‘One In, One Out’ Migrant Flights Cancelled for Second Day
Deportation flights under Sir Keir Starmer’s ‘one in, one out deal’ have been cancelled for a second day after legal challenges and protests, as the policy, already criticised as hopelessly weak, descends into farce. The Telegraph has more.
The Home Office had planned to return migrants on commercial Air France flights from Heathrow to Paris every day this week.
However, flights on Monday and Tuesday have left without any migrants on board after last-minute legal challenges and protests from charities.
The delay is a blow for the Prime Minister as he seeks to put the new deal into action to serve as a deterrent to Channel crossings.
More than 31,000 migrants have crossed to England in 2025 – the highest number at this point in the year since the first arrivals in 2018.
Last month, the Border Force detained almost 100 migrants who had been earmarked for deportation under the one in, one out deal agreed between Sir Keir and Emmanuel Macron, the French president, in July.
The Telegraph disclosed on Monday that the first migrant to be returned under the deal had been removed from his Air France flight, but the French had been informed that he would be flown out on Tuesday. However, his flight has been delayed by at least another day.
Plans to fly out a second migrant on Tuesday were also foiled after his lawyers claimed that his experience of being tortured and trafficked should prevent him from being returned to France.
British and French charities started a campaign to bombard Air France with phone calls, emails and social media messages urging them “not to agree to collaborate with the interior ministry and not to agree to deport these people on these flights”.
Lawyers believe migrants’ cases could be challenged through their right to a family life under Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights if they have relatives in the UK. Challenges could be lodged on the grounds that they have been trafficked or suffer mental ill health.
The Home Office has to give “generous” time extensions to the migrants to take legal advice on challenging their deportation as a result of a ruling against the Tory government’s thwarted Rwanda deportation scheme.
Lawyers said the flight delays meant the legal process was taking longer than the Government anticipated.
Most of the migrants are understood to be from countries with high asylum grant rates but others are also from Eritrea, Afghanistan and Sudan, which account for the highest number of crossings.
As part of the agreement, a similar number of asylum seekers from France will come to the UK. The first flight into Britain is scheduled for Saturday, the Telegraph understands.
Worth reading in full.
Stop Press: A migrant will not be deported to France on Wednesday under the ‘one in, one out’ policy after he won his High Court bid to have the removal temporarily blocked. The Eritrean man took his case to the High Court under human rights law, claiming he would be “destitute” if the Home Office sends him back to France.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
More pantomime
Reminds me of the worst excesses of theatre of absurd/macabre that was “Covid”
A very reasonable summary tof.
EVERYTHING about this is ridiculous.
One in one out? That is not going to reduce the number of illegal immigrants in our country.
Once again the elected government is overruled by unelected judges.
“Charities” are up in arms, saying it is inhumane to send people to France. FRANCE! One of the largest countries in the Lefties beloved EU.
it’s such transparent bollocks as a plan, frankly Baldrick would be too embarassed to suggest it.
Starmer is just unbelievably crap.
Yeah, and I bet the “one in” has already arrived.
X10… x20….
One In One Out? It’s just rearranging the
deckchairsillegal migrants on theTitanicdinghy.Well, that’s definitely going to work as a deterrent…
Smash the gangs, haha.
All part of the theatre.
Exactly and it should only be discussed in those terms. However, the MSM play this it is only intended as distraction / farce.
Why the Hell were they using a commercial airline? It’s bound to face a backlash from the lefties. They couldn’t nip them over in an RAF plane? And really one expulsion at a time?
The 1 in 1 out policy would work IF it was applied with 100% effectiveness, i.e. you were guaranteed to get returned to France if you tried to take the dinghy here, then what is the point of even getting on the boat?
It’s all about having an effective deterrent. Rwanda would have worked, if applied with 100% consistency; 1 in 1 out would work if applied with 100% consistency.
I don’t think they’d find enough migrants with a genuine claim to balance out the huge numbers already here. It would need to be 1 in 100 out, I reckon.
Absolute clown show.
I thought the trial was going to be 50 per week, which with two border force/police officers per illegal equates to nearly a full charter flight or RAF voyager, rather than continuously buying seats on Air France which then go unused. Even bigger question, why a plane, why not a locked Eurostar carriage or a ferry trip. Finally, Pixie Balls promised that the legislation would be drawn up so that there would be no legal challenges – what’s changed or are we witnessing more duplicity from this bunch of shysters
Again, same old problem. Lawyers (paid for by public money) exploiting and twisting the ECHR.
There’s only one answer – get rid, and draft a new national charter with appropriate safeguards.
Migration Watch has a brilliant “Channel Crossing Tracker” webpage with lots of useful graphs, which show the true scale of the invasion in just a few years:
Channel Crossing Tracker | Migration Watch UK
What’s to bet that this turns into “One in Zero out” many thousands of times over?
Perhaps Mr Khan didn’t want to collect a few more airmiles?
I suppose the circa 1000 pseudo-refugee dinghy arrivals weren’t inconvenienced 🤔
Why am I not surprised? If some way is found of stopping the legal processes that block flights the next thing will be violent disruption on the planes, so the whole policy will anyway collapse…
It was obvious from the outset that the policy was just pantomime …. intended to give the impression that Two-Tier wanted to stop the invasion whilst doing SFA to actually deter anyone from getting on a dinghy.