what a tangled web we weave/ When first we practice to deceive”.
As has been said a few times on GB News over the last week particularly in relation the upcoming budget produced by the incompetent Chancellor – do they really believe that we are as stupid as the way they treat us? Refusing to release something is obviously a cover up. Recently they had the blocking of the truth about the Chinook crash that killed security forces from N Ireland which looks like flying in a helicopter that was not airworthy. The files on the murder of Dr David Kelly – or suicide as the Blair government would have you believe – have been sealed until most of us are dead. What are they hiding? A proper post mortem was denied.
There are studies in other countries than the UK that show a link between excess deaths and the Covid experimental jabs. All these have been taken from my list of 100 studies showing the harms of the Covid jabs. https://classicrecords1.wixsite.com/the-sceptic/post/covid-vaccine-harms-list-of-studies-and-scientific-papers-and-articles Why Aren’t We Talking About Excess Deaths in Countries With High mRNA Vaccine Rates? Medical commentator John Campbell, Ph.D., examined the differences in excess death figures across countries with varying mRNA COVID-19 vaccination rates. “It’s the end of May 2025, and we’re still seeing excess deaths in most Western countries, but not in Eastern countries. What could the difference possibly be?” he asked. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/excess-deaths-in-countries-high-covid-19-mrna-vaccine-rates/?utm_id=20250530 A study released last year of excess mortality in 125 countries during the COVID-19 pandemic found that higher-than-average excess deaths were due to the public health establishment’s response and the COVID-19 vaccines. https://correlation-canada.org/covid-excess-mortality-125-countries/ A peer-reviewed study published in March in Discover Medicine found that Japan recorded an abnormal increase in excess deaths in the years since the COVID-19 vaccines were introduced. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44337-025-00274-0 A peer-reviewed study published in July 2024 in the European Society of Medicine’s official journal, Medical Research Archives, found that the number of excess deaths in Australia is positively correlated with the number of… Read more »
Nope, all these excess deaths were caused by global warming, by the patriarchy, by the far right, and by Putin.
If we were allowed to see the facts then we might become very angry and our blood pressure might rise, which would be bad for our health.
So our caring leaders are committed to making sure we never find out what really happened. As always their sole motivation is the good of the British people.
(Sarc if you hadn’t guessed).
Nothing to do with concern for bereaved relatives, everything to do with saving the skins of UKHSA, MHRA, SAGE and any number of other official bodies that colluded in The Pandemic That Never Was.
DT article fails to mention Dr Craig, whose case was merged with UsforThem’s. Detailed writeup/video from her here:
https://drclarecraig.substack.com/p/the-outcome-of-the-icoukhsa-foi-court
The government clearly hasn’t learnt anything from previous scandals e.g. Muslim rape gangs, the Post Office etc. The truth always comes out in the end and the longer the cover up goes on the angrier people are.
I hope you’re right but the difference in this case is that there are a lot more victims who may prefer to forget about having been fooled or bullied
Can I just check, are they saying that we mustn’t hear the truth because it may upset us?
It is such a relief to be spared the pain.
Yes, that is the argument. Smacks of desperation. I mean, they obviously don’t care about anyone’s feelings, but if that’s the best they can come up with, they are in trouble.
Truly a $cientific approach…
My letter to the UKHSA to ask them to reconsider the release of vaccine data.
https://open.substack.com/pub/mfvh/p/ukhsa-foi-request-release-anonymised?r=ylgqf&utm_medium=ios
Will let you know if I get a reply…
What makes my head wobble is that the pro-vax posts I’m seeing on X seem to overlook that this data could prove the sceptics wrong and still they criticise them. Really can’t win.
Are they taking the proverbial? That is most certainly a cover up and an exercise in arse covering! Labour government covering for a previous Tory government? Hmm? Smells of establishment closing ranks to me!
The Establishment doesn’t dare admit the truth. Their justification is …. “we couldn’t handle the truth.”
So they are guilty then , with bells on , + there is a snippet going round showing the development of aerosol delivery of MRNA vaccine material which could be sprayed onto us , it’s relentless 😵💫🤯
So we can’t talk about rape gangs because that might upset well meaning and innocent Muslims? We can’t talk about vaccine side-effects as that might upset the victims of government propaganda? But we have to talk about things like colonialism, gender etc, when suddenly its fine to offend.
I asked Grok yesterday about the evidence for adverse reactions/deaths/myocarditis etc and it obviously has been programmed only to consult official stats sources and parroted the establishment line