Are We Failing to Section Dangerous African-Caribbean Schizophrenics Because Health Professionals and Police Officers Are Scared of Being Labelled Racist?
It’s become an all-too-familiar tale. An individual who, at this stage, is thought to have been known to the police and mental health services, is alleged to have carried out a random, marauding knife attack.
Anthony Williams appeared in court this week charged with 11 counts of attempted murder after multiple stabbings occurred on a Doncaster to London train on Saturday November 1st in an incident which has shocked the nation. The 11th count is for a separate alleged attack against a 14 year-old that took place on the Docklands Light Railway in east London earlier the same day, as we’ve since learnt. Thankfully, at the time of writing, nobody has died as a result of these attacks.
These incidents follow several high-profile cases where men of black African heritage who were known by the authorities to be dangerous have been allowed to roam free in the community, either as a result of clinical decisions or ineptitude, and who have gone on to commit some of the most shocking crimes in modern history.
There was Zephaniah McLeod, who murdered 23 year-old library intern Jacob Billington during unprovoked attacks on eight people in Birmingham in September 2020. McLeod had been released from prison months earlier with no restrictions or supervision, despite experiencing delusions, refusing to take medication and making weapons in his cell.
Pensioner Thomas O’Halloran was killed by Lee Byer in August 2022 while Byer was suffering from ‘demand delusions’ and only five days after his being released from prison.
Valdo Calocane, in June 2023, fatally stabbed students Barnaby Webber and Grace O’Malley-Kumar and caretaker Ian Coates during a rampage on the streets of Nottingham. He had not been forced to take injectable anti-psychotic medication because he “did not like needles”, a report on his care found. In addition, he was allowed to live in the community despite the fact that he had a history of violence, and did not even agree that he was mentally ill.
The most notorious of all is, of course, Axel Rudakubana, responsible for the slaughter of children Alice da Silva Aguiar, Bebe King and Elsie Dot Stancombe at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Southport, Liverpool, in July 2024. There had been ample warning signs leading up to the atrocity. Axel Rudakubana first became known to a range of agencies in 2019. He was permanently excluded from school after telling Childline that he was being racially bullied and was bringing a knife into school to protect himself. After his exclusion, he returned to the school and assaulted someone with a hockey stick. Later that same year, Rudakubana again contacted Childline and asked: “What should I do if I want to kill somebody?”
The list could go on, but suffice to say that more people would probably be alive today had it not been for serious failings in Britain’s mental healthcare system, along with other arms of the state. We can be reasonably confident that a lack of funding is a major factor in all of this, and it is cited by many mental health professionals as a factor in the decline of care quality. But with all these disturbed, violent individuals being black, could ‘anti-racist’ sensibilities also be playing a part in these failings?
We know that much of the political class sees the rate at which black people are sectioned as itself a problem. In 2021, the then Conservative health secretary Matt Hancock proposed reforming the Mental Health Act to address the disproportionality in the sectioning of black people compared with their white counterparts, and, in its 2024 manifesto, the Labour Party promised “targeted interventions to reduce the disproportionate detention rates of black individuals under the Mental Health Act”.
When I was a police constable in London, I was involved in the sectioning of a number of people under the Mental Health Act. On each occasion, it was the informed decision of the duty officer (an inspector) and the officers on the ground that the individual in question posed a physical risk to either themselves or members of the public. Nearly all were black men, and nearly all were known to mental health services.
Are we now saying that the professional assessments of duty officers, whose primary concern is supposed to be public safety, are to play second fiddle to political considerations? Rather than taking necessary robust action, an inspector today might well be mindful of such absurdities as the Police Race Action Plan, a product of the ideologically captured College of Policing, which asks officers to “consider the levels of disproportionate contact between the police and Black people suffering mental distress”. Certainly, if that inspector were keen on promotion, he or she would at least be hesitant.
I’m sure some will say that to blame ‘woke’ officialdom is a knee-jerk, Right-wing reaction and there’s nothing to see here. So how does one explain the response to one of Rudakubana’s former headteacher’s education plan for him? Joanne Hodson described Rudakubana as “sinister, cold and calculating”. An unnamed mental health worker challenged this assertion and accused Hodson of racially profiling “a black boy with a knife”.
Hodson told the Southport Inquiry that the accusations succeeded in shutting her up, even though she had a “visceral sense of dread” that Rudakubana was building up to “something”. We will never know what the outcome would have been had she not been silenced.
Mental health outcomes and experiences can vary significantly across different ethnic groups in the United Kingdom. The question of why black people may be more likely to suffer from mental health issues, yet often not be sectioned under the Mental Health Act when they should have been, is an undoubtedly complex one. But progressive dogma should have no place in decision-making where psychotic individuals are concerned. People’s lives depend on it.
Paul Birch is a retired police officer who spent 24 years in the Metropolitan Police, 16 of which in counter-terrorism. You can watch his recent interview with the Sceptic here, and subscribe to his Substack here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I strongly suspect you are right.
My prediction is that at some point it will be revealed that Williams was a frequent user of cannabis, which will be followed by the usual suspects claiming that there is no link between cannabis use and mental health.
I think trying to utilizes this murderous rampage for your pet agenda despite you very well know that Cannabis users in the UK number millions is thoroughly despicable.
Methinks the pothead doth protest too much.
Well I think RW has mentioned using cannabis, but so do millions of other people. Ditto alcohol. Ditto many other drugs, legal and illegal. The more interesting question is the tradeoff between restricting the liberty of the many people who manage to use all sorts of substances without causing problems with “protecting society”. What happened during “covid” has made me reconsider my position and I now favour legalisation.
Similar arguments apply to gun ownership, driving cars and many other things.
I should never have stepped into this discussion when the (think of some green found inside people’s noses) people with their Cannabis! idee fixe thought this would be a brilliant opportunity to push it for the first time. There are presently 11 people in hospital because some madman went on a rampage with a knife. That’s not the proper context for a “We must prevent legalisation of Cannabis in yet more places of the world!” offensive.
Now imagine if 11 people on a train had been hospitalized with covid and would now be in intensive care. We would be hearing the preachers and authoritarians and closet fascists climbing on their pulpits thumping their science books and saying the well being over the few should override the liberty of the many and let’s bring back masks and vaccinations and travel restrictions (especially to countries where they sell fake certificates) and let’s let old people die without seeing their families (with the prime minister and his entourage being excepted of course). And the press would be bleating in chorus and praising the decision.
Why is cannabis different?
It’s not different, just the set of authoritarian cranks who are completely convinced that they must get to make decisions for other people in this particular respect differs, or, to put the in the proper terms: Members and adherents of US party A are more likely to want more COVID and less Cannabis restrictions and for members and adherents of US party B, it’s the other way round. Everybody wants his own settled science to triumph over the settled science of other guys and nobody is particularly bothered about the veracity of the claims of any of these settled sciences or even just that claims made on behalf of either settled party A science or settled party B science aren’t completely absurd.
Facemasks must be prohibited because COVID causes cannabis or COVID must be prohibited to stop facemasks from becoming psychotic. Or any other combination of the key words. It really doesn’t matter which.
I have no more interest in your drugs, sweetheart, than I have in most other parts of your dishonest and superficial society. That was just a wrong turn I once took because I tnought it would turn out to be something different than what it actually was.
BTW, did you already notice that the 1960s are over and that terms like pothead have become a little dated in the 60 odd years since?
This is from the Psychiatrist.
’New research links cannabis use disorder to increased dopamine-related brain activity associated with psychosis.
There’s increasing research indication strong links between cannabis use and psychosis and trying to shut down the debate dies no one any favours.
[comment removed]
Is it just me or does it appear that certain ethnicities are more likely to suffer permanent mental damage from cannabis than others. Or is this one of those questions that may not be asked?
Matt Hancock
What a disgraceful individual
Vote Tory, get woke socialism
Of course “Kemi” will sort it all out
He was the wrong man for the job a few years ago, but it begs the question about the competence of the permanent secretary and others in his department.
We could run a competition to suggest what jobs would suit him. I have never seen an advertisement for “a lying snide little bastard” but maybe I have used the wrong recruitment sites.
He must have a wonderful, credulous CV.
Competence or honesty?
All round lack of moral fibre. Weak character.
Elected to be patriotic conservatives, pursued woke globalist socialism.
The problem is not so much Hancock himself but an environment which begets – or rather, attracts and promotes Hancocks because it’s founded on untruths and thus, needs people who aren’t much troubled by something like a conscience when championing manifestly unworthy causes. In 2021, the then Conservative health secretary Matt Hancock proposed reforming the Mental Health Act to address the disproportionality in the sectioning of black people compared with their white counterparts, and, in its 2024 manifesto the Labour Party promised “targeted interventions to reduce the disproportionate detention rates of black individuals under the Mental Health Act”. This claim of disproportionality is based on the assumption that there’s a known proper rate for mental health issues among black people which can be derived from their number without any regard for the actual individuals in question, that mental health issue are diagnosed in excess of it because of racism, and that the government must act to reduce the actual number of such diagnoses to their proper number. But why would the rate of mental health issues among members of a certain group match the ratio of members of this group versus non-members in some larger population? Empirical evidence suggests that… Read more »
Indeed – a vicious circle. Weak, vain, dishonest people in world already beset with idiocy and dishonesty.
Begs the question about the competence of most of them in government and their departments.
Many, including Truss (in her book) and Cummings, have given graphic examples of how ministers are so beholden to the civil service.
Instead of dismissing it as Tory excuses, there needs to be a thorough investigation, analysis and reform. There is gathering consensus that if this is not done the next government will be as effective as the current one. It’s part of the reason why the Right is split: many, including Habib and Lowe, have believed that the Reform Party have been too superficial in their approach. For example, these changes need to be in the party manifesto, in detail, to stop the House of Lords from blocking them, and the civil service to procrastinate.
Mass murderer.
I suppose the unnamed mental health worker has since been promoted when he or she ought to have been given retraining, especially after the murder. I doubt there has been any accountability or sen e of guilt by authorities’ staff.
The concerns expressed in the article seem all too likely to be well founded. In addition I suspect the elites don’t want more cases sectioned because it would make their dream of legalising cannabis more difficult.
Elsie Dot Stancombe – one of the victims of Rudakubana. Can you think of a more English name? I’m not meaning to distract from the other murdered girls and those injured, but the death of Elsie Dot Stancombe feels like the death of England itself. Frankly it brings tears to my eyes.
I suppose it’s what you get when weak minded, midwits take over all the positions of power from principled, strong, capable people.
How weak minded midwits got so much power is whole other question.
Most politicians used to have a life before politics: they had grown up. But now who, in their mid thirties to early forties, would swap a successful career (because we want MPs that have been successful) for being put in a group of ignorant children, that have no experience of Industry, Business, the Competitive Marketplace, STEM, Planning, Supply Chain Management, or the requirement to ‘Make a Profit or Lose Your Job’.
It’s easy to know that some terrible mistake was made in hindsight. The important question is: Could it have been avoided with more foresight? A crucial statistic for this would be the success/ failure rate of this foresight: How many people are not sectioned despite someone believed they should have been and how many of these then committed violent crimes?
I have no opinion on that for want of information. But it’s always easy to reason backwards that something should have been done differently and in itself, this doesn’t solve any problems.
But it is necessary for there to be any chance of diminishing the chance of it happening again.
The issue is not about sectioning these barbarians, which would simply cost she’d loads of taxpayer money, the issue is why aren’t these being sent straight back to where they came from?
KISS.
Meanwhile, today Tommy Robinson’s in court to hear the verdict on his ‘terrorism’ charge, all because he wouldn’t allow the police access to his phone, FFS.
”The doors of the court have opened ahead of the verdict at 10:00 on the Tommy Robinson “terrorism” charge”
https://x.com/profnfenton/status/1985634569844895852
Result! 🙂
”Judge: in light of my findings, the decision to stop you was not lawful. Judge tells Tommy to stand. Says he’s acquitted. Public gallery cheers. Regime media looking very glum!”
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1mrGmBNWeNkJy
Judge commented that he was not impressed by the police’s contribution to the case.
But of course you won’t find the judge’s comments in any articles relating to TR’s acquital in the MSM. The BBC continues its bias reporting…….
Terrorism has basically come to mean pretty much any credible challenge to established authority.
Yes, because terrorism only needs to be “suspected.”
It’s a pity suspicion is not used more frequently against the Calais Yacht Club members.
Thanks Mogs. DS are always loathe to put up any articles involving Tommy Robinson. I have also posted the info further up the trail.
Little snippet of the speech he did outside the court afterwards, if anyone wants to have a look. Elon Musk has kindly been paying all Tommy’s legal fees too, which is very good of him;
”Judge: this was “driven by your political beliefs”. That is, it wasn’t terrorism.
“There is no evidence at all” to suspect terrorism.
In light of my findings, the decision to stop you was not lawful.”
https://x.com/alanvibe/status/1985750364813947348
the then Conservative health secretary Matt Hancock proposed reforming the Mental Health Act to address the disproportionality in the sectioning of black people compared with their white counterparts
Only random selection from the whole population will ensure that members of each identifiable subgroup will be selected “proportionally” and even this only approximately. Since the decision to section someone is most certainly not made randomly, demanding that it ought to occur “proportionally” is nonsense and trying to address the “disproportionality” of a non-random selection process a fool’s errand.
The people we need to “section” is the entire governing class who should be sequestered in secure accommodation for the criminally insane, and all exits bricked up.
In the Fletcher Memorial Home?
That’s my sort of logic, although numbers contained therein and at our expense could be reduced markedly after a few years Nurembergs.
I may be misremembering but weren’t the rules for ‘sectioning’ changed, just before or during the convid scam, to make it easier to section and detain individuals?
As I recall, there was a reduction in the number of professionals required to make the decision to “section” someone to speed up the process. This was part of the “emergency measures” at the time. The Mental Health Act 2025 with a number of amendments to the 1983 Act is currently going through parliament. Mind has a comprehensive guide to the process of being sectioned and the various sections of the Act that are applied depending on circumstance.
https://www.mind.org.uk/information-support/legal-rights/sectioning/about-sectioning/#WhatDoesSectioningMean
Yes the rules were changed as you thought.
I thought that was the case. I feared they would use the amended powers against those who challenged the government and NHS narratives about a ‘killer’ virus.
Young black men living in the UK have an increased risk of acute psychotic episodes. I am sure the causative pathway to psychosis is complex with genetic, social and cultural factors involved. But there is also an important physical factor: melanin pigmentation of the skin reduces the sun’s rays which penetrate the skin and reduce the production of vitamin D. Vitamin D is a co-factor for the immune system and has a role in preventing bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus getting into the tissues. The resullt is that black men and women have increased carriage of S. aureus. This bacterium produces toxins which are wrapped up in extracellular vesicles (nanoparticles, very similar to the nanoparticles of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine). The nanoparticles spread through the blood stream and can enter the brain. The particles then enter brain cells and release the toxins which can kill or excite neurones. Acute schizophrenia is more common in men than women (roughly 3 to 2), and several times more common in black men than white men. Acute psychotic episodes should be controlled by drugs. But I suspect that in the future psychiatrists will then concentrate on optimising the microbiome to reduce S. aureus carriage… Read more »
The Weed-rush generation .. the smell is everywhere in London these days. Another area the police and CPS have given up on.
The College of Policing where officers are instructed in how to deny reality and how to disbelieve the evidence of their own eyes. Motto above the door “Abandon all common sense ye who enter here”. Badge: The Three Brass Monkeys.
👍👍👍
Elephant in the room? Are we ignoring the increased likelihood of psychosis in a culture of cannabis abuse.
Too many knee-jerk racists from the USA in the room?
“It’s a black guy! He must have been stoned when he did this! They always are!”
Oh look, another mentally ill black man! Way to go care in the community! Fear of being racist costs lives!
Notice how they let the other one go? Because coincidental double mental illness wouldn’t sit well! Did i mention he’s British with a very British name!? Wonder what the other one was called? I smell a rat 🐀
What a ridiculous and irresponsible situation whereby not putting people into a safe place with care given to them because it’s been seen to be mostly black men, both they and the public at large are put at risk!
Whoever thought that up should be sued/ sacked for negligence of duty of care!
Part of their dastardly plan I suspect. The more the public are attacked / killed, the more uprisings there will be against the government and ‘systems’ resulting in stricter measures against the
victimspublic.As a French friend said to me once ” Psychiatrists- plus fous que leurs clients”.