The Murder of Iryna Zarutska and the Pathological Race Ideology of the American Progressive Establishment
I have finally returned to blogging. In fact, I returned on Tuesday, with the firm intention of writing about Friedrich Merz’s spiralling political problems and the collapse of the French government, but I can’t bring myself to write about those things right now. I have to get something else out of my system first, and this something else is about the murder of that young woman in Charlotte, North Carolina, and the lies the media tell about black crime in the United States. I’m sorry if this post pisses people off, but these are true things that I have to say and I’m going to say them.
As everyone knows, Iryna Zarutska fled the war in Ukraine with much of her immediate family, entering the United States in August 2022. Exactly three years later, on August 22nd 2025, Zarutska was riding the train home from her job at a pizzeria when a 34 year-old black man with an extensive criminal history and at least 14 prior arrests named Decarlos Dejuan Brown Jr. slashed her neck with a knife.
Zarutska died within seconds, and security footage captured the murder.
That video emerged last Friday and it has inspired a wave of outrage about the dubious, liberal approach to criminal justice that prevails in many US cities. Most of this outrage has been expressed on social media. The American establishment press first tried to ignore this story. It suppressed it so thoroughly that, as of Monday anyway, the average German on a totally different continent was probably better informed about this murder.
Of course, blunt suppression becomes self-defeating before too long. Late on Monday, everybody’s favourite paper of record, the New York Times, finally relented, deigning to inform its readers not that a crazy violent black man had killed a young Ukrainian refugee in Charlotte, but that “a gruesome murder in North Carolina [has] ignite[d] a firestorm on the Right”.
The article is typical of establishment coverage, which is to say that it is extremely bad. Beyond the opening paragraphs, its authors hardly mention Zarutska at all. They are far more interested in the “troubled history” of her killer, assuring us that Brown is “mentally ill”, that according to his mother he has schizophrenia, and that he was homeless. The excuses laced throughout all of this are so loud it is hard to call them implicit.
Then we get to the statistical deceptions. The New York Times wants you to believe that crime isn’t a problem in Charlotte specifically or in the United States more generally, because it is in decline:
In Charlotte, overall crime was down by 8% in the first half of this year compared with the same period last year, according to the police, while violent crime was down by 25%. …
Today, Mr. Trump’s critics fear that he will use the death of Ms Zarutska to justify sending federal troops into American cities, as he has already done in Washington, despite statistics showing a downturn in violent crime nationwide.
You can smell the lie an ocean way. In truth, however the statistics might be trending at the moment, the United States has wildly high crime numbers compared to many other Western nations. And the Charlotte homicide rate hit a three-year high in 2024, surpassed in recent history only by the extremely violent Summer of Floyd in 2020. In 2025, city homicides have so far slipped back towards the mean, but they’re still hovering between nine and 12 per 100,000 residents. For comparison, that is at least 11 times higher than the German homicide rate. These are eye-watering numbers.
And as if all of that weren’t enough, our eminently progressive authors towards the end of their piece just have to squeeze in a gratuitous reference to a “white supremacist uprising in Wilmington, NC, in 1898, in which at least 60 black men were killed”. The ugly if plausibly deniable subtext is that it’s white people’s fault Zarutska got stabbed on the train. If only all that 19th-century racism hadn’t happened, the poor girl might still be alive.
Coverage like this is not just bad; it is openly deranged, particularly given the histrionic tendencies we invariably see whenever the races are reversed. In 2020, the New York Times and the rest of the Anglophone establishment lost their collective minds over the death of an unarmed man (allegedly!) at the hands of the police – something that happens about two dozen times a year in a country of 340 million people. Approximately the same number of Americans are killed every year in freak air rifle accidents. Zartuska’s murder is far more frequent occurrence, and the press hopes only to bury it.
What we are seeing here is an ideological and also a psychological reaction to a very dark truth at the heart of American society. This truth is that the American black population commits violent crimes at rates that are so high, many Ukrainian refugees would be safer staying home than fleeing to certain US cities.
Consider this: aside from Mariupol, the war in Ukraine has directly caused around 11 civilian deaths per 100,000 people every year since the Russian invasion in 2022. That is less than the intentional homicide rate of the city where Zarutska was murdered in August. (The total intentional homicide rate in Ukraine right now – war deaths plus civilian homicides – is hard to work out, because statistics are no longer being published since the invasion. Prior to February 2022, Ukraine had an intention homicide rate of nearly four per 100,000. Since the war, various indirect indications suggest it has plummeted dramatically. This is what we would expect, given that much of the young male population has been shipped off to fight, and that many cities are now under an enhanced security regime. It is very likely that Ukraine is more or less equivalent to Charlotte overall in terms of intentional homicide.)

And Charlotte is far from the most dangerous place our young Ukrainian could have fled to. Detroit (32 per 100,000), Baltimore (35 per 100,000), San Juan (37 per 100,000), Memphis (48 per 100,000) and New Orleans (54 per 100,000) are all vastly worse. To put it as bluntly as possible – and with as little racial sensitivity as I dare – the US black population is largely responsible for imposing on many American cities a civilian homicide rate equivalent to or far exceeding that seen in a modern country fighting a war on its own territory.
This fact has made the progressive American political establishment crazy, and it has developed an entire ideological system to avoid confronting this terrible, ruthless reality. Establishment types suppress stories of black violence and desperately promote quite rare and exceptional cases of white-on-black crime to invert the hated truths before them. When they are forced to acknowledge inconvenient stories like Zarutska’s murder, they insist that these are also the fault of white Americans because of things that happened generations ago and for which no living person bears any responsibility. All of this vile excuse-peddling, these blind rehearsals of anti-racist ideological nostrums, and these unceasing, desperate searches for responsible parties and factors beyond the obvious ones – all these are psychological reactions arising from cognitive dissonance, finally sublimated into a quite pathological ideology.
This article originally appeared on Eugyppius’s Substack newsletter. You can subscribe here.

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
these blind rehearsals of anti-racist ideological nostrums
We have to stop using the Left’s lies about itself. The Left is not “anti-racist”. The contemporary Left is deeply and pathologically anti-white.
In amongst all the F-bombs, this guy makes a good case for why he became an ex-Libtard. What sane person with an ounce of compassion and humanity would ever want to be associated with these deranged, hate-filled dementors? As Charlie Kirk said himself: “You can tell a lot about someone by how they act when someone dies.”
https://x.com/HoodedClaw1974/status/1966193565878657303
They are also just racist. Following the accidental death of George Floyd and the subsequent mayhem and destruction the BBC reported the following:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-53024298
Black Lives Matter: Students ‘need support’ over George Floyd death
…Oxford University Black students emotionally affected by the death of George Floyd and its aftermath should be offered leniency by universities, the National Union of Students (NUS) said.
The organisation said the events would have been “traumatic” for students who already experience “systemic racism”.
Nottingham, Loughborough and Oxford are among a growing number of universities offering extenuating circumstances to those who feel their work has suffered.
The NUS said others should do the same.
Extenuating circumstances could mean more time to work on coursework or another attempt at an exam…
While trying to be anti racist it is being racist by assuming black students need more time or even retakes.
Here is another example of white liberals being racist regarding voter identity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yW2LpFkVfYk
Ami Horowitz: How white liberals really view black voters
Absolutely. They pretend to mean well, might even believe it, but their attitudes are patronising.
And what do we have in Britain? Rape Gangs. Predominantly brown skinned Turd Worlders, a large percentage from Ragistan, living a seventh century life on 21st century money that they have taken from their hosts. Summarised like that it seems genuinely unbelievable. Added to which if plod can ever be roused to do the job they are handsomely paid for and nick any of the scumbags it’s our fault as the Heroine of Dundee proved.
Seriously, if we made a novel of current life it would have to be registered under the ‘Science Fiction’ section.
Hmm … 55 minutes ago, a German MdB from the AfD published a text on Facebook which contrasted the media treatment of of the Zatruska murder in the USA with the media treatment of the Ukrainian girl who recently got pushed under a train by a supposedly “mentally ill” rejected asylum seeker in Germany¹. He basically wrote that the American reaction was one of nationwide shock and horror, prominently featured in nation-wide media while there was universal “official silence” in Germany, a focus on protecting the perpetrators while ignoring the victims and – above all – a desire to stop anyone from reporting about the murder to avoid it getting “politically instrumentalized by the far right”. Either something doesn’t hang together here at all. Or the German political establishment is much more fubarred in this respect than anything the USA could possibly offer. ¹ The facts known to me are roughly: The girl got pushed under train by a rejected asylum seeker known to be mentally seriously deranged by the German authorities. Her grandfather had the pleasure to hear her die before the phone call cut off. The same man, in an obviously intoxicated state, later led the German police… Read more »
You may have seen and heard Larry Elder?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98Oz7q7Jtys
[Trailer] Professor Blames ‘White Supremacy’ for Blacks Committing Hate Crimes | Larry Elder
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4BKZSFglD4
Larry Elder on Black Crime
And then there is this gem:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clpIncZXA6c
David Webb to CNN analyst accusing him of white privilege
I partially listened to the CNN clip and it’s sort-of nice but, to be honest, I don’t care very much about American bickering, I just want to be left alone with it. I don’t want this unpleasant black woman to tell me anything about my “white privilege” because legal discrimination against black people existed in the USA until well into the second half of the 20th century and – in typical America-centric fashion – she can’t be arsed to accept that a word outside of it actually exists.
That is, I deny her her assumed “American privilege” to treat all of the world as if it was just a rather unimportant appendix of the USA.
Should be added here: Within days of the murder becoming known as murder, one of the usual demonstrations against “far right extremism” took place in the town where the crime had been committed. This involves speakers from state-financed NGOs supposedly representing “civil society” travelling to the location plus violent “anticapitalist” thugs usually appearing masked and in all-black clothing being transported there from all over Germany in order to hold a very noisy street gathering with a lot of shouting of “antifascist” political slogans.
I can’t help thinking that the purpose of these demonstrations which always occur after such crimes Germany is mainly to make it unmistakeably clear who controls the streets in even in small towns and to frighten residents and relatives of the victim(s) lest they make a nuisance of themselves in public by making “far right” statements like demanding that the perpetrators are brought to justice and that unaccompanied teenage girls should be able to wait for a train to arrive without getting themselves killed by foreign criminals officially required to leave the country except that the authorities couldn’t be arsed to enforce this so far.
The poor father of this murdered girl apparently wasn’t even permitted to attend her funeral due to martial law in Ukraine. Despite being in his 50s, age is but a number when you’re forced into the meat grinder forever war over there. Meanwhile, anyone on social media cannot fail to see the collective madness and innate badness of the Leftard commies+Islamist alliance, and what a contrast to decent, Right-leaning folk. In fact, is it really a case of Left vs Right anymore? I feel we’ve gone past this and it’s an oversimplification. There’ll be loads of these vile, young activist hostiles who probably don’t even vote. Can you call somebody ‘Left wing’ or ‘Right wing’ if they don’t bother to vote or have no interest in politics? Does opposing mass immigration and all things Woke automatically single you out as ‘Right wing? I feel like these are more labels people stick on others as opposed to how they identify themselves; “Message to the left. We want Starmer out. You want Trump dead. We want terrorists hunted down. You support them. Patriots loved Charlie Kirk because he was a family man who stood for free speech. You loved George Floyd, a… Read more »
My theory, impossible to prove as people would not be honest: most people know there is a problem that is not going to go away easily and it’s not to do with “racism”. Some of us admit it publicly or at least to ourselves, others feel uncomfortable with the facts so they effectively stick their fingers in their ears and wish it would go away. Others see it as an opportunity to exploit.
We seem in better shape in the U.K. but doing our best to catch up fast. In the US the best one could hope for is to mitigate the problem by being much tougher on crime across the board- better detection and longer sentences. Of course the US left are going in the opposite direction. Tens of millions of Americans have voted with their feet and moved away from black neighbourhoods and states with lots of blacks in them.
This was a mostly peaceful murder.
“You cannot take any people, of any colour, and exempt them from the requirements of civilization — including work, behavioural standards, personal responsibility and all the other basic things that the clever intelligentsia disdain — without ruinous consequences to them and to society at large”
Thomas Sowell
The BBC — our BBC — had an extended piece on the Ten O’Clock News the other night about the Southport murders — extended but not extended as far as naming him or showing a photograph of him or saying a thing about his origins. He was just “a teenager”.
In Charlotte, overall crime was down by 8% in the first half of this year compared with the same period last year, according to the police, while violent crime was down by 25%.
And what major change happened between H1 2024 and H1 2025?
What is wrong with these people? Why not just tell the truth? only when the truth is presented can a solution be found. Is it because the owners and funders and I have to say the journalists working for the msm enjoy and want more of the violence and so do nothing to stop it but everything to fuel it? why do they do this? Or is it because they are backed by a cult/regime that despises white people and the west and seeks its downfall.
They are also changing the narrative concerning mental illness. Schizophrenia is a potentially dangerous condition if the patient does not take medication. It is a condition found more frequently in those with darker skins.
I think we have to provide secure accommodation to those who do not take medication for the safety of society and themselves.
Instead we fund the kids of wealthier folk in their desire to self harm.
I take the argument that a lot of US cities have higher civilian death rates than Ukraine. Clearly this case was a murder of a white woman by a black man. I can also accept that this example was much less reported than the death of violent criminal George Floyd at the hands of police. For me though, the article falls somewhat because it alleges that the black population of the USA is responsible for most of the murders without actually citing evidence for that. I can well believe it is true, but simply stating that places with a high proportion of black residents have a high murder rate doesn’t mean that its the black people doing all the killing (or even “more” than the whites)