The True Hidden Purpose of ‘Sex Education’

We are well into the new autumn term and, by now, your children, grandchildren, nephews and nieces will all be safely back in school. But what kind of things will they be learning there? How to have deviant sexual relations with one another, apparently. The new three Rs in the West’s education system are reading, writing and rim-jobbing.

In 2022, lesson-plans were leaked online, endorsed by the queer caucus of the main US teaching union, the NEA, called ‘Sex Acts That Don’t Get Enough Play’. A video showed footage of adolescent schoolchildren forced to wear large labels across their chests with the names of lesser-spotted sex-acts like “RIMMING” (licking out arseholes with one’s tongue), in order to combat a sort of societally maintained ‘sex-racism’ against such practices. Other kids would approach the ones wearing the labels and ask what their teacher-assigned fetish was all about. If they liked the sound of it, the newly-formed couple could then disappear behind the bikesheds and begin practising upon one another, most likely. 

In a back-to-school survey of nearly 6,000 UK parents this September, 23% said they felt their children had learnt something “not appropriate for their age” in compulsory Relationships, Sex and Health Education (RSHE) lessons – or even in Religious Education lessons! It’s no surprise 56% of the parents surveyed supported the early withdrawal method of pulling their kids out of such indoctrination sessions.

Lessons in things like “consensual choking” (a sex-positive case-study in the career of the Boston Strangler) and intimate questioning of under-age girls on “how they feel about oral and anal sex” now seem very much par for the course. UK teaching unions have dismissed disapproval of such material as “politically motivated” and mere “inflammatory rhetoric”, but as I showed on the Daily Sceptic a few weeks back, UK teaching unions these days are increasingly becoming mere entryist fronts for pushing radical Marxism. But where, precisely, does turning kids kinky fit into this whole world-transforming Trotskyite scheme?

György Pörgy, Pudding and Pie, Queered the Kids and Made Them Cry

The first known state-backed attempt to make children start tongue-spooning one another’s bums is said to have occurred in Hungary, under the mercifully brief 1919 Communist dictatorship of Béla Kun, when the nation was fleetingly rebranded as the Hungarian Soviet Republic.

The People’s Commissar for Education and Culture during this period was an influential far-Left theorist named György Lukács (‘Örgy’ to his friends in the Budapest swingers’ club), who is often said to have abused his position to push sexual deviancy to pupils in schools, in order to fatally undermine the traditional monogamous heterosexual family unit which Marxists correctly saw as one of the main obstacles to complete societal control on behalf of the Party. Via a programme of such “cultural terrorism”, the traditional ranks of the proletariat were ultimately to be expanded from merely the workers of the world to the wankers of the world too, particularly homosexuals and what were still then quaintly dubbed ‘cross-dressers’.

One of the main intellectual founders of what is now known as ‘Cultural Marxism’, Lukács is sometimes absolved of this crime against childhood by those on the Left who want to pretend this is all nothing but a ‘far-Right conspiracy theory’ using a very devious rhetorical smear-method.

Exploiting the chance fact that Lukács happened to be Jewish (as were most of his fellow original-model Cultural Marxists in what came to be known as the ‘Frankfurt School’), his defenders tar the man’s critics as simple ‘antisemites’, disingenuously painting the very idea of Cultural Marxism itself as nothing but a disguised vehicle for Jew-hate. So, if you bigotedly object to your five-year-old being told how to eat shit by a naked 55 year-old hermaphroditic SWP voter who self-IDs as a non-binary marshmallow in his or her reception class, that’s just the first step on the road towards Auschwitz II: The Big Gay Sequel. 

To be fair, Lukács was only in his post for two months, which probably wasn’t quite enough time to drive the entire nation Hungary for cock, and his alleged perverted influence may indeed have been somewhat inflated by critics like the Catholic Church. But journalist Peter Hitchens has found clear textual evidence that, whether he was able to succeed in grooming kids into Queer Communism or not, Lukács seemingly aspired to do so.

And, even if this was all an exaggerated smear against Lukács’s name, there were certainly others who came after him who heard rumours of what he had supposedly tried to do, and aimed to put it into practice for real upon the helpless schoolchildren of the West nonetheless. Regrettably, they appear to have since succeeded.

Drinking the Lukács-AIDS

The main vehicle for queering your kids’ minds in British schools right now is of course transgenderism. Consider the case of Alleyn’s School in Dulwich, London, which this summer was outed in the media as having devised a whole new rainbow-tastic curriculum for its soon-to-be-Lukácsed pupils to follow in terms of its English syllabus. Previous students at Alleyn’s include Laurence Llewelyn-Bowen, who is apparently the ideal camp alumnus they wish all future leavers to follow in the long-haired, mincing footsteps of.

Classic books like Dracula will still be studied, but through an obsessively ‘queering lens’, so the Count now sucks something else for a nocturnal bedroom hobby in addition to mere blood from Mina Harker’s neck, whilst new contemporary texts like Woman in the Making, a memoir by a 56 year-old Irishman named Rory O’Neill who likes to pretend he is a woman named Panti Bliss in public for reasons best known to himself and his therapist, has been added to the school reading list too.

The reason why children are henceforth to be asked to parse the amazing words of a ‘woman’ whose very name literally means ‘I’ve Just Cum in My Knickers’ rather than those of genuine classic non-binary authors of England’s past like William Shakesqueer and Thomas Hardon, is supposedly in order to equip students with the “empathy and confidence to challenge and dismantle sexism, racism, homophobia – indeed, discrimination of any kind – when they encounter it”.

No it’s not. It’s actually in order to equip them with the “empathy and confidence” to dismantle the normative family unit and traditional capitalist social order and replace it all with some unworkable new gay Maoist replacement disaster-zone instead, just as György Lukács would have wanted, whether the Alleyn’s School teachers have ever specifically heard of the man or not.

Lil’ Miss Trouble

The most notorious tool in this deliberate corruption of our youth is the all-time obscenity of Drag Queen Story Hour (DQSH), a phenomenon substantially devised by someone calling ‘herself’ Lil’ Miss Hot Mess, which makes it sound like ‘she’ has just explosively shat ‘herself’ following a large shop-soiled curry filled with galloping botulism. Lil’ Miss is really more of an actual biological Mr Man, considering that his real name is Harris Kornstein, and he is a male academic from America. This renowned ‘educator’ now goes around looking like this, though, so is evidently today a full-blown ‘person with ovaries’ of precisely the kind recently mentioned by Bristol Borough Council:

Being a professor, Dr Hot Mess has published a full ‘scientific’ (in the sense of ‘social scientific’, in the sense therefore of ‘not scientific at all’) justificatory manifesto for the movement, together with fellow tranny academic co-author Harper Keenan, called ‘Drag Pedagogy: The Playful Practice of Queer Imagination in Early Childhood’, which I am ashamed to say I have now read.

In case you are Panti Blissfully unaware of Drag Queen Story Hour, it is a lamentable practice in which obvious men in dresses (some of whom have later proved to be convicted paedophiles) sit themselves down in front of toddlers in school libraries and read pieces of infant trans-porn with titles like Cinderelliot, Bye Bye Binary, Everybody Poops and They, She, He, Easy as ABC to them, whilst engaging in singalongs to equally gay ditties about guys with titties like The Dress On the Drag Queen Goes Swish, Swish, Swish. How can someone like Little Mister Not Miss justify this evil crap? By recapitulating the basic cultural terrorism philosophy of György Lukács couched in emetic #BeKind bromides about inclusivity, diversity and the need to dismantle prejudice.

Hot Mess’s paper boasts of instilling “queer ways of knowing and being” into children’s malleable brains, at the direction of “a queer teacher”, who “encourages children to think for themselves and even to break the rules”, all except for the key currently prevailing social rule that the children should not observe accurately that this “queer teacher” is in fact clearly a large mentally ill man. This “drag pedagogy” is not really about increasing tolerance for lunatics, though, but more meaningfully meant as a specific “model” for “how to live queerly”, i.e., an explicit attempt to turn your children gay, the “camp curriculum” becoming a means of thereby transforming capitalist society across-the-board.

Public schooling itself is revealed as simply “a way of maintaining nation-states”, by encouraging kids to get married and have babies, and to seek productive jobs to keep the economy rolling. However, from a cultural terrorist point of view, it is best to encourage society to be unable to reproduce itself, the basic self-nullifying philosophy of the mad Marxist educational theorist Paulo Freire (see my article on him here). Queers can’t reproduce naturally, and no nation has yet built a successful economy based upon producing millions of drag queens rather than engineers or scientists, so wasting children’s time with drivel like this becomes an excellent way to disassemble the West. A queer “sideways growth” is intended for children, so they will never grow up to be “straight” in either a sexual or a socioeconomic fashion: to be law-abiding, economically productive or fertile are, from a Queer Commie perspective, 100% undesirable.

The Sexual Revolution

Astonishingly, knowing full well no-one half-normal except me will ever read his paper, Professor Hot Mess openly admits that, when challenged about all this, drag queens should just, well, lie:  

Though DQSH publicly positions its impact in “help[ing] children develop empathy, learn about gender diversity and difference, and tap into their own creativity”… we argue that its contributions can run deeper than morals and role models. In what follows, we keep with a common drag performance trope in redirecting our readers away from what’s said on the surface and towards the subtle nods and zingers that gesture at what is happening between the lines. For us, drag pedagogy is less about imitating drag queens’ specific behaviours, and more about embodied inquiry into queer/trans ways of being that reach beyond the present [into an imagined queer utopia].

In other words, the whole thing is a gigantic #BeKind façade intended to facilitate a colossal act of neo-Marxist queer social engineering, and your children are mere collateral damage guineapigs in it all; these bastards are Marxists operating in glittery ideological drag as supposed harmless, kid-pleasing entertainers. If only Auntie Joe Stalin had thought to wear a bathing suit and a pair of rubber breasts, he could have conquered the entire world, unshaven moustache and all!

Hot Mess further adds that, as drag queens habitually break all the standard social rules in life – e.g. grooming children – they help orient toddlers towards a future in which they do not obey society’s rules either, something termed “a practice of strategic defiance”. Furthermore, “fostering collective unruliness also helps children to understand that they can have a hand in changing their environments”, in the specific sense of acting to “make revolution irresistible”, so fostering a “truly world-dismantling effort”.

As György Lukács would have advised, it’s also a determined family-dismantling effort, too:

DQSH offers a queer relationality with children that breaks from the reproductive futurity of the normative classroom and nuclear family. … It may be that DQSH is ‘family friendly’ [as its proponents often fib to soothe sceptical parents’ nerves]… but it is less a sanitising force than it is a preparatory introduction to alternate modes of kinship. Here, DQSH is ‘family friendly’ in the sense of ‘family’ as an old-school queer code to identify and connect with other queers on the street.

So, it’s only ‘family friendly’ in terms of priming students to want to turn gay and run away with their new adopted ‘queer families’ of strange non-related street-trannies etc, abandoning their actual family homes as far-Right incubators of oppressive heteronormative gender-fascism. In conclusion, writes Mr Hot Sticky Mess, “We’re reading books while we read each other’s looks, and we’re leaving a trail of glitter that won’t ever come out of the carpet.”

I don’t want to claim every lesson in every school is now like this – but that any are like this whatsoever is itself a deeply alarming fact. What happened to Section 28 when you need it?

Steven Tucker is a journalist and the author of over 10 books, the latest being Hitler’s & Stalin’s Misuse of Science: When Science Fiction Was Turned Into Science Fact by the Nazis and the Soviets (Pen & Sword/Frontline), which is out now.