News Round-Up
- “Charlie Kirk murder is assault on free speech… shame on those who ‘celebrate’ it” – We can be as unpleasant towards each other as we like in the political arena, but if we go beyond that and start engaging in violence, society will descend into civil war, warns Toby in the Sun.
- “Charlie Kirk believed in free speech. He died for it” – Charlie Kirk wanted to revive America, but now it is even less certain that the country can avoid a lurch into a fresh orgy of violence, writes Jacob Heilbrunn in the Spectator.
- “Charlie Kirk’s assassination serves as a chilling warning to Britain’s intolerant Left” – Sickening celebrations on social media demonstrate how many progressives have become the very fascists they claim to deplore, says Suzanne Moore in the Telegraph.
- “Charlie Kirk died doing what he did best” – It is grimly fitting that Charlie Kirk was killed doing what he did best: debating others in public, writes Freddy Gray in the Mail.
- “The killing of Charlie Kirk is an assault on America itself” – This is America’s Charlie Hebdo moment, says Brendan O’Neill in the Spectator.
- “Why Charlie Kirk’s assassination matters for all of us” – On Substack, Rebekah Barnett reflects on the assassination of Charlie Kirk, warning it could be a flashpoint for political violence or, if we choose, a turning point towards civility and genuine debate.
- “Free speech should never be fatal” – No civilised society can survive a situation in which public speech becomes a life-threatening act, writes Jonathan Sacerdoti in the Spectator.
- “Are we at a turning point?” – Can the murder of Charlie Kirk change the world? wonders Laura Dodsworth on her Substack.
- “Charlie Kirk, pivotal Maga influencer who took Trump’s message into college campuses” – A combative debater and popular podcaster, Charlie Kirk was able to translate disjointed Trumpian rhetoric into coherent soundbites, the Telegraph says in an obituary.
- “The murder of Charlie Kirk” – Charlie Kirk was, in conservative terms, a moderate, says Spaceman Spiff on Substack. No rational person would think him an extremist – except an actual extremist, of course.
- “What happened to Charlie Kirk could happen in Britain” – Politicians on both the Left and Right in this country have been proved equally vulnerable to violence from those who oppose them, warns Isabel Oakeshott in the Telegraph.
- “Hate not hope: the far-Left frenzy for political violence” – Charlie Kirk’s assassination has dramatically exposed, if that were still needed, the awful violence of the far-Left, says Niall McCrae on his Substack.
- “Councillor resigns after sparking fury over Charlie Kirk post” – Councillor Fiona Wild, an independent councillor in Burnley, has resigned just hours after claiming American conservative activist Charlie Kirk “made himself a target” and “brought his assassination upon himself”, reports the Mail.
- “Oxford Union President who debated Charlie Kirk appears to celebrate shooting” – The Oxford Union has condemned comments made by its incoming president about the shooting of Charlie Kirk, reports the Independent.
- “The killing of Iryna Zarutska shows the mainstream media’s total moral collapse” – The media is more interested in narrative control than in dealing with the issues laid bare by the murder of Iryna Zarutska – and that of Charlie Kirk, says Jacob Reynolds on the Academy of Ideas Substack.
- “Keir Starmer edited manual on interpreting human rights laws” – The PM edited a guide on the Human Rights Act 1998 and the European Convention on Human Rights in 1999 when he was a human rights lawyer, reveals the Mail.
- “England fans’ chants cast Keir Starmer as first Prime Minister to become The Enemy” – British prime ministers have been pretty much invisible on the terraces… until now, says Barnay Ronay in the Guardian.
- “Mandelson should never have been appointed” – There is nothing wrong in principle with political ambassadors, but Starmer made a poor choice, writes David Frost in the Telegraph.
- “Starmer took too long to fire Mandelson and Britain’s reputation in Washington has suffered” – Days before Donald Trump’s state visit, Sir Keir once again appears weak and indecisive, says Gordon Rayner in the Telegraph.
- “Spotlight falls on Starmer’s political judgment after Mandelson sacking” – Keir Starmer is facing serious questions about his political judgment after he was forced to sack his US ambassador, Peter Mandelson, over his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, reports the Guardian.
- “The misplaced sympathy for Angela Rayner” – It would not have surprised me if the BBC had organised a shrine to our former Deputy Prime Minister, writes Rod Liddle in the Spectator.
- “Emily Thornberry drops out of Labour’s deputy leadership race” – Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson and former Commons leader Lucy Powell will go head-to-head for Labour’s deputy leadership after the other candidates failed to make it through the first round, reports Sky News.
- “Congratulations Labour, you could elect someone even worse than Rayner” –Bridget Phillipson is no working-class hero, says Ella Whelan in the Telegraph; she is merely a part of the party political machine.
- “The female-only leadership contest in the party that can’t define ‘woman’” – In TCW, Sean Walsh slams Labour’s deputy leadership farce, mocking a female-only contest in a party that still can’t say what a woman is.
- “Its biggest champion Lord Hermer has just demolished the case for the ECHR” – For the Attorney General to admit that British judges have been wrong, and Parliament should advise them, is sheer heresy, writes Peter Lilley in the Telegraph.
- “‘I do nothing and it’s breaking me’: civil service forum reveals culture of idleness” – In the Telegraph, Emily Smith lifts the lid on a Reddit forum where disillusioned civil servants confess to crippling boredom, mindless bureaucracy and managers who tell them to “pretend” they are working.
- “Labour MP’s constituency office ‘set on fire’” – The office of Labour MP for Washington and Gateshead South Sharon Hodgson has been hit by a suspected arson attack, reports GB News.
- “Reform wants to scrap neutral civil service and hire anti-ECHR staff” – Reform UK would create a new department for immigration staffed solely by people who agree with the party’s radical policies to leave the ECHR and implement mass deportations, says the Times.
- “The Left think the BBC is biased towards Reform. What planet are they on?” – An attempt to represent the views of Farage voters is being interpreted as a lurch to the Right, writes Michael Deacon in the Telegraph.
- “BBC censures staff for calling Hamas a ‘terror group’” – The BBC says that its rolling news channel broke editorial rules after a presenter described Hamas as a “terror group”, according to Deadline.
- “John Lewis boss urges reform as tax hikes widen retailer’s losses” – John Lewis Partnership saw its pre-tax losses widen to £88 million over the six months to July 27th, from £30 million over the same period last year, according to This is Money.
- “Teacher injured in Southport knife attack shunned in home town” – The teacher who organised the Southport dance class where three young girls were stabbed to death says that the attack has left her “excluded and ostracised” in her hometown, reports the Mail.
- “Eco tycoon urges Miliband to subsidise North Sea oil and gas” – Dale Vince has called on ministers to put fossil fuels “on an equal footing with renewables”, according to OGV Energy.
- “Ed Miliband’s lonely war on the North Sea” – When even green energy tycoons are telling him to embrace the North Sea oil and gas industries, Ed Miliband really is beginning to look somewhat isolated, says Ross Clark in the Spectator.
- “New research finds ‘no statistically significant acceleration’ in global sea level rise” – There has been no sea level acceleration consistent with the alarmist global warming narrative, reveals Kenneth Richard on NoTricksZone.
- “Belgian wind project vetoed; global total of renewable rejections hits 1,104” – On Substack, Robert Bryce reports that global opposition to wind, solar and battery projects is surging, with 1,104 rejections now tracked in his newly consolidated Renewable Rejection Database.
- “Meteorologist explains why climate change isn’t ruining Napa’s Pinot Noir grapes” – Claims that climate change is harming California’s Napa Pinot Noir grapes are false, says Anthony Watts in Climate Realism; yields, markets and natural cycles tell a more nuanced story.
- “Newsom’s ‘clean energy’ claims don’t match California’s reality” – Governor Newsom touts “clean energy” as California’s growth engine, but fact-checks reveal costly mandates, false claims and heavy reliance on gas, oil and nuclear to keep the lights on, writes Edward Ring for American Greatness.
- “Mitsubishi Heavy Industries to double gas turbine capacity” – On Substack, the Energy Bad Boys report that Mitsubishi is doubling its gas turbine output – proof that reliable gas, not wind or solar, will power America’s data centres.
- “Mending things and keeping things going” – In Climate Scepticism, Jit argues that fixing old electronics and cars is often greener and more practical than buying new “eco” models.
- “Wind turbine boss ‘destroyed flowerbed after planning dispute’” – A businessman dug up and destroyed a flowerbed that villagers had hoped would score highly in the Britain in Bloom competition after a council rejected his planning application, reports the Times.
- “Covid: the permanent pandemic” – In TCW, Dr Roger Watson slams the media’s bid to keep Covid alive as a “permanent pandemic”.
- “How an elite Ukrainian unit blew up the Nord Stream pipelines” – In the Telegraph, Colin Freeman reveals how a small Ukrainian team, allegedly led by retired sea captain, blew up the Nord Stream pipelines in 2022, sparking a global whodunnit.
- “Kamala Harris is still blaming everyone for her failures but herself” – Excerpts from the former VP’s memoirs paint her as the eternal victim, says Dan McLaughlin in the Telegraph, and they also suggest she lied about Biden’s capacity to do his job.
- “The Welsh Government should be ashamed of its minority grant scheme” – Just five days remain to apply for the Welsh Government’s Culture Grant Scheme for grassroots groups – but beware: it excludes organisations led by or serving white, heterosexual, able-bodied people, writes Dia Chakravarty in the Telegraph.
- “Just watch” – Matt Goodwin has posted a video of Charlie Kirk engaging with an opponent. Quite-eye-opening.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Another day, and the madness is slowly accelerating, I see. Hang on friends. It will get much worse before it gets better.
Yes, I think you are right.
We have been sucked into some kind of insanity vortex. Mad ideas are tried and when they don’t work, even madder ideas are tried. The list is endless. And when someone points out the insanity, the response is not self-reflection and a correction of course but furious, aggressive doubling down on the insanity.
Like some heroin addict who needs a higher and higher dose to reach the same high.
This process will go on until some self-destructive mechanism kicks in. That always happens in the end, as reality always wins.
A lot of comments on X, especially from high profile conservatives, seem to suggest that a hard line has been crossed with the assassination of Charlie Kirk followed by the wave of videos with crazy eyes people celebrating, not to mention what happened in the US Congress and EU parliament yesterday. Some even compare it to 9/11, saying that it feels like a cornerstone moment, the masks are off, a sleeping monster has been awaken, there’s no turning back… Fingers crossed!
Cue allegations of a false flag operation.
Excellent post.
“Reform wants to scrap neutral civil service and hire anti-ECHR staff”
Hyperbole, I hope. Civil service staff should just get on with doing what they’re told to do by the government.
I don’t know the exact numbers and the mix between permanent staff and politically appointed staff but I believe US Presidents bring in pretty large teams of their own to get things done.
Anyone who is a political activist for causes contrary to the governments policy should not be there. Very hard to have e.g. Immigration offices attending ‘Hug a migrant’ training. The Civil Service used to appear neutral, but that all went out the window 25 years ago. We cannot have whole departments doing a Sir Humphrey on us
Agreed. Any civil servant found to be trying to thwart government policy should be sacked. If you don’t want to serve then go work somewhere else.
Correct but see my response.
A neutral civil service? Clearly not referring to this country.
Unfortunately the higher echelons of the CS are filled with seriously stupid, left wing, DEI idiots who believe they are always right and therefore have a duty to do the exact opposite of what they are supposed to do. This thinking is pushed down the ranks and those seeking advancement suck it up. Anybody speaking common sense is made to suffer.
How an elite Ukrainian unit blew up the Nord Stream pipelines ‘Fox host Tucker Carlson claimed on 27 September 2022 that the sabotage was an “escalation” by the American government in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine” ‘Russia has also made use of another piece of information offered by conspiracy theories, that is, the claim that the sabotage was carried out by British scuba divers.’ ‘Somewhat later, Russia accused Britain and the United States of conspiring to blow up the pipelines by drawing on a text message sent by former Prime Minister Liz Truss. Immediately after the damage, she wrote to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken “It’s done” ‘…tweets about conspiracy theories were supported by news sites with low fact-checking scores……conspiracy theories are articulated on 8kun and Gab online forums. It appeared, for example, that sources related to QAnon – an American political conspiracy theory and political movement – are particularly popular on posts submitted to 8kun, while Gab users shared more news available in websites such as InfoWars. Overall, low-credibility sources were prevalent on 8kun and Gab….users of these platforms also drew on more established information sources, for instance, Twitter and YouTube…..the participants placed the main emphasis on the plausibility of information, while accuracy of information… Read more »
I’m confused- who is it you think blew it up, and why?
Cui bono?
It is the Americans who have benefitted most through the sale of LPG to Europe.
I have always said that there are only two ‘hot’ parties in this conflict, so take your pick as to which was responsible.
Innocent until proven guilty; let’s see how convincing the evidence is in this instance.
Yep, innocent until proven guilty, just like all those people against whom as yet unproven allegations are made. You know, like Putin and Medvedev and Trump and Zelensky.
PS Someone saying it in an obscure publication does not constitute evidence.
‘There was a development of Novichok outside the Chemical Weapons Convention and Russian agents were trained in assassination techniques, including the use of such agents on door handles…. In the UK, the police are independent of government and they have been conducting a painstaking and forensic investigation. This investigation has involved around 250 detectives who have trawled through more than 11,000 hours of CCTV footage and have taken more than 1,400 statements. Working around the clock, they have carried out painstaking and methodical work to ascertain exactly which individuals were responsible and the methods they used to carry out this attack. This evidence has been independently reviewed by the Crown Prosecution Service, and they have concluded there is a sufficient basis to bring charges. We have thus independently concluded that there is enough evidence to bring charges against two Russian nationals for the following crimes: the conspiracy to murder Sergei Skripal; the attempted murder of Sergei and Yulia Skripal and Detective Sergeant Nick Bailey; the use and possession of Novichok; and causing grievous bodily harm with intent to Yulia Skripal and Nick Bailey…. The evidence reveals the following. It shows the arrival of two individuals traveling under the names of… Read more »
This is not evidence, it is entirely circumstantial. Since when does anyone these days trust “thorough” analysis of any sort by the government of any stripe.
Covid – no.
Global warming – no
Immigration control – no
and so on.
The Mail did not ‘reveal’ that Starmer edited the human rights manual, the Lotus Eaters podcast did, some weeks ago. At length.
Its been a long time in the planning….
“Eco tycoon urges Miliband to subsidise North Sea oil and gas” – Dale Vince has called on ministers to put fossil fuels “on an equal footing with renewables”
Two ways to do this, give subsidies to fossil fuels to match renewables or remove subsidies from renewables and tax them equally to fossil fuels, guess which one Vince wants?…anything but removing subsidies from renewables! What does that make absolutely clear about renewables? They cannot compete with fossil fuels! Ergo, they cannot replace them!
My name is Mercury! Mercury is made angry because another person says things that it doesn’t agree with. how does this person survive? how cosseted, and weak is it that it becomes angry because other people will not pander too and agree with its views, and because this is the case they are the person who is then a victim.
What have we done as a civilisation to have allowed and fostered this degree of narccissm
Quite so. As you do, I blame his parents and educators; he has been brought up to believe his feelings are so important that nobody should be allowed to express a view he disagrees because that upsets him. Sadly there are far too many like him.
It’s because facts and common sense are genuine threats to their already fragile ideology, and they would rather see their critics eliminated than even slightly question their own beliefs.
I for one have a lot of people that I strongly disagree with on my hate list, however I do not wish them to suffer any physical harm because of that and if such thing would happen I’d take a step back and seriously reconsider whether I’m still on the good side.
“Why Charlie Kirk’s assassination matters for all of us” And the very next day after the brave American Patriot Charlie Kirk was assassinated… ..the brave Brazilian Patriot Jair Bolsonaro was sentenced to 27 years in prison by THREE JUDGES, all appointed by Evil Marxist Lula: Carmen Lucia, Flavio Dino & Cristiano Zanin, THE PERSONAL LAWYER OF MARXIST DICTATOR LULA. Of the panel of five judges, only one honourably voted to acquit former President Bolsonaro: the Jewish-Romanian Justice Luiz Fux appointed by Marxist Dilma. The fifth judge, who pretended to abstain, so as not to make his corruption too obvious, is of course Marxist Lula’s Notorious Collaborator Alexandre de Moraes, who has been hounding Bolsonaro and his family for years, like some kind of Obsessed Demonic Stalker. As one public commenter said, the Communists pulled a coup, then falsely accused the Patriots of trying to pull a coup, so that they could throw The People’s President Bolsonaro in prison, hoping he will die there, after they tried to assassinate him, as their fellow Leftists in America assassinated Charlie Kirk. Please have a look at what I think is the best summary of the whole situation: Men Of The West: We Are… Read more »
“The killing of Charlie Kirk is an assault on America itself” – This is America’s Charlie Hebdo moment, says Brendan O’Neill in the Spectator.” Brendan O’Neill is right to compare this with Charlie Hebdo, because of Charlie Kirk’s recent post on X before he was slain: “Islam is the sword the Left are using to slit the throat of America.” Some US military experts are pouring scorn on the suggestion that this was a professional hit by a militarily-trained sniper, because they said snipers are trained to aim at the whole head, especially in long-distance shots like this one, so this shot through the throat was a blunder by an amateur, like the scrawny specimen the authorities are claiming is the shooter, who fired only one shot at Charlie Kirk, in contrast to the seven shots fired at President Trump in that assassination attempt. But the experts are forgetting Charlie’s quote about Islam slitting the throat of America. Some suggest that the shooter was a professional hitman who aimed for Charlie’s throat to teach him and Americans a “lesson”, killing him in the same way that halal/kosher animal sacrifices are butchered, and left to slowly choke to death on their own blood while… Read more »