The ‘Feminist’ Open Letter Which Tells British Women to Shut Up and Get Raped – Just so Long as the One Doing the Raping Happens to be an Immigrant
There are some really serious acts of gender-based violence being committed against women in Great Britain today. Take the horrendous case of Paloma Faith, who appears to be both some kind of singer, and some kind of self-appointed campaigner for women’s rights. In her tell-all memoir, released last year, Paloma revealed an appalling example of abuse at the hands of a fellow celebrity judging panellist on TV caterwauling contest The Voice UK, who violently raped her, live on television, before an applauding audience of millions and millions of evil sexist white men.
Oh no, wait, that’s not what happened at all: actually, the unnamed judge (seemingly the notoriously toxically masculine Boy George) just made a joke about Paloma acting like she was suffering from PMT. At this point, so incredibly distressed was the completely rational and unemotional, utterly empowered, independent, vibrant and sassy woman, that “I ran off stage, to the toilets, and blacked out. I don’t actually have a recollection of any of it until I came to on the floor with my then-PA’s hands cupping my face… Apparently I was shouting something like, ‘My fucking father’ over and over again… and sort of convulsing.” I’d hate to see how Paloma might have reacted if she was actually on her period at this point.
To read the rest of this article, you need to donate at least £5/month or £50/year to the Daily Sceptic, then create an account on this website. The easiest way to create an account after you’ve made a donation is to click on the ‘Log In’ button on the main menu bar, click ‘Register’ underneath the sign-in box, then create an account, making sure you enter the same email address as the one you used when making a donation. Once you’re logged in, you can then read all our paywalled content, including this article. Being a Donor will also entitle you to comment below the line and access the premium content in the Sceptic, our weekly podcast. A one-off donation of at least £5 will also entitle you to the same benefits for one month. You can donate here.
There are more details about how to create an account, and a number of things you can try if you’re already a donor – and have an account – but cannot access the above perks on our Premium page.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Those signalling their virtue and named here should read this and reflect on their actions
I doubt they will. They are too wrapped up in ideological zealotry to be able to reason, I have come to the conclusion that lefties are entirely incapable of accepting anything that is even slightly outside their ideological viewpoint. I think the reason is that to give any ground whatsoever will force them into thinking about their own sanity. Let’s face it, mad people don’t know they are mad.
Many years ago societies had ways of dealing with people who turned against and endangered their own kind.
I doubt they will either unfortunately
Good piece and marginally shorter than usual from this author. These virtue signalling well heeled elites live in another world to us and should be ignored publicly, which is, of course, a death knell for them.
Morning Campers , my God we are in “deep deep do do” !
Unbelievable isn’t it. The elite at open war with society, quite obvious that the Corona plandemic-coup was just one part of this war – gender fascism, trans fascism, net zero, white/English racism and open borders are other fronts in this war.
Ugly women saying if Ahmed or Wankala Walala rape women (white only please) that is okay?
“impeccable human rape-repellents as Diane Abbott, Charlotte Church, Zara Sultana and Shami Chakrabarti, and coordinated by the Left-wing pressure group Stand Up To Racism (SUTR)”
In the Middle Ages a violent revolution would long have ago have transpired. In apathetic Britain, as we saw with Rona, 80% are asleep if not brain dead.
The lefty virtue-signallers should be forced to study Statistics and the Law of Probability ….. until they understand it.
That could take quite a time.
Probability is the likeliness that a random selection experiment will have a certain outcome. It’s nowhere involved here.
To be a bit more precise: For a given case, if someone were randomly selecting members from the group of all Afghans living in the UK, the relative frequency of sex criminals among this group would be the probability of having selected one.
But this never happens in practice.
Has it occurred to anyone that our law is becoming remarkably like the Mediaeval Sharia? You are judged according to your background.
Spooky.
The women who are writing these letters are the same elite luxury belief set who were part of the Metoo hysteria, priveliged, educated and relatively wealthy. They couldn’t care less about the white working class children, raped, tortured and killed in some cases by the mostly Pakistani rape gangs, they couldn’t care less about the girls abused by Migrants near the Government funded hotels. You see these girls probably deserve it, they are no doubt part of the Far right family and as such are not as good, kind and virtuous as these very nice ladies in politics, the media and light entertainment.
Their children will never be bothered by these men, because they are fortunate to live in their ivory towers above it all. Perhaps they would benefit from a few months in Rotherham, Telford or other areas where these communities of “nice men” inhabit.
I think one has to consider the possibility that many women not only don’t mind all this immigration but welcome it. At least in principle and notwithstandibg that it can backfire a bit. The fact is most immigrants are young men.
Put in a different way, if 90% of immigration were young women between the age of 20 and 30, I think many men would regard immigration in a more positive way.
That is ridiculous.
Not ridiculous at all.
But I’m not surprised at the negative response to this idea. Modern society has so detached itself from reality and is so at odds with human nature that we’ve begun to forget the impact of our nature.
Modern discourse on human nature is almost entirely about how it should be rather than how it really is to the point where too many of us no longer distinguish between the two.
Anyone who thinks that male and female behaviour isn’t driven in a very significant way, consciously or subconsciously, by reproductive instinct has basically lost touch with reality.
I think your observations have a good deal of truth to them. I guess the question is, what to do about it. People seem to find it divisive. Ultimately we have to win the battle of ideas.
It’s a good question to which I don’t have a good answer.
What I do believe quite firmly is that observing reality and acknowledging it generally pays off eventually. Even if it’s initially annoying or as you say divisive.
I’m not sure it’s healthy to have to tiptoe around and issue or even avoid it altogether just because some people are going to get very angry or offended by it, if the points are valid and reasonable.
I mean, all I’ve said is that both men and women prefer a bigger pool of potential mating partners and may even be willing to act on that in ways that aren’t necessarily good for society at large in other ways.
Is that really so divisive? If it is, why so?
As some commentators of the Kennedy appearance before congress observed, you know you’re over the target when you start getting a lot of flak.
I agree. I guess when I said it was divisive I was mainly thinking about your observation regarding women being involved in politics or something along those lines. I think we are best off with a balance of masculine and feminine ideas and behaviours- for want of better terms – but bear in mind that those things are not the exclusive province of the respective sexes.
You are the one at odds with human nature. Or else you need new glasses.
Please explain.
Come on Stewart. !
I wouldn’t be surprised if Paloma Faith has no idea about any of this stuff and is just “standing up to racism” at the behest of her PR/management agency, (which will be infested with the usual conditioned liberal arts graduates).
Otherwise, she’s even more stupid than she already appears. Like Ellie Goulding.
When anti-whitists and anglophobes are openly prepared to sacrifice white women and girls to the invaders, we’re not witnessing virtue signalling gone wrong. What we’re witnessing is degeneracy signalling.
Scott Adams has a theory that many women (more so than men) are in favour of unrestricted immigration because most of the migrants are young men and so it increases the mating pool for women. And men are more likely to be against it for the same reason.
It’s an interesting theory.
Perhaps coincidentally, perhaps not, laxity around immigration seems seems to track the increase over time in the number of wonen in parliament and in senior government and establishment positions.
I’m not convinced by that at all. Surely illegal immigration would only increase the mating pool of very low-status males.
I’m not sure about very low status. Sure, initially socially low status here. But in some ways, not so low status. The kind of men who have the drive and audacity to undergo the brutal process of emigrating illegally to Europe and the UK aren’t exactly weak, feeble humans. The weak and feeble ones are the ones that have no options in their own countries and still stay behind.
But in any case there are also lots of low status women here who struggle to find mating partners and are more than happy to have more potential options.
Just to say, there are thousands of men who take trips to third world countries to get brides. It’s an industry. For women, immigration could be seen as a potential home delivery service.
I’m not sure why one would assume that women are potentially any less interested in young foreign mating partners than men would be.
Cough…aren’t the majority of illegals alleged to be skilled professionals – or wannabes – who will enhance our country and society?
I would like to add the observation that Ukrainian refugees welcomed here seem to be mainly women and children, not so sure about the male/female mix of Hong Kong Chinese.
Young single men of fighting age from war zones are going to be moved from hotels to army barracks. Is the next step uniforms and weapons? Are UK troops going to be deployed in Ukraine? Is that why the barracks accommodation will become available?
It seems odd there are so many rapes of girls and women when we seem to hear that the justification for asylum is so often the claimed gay status of the illegal immigrant.
Something doesn’t add up.
“There is no evidence that people seeking refuge are more likely to commit acts of sexual violence. ” Surely the most idiotic of all the luxury beliefs.
Well, actually, there is no such evidence. All which exists is historical data showing that they’ve committed such crimes at a higher rate than the native population in the past. But this means the rate of people who commit sex crimes is higher among certain groups and not that individual members are more likely to commit such crimes.
That’s an important distinction: The mere act of dividing one number by another number does not yield a probability, just a quotient.
“Blaming The Victims
1 Comment / Comment / By Frankhaviland”
https://thenewconservative.co.uk/blaming-the-victims/#:~:text=Blaming%20The%20Victims,/%20By%20Frankhaviland
An excellent piece by the brilliant Frank Haviland.
Until Muslims actually treat all women as equals, we should refuse to have any further discussions, or dealings with them.
Seconded.
And when muslims accept women as equals they can be exported from whence they came in order to shed enlightenment.
No. Only the second part of your statement is valid:
“We should refuse to have any further discussions, or dealings with them.”
There. Fixed it.
Ah, so that’s what the ‘Who’s Who’ of ignorant Far Left whores was all about.
‘I should make it clear Paloma Faith does not literally approve of Mohamed Iidow’s actions; I doubt she even knows who he is.’
And therein lies the rub. In my opinion, few if any of these facile, virtue signalling idiots have any real understanding of exactly what they are supporting. Trapped in the vacuum of the celebrity world of phoney, performative empathy for whatever ‘victim’ they’ve had, dangled in front of them like a shiny object. They’ve completely forgotten what it is for working families to live in the absolute lack of social justice Britain has become.
I am a feminist and will be till my dying day but I am painfully aware how very stupid – dangerously so – many so-called feminists are. I used to admire Germaine Greer until she condoned rape within marriage and FGM – the latter once again tediously on the grounds of ‘cultural differences’. If a culture is clearly barbaric and deeply misogynistic it has no place in a civilised society and should be unceremoniously booted out. The problems within the feminist movement began almost immediately when the early leaders aligned themselves with the hard left – countless workshops on how feminism fitted in with Marxism were held in the 70s and 80s. Ad nauseum! Now the only feminists I have anything in common with are common sense feminists like Christina Hoff Summers of The Rational Feminist, J K Rowling, Julie Bindel and all the other women who know the trans movement is just a trojan horse for male sexual predators to invade women only safe spaces. I have lived in Islamic societies and I know how the women are treated in them. They are barbaric and backward in their attitudes and values. All the people who are signing these letters… Read more »
Great post.