The Existential Crisis Facing Labour

After a disastrous first year in government culminating in Angela Rayner’s ignominious resignation, one might assume that the only way was up for Sir Keir Starmer. In fact, he and his party face a much greater threat than ill-advised financial decisions by the deputy prime minister: barely anyone supports them.

By that, I don’t mean that no one’s going to vote Labour at the next election. There will always be people who back them strategically to ‘keep the Tories out’. And there will always be those who vote based on tradition (working class identities die hard). Indeed, opinion polls tell us that — despite the Government’s abysmal approval ratings — one in five voters still intends to cast a ballot for Starmer’s party.

What I mean is that barely anyone is cheering for them on social media and in the newspapers. There’s no group of energetic activists they can rely on to defend their policies and promote their message. It’s worse than that: most Left-wing influencers are highly critical of Labour.

There are two reasons for this: one less important and one more. The less important reason is that Starmer was seen as pandering to the ‘far Right’ when he referred to “an island of strangers” in his immigration speech back in May (Enoch Powell having used a similar phrase in his famous ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech). However, the Prime Minister subsequently apologised for this perfectly reasonable utterance and managed to achieve some measure of damage control.

The far more important reason is Gaza. Since getting into office, Starmer has pursued a policy wildly out of touch with the views of most Left-wing activists. Again, I don’t mean voters. I’m talking about the sorts of people who shape public opinion — influencers, journalists and campaigners.

Although there are no surveys of Left-wing activists per se, there are surveys of Labour party members. (These are the small subset of voters who care enough about politics to actually join a party and try to steer it in their preferred direction.) A survey back in June found that 87% of Labour members thought the Government should be more critical of Israel, and 84% thought it should impose sanctions on the country. To date, the Government has applied a few token sanctions — though nothing remotely on the scale of sanctions against Iran or Russia.

Another survey of Labour members found that 71% thought the Government was wrong to ban Palestine Action, with only 21% taking the opposite view. In fact, it is only among Conservative and Reform voters where a clear majority supports the ban. Ironically then, that decision by Starmer was strongly opposed by his party’s own members but was actually supported by most people on the Right. You can see why Left-wingers might be slightly indignant.

Further evidence of Labour’s disconnect with its activist class can be found on X, where popular influencers like Owen Jones regularly accuse the Government of complicity in genocide. In fact, almost every tweet about Gaza by the Prime Minister or his now-reshuffled foreign secretary is littered with replies from Left-wing accounts saying things like “you’re going to The Hague”. Not exactly ideal from a PR standpoint.

Contrast this with tweets by Nigel Farage, where the comments are overwhelmingly positive. Right-wing activists are largely with Reform.

Even Led by Donkeys, an organisation that spent years moaning about Brexit and going after politicians like Farage, has turned on Labour. One of its latest stunts involved hanging a huge banner depicting destruction in Gaza opposite Labour HQ. The caption read: “Protesting this isn’t terrorism.”

Starmer is presumably hoping that by the time of the next election, Left-wing campaigners will have forgotten about the war. But I wouldn’t bet on it. With activist energy focused on the Greens, Jeremy Corbyn’s new party and the SNP in Scotland, Labour’s performance could prove even more dismal than current polls suggest.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

24 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DiscoveredJoys
DiscoveredJoys
7 months ago

Starmer is presumably hoping that by the time of the next election, Left-wing campaigners will have forgotten about the war.

Perhaps his legal training (and his nature) mean that he sees the world around him as a set of cases or particular circumstances that are ‘decided’ and then can be left behind? He is probably astounded that people can keep bring up and revisiting ‘decided’ issues.

In which case his wish that ‘the war’ will be forgotten will be dashed. There are too many people outside his control that hold deeply held beliefs for the ‘the war’ to be ‘decided’ any time soon. Even if a truce were to be established, it would still be breached – at least if history is any guide.

Now repeat that disappointment for group-based child sexual exploitation, illegal immigration, inheritance taxes, welfare benefits, activist action by various groups, and his own supporters wanting wildly different things. None of this is going to be ‘decided forever’ any time soon.

Marcus Aurelius knew
7 months ago
Reply to  DiscoveredJoys

Starmer is the boring lad who did well at his A Levels but is only now coming to realise that the whole world does not work like school, and that he is a shit headmaster anyway.

Old Arellian
Old Arellian
7 months ago

I wonder how the new Ofsted inspection would “grade” him and his useless band of deplorables aka the Cabinet?

FerdIII
7 months ago

Labour is just a globalist uniparty dissinformation cult. The population at large are uninterested in endless war, open borders, green nazism, trans-fascism, queer-fascism and anti-reality programs. Their cousins the Demon party are dead. That is Labour’s fate. Reality bites and bites asshats hard.

Jeff Chambers
Jeff Chambers
7 months ago

This is the last “Labour” government. And this is because the Anti-white Party is motivated a profound anger and hatred for the people of our country – except those designated “victims of wicked whitie” – which in turn derives from a profound dislike of reality.

JXB
JXB
7 months ago
Reply to  Jeff Chambers

You could be right. The Blairites reasoned that a Labour Party in the old mould, after 17 years in opposition, could not win a General Election, particularly as it spectacularly missed an open goal in the post-Thatcher GE, as England was mostly conservative, and most of Labour’s support was in Scotland and Wales which yielded few seats. So they decided to reform Labour to make it more “Thatcherite”, and created New Labour – a deceit. They then created devolution for Wales and Scotland whose assemblies they expected to control, so even if they were not in National Government, Socialism could still infest part of the Country and govern and fight Conservatism. Well that last cunning plan backfired when Scottish and Welsh nationalist Parties took control. Now old, old Labour is back, it’s the 1970s all over again. The British electorate most of whom were not alive during the 1970s, now know that Labour isn’t the moderate (at least on the surface) New Labour which many experienced, but a ghastly, destructive horror. Given that Reform UK has replaced the Conservative Party as the party of conservatism (the working class always have been social conservatives), and support for Labour minimal in Wales… Read more »

transmissionofflame
7 months ago

It has certainly been disastrous for the country. Most of their MPs will lose their seats but most will fall on their feet, especially the senior leadership. Much like the Sunak government before it, they didn’t seem to have much interest in getting re-elected – just a bridge burning exercise.

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
7 months ago

I’m afraid I agree that banning Palestine Action was wrong.

Not sure whether it was a 4D chess move or just the usual knee kerk expediency and incompetence, but it was a mistake.

Marcus Aurelius knew
7 months ago
Reply to  Jack the dog

Agreed

john ball
john ball
7 months ago
Reply to  Jack the dog

No doubt it was banned to distract from the failure to guard the airfields, sufficient legislation to prosecute already, but maybe it should be banned anyway together with the IRGC, and the hate marches should have been stopped 23 months ago as suggested by Richard Tice (see below). The MSM/BBC will twist things anyway to give support to those supporting Ham–. So no coverage in MSM/BBC (despite it passing by on the way to Parliament Sq.) of the huge 70,000 strong march on Sunday (despite the tube strike) organised by the Campaign Against Anti Semi—-. Huge participation from non-J—s including the 2 couples we mainly talked to, one of which had come from the N.Midlands. Excellent speeches (all on Utube ) from the organiser for CAAS, the Chief Rabbi, a brave 20 year old girl student at Kings College; and especially Chris Phelp, shadow Home Sec (who had previously not impressed me when trying to be my local MP) and Richard Tice. The Govt./Labour Party shamefully declined the invitation.

transmissionofflame
7 months ago
Reply to  Jack the dog

I certainly don’t think expressing support for them should be criminal, because I believe in freedom of speech. As for “banning” the organisation, which seemed to be organising expensive and dangerous sabotage of military targets, I have less strong feelings, though tend to think that existing laws against what they did and planned to do would have been sufficient.

JXB
JXB
7 months ago

Freedom of speech is limited under the principle of Common Law that says it cannot be used to incite hatred and violence.

Freedom of speech confers no freedom to engage in actions and threats which cause harm to others, damage property, interfere with other peoples’ Rights to go about their lawful activities, not to live in fear, or be intimidated, threatened, or be caused a nuisance.

Any organisation which exists to do the above – that’s organised criminal activity – should nit only be banned but its adherents locked up.

However, seeds only germinate and grow in fertile soil, and but for the politics of the last three decades, such an organisation would not exist in the first place.

Footnote: the IRA was banned in the Republic of Ireland but not in the UK. It was even given the opportunity to win seats in Parliament (Sinn Fein) and given taxpayer money to fund its political effort.

We must have been mad.

transmissionofflame
7 months ago
Reply to  JXB

Who defines all of these things? Who would you trust to define them?

In the US I do not believe it is illegal to express support for a “terrorist organisation” – only to provide them with material assistance. The US does not seem to have been overwhelmed with terrorists.

If you believe Palestine Action to be a reprehensible organisation (I probably agree) then surely it’s useful for us to know how many people support it, and for those people to express that so that we can all know the reality of the situation and make our minds up as to what we think.

MadWolf303
MadWolf303
7 months ago

Ununiformed trespassers on a military site, can be shot on sight and should have been.

transmissionofflame
7 months ago
Reply to  MadWolf303

I wouldn’t necessarily disagree with that

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
7 months ago

Exactly.

DiscoveredJoys
DiscoveredJoys
7 months ago

Ah… but it presented an opportunity for The Powers That Be to exert totalitarian control over people whose opinions they dislike.

Perhaps there is a spiteful streak of authoritarianism in Socialist/Globalist organisations which looks to punish wrongthink and then goes on to search out fresh wrongthink?

Norfolk-Sceptic
Norfolk-Sceptic
7 months ago
Reply to  Jack the dog

Protesting this isn’t terrorism”

Dreadful !

It should be:

Protesting against this isn’t terrorism

It does hint from where the funding originates.

JXB
JXB
7 months ago

Socialist doing what Socialist do, when they have nobody else to fight they fight each other.

JeremyP99
7 months ago

“The Existential Crisis Facing Labour” IS … Starmer.

Serve them right.

MadWolf303
MadWolf303
7 months ago

Jeeeeez louise ….has the author ever considered that even the dumb as a stump 2TK, might have done a head count of those Owen Jones types and found he only needed one hand……

Purpleone
7 months ago

He seems to be looking more and more like a confused Desperate Dan by the day…

RTSC
RTSC
7 months ago

Even previously reliable left-wing journalists in the MSM are consistently sticking the knife into Two-Tier and his Cabinet Rabble.

They know that the electoral juggernaut being led by Farage has Labour in its headlights and is going to flatten it as comprehensively as it flattened the Not-a-Conservative-Party in 2024.

JeremyP99
7 months ago

Further evidence of Labour’s disconnect with its activist class can be found on Twitter/X, where popular influencers like Owen Jones regularly accuse the government of complicity in genocide. In fact, almost every tweet about Gaza by the prime minister or his now-reshuffled foreign secretary is littered with replies from Left-wing accounts saying things like “you’re going to The Hague””

Well, he is, thanks to the people of the Chagos Island

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/09/09/starmer-chagos-islands-deal-international-criminal-court/