How the Government’s Digital ID Fantasy Will Fall Apart
As we all know, our farsighted, imaginative and inspiring Prime Minister recently announced he is planning to introduce digital IDs for UK citizens. You can read about the Government’s plans here.
Some people may think it’s a good idea. Others will be dubious. I’ve just had an early experience of the likely way this will shape up.
Being the fortunate recipient of a triple-locked state pension, I was keen to cough up a measly £94 Class 2 National Insurance payments for the one year I was slightly short. I applied in April and paid that in July.
Has it been actioned? You know the answer already, don’t you?
I went online to check my state pension payments. It is, or rather was, a simple Government website login dedicated to that service. It took about 15 seconds, or at least it used to. Not anymore it doesn’t. My heart sank. Now you have to create a Gov.UK One account. This is supposed to be an impending system to access all Government services.
What, another one? Yes, indeedy.
Creating that account turned out to be a cavalcade of horrors and wasted time. You can’t just enter an email, password and a mobile number for passcodes. You need to start like that, but then it wants to take you through a nightmarish procedure to verify your identity.
This was a gateway into hell. I was on my computer. The website wanted my passport. I then also had to install a verification app on my phone that took a photo of the passport, uploaded it and then was supposed to read the chip in the passport, operating in tandem with the website on the laptop.
Now, that’s a knotty problem. My passport chip doesn’t work at Heathrow. It works everywhere else in the world I’ve used it. It works with a commercial chip reading app on my phone, but now it turns not the Gov.UK One app. After grinding round for ages, I changed to using my driving licence. The app then wanted to scan my face to compare with the licence and tried to connect me to something called Face Scan except that wouldn’t connect. Of course it wouldn’t.
Then I was told I’d have to verify my identity at the Post Office instead. Down to the nearest town I went with my passport, queued behind the usual people totally unprepared for their transactions so that was another 15 minutes. The Post Office chap couldn’t have been more helpful. He scanned the QR code Gov.UK One had helpfully supplied with his tablet, uploaded a photo of my passport and happily read the chip (instantly actually). He photographed me, sent it all up to the Government site and I headed home.
When I got there, I saw the Gov.uk One email inviting me to login to see the result. So, I did and Gov.UK One supplied a link for the state pension site, telling me I could now proceed. I tried that, but to my incredulity it started the identity verification all over again instead as if the previous several hours had never happened. Round and round I went, going nowhere.
Eventually I tried the driving licence again. This time, inexplicably, the Face Scan worked. I was in! Only four hours after I started. You’d have thought I’d been applying for a day pass at GCHQ.
There indeed was my pension, just as it had been on the old site except that this time it hadn’t taken a few seconds to get there. It hadn’t been increased. Of course it hadn’t, despite assurance on previous calls to the Pension Service that it had been.
I called the Pension Service for an explanation as to why my pension hadn’t been increased. I had to wait 30 minutes to get through. The agent who took the call happily told me that she couldn’t get into Gov.UK One at all herself. “It’s useless,” she said. She laughed and added: “I bet it sent you back to the beginning again,” and described it as Kafkaesque. She’s given up herself.
Reassuring.
That amusing exchange of anecdotes settled, she told me my pension account was too complicated to answer my query immediately. She’d have to call me back. She did too (that was remarkable) and told me that HMRC, which sets the additional voluntary contributions amounts, had failed to associate a ‘Standard Record of Benefit’ with my account. This, mind you, had not been mentioned on any previous enquiries. I’ve never heard of it. I would, she gaily told me, have to call HMRC again and get them to do that.
Incredulous, I called HMRC. Another 30-minute wait to get through. The agent told me she’d never heard of a Standard Record of Benefit. Well, why would she have done? She put me on hold for another 30 minutes while she cranked through my data.
Back she came to tell me that my additional contribution had gone down wrongly as a “late payment”. She’d corrected it but – wait for it – I’d have to call the Pension Service again to tell it I’d called HMRC as instructed and get it to action it. My heart sank.
This time it took 40 minutes to get through back to the Pensions Service. The agent told me it was indeed all correct now. “Why had the HMRC person not heard of a Standard Record of Benefit?” I asked. “I have no idea,” she said. Whatever it is, it had apparently now been done.
Then she told me it would now have to be sent to a specialist adviser to process and that would take another four to six weeks.
Let’s be clear. This was to process a payment I had been instructed to make by HMRC months and months ago. I am entitled to the elevated pension. I have actually paid for it.
Despite all that, I have still been subjected to the need to spend ages on the phone repeatedly talking to different people in the State Pensions Service and HMRC, every one of whom has given me a different variant on the story.
It’s an allegorical tale of the byzantine modern state, a Gormenghast edifice hamstrung by contradictory procedures, staff of varying abilities, departments that cannot interact or communicate with the same language, and hopeless inaction.
My issue was a trifle, something of such astonishing simplicity it is almost impossible to credit how much of a mess has been made of it, a mess that remains until finally I get the additional money.
To this has now been added yet another tier of digital complications involving a new Gov.UK One login system that took me four hours to sort out, requires the person to have a laptop and a smartphone as well as a passport with a chip or some other sort of electronic ID, merely to see what my pension payments are. I’m fairly tech savvy, but this drove me spare.
I only eventually sorted my issue out (for the moment) because I was able to speak to people on the phone and because I had the time to waste going down to the nearest town and have my passport scrutinised in a Post Office. And even that didn’t work properly.
And the Government seriously thinks it’s going to initiate Making Tax Digital from April 6th 2026 successfully? A system that relies on a maze of commercial software options, each of which is supposed to be integrated with HMRC’s systems. Seriously? I dread to think how some sole traders and landlords are going to cope when the inevitable problems arise and they are plunged into black holes of digital despair and automated penalties. And there won’t be anything like enough people at the end of a phone line to help, let alone any of them who will actually know how to sort any problems out.
This is also the Government that thinks it’s going to impose digital IDs. Don’t make me laugh. Any such system might work for some people, but for anyone encountering a problem one can only start to imagine how much misery and frustration will be coming their way.
Perhaps we should be grateful. These days there’s lots of talk about an impending financial crash. I think it’s more likely the whole system of government will fall apart first. The sheer extravagance of the scale of the ineptitude and all-round crappiness of what I’ve experienced in the last 24 hours was unprecedented for me, though I have no doubt everyone and anyone reading this will have their own stories to tell that are at least as bad and probably worse.
Stop Press: I emailed the Gov.UK One help service, explaining what had happened. This is the email I received back. What I’d written had been totally ignored:
Thanks for contacting GOV.UK One Login team. I am sorry you’ve had problems using GOV.UK One Login.
If you are still facing issues please reply to this email with a detail of the service you were trying to access for example (DBS or Companies House) and what exactly were you struggling with.
I might as well have emailed the cat. “DBS” stands for Disclosure and Barring Service. And what has Companies House got to do with it? Hold onto your hats, folks. We’re in for a helluva ride.
Guy de la Bédoyère is a historian and author with numerous books to his credit, mostly concerning the ancient world and the diarist Samuel Pepys. His latest book is The Confessions of Samuel Pepys. His Private Revelations (Abacus 2025).
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I’ve just finished trying to renew my car insurance with Aviva. The new quote, for the same drivers driving the same cars, had increased by almost 25%. Why? I wanted to know. As far as I could find, there’s no human you can speak to, the best available option is a chatbot.
Companies & the State alike, have contempt for their customers.
I’d like to go somewhere else for my insurance but I know how long & painful the process is to just get a quote. I’m sure Aviva are relying on these frictional costs to allow them to hang on to annoyed customers.
I finally moved after several years with Aviva. Their new renewal quote was significantly more than last year so I rang them to find out why & if I could get more than the offered 10% discount for returning customers. I did speak to someone (at least I think it was a lady) but she was difficult to understand & I gave up. Reason? A verbal shrug – inflation- claims from other customers?
I got a better quote with a different company & decided to switch. Took time & effort yes – a full morning – but £100 worth it?
Suggestion. Try Go Compare for quotes.
And/or instead of renewing with Aviva, start as if you were a new customer. You may find the quote you get as a new customers is better than as a renewing customer.
Agreed or confused.com – I’ve used the later for years now, moving relatively simply each year. One year, the existing insurer put up the premium by just £10. I stayed with them. I really don’t understand the logic of putting up the premium by so much each year forcing you to move insurer. There must be some weird reason.
Same here – stuck with one insurer for years because they were really good on a large claim in the dim and distant past, I still had to phone up every renewal time to haggle away the 1-200 extra pounds they’d,try and lump on without fail. Now I usually change every year, they are all pretty much as bad as each other
I got my renewal through from Aviva recently. For the first time in my life it has gone DOWN by over £50. Nothing has changed about my circumstances. It is not a ‘no claims’ decrease as the last time I troubled an insurance company was over 3 decades ago.
I got a renewal for one of my Aviva policies and it too had gone down considerably but the vehicle now has 4 years no claims. You would think I would renew with joy but…uswitch has emailed an even lower renewal offer from Saga.
I go through this dance every year with car- and health insurance. If you are loyal, they just take you for a ride (no pun intended). Switch and you are much better of!
Full steam ahead into the Iceberg
This all may seem very new and irritating to the ordinary person. But this level of bureaucratic incoherence that grinds things to a virtual halt is what enterprises encounter all the time. The more complicated the enterprise the deeper and thicker the regulatory, bureaucratic jungle that needs to be crossed. And a company’s ability to overcome this depends entirely on its financial strength to be able to employ all the necessary resources – lawyers, project managers etc – to slash through the jungle and carve out a route.
Really, I don’t have any sympathy for ordinary people who are now beginning to get a taste of the brutality of the administrative state’s bureaucracy. The public generally calls for regulation and their attitude towards companies that clamour for deregulation is that they are only doing so to make it easier for themselves at the expense of ordinary people. So, now, the public can suck it up and learn what mindless regulation and bureaucracy is all about.
Agreed.
Compliance with regulation has a cost for companies – that cost is passed on one way or another to consumers – higher prices, reduced services.
People complain about banks closing branches, but are unable to connect that with the money saved to fund the £billions it costs banks to comply with (useless) money-laundering regulations.
But then we have a population that thinks the NHS is free. People want better public services and Government to supply them “free” and want more money spent on them to improve them. That money has to be borrowed, part of tax receipts are used to service debt incurred, which results in less tax available to be spent on public services which means their quality deteriorates so people want more spent on them, therefore more borrowing.
How did we get here?
A population brought up in a welfare-state where Government has an open-ended commitment to provide unlimited services “free” to all-comers, apparently now the whole World too.
People then are used to free stuff from the State, so expect free stuff from businesses.
Agreed. And few in decision-making positions understand that anything which is ‘free’ is seen as without cost. The consequence of this perception is clearly seen in, for example, the NHS. A GP appointment is ‘free’. Compare many European countries where you pay a small amount – usually reimbursed afterwards (unless of course you don’t turn up!). Result – you can actually get an appointment within hours or days. Contrast with ‘our wonderful NHS’.
Years ago prior to Man orbiting the Earth or landing on the Moon, we would watch footage on the News of the latest rocket test at Cape Canaveral.
3 – 2 – 1… Lift off! The rocket would rise slowly, gracefully, clear the launch tower, hesitate, wobble a bit and fall back onto the launchpad in a huge burst of fire and smoke.
That precisely characterises every Government attempt to launch an IT system. Unlike NASA which eventually did succeed, HM Government spends years and £ billions, then throws in the towel.
NHS, Post Office, Track & Trace… just a few glorious failures.
Digital ID? Less likely than first encounter with the Klingons.
My wife has had the same problem with her passport not being recognised by UK Borders Agency machines. Having queued to get to one she has then to queue to see an officer.
officers cannot help except to suggest there might be someone with a similar name on the wanted list. What! We both have unexceptional first names and our surname is Smith. Is it suggested all Joneses and Mohamed’s will not be able to use the automatic machines either.
mine works almost all the time.
If it’s not recognised / readable, how would it know about Mrs Smith?
When opening a new online savings account, I had a similar experience convincing a savings provider I wasn’t laundering my own money transferred from my own existing account with that same provider I’ve saved with for decades.
Abandon hope ye who enter here. The customer is always wrong.
It’s the same in France. There are several providers of the digital identity verification service, and when I tried to register, they ALL failed for one obscure reason or another. No-one uses them anyway, at least I don’t know of anyone who does. The most reaction I have had when I make reference to the systems is a scoff and a sideways glance and a good old Gallic shrug. They go in person to the local tax offices, of which there are many, and the people there are always knowledgeable and helpful.
Your last sentence nails it – I believe we’ve ‘optimised’ out those local offices full of experienced people in the UK…
Why does Guy continue with the fantasy, that the fact that it does not work in the real world for a significant number of people, will stop them continuing.
Oh, they will continue. Most of them are the sort of people who accepted from a very young age the training to follow rules and they have been following them for so long that they have forgotten any other type of existence. They mostly cannot imagine that there are other people who THINK instead of following rules and that these thinking people, who like to get stuff done, find ways around their stupid rules. I genuinely believe that for most of these rule followers it comes as a genuine surprise when they discover that there are normal people who don’t want to follow their rules and have not actually been following them for a very long time.
I still get incredulous looks when I tell people that I travelled all over during the “pandemic” without succumbing to any nose sticks nor the jabs. One of those people even used to comment here, in the early days, went by the handle “Emerald Fox”.
Companies House now requires anyone dealing with their own directorship to have a personal code which can only be obtained using the method described in this article. Having failed inexplicably to achieve recognition with full biometric identification, one director in our group was compelled to pay a professional operator to verify his application. It took two weeks and much trouble. Not fit for purpose.
The more complex the system, the more people it needs to create, maintain and correct errors, the more jobs for the bureaucrats. Self preservation is a very strong instinct, and a cumbersome process only understood by the anointed few in your own department is a good way to protect your continued employment.
Anti Money Laundering Regulations are an interesting insight into this sort of idiocy. In my line of work I spend a significant time every week committed to AML regulations. It is a worthless activity. I deal with Joe Bloggs and there’s never even been a sniff of AML. The Law Society however, has now introduced incredible fines on firms who do not comply with their regulations. The fines can be a percentage of turnover and, unbelievably, can be issued even if no money laundering has occurred. Simply the act of not having the “correct” procedures can result in one of these fines being issued to a firm. And so with this ominous threat, more meaningless AML jobs are created and more time is spent talking about it. After a while, these people who work as a AML officer need something to do, and so the only thing left is to create ever more complex regulations. My brother had to provide many many years of bank statements to buy his first flat, on account of an inheritance. It was a logistical nightmare, for a 20 odd year old, UK born and bred young man to buy his first flat. It’s interesting… Read more »
We need to get back to simple landline phone calls, where an actual person answers you straight away. This is completely mad and unfortunately quite credible.
I have recently told two providers that I will cease trading with them if the automated delivery system used by Evri, which they use, does not also provide a customer helpline managed by humans. Chatbots are useless.
It will be someone with an accent you could cut with a knife, keeping to a script, who knows nothing.
And are you prepared to pay for that?
How many “actual” persons do you think it would take in all companies and Government departments to handle the hundreds of call each would receive each minute? And how much would it cost to employ them all?
So would you be prepared to pay a fee, say £10, every time you needed to talk to an “actual” person?
But somehow the fact that the customer is now doing the work has never resulted in a reduction in fees..
People don’t work for HMRC or any other government department because of their supreme intelligence and problem solving ability. They are there because either they are thick as two short planks and no one in the commercial world would give them a job, or they are so devoid of ambition and get up and go that working in a government department as a nobody is the pinnacle of their achievement .
I was once brought in by DWP to help sort out what was wrong with a system which had cost almost half a billion pounds to implement but which was, allegedly, causing more problems than it resolved. I visited one of the relevant offices, where half of the staff were sitting on desks chatting to the other half, until they noticed two men in suits had entered, so they scurried back to their desks. One man continued reading his newspaper; we pointed out that the flashing light on his desk meant that a struggling citizen was looking for help, and he was their contact: he looked at us, snapped “I am not a robot!” and went back to his paper. Despicable people.
I imagine the “work ethic” has deteriorated even from that abysmal level, especially with working-from-home, so I expect long waits and little help from any civil servant.
Office of Circumlocution goes digital!
We are still waiting for an unregistered house we bought in February to be registered at the land registry. Solicitor has a letter saying it could take a year.
Our dear 89 year old neighbour. No internet. No smartphone. Indeed, rheumatoid arthritis means he can just pick up a landline and receive a call. but is unable to call out.
What happens to him? L
Or my father the same age who has all the above but can’t get codes etc before it times out?
My wife and I are both in receipt of French pensions and living in England, we have to prove we are alive every year.
They have recently introduced a similar system of taking a photograph of your passport and then a video of yourself blinking or opening mouth as instructed. Latter almost impossible for me as to read instructions I need my glasses, then I have to remove them and recentre my face in a selfie with an unsteady single hand. I eventually managed both to the apps satisfaction, but then it said I’d failed. Several tries later still failed. Help system says here are the instructions. Person you have to pay to call in France and who only speaks French for a foreigners service had no idea and made no effort to help (tres francaise).
Same for my wife with my help.
We’ve both reverted to the old system of gettinga letter stamped and signed at the Council offices, but who knows how long that will last.
Pfff!. Teething problems – it will be sorted out – sometime, never.
I’d forgotten that governments record with large IT projects is not all that good. The digital ID is on a much bigger scale than anything yet seen. It will fail and fail spectacularly, if it ever gets adopted. Our strategy,the one Keith and his government readily respond to, is to adopt the sub continent response of kicking and screaming. I don’t think that that is too far away for the proletariat.
My brother in law had 5 remote controls on his couch. I thought I’d help him by buying one programmable remote. He then had 6 remotes as he still kept the other!
I see a similar problem with the government “one stop” access!
There seems to be a general code of conduct, “if you can make it complicated, GO FOR IT!”
Great article and so true.
And it is really not clear what kind of personal data is held where and who it is shared with.
We desperately need a Bill of Digital Rights to maintain our privacy and stop surveillance, control and data sharing.
Example: Churchill has merged with Aviva and I got an email that they now share my data with Aviva. I sent them an email to say that I was not happy for them to share data and asked them to remove my data under GDPR rules. The reply I got back was that they looked at it and found that company interests outweighed my request, so they were not going to remove my personal data.
I am also trying to work out what data Companies house is actually storing under this new registration scheme. So far no reply…
How is any person supposed to understand and keep track of why is actually
happening with your data?
You write a comic account of your battles – and I salut your determination and wit – but it is tragic. Imagine a retired manual worker who has never been at ease with computers, or a widow who relied on her husband for admin, or a cancer patient who just doesn’t feel they have 5 hours of precious energy to spare to fight this sort of bureaucracy. Those would be typical profiles of people trying to do this sort of thing.
I agree. It just shows how terribly shrunken the bureaucratic mind is. I am not feeling big-hearted towards them or any of their coat-tail riders (can’t think of the right word right now; just effing furious).