Reeves Ditches Income Tax Rise – and Streeting Celebrates
Rachel Reeves has dramatically ditched Budget plans to hike income tax, leading Wes Streeting to effectively claim victory as he publicly declared that he had not supported the rise. The Mail has more.
The Health Secretary – seemingly emboldened by a botched Downing Street ‘hit job’ on his leadership ambitions this week – publicly declared that he had not supported the move.
The intervention could fuel speculation about Keir Starmer’s position, as the sense of chaos around the looming Budget grows.
Labour insiders are in despair about shambolic briefing ahead of the critical package, with blame being cast on Treasury Minister Torsten Bell and No 10 Chief of Staff Morgan McSweeney.
The pound has taken a hit after the latest extraordinary U-turn emerged overnight. Interest rates on gilts – the main way the Government borrows money – also spiked in early trading, although they eased back slightly after the Treasury issued a statement stressing the Chancellor’s determination to shore up the public finances.
With Ms Reeves needing to close a fiscal gap of up to £40 billion on November 26th, Analysts warned that the UK could be facing a “credibility shock” after the maelstrom of infighting and public contradictions, while even Labour’s favourite think-tank branded the situation is “not normal”.
It leaves her scrambling to find other ways of filling the estimated £30 billion black hole in the books, less than a fortnight before the critical package is unveiled.
The Financial Times said she is now looking at cutting tax thresholds to drag millions of people deeper into the system. That would represent a huge expansion of the hated ‘stealth raid’ that has been in effect for years.
Ms Reeves could then attempt to argue that the manifesto has been abided by – but critics would point out that ‘working people’ were suffering.
Ms Reeves’s shift in approach appears to have been prompted by panic in Downing Street over the threat to Sir Keir.
Only last week the Chancellor was delivering a highly unusual pre-Budget speech warning that “everyone” will have to “contribute” to shoring up the Government’s books. She then stated publicly that cutting capital spending would be the only way to abide by the manifesto promises.
That was seen as confirmation of broad-based tax increases.
Nigel Green, CEO of global financial advisory deVere Group, warned that “mixed signals” were spooking the markets.
“This is exactly how credibility shocks begin,” he said.
“Gilts are sliding, borrowing costs are climbing, and sterling is weakening because markets fear the government is improvising. There’s nothing investors hate more than indecision disguised as strategy.”
He added: “The reaction is unmistakable. Bond traders are telling the Treasury that they will not tolerate mixed signals. They saw what happened during the Truss turmoil and they’ll not wait politely for clarity. They’re pricing risk in real time.”

Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Raises taxes… oh, no, can’t do that, people will revolt
Ok, then, cut benefits….. oh, no, can’t do that, people will revolt
Ok, then, fleece the rich…. oh no, can’t do that, they’ll leave and make it even worse.
Ok, then, raise taxes….. oh no, can’t do that, people will revolt.
Ok then, cut benefits…..
etc. etc. etc.
The solution – borrow more money and blame someone else when the whole thing crashes
As far as I’m aware, they’re still blaming “the Tories” and Brexit. As though they haven’t been in government for over a year now. Plus ça change…
Indeed. Wouldn’t it be good if we got to a point where the state was not seen as responsible for our prosperity, but instead was judged on how efficiently it provided essential services, and we got used to the idea that our prosperity, as far as we are able to control it depends on how hard and how smart we work?
As I posted on another story, last weekend we were told that the OBR (Office for Bungling and Rubbish?), had to revise the previous Government’s productivity forecast down, creating another unforeseen black hole that was going to force the illegal landlord to break her manifesto promise. This week, numerous bad news stories for TTK and suddenly the OBR say receipts are better than expected, spending doing well, so no need to change income tax after all. Does nobody think that this is just total 🐂💩 to protect Starmer and Reeves and that the OBR is just a branch of the Labour party?
The OBR should be disbanded as it has never got anything right. It was created by Boy George – another inept Chancellor – in response to Gordon Broon’s dodgy tax agenda.
They’ve clearly been told their first scientifically calculated answer was incorrect, so could they adjust the facts used, to come up with the required one…
Not increasing Income Tax? That’s one shoe dropped.
A determined plan to reduce spending (especially ‘discretionary’ spending)? Shoe still held up, although the Chancellor’s grip is weakening.
See my comment earlier in the “roundup”: “abandons expected tax increases…” (GBN subheadline): Are we being taken for a ride, to see how we react? The unusual feature of the forthcoming budget is how slow it is, as if they are deliberately testing us to see how we might react.
And Huxleypiggles comment to it.
“filling the estimated £30 billion black hole in the books”
Simple. Stop spending our money on fripperies and ideologically-driven rubbish!
They claimed a £22bn ‘black hole’, then immediately spaffed that amount on nonsense. This £30bn deficit is all on them, and any remediation is likely to be horribly debt fuelled.
The public do not exist simply to pay tax. Maximising tax revenue has huge deleterious impact on growth and hence on the economy’s future value.
This is an interesting essay on the subject.
https://isabelpaterson.substack.com/p/laffer-loathing-my-lovehate-relationship
Thank you for this link. Really interesting. Have restacked it and I hope ‘our’ government reads it…..
Industry, commerce, employment, self-employment, agriculture, trade, private sector, profits, productivity, wealth creation, enterprise, incentives, prosperity, and ambition. Has this apology for a Chancellor of the Exchequer ever heard of these things or, being a resentful, parasitic socialist, does she think that they are swear words?
This is the first time – I think – in the UK where the details of a budget are in general public circulation weeks ahead of the actual budget.
What happened to Budget purdah: the period after plans have been prepared but before the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s annual budget is announced, when they refrain from discussing any matters which have relevance to the forthcoming budget?
How about stopping haemorrhaging money on Ed Millifools climate catastrophe rubbish. How about refusing anyone who comes into the country free everything plus pocket money and jail them until they can be deported.
how about stopping disability for people with mental “elf” problems?
there are so many things this lot can do before fleecing the poor indigenous even more by dragging them into the tax jelly.
Hear, hear!
Honestly, I have never encountered a more rudderless government in my lifetime. Months of budget speculations creating anxiety, uncertainty and financial havoc.
Agreed – I think they are testing the public reactions to be honest, like everything in modern politics it’s about what people feel rather than what’s right and needs to happen…