In Defence of Cancelling the Left

This past fortnight has seen an explosion of interest in free speech in the United States. First there was the political assassination of the conservative activist Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA. Then there was the decision by Disney (owner of the ABC TV broadcasting network in the US) to remove late night host Jimmy Kimmel from the air. A lot is going on in the name of ‘free speech’ so let me start with some facts.

Firstly, Charlie Kirk not only believed in free speech, he practised it. He would go onto college campuses, set up his desk and microphone, and debate any and everyone. And he was respectful. He heard people out. He believed in the exchange of ideas. He insisted no one be booed. And he was very good at what he did, a first-rate debater. Many outside observers attribute to Kirk and his Turning Point outfit the incredible surge in young voters’ support for Trump in last year’s Presidential election, especially amongst young men who now markedly, even mightily, lean Republican.

Secondly, the assassin was motivated by hard-Left identity politics concerns. He lived with a man who was transitioning to be a trans-woman. He left behind clear evidence he was motivated by DEI-type concerns. He thought Kirk’s views were hateful and that that fact warranted not just physical violence but death. Yes, the killer came from a conservative Republican home. But that just shows how effective the indoctrination can be at some universities (where the assassin went for a semester) and online. If you look at the post-Obama incidents, there is a good deal more ‘Left on Right’ violence than vice-versa.

Now to the immediate aftermath of the Kirk murder. It is undeniable that many on the Left (explicitly or implicitly) celebrated or condoned or justified Kirk’s homicide. The evidence is overwhelming and readers will have seen myriad examples online from Hollywood types to professors and teachers to medicos to a few Democrat politicians. Many lost their jobs as a result.

And that brings me to late-night TV host Jimmy Kimmel. Kimmel has for years been an open and ardent supporter of the Democrats. The old Johnny Carson days of bipartisan humour and trying to attract all political points of view to your broadcast are dead in the US – which explains why Kimmel’s audience has collapsed by about 70% (much like the audience of his late-night competitor Stephen Colbert). Anyway, last week Kimmel’s opening monologue lied about the shooter of Kirk. Kimmel asserted the killer was a MAGA type. Kimmel could not possibly have believed that given the evidence widely available. Kimmel’s monologue caused outrage across a huge chunk of America. Kimmel’s ABC (again, owned by the Left-leaning Disney corporation) does not own all the affiliate TV stations across the US and one of the biggest ABC affiliate owners announced it would no longer air the Kimmel show. Disney then opted to pull the Kimmel show.

And then many, many of those on the US political Left erupted in fury. ‘This is the end of free speech,’ they lamented. ‘This is the start of authoritarianism.’ Etcetera. Etcetera.

So let me add some nuance. One: many, many conservative TV and sports commentators in the US who have voiced conservative views have been fired by what (outside of Fox) is a wall-to-wall progressive-Left media landscape. Roseanne Barr had the most popular sitcom on TV when she made a tweet – so on her own time not while working as with Kimmel – and she was fired. Almost universally the Lefties applauded this Barr firing as wholly compatible with US First Amendment free speech principles – which it is, by the way. The US Bill of Rights offers citizen-government speech protections, not person-to-person or person-to-corporation protections. The same fate that Barr suffered was dished out to at least three notable ESPN sports commentators who voiced conservative views (while Leftie sports people can hold moments of silence against Trump and against Supreme Court decisions and say just about anything with never any consequences). I could give you all sorts of other conservatives in media who have been fired by their privately-owned networks without a peep of complaint from the political Left. Only with the firing of Jimmy Kimmel have these Lefties shown any concern with free speech. Here’s the truth of the matter. Cancel culture is and was a Left-wingers’ creation. They have used it to silence Right of centre views as far as possible.

So here are two big questions. First off, what should we make of the Kimmel axing? Over 60 ABC affiliate TV stations had opted not to air his show. Plus, the Disney-owned ABC was already bleeding money on this show because Kimmel (and Colbert) had long ago moved to only making Left-friendly jokes and monologues, costing him three-quarters of his audience. There is no free-speech principle that your boss can’t fire you for losing him loads of money. Nor is firing someone for what he did today equivalent to searching through emails from 15 years ago to find some undergraduate tweet that can be used to cancel someone just appointed to some big job today – the way the Left-side of politics went after Toby Young in the UK.

I’ll be honest. I would prefer to live in the 1970s world of bipartisan humour where comedians are left alone because they dole out the hits to all sides. But we don’t live in that world. And attempts to claim, in effect, that one of the first things the Nazis (a.k.a. Trump) did was to cancel underperforming late night talk shows, are risible. Yes, Trump’s Attorney General was an idiot to broach hate speech laws. Yes, Disney has other business concerns that will need Trump administration approval. But the Fox network and conservatives live with these administrative state idiocies all the time.

And that brings me to the biggest issue confronting conservatives who believe in free speech. Do we hold ourselves to a higher standard than the Left and refuse to cancel and ask for the firing of those on the Left (who would most definitely suffer that fate were they conservatives)? Or, given that the political Left has created this cancel culture world, do we make them live up to the standards they created? Do we demand they be fired too, enjoying a soupçon of schadenfreude when it happens?

Sadly, I’m afraid it has to be the latter. This is not some Sir Walter Scott romantic jousting match where chivalry is all. We know from game theory and from evolution that those who are always generous and benevolent lose. Those sort of genes die out. Reciprocity is the approach that works. I’ll be nice and play by the rules as long as you do. But when it’s plain that you are not – for you it will be cancel culture and attempting to silence voices you dislike – well then right back at you on steroids. What’s good for the Roseanne Barr goose will also be good for the Jimmy Kimmel gander. Remember, Kimmel is not banned from every major social media app (as the Left banned then candidate Trump). No one is trying to put Kimmel in jail or bankrupt him (ditto). No one is sending bullets his way (ditto). He lost his job, as did a whole bunch of Lefties who celebrated Charlie Kirk’s murder (showing their distinct lack of humanity, by the way).

Boo-hoo. I’m now for applying their rules to them. Disney has now, predictably, caved in to the Left and is bringing back the Kimmel show. This is yet more evidence the Left plays under a different set of rules than the Right – two-tier cancel culture if you will. The good news is Kimmel bleeds Disney money. For how long we shall see.

James Allan is the Garrick Professor of Law at Queensland University. This article was first published in Spectator Australia.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Arum
Arum
6 months ago

Wait long enough and the left cancel their own.

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
6 months ago
Reply to  Arum

My instinct as an Englishman and a cricketer is that we need to hold ourselves ro a higher standard.

However, I now realise this is a war.

You don’t bring a knife to a gunfight. They send one of yours to the hospital? You send one of theirs to the morgue.

Unfortunately we’re there, politically speaking.

We have the numbers, and our numbers are the people that make the country work.

So we do win. Ruthless.

Bill Bailey
Bill Bailey
6 months ago
Reply to  Jack the dog

Yes you are right, the left declared war years ago, in the UK it’s been many decades, probably the post war Labour government. They have eroded everything and it’s got to the point where we are facing a collapse. The answer by Labour are censorship, identity protocols and surveillance. People now realise that it’s a fight for survival of the country as we know it. The same in most of the western world.

The left will not stop, the are fanatics and will try every trick in the book and many more that we can’t fathom.

Gezza England
Gezza England
6 months ago
Reply to  Jack the dog

Exactly my thinking. As I have said before, leftism is a cancer on society and you need to treat it the same way.

Free Lemming
6 months ago

It has to be so. The only reason right of centre politics is gaining any traction is because it’s finally realised the game has new rules. The old rules are gone, and the game cannot be won by holding onto them like an umbrella in a storm, constantly bemused as to why the umbrella keeps upending itself and rendered useless.

The weapons of the conflict have changed, and we’ve been shooting arrows whilst they’ve been firing missiles for far too long. Time to let them know what it feels like. Time to make them fear the weapons of their own creation.

jeepybee
6 months ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

I think it’s more that us normal folk haven’t been firing at all. We have been playing the role of frowning parent, finding it all absurd and tasteless but preferring stability.

Well, now the toddlers are out of control. And that’s all they are really, children. Naive and immature. But now they are going to see what happens in the real world.

jeepybee
6 months ago
Reply to  jeepybee

That was a world salad for FAFO.

DiscoveredJoys
DiscoveredJoys
6 months ago

I think it would be acceptable to criticise current unacceptable behaviour even if the consequence was cancellation.

But the Left have already moved beyond criticism to digging into ages-old speech, misquoting, and confecting outrage in an effort to punish their political opponents.

Should the Right do the same? No. I suspect the consequences of acceptable criticism would be enough, although it must be followed through to resolution.

JDee
JDee
6 months ago

It is the failure of the supposed ‘right’ to work out what is wrong with what the left has been doing for so long which has allowed things to get so bad. This essay is a continuation of the same. We still don’t no what’s wrong but now we are at least going to do the same back to the left . F*cking great!

Mogwai
6 months ago
Reply to  JDee

Don’t you find, though, that it’s because this particular topic shines a light on the hypocrisy of people? If you are somebody who professes to be all about free speech, then you get triggered by something somebody says, either verbally or written, then you’ve just demonstrated your double standards, in my opinion. You’ve just contradicted yourself. People could just think to themselves: “Well that’s a load of crap and I totally disagree”, but instead they react, usually because they’re emotionally driven. Evidence and examples of this abound. Then there’s the fact free speech is hard to define and apply/uphold in a consistent manner. To my mind, it exists as a concept but if it cannot be applied consistently to all, at all times, because the parameters are being moved by those in power or who make up the majority, then it’s basically meaningless and will always be abused. Perhaps not so bad in the US compared with Europe, with their various ammendments and such, but as the above article describes, it’s far from a cut and dried situation. So I think not many people practice what they preach when it comes to allegedly being a proponent of free speech, and… Read more »

Bill Bailey
Bill Bailey
6 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

The left should be cancelled but at the same time their right to free speech is sacrosanct. That is what many people such as Starkey, Peterson and many more have to do. People like Kimmel should definitely be cancelled and be prevented from spewing their bile, but now he will have to find a new outlet to exercise his right to free speech just like all the others who have lost the livelihood.

Bill Bailey
Bill Bailey
6 months ago
Reply to  Bill Bailey

I’ve just read that Kimmel is being reinstated.

transmissionofflame
6 months ago
Reply to  Bill Bailey

Excellent news and very helpful to our cause. The more his scummy ideas and behaviour are exposed, the more people will realise how far wrong we have gone.

Gezza England
Gezza England
6 months ago
Reply to  Bill Bailey

Yes he has, but 2 major distributors of ABC productions have refused to put Kimmel on their various outlets which should be a big blow to ABC and Woke Disney+.

transmissionofflame
6 months ago

“And that brings me to the biggest issue confronting conservatives who believe in free speech. Do we hold ourselves to a higher standard than the Left and refuse to cancel and ask for the firing of those on the Left (who would most definitely suffer that fate were they conservatives)?”

What “we” are you talking about? You obviously don’t believe in free speech. Good luck with that. It ends badly.

It’s got nothing to do with “holding myself to a higher standard”. I just think letting people say what they think is the best approach.

More than happy if his employers take him off air or sack him because he’s bad for business – that is their right. But that’s a commercial, not a political, decision.

Neil Datson
Neil Datson
6 months ago

You obviously don’t consider yourself a member of ‘the right’, whatever that be. Me neither. As far as I’m concerned people who care about the government of their country and public affairs should try to judge issues on their merit, not to show that they belong to a particular strand of political thought. I’d never heard of Kirk before he was murdered but he was clearly a decent man. I’d never heard of Kimmel before he was fired but he sounds like a dreary, opinionated, bore. Neither should be seen as pawns in tribal warfare.

transmissionofflame
6 months ago
Reply to  Neil Datson

Right and left are such vague terms. I’m certainly not a socialist. Libertarian/minarchist right I suppose. Small c conservative in how I live my life and in my attitudes, but no interest in imposing that on others. I believe in nation states as a reasonable compromise political unit in which liberty under the law and private enterprise can flourish.

People keep referring to a “war” and I suppose yes there is a “war” but I think it has to be a war of ideas and I don’t think you win by shutting the other side up.

Mogwai
6 months ago
Reply to  Neil Datson

Precisely what I’ve said multiple times on here. It’s why I’ve stopped referring to the terms ‘right’ and ‘left’ altogether. The majority of people’s views are way more mixed and complex than what is represented by the fringe, the very extremes that we see on social media etc. Many Democrats were disgusted with how people reacted gleefully to the murder of an innocent man so they even switched to Republican.
I used to refer to people as ‘Leftards’ but then realised it’s not as simple as assigning people to one of two camps, plus I’d be lowering myself to their standards, given they’d no doubt label me as ‘far right’ for my views. If I wouldn’t label myself as that then why would I happily stick labels on others? So I’ve stopped being a hypocrite and playing the ‘Us vs Them’ game, where we’re supposed to only choose one of two sides pitted against each other like enemies, and it is tribal, as you say.

Myra
6 months ago

I don’t agree. I think we should hold ourselves to a high standard.
We should show that civilised debate is the only way forward to get out if this spiral of increasing polarisation.

CrisBCTnew
6 months ago

If someone believes it’s right to do something, then that should also be applied to them.

This means that since someone on the left believes cancelling is the correct thing to do to anyone opposing their viewpoint, then that can and should be applied to them by their opponents.

ie. What’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander!

Mogwai
6 months ago
Reply to  CrisBCTnew

Germany is the country that just keeps on giving when it comes to examples of authoritarianism. I don’t know if they’ve a FSU equivalent but they could do with it. I read an article the other day of how a bank employee wrote on a service provider’s Instagram account: “R.I.P Charlie Kirk” and they got sacked. When condolences = ‘hate speech’. Crazy. 😕

jsampson45
jsampson45
6 months ago

There are arguments on both sides (see Lord Young here). ISTM it is up to we Christians to do what is right and trust God for the outcome. God said “Vengeance is mine” (not “Vengeance is wrong.”).