Wind and Solar Farms Set to Take Over Up to 9% of Total UK Land Area

I was chatting to a correspondent recently, who dropped into the conversation that Ed Miliband’s Clean Power 2030 agenda would be bringing hundreds of gigawatts of expensive, unreliable and mostly redundant generating capacity online. I was sure he was wrong. The peak demand on the grid, on dark, cold winter nights, is usually around 60 gigawatts. “Do you mean megawatts?” I asked.

According to the DESNZ’s ‘Clean Power 2030 Action Plan‘,  there are currently approximately 15 GW of offshore wind capacity, which will nearly triple. There are 14 GW of onshore wind capacity, which will double. And there are 17 GW of solar, which will also triple. That’s a lot of new capacity: nearly 80GW, bringing the UK’s solar and wind fleet up from 46 GW up to a whopping 125 GW, very little of which will work on cold winter nights, despite costing us billions of pounds each and every year. But that’s still far from “hundreds”.


To read the rest of this article, you need to donate at least £5/month or £50/year to the Daily Sceptic, then create an account on this website. The easiest way to create an account after you’ve made a donation is to click on the ‘Log In’ button on the main menu bar, click ‘Register’ underneath the sign-in box, then create an account, making sure you enter the same email address as the one you used when making a donation. Once you’re logged in, you can then read all our paywalled content, including this article. Being a Donor will also entitle you to comment below the line and access the premium content in the Sceptic, our weekly podcast. A one-off donation of at least £5 will also entitle you to the same benefits for one month. You can donate here.

There are more details about how to create an account, and a number of things you can try if you’re already a donor – and have an account – but cannot access the above perks on our Premium page.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Grahamb
5 months ago

And this green infrastructure will be contracted with committed spend to China for the various components and huge costs of cancellation. Simple wealth transfer

shred
shred
5 months ago

Apart from which there is not enough lithium and other rare materials in the world to manufacture this quantity of batteries, solar panels and wind turbines.

Art Simtotic
5 months ago

Kommissar Miliband’s five-year plan to take us back to the Dark Age.

marebobowl
marebobowl
5 months ago
Reply to  Art Simtotic

I do not understand why people in the Uk are so helpless?

Jaguar
Jaguar
5 months ago

Perhaps even more alarming is the fact that we are NOT replacing power stations that are coming to the end of their natural working lives. Either some old power stations will somehow have to keep going much longer than planned, or we will have to buy fleets of diesel generators…or the light will go out.

Marcus Aurelius knew
5 months ago
Reply to  Jaguar

Or use interconnectors with France et al. Which won’t be possible if the UK’s grid has collapsed, because (as far as I know) the UK grid must be running normally to manage the conversion back to AC from the DC cables.

Keencook
Keencook
5 months ago

Someone is making very large amounts of money on the back of others. Wrapped up in ‘innovation’, green jobs & “renewables”. Watch & weep.

ChrisA
ChrisA
5 months ago

Well, people wondered how they would make us own nothing and be slaves, this seems to be the mechanism, they will compulsory purchase all the land to do this insanity, large solar installations are already doing this without opposition on vast swathes of farmland, despite the fact the “law” was set up to be used on non agricultural land except in extremis.

soundofreason
soundofreason
5 months ago

Assuming that the 379 GW of battery storage in the TEC register equate to 379 GW hours…

If the people promoting the super-duper battery can’t understand the difference between 379GW and 379GWh then they shouldn’t be let anywhere near any policy makers.

Ben points out that 379GWh of stored energy is enough for about 6 hours of peak 60 GW demand. However, if it can only* supply power at a rate of (say) 6GW it will last for around 60 hours. Great: 60 hours of not meeting 90% of grid requirements.

The rate at which it can supply power (GW) combined with the amount of energy it can store (GWh) both affect how useful the battery can be. A 379GWh battery feeding a domestic mains socket would last over 120 million hours. Take it in turns to plug your kettle in to that socket, won’t you?

*6GW is a lot. 25 million Amps at mains voltage, nearly 2 million domestic power sockets running flat out. 6 million electric bar heaters.

Purpleone
5 months ago
Reply to  soundofreason

And even if it could output it, can the grid actually transport that power to where it’s needed?

mrbu
mrbu
5 months ago
Reply to  Purpleone

Isn’t that where the local generation and storage, local grid idea comes into play? With differential pricing so that those in densely populated areas (with more demand and less space for all the wind farms, solar farms and batteries) will pay more for their power. That would be a handy way of “levelling down” in the south.

Cotfordtags
5 months ago

Milibrain has apparently admitted in the last 24 hours that windmills are not efficient – no 💩 Sherlock. That’s why they were abandoned long before the start of the industrial revolution. Presumably, the BoJo plan to be the Saudi Arabia of wind power actually requires surplus electricity to be generated so it can be exported. Fine intentions, but with this useless, intermittent power source being so expensive in this country, why would any countries buy power from us at the price? We can already see how much more we are importing than exporting and I don’t see that equation changing anytime soon. We are governed by morons

Gezza England
Gezza England
5 months ago

In my corner of Surrey we now have two subsidy farms using panels under proposal. One makes a link missing from the article and that is one is proposed with batteries as well. I have no details on the other proposal as that has only just appeared. So it could be that a lot of the solar is linked to batteries.

John Kitchen
John Kitchen
5 months ago

We’ve had solar PV on our roof for five months now, and I already seem to know much more about it than Milliband does – though that’s not much of a boast.

Our system can produce 3500 watts when the sun shines, which isn’t bad. But what is it producing at the moment (3.20 pm on a day of thick cloud) ? It’s producing 100 watts.

So in a nutshell, murky afternoon output is about 3% of peak output. And at night it is of course 0%

So how Milliband can pretend solar PV is a serious method of supplying the country’s electricity needs I really cannot fathom.

What is the explanation then: Ignorance? Stupidity? Corruption?

marebobowl
marebobowl
5 months ago

Is there really no one in this country who can stop such lunacy. What on earth is going on?