Tube Strikes Unleash “Pure Carnage” on London as Drivers on £72K a Year Demand More Money, a Four-Day Week and 75% Off All Rail Travel
London is facing “pure carnage” today as striking Tube drivers on £72,000 a year bring the capital to a standstill demanding more money, a four-day week and 75% discounts on train journeys nationwide. The Mail has more.
Members of the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union today began their five-day strike, leaving commuters facing days of travel mayhem with little or no service on all of the Tube as different parts of the union walk out on different days.
Hard-pressed Brits faced scenes of chaos this morning as the London Underground network was paralysed, bus drivers turned away passengers and motorists and cyclists faced crippling lane closures.
The Elizabeth Line and the Overground – the only two lines running as normal – have been completely overwhelmed, with queues forming out of the station exits.
Images throughout London this morning show closed off entrances to stations and mammoth queues at bus stops as millions of British workers look to fight tooth and nail to make their way into the city.
The strike has been exacerbated by lane closures, with commuters stuck in gridlocks through parts of central London including on roads around Kings Cross St Pancras – ironically where drivers are on the picket line.
Many looking for alternative ways to work have been unable to order Ubers – or face surged pricing – while hire bikes have been snapped up in seconds.
As hard-working Londoners were unable to get across the capital, Labour’s Liverpool Riverside MP Kim Johnson said she stood in “solidarity” with the RMT, adding: “No worker should be put at risk by fatigue and extreme shift rotations – power in a union, always!”
Striking Tube workers are demanding a boost to their pay packets despite already being on £72,000 per year – as well as a reduction from a 35 hour working week to a four-day, 32-hour system.
They are also asking for a 75% discount on all rail travel, despite already receiving benefits which entitle their loved ones to free travel across the entire London public transport system.
It is believed any moves to meet the RMT’s demands would cost around £200million – and that is before the huge discount on rail travel is even considered.
TfL, which has since tabled a 3.4% pay rise offer to the union’s members, said reducing working hours would be “simply unaffordable” – adding today that it was “bitterly disappointed” with the RMT’s decision.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Those who missed the 1970s are about to see a replay. It was not much fun then but at least the music was much better.
Agreed, though I have the occasional shudder over some of the fashion choices. Revising by candlelight for A levels wasn’t much fun.
Not looking forward to the inevitable power cuts. Hoping some enterprising manufacture, (that has not yet emigrated,) can revise the Soviet era device that produced electricity from an oil lamp. https://swling.com/blog/2020/05/soviet-era-kerosene-lamp-generator-gives-new-meaning-to-lets-fire-up-the-radio/
A case of déjà-poo.
Full steam ahead into a tribute to the 1970’s winter of discontent. Or should we name this version the Winter of disconnect.
“Pure Khanage”, surely?
I’m a software developer (Linux) with a little less than 25 years of experience working in the industry and I’d consider myself lucky if I could find a job (my nominal employer is de facto bankrupt) which would pay £45,000/ year.
These guys have “from the cradle to the grave” (so to say) job security, get £27,000/year more than that and already work less than I ever had to (nominally 37½ hours/ week, in practice, always +40 hours).
That’s not working class but absolutely “also working” aristocracy. And they still can’t get enough. I suggest the Labour party adopts a new motto: For the exceedingly few, f***k the many!
£72 K a year – work maybe 7 hours x 5 days. Plus we have that defined benefit pension….so in reality they are getting over £100 K year. When they retire at say age 55 or so, they have guaranteed £30 K a year….few of us have that kind of security.
RW, you should be getting more than £45K a year.
Seconded
All kinds of things should happen. While I’m pretty good at programming computers, I absolutely suck at getting people to do anything or to convince them of anything. Which means that £45K/year would be £45K/year more than nothing, a situation I expect to continue for months (4½ so far), if not years.
Thankfully, my savings will last for a while, although certainly not until my death unless I’m unusually unlucky (or lucky — that’s a bit difficult to decide).
I wish you well pal, sounds a difficult situation.
Thanks.
Agreed. Earnings are important, but what you KEEP is much more important!
I have no idea what you believe to be agreeing with. I earn nothing and consequently, keep nothing. The usual outcome of me applying for a job is so far either
Early on, I had exactly two three-stage interviews which seemed to go well but then ended up in the indicated way for a reason unknown to me. But generally, I’m stuck that the “some HR person decides that this certainly isn’t worth bothering anybody higher up the food chain for a reason he/she doesn’t deem necessary to communicate” stage. As remarkable oddity, a few people called for no other apparent reason than to tell me that they’d never hire someone living in Reading.
In theory, I’m highly experienced, talented and motivated and should easily get a salary in the region of what I used to earn (about $100K). In practice, ability above average is simply surplus to requirements and usually not believed in, anyway (as far as I can tell).
About time HGV drivers had a rise then. I drove artics to 44 tons for decades. You have to steer them, and reverse them into impossible places. Thick fog at night is no joke either, nor is snow and ice. Unsociable hours, no decent facilities, low pay. No wonder we are at least 60,000 drivers short.
I accept that railway vehicles like trains need to take weight and inertia into account. But every class of vehicle from scooters to supertankers need an understanding of dynamics. But railways are one dimensional – keep to the speed limits and follow the signalling and stay awake and the train stays where it should be,on the rails. I don’t get the status of traincrew.
And they can be replaced by automated trains.
I was in Lyon a couple of weeks ago. Metro has no drivers. I am sure there are some human eyes on the situation, but I didn’t see a single pair anywhere. Which was a bit of a pain when I needed help to understand the ticketing system at the southern end of the green line in Vénissieux. Anyway, it explained itself, sort of, and the whole experience was otherwise a breeze. Lyon is fantastic, too. Particularly the Roman remains and the wonderful architecture of the museum there, appropriately named Lugdunum.
London seems to be the seat of most of the unrest in this country. There is a growing divergence between the capital and the regions.
Reform should plan a programme of decentalisation of government and introduce disincentives for businesses to locate there, matched by communications and transport..
There are many advantages of distributed systems rather than hub and spoke models, resilience and speed of response being a couple of them.
London does seem to have become a cesspit.
Not wishing to name names but cities, like fishes rot from the head.
I would say that they should invest about £1 billion and automate the whole system. (Can’t be that difficult with AI. I suspect some model rail layouts are nearly as complicated.) The problem is, with TFL, the cost would balloon to £10 billion and still need even more drivers.
I think on the Victoria line at least, the drivers just open the doors. On the core of the Thameslink route between St Pancras and Blackfriars I think everything is automated. Trains every couple of minutes. Drivers are really just a backup.
Thameslink trains can run on most of the network automatically.
Docklands Light Railway
And it seems drivers aren’t even a backup anymore. Seem to be more about getting our backs up.
Tokyo underground became driverless 30 years ago. It’s high time we did the same.
Yes, but leave “AI” out of it…. recipe for disaster, mark my words.
They should take a good look at themselves in the mirror!
What really ranks is asking for even more money, then not wanting to pay for their own travel!
They should counter the union tactic of having different parts walk out by announcing the network is closed down and everyone is laid off without pay.
I wonder if we could get somebody to print placard passengers can hold up when trains come in saying ‘Greedy bastard drivers’.