Labour Abandons Disability Benefit Cuts Ahead of Budget Tax Hikes

Labour has abandoned urgently needed welfare cuts as it admits that its flagship review of disability benefits will not recommend reducing spending, despite a spiralling welfare bill and further tax hikes expected in the Budget. The Telegraph has more.

A review of the Personal Independence Payments (PIP) will not look at ways to bring down the ballooning cost of the benefit, official documents reveal. Instead, it will only ensure the system is “fair and fit”.

Sir Mel Stride, the Shadow Chancellor, said it showed “Labour has thrown in the towel on welfare reform”.

Paul Johnson, the former director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said the admission “confirms [the Government] has given up on any savings from PIP”, which is projected to cost taxpayers £30 billion a year by the end of the decade.

The revelation will fuel fears of significant tax increases in next month’s Budget as Rachel Reeves struggles to rein in runaway Government spending. Economists believe the Chancellor must find as much as £40 billion in either tax rises or spending cuts to fix her plans.

A document published on Thursday explicitly stated that the Timms Review, led by Sir Stephen Timms, the Disability Minister, would not “generate proposals for further savings”. The review will also “operate within the Office for Budget Responsibility’s (OBR) projections for future PIP expenditure, to ensure it is there to support generations to come”.

Those OBR projections show the cost of PIP benefits for working-age adults has doubled since 2020 to £22 billion a year and is on course to top £30 billion a year by the end of the decade.

The surging cost has been driven by a rapid rise in young people claiming the benefit for mental health problems.

Liz Kendall, the former work and pensions secretary, said earlier this year while still in that brief that the rise in PIP claims was “not sustainable”.

Ms Reeves sought to rein in the spiralling cost of disability benefits spending earlier in the year, with plans to save £5 billion per year announced in her Spring Statement. But rebellions by Labour MPs forced the Chancellor to abandon her plans. The Timms Review was launched in the wake of the failure to pass the reforms, billed as the first ever full review into PIP.

Sir Mel said: “Starmer and Reeves are letting the benefits bill spiral because they’re too weak to stand up to their own MPs. We offered to work together in the national interest to get welfare under control – they refused.

“Let’s be clear: more tax rises are coming because Labour have lost control of spending. Rachel Reeves can point fingers all she likes, but families are paying more because Labour have failed to get a grip.”

Worth reading in full.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
NeilParkin
5 months ago

“Fire extinguishers.? No, we dont need them. We’ve just doubled our order of paraffin instead.”

stewart
5 months ago

It’s actually quite amusing at this point watching bankrupt western governments scrambling to find a way to cut spending… without actually cutting spending.

The moment they announce anything, the affected part of society goes nuts, sage pundits explain to the rest of us the social.impact as if we were all too stupid to realise that reducing government payments is going to affect the people receiving the payments. And eventually the governemnt buckles under the pressure and backs off.

And btw, for anyone excited about a possible Reform government, if they manage to win an election, it’s going to play out in exactly the same way.

Art Simtotic
5 months ago
Reply to  stewart

Somehow reminds of Labour Chancellor Dennis Healey being booed at a party conference in the 1970s for proposing spending cuts, that were only implemented when the IMF came along a few months later to conveniently take the rap.

Gezza England
Gezza England
5 months ago
Reply to  Art Simtotic

The economist with the red braces – a proper one not a former tea lady – said the other day on GBN that this time the IMF may not be interested in bailing out the UK which leaves us in the realms of the likes of Argentina that defaulted on its debt, numerous times, and had inflation of over 100% etc.

Purpleone
5 months ago
Reply to  stewart

Exactly – the only approach I could see being effective is a 25% cut across the whole lot, everyone is impacted equally… still won’t happen mind, they’ll just keep printing new money and lending it to themselves, writing it off over time with inflation…

stewart
5 months ago
Reply to  Purpleone

Ah, but the inflation rplay isn’t working. Why? Because most of the inflation is going to asset inflation which doesn’t produce.higher GDP nor more tax receipts. UNLESS, you start taking wealth.

I wonder why the government is so keen on on a wealth tax…

DiscoveredJoys
DiscoveredJoys
5 months ago

One of the problems with cuts in any benefit is that people will bitterly, bitterly, resent any reduction or removal of something they received. People hate stuff being taken away.

So there are at least 4 ways to limit state spending on benefits:
1) Just take them away and stand the upset.
2) Do not allow any increase for inflation of a benefit.
3) Be miserly in accepting claims for a benefit.
4) Buy out an individual’s benefit (either in money or by a reduction in tax).

But unfortunately politicians like dispensing benefits – distributing patronage is what they do. Until the money or borrowing shudders to a halt.

Heretic
Heretic
5 months ago
Reply to  DiscoveredJoys

Yes, like those French aristocrats who used to throw money out of their carriages at the peasants as they drove past, to watch them all scramble for it. At least it was their own money they were throwing, unlike our politicians dispensing benefits (“distributing patronage”) with British Taxpayers’ Money instead of their own…

Heretic
Heretic
5 months ago

I thought I recognized Stephen Timms in that photo: now Sir Stephen Timms, Disability Minister.

In May 2010, Timms survived an attempted murder by Muslim Terrorist Roshonara Choudhry, who stabbed him twice in the abdomen at his constituency surgery. Choudhry was convicted of attempted murder and sentenced to life imprisonment.”

His reported failure to take any action on cutting bogus disability claims made me wonder how many such claims have been made by Muslims, both legal and illegal immigrants to Britain.

Covid-1984
Covid-1984
5 months ago

Not to worry. The country will abandon Labour in 2029. Until then buckle up.