Labour “Nowhere Near” Hitting 1.5 Million New Homes Amid “Devastating” Collapse in Construction, Say Experts

With the news still burning in Labour’s ears of the Welsh parliament by-election catastrophe in Caerphilly, more news comes of the Government’s disastrous promise to build 1.5 million new homes a year.

According to the Telegraph, developers are abandoning new-build projects across London as the business collapses, putting the government’s much vaunted housebuilding targets under even more threat:

According to a report by Molior Consultancy, work has stopped at one in six housing construction projects, including developments with more than 20 private homes.

Those projects would have provided up to 5,400 homes, the research suggested.

Weakening buyer demand combined with the long-term effects of inflation and rising costs have created a perfect storm in the housebuilding sector.

Experts told the Telegraph that stalling construction was “devastating” and claimed it showed Labour was “nowhere near” hitting its housing promises.

The collapse in construction projects means Labour’s annual target of building 1.5 million new homes nationwide and 80,000 new homes in London is looking increasingly beleaguered:

Ben Walden-Jones, Head of Residential Development at real estate company JLL, said the sector was in the worst state he had seen since the global financial crisis.

He described how construction on the business’s projects had slowed to a “trickle” after a “death by a thousand cuts”.

“Whereas we usually would have at least two launches a month in London, we now only get about one launch every two months. It’s as low as five schemes a year coming through.

“It’s a trickle. And the number of sales that we’re doing has just collapsed. Our competitors are in the same boat. No one is having any better luck, really.”

The industry is beset with exacting design standards that simply can’t be afforded in a market with very tight margins, especially those imposed in London by Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan:

The Government is also reportedly considering loosening design standards, such as the requirement for bicycle storage space and the provision of ‘dual aspect dwellings’, meaning homes with windows opening on at least two external walls.

Robert Colvile, of the Centre for Policy Studies think tank, said: “His [Khan’s] plans were stuffed with loads of things that developers could just about cope with in an environment where housebuilding was absolutely booming and they were making huge amounts of money.

“But that’s not the world we’re living in any more,” he added.

“There’s a really simple lesson: the only way you can get builders to build is if they can make money by building. A lot of people on the Left are hugely uncomfortable with that.

“They and many others have been taken aback by the sheer scale of the housing shortfall in London.”

The Centre for Policy Studies blamed the slowdown on Mr Khan’s “misguided” London Plan, the Mayor’s new blueprint for development, as well as excessive affordable housing requirements and the new building safety regulator introduced after the Grenfell Tower disaster.

Discussing whether Labour’s mooted reversals would be enough to restore the sector, Colvile said: “I don’t think it’s enough.

“Each of these was the straw that broke the camel’s back. The camel’s back is now broken, so taking off the straws isn’t going to do all that much.”

Tim Craine of Molior Consultancy alleges that Labour’s manifesto promises were “never realistic”:

They were always impossible targets set by people who don’t know how the world works.

If you went into a boardroom in any business and made the statements they’ve made, you’d have the door shut on you, and no one would pay them any attention.

It’s drastic. It’s devastating. It’s devastating that homes aren’t being built for rent. The country needs landlords so that young people can live somewhere of their choice, and that choice is disappearing rapidly.

However, there was some consolation from the Mayor of London’s office where they have no doubt who to blame for the problems. A spokesman is quoted as saying:

The disastrous legacy and underfunding from the last government led to record construction costs, high interest rates and lengthy delays from the Building Safety Regulator, which created a perfect storm leaving the capital facing the worst conditions for housebuilding in decades.

It’s always someone else’s fault, isn’t it?

Worth reading in full.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
stewart
5 months ago

Why does the governemnt have a target for the number of nee homes to be built? That is foe the market to decide surely. We don’t.live in a centrally planned communist country, do we?

Oh, sorry, my mistake. We do. Most of the economy is centrally planned now from energy to transport to healthcare to eduction.

And any problems that arise? The failure of capitalism that creates mass inequality. Even though literally more than half the economy (by their own figures) is managed by the state.

Why don’t they just drop the facade and have 5 year plans?

JXB
JXB
5 months ago
Reply to  stewart

We don’t.live in a centrally planned communist country, do we?”

In 1945, Marxist-Socialist Labour nationalised the economy – its industry, utilities, public services, and labour force – and turned us into a Socialist cradle-to-grave welfare-state, stopping just short of being an actual Communist State.

Arguably you could call it Fascist since under Fascism some business and workers remain private but all economic and social activity must take place to serve the interests of the State as determined by the State.

Since 1945 we have had a State-directed economy by use of nationalisation, regulation, taxation, subsidy, intervention, and corporatism – the merging of corporate power with government power… often called “crony-capitalism”.

For example: most people think the railways were privatised but the State owns Network Rail which costs £12 billion a year, and owns the Rights to operate rail services over the network, which it franchises out. Train operators get £4 billion annually in subsidies and it is Government which decides rail fares. Then of course there is our energy market.

transmissionofflame
5 months ago
Reply to  JXB

In many ways this arrangement suits the socialists a lot more than the state actually directly owning everything, because this way when things go wrong they can just blame nasty private firms, but on the rare occasions things appear to go well, the government takes credit.

For a fist full of roubles

It is fair to say that business confidence in almost every sector has collapsed over the last year.
It is ironic that Black Friday is the day after the budget.

stewart
5 months ago

Yep

Marcus Aurelius knew
5 months ago

“There’s a really simple lesson: the only way you can get builders to build is if they can make money by building. A lot of people on the Left are hugely uncomfortable with that.”

Enough said.

JXB
JXB
5 months ago

Thomas Sowell: ‘Socialists don’t understand economics, if they did they wouldn’t be Socialists.’

mrbu
mrbu
5 months ago

Of course the Mayor of London’s office is going to blame the previous government. A lot of things that aren’t right in the UK could be laid at their door. But this government was elected on a pledge to turn things around. At some point they have to stop blaming the previous lot and start admitting they haven’t done what they said they would.

JXB
JXB
5 months ago
Reply to  mrbu

The previous Government term was May 1997 to July 2025.

huxleypiggles
5 months ago

A good friend of mine has a construction company. All projects coming to an end in November and currently nothing due to start, a situation he has never known in forty years. He believes the company may have to cease trading.

The industrial destruction continues and is gathering pace.

JXB
JXB
5 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Anyone old enough to be aware in the 1960s/1970s has seen this all before and knew there would be a repeat with the current Labour Government.

It’s going to get worse.

Dinger64
5 months ago
Reply to  JXB

100%

Dinger64
5 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Correct hux! Not enough quality builders in any of the trades to even consider constructing on that kind of scale, no builders, no buildings!

DiscoveredJoys
DiscoveredJoys
5 months ago

Socialism requires centralised planning to herd everyone towards the glorious socialist utopia. Unfortunately such planning depends upon “impossible targets set by people who don’t know how the world works”. Not just for housebuilding either.

Dinger64
5 months ago

Planning permission aside, if you want builders to build homes at scale drop the regulations!
Mandatory car chargers, solar panels, heat pumps, window aspects, bicycle sheds ridiculous insulation requirements, heat bridge demands, etc etc
Build quality good housing quickly, cheaply and efficiently ! Drop the dead donkey that is net zero and build places for people to live!

Frances Killian
Frances Killian
5 months ago

Buyers also are lacking. First time buyers priced out of affordable mortgages. Downsizers deterred by swinging taxation and stressful selling /buying processes. Investors buying to let regulated and demonised to such a degree that are no longer coming forward. Even if building affordable homes is made easier there still have to be buyers able and willing.