The Trudeau Disaster

In 1931 the British Parliament passed the Statute of Westminster. For all practical purposes this statute granted legislative independence to the self-governing Dominions of the British Empire, which at the time basically meant Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, the Irish Free State and Newfoundland. The gist of this very famous statute was that the UK Parliament could no longer legislate for a Dominion without its consent. They were of equal status to the UK.  And of these old Dominions, Canada and Australia were the glittering stars. These two countries had everything before them. They went on to perform brilliantly in World War II. Their post-war fortunes included producing some of the highest standards of living on Earth as well as being amongst the most free. Even as late as 2015 Canada’s two richest provinces were, in per capita terms, comparable to the top 10 of US states. And Australia had comparatively cheap electricity, low debt and high per capita wealth.

And then, in that same year of 2015, Canada elected an ex-kindergarten teacher, trust-fund baby and virtue-signaller Justin Trudeau while Australia’s moronic Liberal partyroom opted to ditch Tony Abbott in favour of the distant maternal cousin of Angela Lansbury, the man who had tried to join the Labour Party but had been rejected. Say the world’s biggest ego with me, ‘Malcolm Turnbull’. Believe it or not, Trudeau Jr was the bigger disaster. Both countries completely screwed up their Covid responses, opting to copy the Communist Chinese politburo response and go down the economy-killing, thuggish, ‘let’s try to infringe more civil liberties than we have in 300 years’ route. Both also signed up to, and threw themselves into, the whole Net Zero religion – though to my way of thinking this is more forgivable when it’s done by a Left-wing Canadian Liberal Party than when it’s done by a Right-wing (okay, supposedly Right-wing) Australian Liberal Party. To give you some context, in under two decades Australia went from having just about the lowest electricity prices in the democratic world to having virtually the highest today. And did so without affecting the world’s climate at all, as Australia could go back to the Stone Age tomorrow and that would make zero difference to the world’s temperature or temperature trajectory. It is virtue-signalling par excellence, and no one is copying its lunacy.

So where are we today? Canada’s richest province, after the Justin years and then some months under his advisor banker successor Carney, is today poorer (in per capita terms) than the poorest US state, Mississippi. Just think about that sort of decline in barely over a decade. Meanwhile both Australia and Canada have had seven or eight quarters of per capita GDP decline. That sort of decline would be a depression in straight up GDP terms. (And note that GDP as a measure is highly flawed, oozes all sorts of Keynesian big government presumptions, and can be kept above zero with enough huge immigration – you decide if that’s a coincidence.) These two stars of the 1930s’ firmament today are basically becoming irrelevant. Just consider the platitudinous sanctimony that achieved nothing of their recognising Palestine. Today, both Canada and Australia have low productivity, and in fact it’s been declining. In US dollar terms both have low wages. The taxes in both countries are high, by US standards very high. Comparative education results stink. Both seem to be amongst the ever-shrinking handful of countries who cling to the self-imposed hair shirt of the Net Zero religion. Both countries also have significantly indebted households and housing markets whose prices are so stratospherically high that the young have been priced out of buying – thank you, in part, lunatic Covid response that poured jet fuel on asset inflation. (And any self-satisfied oldies out there need to go back to the 1970s and look at the median house price over the median wage, get that ratio, and then do the same exercise today to see the difference. Young people have a justifiable grievance.)

Oh, and both Canada and Australia are the two biggest indulgers in mass immigration in per capita terms. This not only significantly reshapes the voting base (intentionally or unintentionally, your guess is as good as mine, but we all can see the difference as regards, say, the huge jump in antisemitism), it also serves to lower productivity because – contrary to the propaganda – the bulk of the people both countries are letting in are not highly skilled. Sure, the big end of town loves all the people pouring in as it keeps wages down. But the big business lobby groups have been woeful, woke, cowering and not worth listening to for decades. Australia, meanwhile, has one of the highest minimum wages in the world. (Canada, like every other democracy on earth, including Left-wing France, does not have Australia’s bizarre labour relations scheme where a bunch of pseudo-bureaucrats and pseudo-judges issues thousand page ‘awards’ that kill productivity and flexibility and that even Coles, Woolworths and the ABC find so cumbersome, labyrinthine and impenetrable that they unwittingly breach their obligations.) And Australia now is looking at the vast preponderance of new jobs happening in the public sector, the worst ratio in the OECD. Our private sector is moribund. That is a really bad canary in the mineshaft.

To sum up, these are two countries that are deliberately hobbling their energy and resources sectors. Two countries that are amongst the world’s worst in terms of buying into the woke, virtue-signalling world of DEI and implicit quotas and condescending land acknowledgements. Oh, and two countries that are over-reliant on one nation to buy their respective products. That’s China for Australia and the US for Canada, though for Canada the problem is worse and compounded by the fact of having elected politicians who spent years personally insulting Donald Trump, in hysterical terms, despite his country taking 76% of Canada’s exports. Daft, right? Well, that seems to be how the Leftie political mind works. The goal appears to be to extol your own moral virtues and credentials, all likely future consequences be damned.

I’ve said it before. These past two decades or so, Canada and Australia (and yes, Britain too) have arguably suffered through having had the worst political class in their countries’ histories. Maybe it’s the growth of career politicians who start as politicos in uni (where no other students want to hang out with them, for good reason) and then work for ministers, unions, think tanks et al. before wrangling the desirable preselection and decades as conviction-free politicians.

Not an optimistic picture I just painted, is it? Of course, ultimately the fault lies with all of us voters. That’s democracy. You should always get what you vote for, and get it good and hard till it hurts. Canadians and Australians are going to be hurting for some time.

James Allan is the Garrick Professor of Law at Queensland University. This article was first published in Spectator Australia.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

32 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Monro
5 months ago

Career politicians are like career strategists.

‘If I were you, I wouldn’t start from here….’

Monro
5 months ago
Reply to  Monro

‘Business strategists too often think that their job is done when they have designed a grand strategy: an overarching vision (e.g., “solving the world’s mobility challenges sustainably”), ambitious goals (e.g., “selling 10 million electric cars by 20xx”) and high-level choices about where and how to compete. While formulating such a grand strategy is exciting, it has one fundamental limitation. As it is based on averages and estimates (e.g., average growth rates and profitability of a market, overall attainable market share, and assumed advantages of the company), the outcome is at best a hypothesis that subsequently still needs to be validated, adapted and detailed, or possibly even rejected. And such testing must be based on evidence about customer preferences, because the success of a business strategy eventually depends on the choices that customers make rather than on managers’ hopes and wishes. Rigorously eliciting customer preferences and making bottom-up evidence-based revenue and margin estimates is part of what we call operational strategy. ….strategy formulation should be an end-to-end process, starting with grand strategy and leading to operational strategy. The latter has to be completed before pushing the “commit now” button.’ LSE Aug 2019 Part of ‘operational strategy planning will be a cost/benefit… Read more »

Monro
5 months ago
Reply to  Monro

And on a completely different subject:

Samir Zitouni, best known as Sam, is credited with saving multiple lives during a mass stabbing aboard a Doncaster-to-London train between Peterborough and Huntingdon in Cambridgeshire…..

Samir Zitouni was born in Algeria

Working his shift as usual, he spotted the danger and acted without hesitation. CCTV footage, reviewed by British Transport Police, captures the harrowing moments: Zitouni positioning himself between the knifeman and vulnerable passengers, including a young girl he is credited with shielding from a potentially fatal blow.

Witnesses describe him charging forward bare-handed, using his body as a barrier to block the attacker’s path. “He threw himself in front,” one passenger recounted, “yelling for everyone to get down while grappling with the man.”

The confrontation left Zitouni with severe injuries—a deep gash across his head and neck that required immediate medical attention. Despite the blood loss and pain, he continued to direct others to safety, buying precious time until the train halted at Huntingdon station and armed response teams arrived. Police later praised his intervention as “nothing short of heroic,”

Chris Kenny
Chris Kenny
5 months ago
Reply to  Monro

He should get the George Cross.

EppingBlogger
5 months ago

Young people have a justifiable grievance you say but they have voted for the parties who delivered these results for the past 20-30 years. I would also observe a lack of committment to education or work among a much larger proportion than half a century ago when I was in their position. Most of them seem to have visited more foreign countries and drunk mopre liquor than me and I’m 50 years older than them. That’s where the money has gone for some of them.

JXB
JXB
5 months ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

The problem for the young today: I bought a flat in London in 1979 for £33 000 with about 15% deposit and mortgage three times salary – mortgage rate variable of 16%. Today those flats are selling for around £275 000. I doubt that most young people could get sufficient mortgage to buy on three times salary. Young people 50 years ago had a possibility of being able to buy a home and start a family – and that’s where their money went. They could afford the basics but not luxuries. Today many young people have no prospect of buying their first family home and raising children. They have more disposable income than young people did 50 years ago, but whereas back then the young could afford basics but not luxuries, today the young cannot afford basics but can buy luxuries, which is where they spend their money… on what else would they spend it? This is after years of monetary inflation which drives up asset prices far faster and higher than wages. All to pay for a ruinous welfare-state a de facto national taxpayer funded charity open to all, NHS, nationalised industries and public services, mass immigration of cheap… Read more »

Matt Dalby
Matt Dalby
5 months ago
Reply to  JXB

In 1974 my dad was 26, had a good job, today it would be considered graduate level, plus a stay at home housewife and 2 children under the age of 4. He was able to get a mortgage for a 3 bed semidetached house with a massive garden within an hours commute by train of central London. Based on what I’ve been told, after paying the mortgage money was very tight for 6-8 years but that was a fact of life in all households with only one parent bringing in a wage.
What are the chances of this being possible today, even if both parents were working full time?

Smudger
5 months ago
Reply to  Matt Dalby

Anyone working full time in the textile, coal, steel and engineering industry could do the same. With textiles they could until the 60s. With coal, steel and engineering it lasted for another 20 years, Of course this was only possible providing the home owner didn’t gamble or drink excessively.

JXB
JXB
5 months ago

“It is virtue-signalling par excellence, and no one is copying its lunacy.”

Er… UK is, Germany is.

John Kitchen
John Kitchen
5 months ago
Reply to  JXB

UK and Germany aren’t actually copying Canada and Australia. They are just following the same deluded and self-destructive instructions as Canada and Australia.

And they all imagine that other countries admire their selflessness. (Rather than being astonished by their stupidity).

JXB
JXB
5 months ago
Reply to  John Kitchen

Not following, but certainly in joint enterprise to deliver World Government over impoverished humanity.

huxleypiggles
5 months ago
Reply to  JXB

Or to use the proper headline – Agenda 2030.

varmint
5 months ago
Reply to  JXB

yes they are, and the UK and Germany now have the highest electricity prices in the world, millions forced into energy poverty and their Industrial Base is collapsing, all because of the phony planet saving agenda

JXB
JXB
5 months ago

“…  decades as conviction-free politicians.”

I am of the view we should start convicting them. . Oh and bring back capital,punishment.

huxleypiggles
5 months ago
Reply to  JXB

I completely agree. Unfortunately our Nurembergs would drag on longer than a covid enquiry.

varmint
5 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

I agree but but when you cannot even let the right people go what chance they would execute the right person.

Art Simtotic
5 months ago

And to replace Trudeau, Canada turned to Carney – from one WEF stooge to another.

JXB
JXB
5 months ago
Reply to  Art Simtotic

Jumping from the top of a burning building into a skip full of broken glass.

huxleypiggles
5 months ago
Reply to  JXB

That’s an excellent analogy.

huxleypiggles
5 months ago
Reply to  Art Simtotic

And just to rub it in Carney came along with his ready-made sobriquet- Carnage.

Smudger
5 months ago
Reply to  Art Simtotic

The politically activist corporate lobby got their man!

huxleypiggles
5 months ago

Off-Topic

I haven’t seen any mention in the articles and I appreciate that DS tries to avoid Tommy Robinson but he has been found Not Guilty of the ficticious terrorism charges this morning.

GroundhogDayAgain
5 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Thanks HP. I like TR – a bit rough round the edges but basically decent.

Norfolk-Sceptic
Norfolk-Sceptic
5 months ago

Has the attempt to elevate TR to the higher levels of fixing the problem, like taking a leadership role within a political party, instead of thanking him for highlighting the problem and treating him as a major witness, to denigrate him, intentional or just an act of stupidity?

Smudger
5 months ago

Isn’t he a member of Ben Habib’s Advance UK?

Gezza England
Gezza England
5 months ago

And it was pointed out on GB News today that the UK is in the same position in that it is worse than Mississippi.

sskinner
5 months ago

I’m sure no one will forget this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxGQJCMAnWw
Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau Admires China’s Dictatorship

ScienceTeacher
ScienceTeacher
5 months ago

This article sums it up for Britain also. Democracy!
When a large sector of the voting base do not pay any tax they wield huge voting power with zero responsibility. I can’t see it changing unless we readjust our view on universal suffage. Only tax payers vote.

Spiv
Spiv
5 months ago

A terrible indictment of both Trudeau and the ejit in Australia, but it’s deeply saddening that Britain mirrors the decline of both governments.
It is clear evidence that whilst communist regimes, inevitably decline into a police state, socialist regimes inevitably fall into economic decline.

Rusty123
Rusty123
5 months ago

Quite frankly I’m sick to death of comments like this that the “oldies” bought cheaply had good wages etc, what about mortgage rates 17.5%, 3 day working weeks, strikes left right and centre, blackouts and more importantly mass unemployment?? There is no disputing the young have it difficult, but its not the “oldies” fault, part of the reason being mass immigration keeping wages low, de industrilization, we no longer have manufacturing on any level and seem hell bent on turning youngsters into perpetual students/unemployed or all in IT, AI etc, and not just this country too.

Norfolk-Sceptic
Norfolk-Sceptic
5 months ago
Reply to  Rusty123

It is the same with the accusations of still thinking of Empire. I could see in the middle of the 70s that Britain could succeed by focusing on Manufacturing, in the broadest sense, to include the whole supply chain. So, at a pinch, even an accountant at a steel production company could be considered part of that effort. Yet the culture has been to discourage this. Promoting celebrity, the Arts and Humanities, of course, but STEM? It’s why do we need them? We are a post-technological country, so we can let others do that.

So we end up with management that don’t understand the basics. If they had realised that NET Zero requires the Laws of Physics to be very flexible to succeed, they might have had the courage to disrupt its introduction. Lower Energy costs would have worked wonders. If they understood that competitors don’t normally give aid to the distressed, we could have had a more resilient manufacturing sector, and even a more resilient, and prosperous, country.

varmint
5 months ago

So they got poorer. ——This is a great success then.—- Because that is what Sustainable Development is all about and what the goal is. The wealthy west have too much of everything and must make do with LESS