Hurricane Melissa Was Not the ‘Storm of the Century’
The media called it the Storm of the Century.
Hurricane Melissa, which devastated Jamaica last week, was certainly catastrophic with the death toll at the time of writing standing at 28 in the country. And, based on atmospheric pressure, it was the most intense Atlantic hurricane since Wilma in 2005. But Storm of the Century it most certainly was not.
To read the rest of this article, you need to donate at least £5/month or £50/year to the Daily Sceptic, then create an account on this website. The easiest way to create an account after you’ve made a donation is to click on the ‘Log In’ button on the main menu bar, click ‘Register’ underneath the sign-in box, then create an account, making sure you enter the same email address as the one you used when making a donation. Once you’re logged in, you can then read all our paywalled content, including this article. Being a Donor will also entitle you to comment below the line and access the premium content in the Sceptic, our weekly podcast. A one-off donation of at least £5 will also entitle you to the same benefits for one month. You can donate here.
There are more details about how to create an account, and a number of things you can try if you’re already a donor – and have an account – but cannot access the above perks on our Premium page.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Modern technology enables the creation of hype and hysteria.
Before television, the news of a hurricane in Jamaica would have only resulted in a newspaper article with a few black and white photos, several days after the event.
These days, you will have live reporting, carefully choreographed, with dramatic background scenery and a reporter acting to convey a sense of the extraordinary.
The whole thing is very obviously manipulative and used to reinforce some ideological message (climate change, for example).
Also, I have noticed: when the BBC latches on to an ideologically expedient message, they just go on and on about it. The Jamaica hurricane was 15 minutes on the main 6 o’clock news, as if nothing else of any significance had happened on that day.
Our weather forecasts are the same. Anything other than 18 centigrade with low winds and little rain (preferably not in the south east) is a matter of contorted anxiety by the presenter (oh, have I exaggerated?).
Both with Melissa this year and one last year, before they hit land they were going to be ‘greatest ever” or “one in a thousand year event”. However, after they hit the damage and destruction was reported, but the hyperbole was entirely missing. They were bad, but not that unusual. I believe it was Beria, Stalin’s sidekick, that said “if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth”. This seems to be the motto of climate science.
It was Lenin.
All the pictures that I have seen of storm damage showed most of it was caused by torrential water not high winds, but no-one seems to be talking about rainfall quantities.
We will soon be forced to only access ‘trusted media outlets’ if the EU and Starmer have their way.
Like the Beeb !!!!!
Physicist Dr Ralph Alexander, delving into newspaper reports of extreme weather over the last century…
https://www.thegwpf.org/content/uploads/2024/03/History-Weather-Extremes.pdf
“…This report refutes the popular but mistaken belief that today’s weather extremes are more common and more intense because of climate change.”
To be a pedant it was the storm of the 21st century so far. All the examples shown predate 2000. But of course the MSM are always going to hype extreme weather for political purposes to support net zero. We wouldn’t expect anything less.