Middle England is Becoming Poor

Something interesting is happening shopping-wise across middle-class Generation X (those in their 40s and 50s). Instead of graduating like their parents to shopping at The House of Bruar or OKA, they have discovered Vinted, TikTok Shop, Aldi and even Cash Converters as more economically useful ways of buying stuff. Some might call it a sign of the ongoing immiseration of the middle classes, others may welcome the middle-classes finally living sustainably like those with less money. Whatever reaction, Rach from Accounts will find growth even more elusive if the middle-aged middle classes are no longer choosing to buy – or are unable to buy – expensive or even moderately priced things. As Rachel Long has observed in the Washington Post, the US economy is ever more reliant on top – not middle-class – earners and it looks as if the same might be happening here.

The middle-aged Investor Relations researcher was wearing a beautiful pair of ecru palazzo trousers and a navy top with geometric crochet edging. She would have looked perfect on the Riviera. As it was, we were having dinner in a friend’s farmhouse kitchen. It was impossible not to say: “You look lovely.” When she unexpectedly replied: “It’s all Shein. Top to bottom £14.99,” the conversation was set for the rest of the evening.

This woman, who once shopped at Reiss and Whistles explained: “My daughter was buying bits and pieces from Shein and the TikTok shop so I thought I’d have a look – and wow! If I’d have bought this from the old boutique in town I would have spent over £300.” One by one all the women in their 40s and 50s began sharing things they were wearing that had been bought on Vinted or from charity shops. The men got involved and said, that’s all very well but they wouldn’t be buying any clothes from such places. One wife pointed out that the bottle green Massimo Dutti jacket her husband was wearing, she’d bought for £19.99 from Vinted. Another admitted her husband’s chinos were from Primark as were all of his holiday polo shirts. Someone had bought their son a GShock watch from Cash Converters (£48) to replace a lost one bought from a shop two years previously (£112). One woman trumped everyone else by saying she was eight months in to buying nothing new at all this year.

Incidentally, the ‘old boutique in town’ has been replaced with a charity shop.

Now I know this sounds like a disgustingly complacent slice of Middle England, discovering ‘cheap things’ – welcome to the real-world morons – but Britain’s growth relies in part on Middle England shopping. What if we won’t – or least not in the same way that we used to? The latest Consumer Prices Index rose by 3.1% in the 12 months to June 2025 – is it any wonder that 81% of Gen X have reduced spending?

All of us at dinner – boringly middle-aged, middle-class people trying to do the best for our children – have come under financial strain in the past few years. A dispiriting number of redundancies and mortgage increases (for us, £480 a month rise last summer) have forced wholesale changes in spending habits. And once changed, it’s difficult to return to the expensive arms of John Lewis, when a lovely burnished bronze lamp can be bought from Dunelm for £11.99. As a friend (53) explained: “When my husband was made redundant, I switched from Waitrose to Aldi. After six months, he’d got another job I returned to Waitrose, walked in feeling flush, saw that a punnet of blueberries cost £3.99 compared to Aldi’s £1.79 and walked straight back out again. I will never return to Waitrose (apart from for saffron).” (Don’t be mean about her, she was also working two jobs.)

None of this comes as a surprise to our children, the Gen Zers who are fully onboard with circular fashion (buying and selling on Vinted and Depop) and shopping at charity shops is de rigueur in a way it wasn’t when I was growing up in the late 80s early 90s. It’s estimated over 50% of Gen Zers shop regularly at charity shops; Mintel reports that 25% of the youngest Gen Zs are buying fewer fashion items overall, and growth in the clothing market is expected to remain flat for 2025 thanks to weak consumer confidence and unsurprising cost pressures.

If Gen X are losing the habit of spending significant money on things, and Gen Z is not adopting the habit at all, how will the economy grow?

Perhaps the Chancellor’s growth agenda will begin take effect and Generation X will remember the spending habits of the Boomers who seem to be the only ones now able to afford to shop and lunch in garden centres or John Lewis. Or perhaps this nation of shopkeepers will become an ultimately impoverished nation of jumble sale stall holders.

Subscribe
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

41 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hester
Hester
7 months ago

The reality is that I used to regard myself as comfortably off, a retired Director, worked 40 years with a Pension. The cost of living and level of tax, plus the hikes in council tax, insurance on my home, the cost of utilities and food, means I no longer eat out, I used to go for a Pub meal most weekends, I don’t do that anymore, likewise going to the Pub for a drink, where I live a glass of wine averages at nine pounds and that is not a large glass.
the reality is I and my Partner were what would be classified as comfortably off, but we are now looking at rising costs and taxes and seriously having to restrict and reduce spending. As mentioned we were what Rachel would probably classify as well off, and we are seriously feeling the pinch, so I dread to think how those on middle and low incomes are managing at all.

mickie
mickie
7 months ago
Reply to  Hester

Let’s face it, the country and it’s population are slowly dying in front of our eyes.

robnicholson
robnicholson
7 months ago
Reply to  mickie

That’s for sure…

Miss Haversham
Miss Haversham
7 months ago
Reply to  Hester

I manage to live well on just the state pension but I am probably a disaster for the local economy. But Mrs Thatcher was famously keen on good housekeeping meaning everyone should live within their means. My parents, who went through the war, were also of this opinion. My mother loved to quote Polonius’ advice to Laertes ‘neither a borrower nor a lender be’. I grew up in a make do and mend household. I do not own a car, I use my bus pass. I eat a relatively cheap but healthy diet – don’t smoke, don’t drink, no meat only canned oily fish. I never go on holiday as I live near a beautiful beach and global warming is giving us Mediterranean summers. I never go to the cinema – I have a Netflix subscription. I grew up reading library books. Now I use kindle books – my one extravagance. I only buy clothes in online sales. I am a happy introvert so do not crave company so do not need to go out much except for my daily walk through the woods to the beach which is free. I paid off my mortgage years ago – the upkeep… Read more »

Marcus Aurelius knew
7 months ago

The wealthy are wealthy because they know how to keep their money.

The truly wealthy neither look nor behave in ways that the majority think marks a person as wealthy.

And a little parable about controlling one’s costs – the number one factor behind successfully accumulating wealth…

Two childhood friends meet after many years. One has become a powerful minister to the king. The other is a thin, shabby monk.

Seeking to help his friend, the minister tells him,

“You know, if you could learn to cater to the king, you wouldn’t need to live on rice and beans!”

To which the monk replies,

“You know, if you could learn to live on rice and beans, you wouldn’t need to cater to the king!”

PeterM
PeterM
7 months ago

That was funny; sounds worth looking into. Sounds like younger people are not so bothered about showing off.

huxleypiggles
7 months ago
Reply to  PeterM

I’m a big fan of second hand. Drew Pritchard, on the telly box is a great source of inspiration with his “Salvage Hunters” series.

Bill Bailey
Bill Bailey
7 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Well spare a thought for someone in a hundred years time when they browse an antique shop for a second hand ikea wardrobe because the contemporary stuff is of poor quality!

huxleypiggles
7 months ago
Reply to  Bill Bailey

There won’t be anybody around in 100 years.

Marcus Aurelius knew
7 months ago
Reply to  PeterM

Well, all proper socialists like to make a big deal about how they are not at all materialistic and would never show off, no sir, not at all.

And then other people’s money runs out. Then suddenly they aren’t so keen to say how they don’t like showing off, because suddenly “not showing off” isn’t optional.

Bill Bailey
Bill Bailey
7 months ago

From my experience socialists are simply nasty, greedy self centered people with low ability. They are virtual signalling on things like climate and immigration whilst avoiding ethnics and travelling around without any regard for pollution.

so we are now trapped in a triple lock of the religion of peace, socialists and corporates stakeholder capitalism aka DEI and ESG and any other minority group grudge you can think of It’s a combination that is causing havoc and the western governments bar one are showing no signs of relenting.

We are trapped by low intelligence leaders who think that slogans such as using the word mission and the coalition of the willing whilst millions are being slaughtered because of their inability to understand indivisible security.

Get the body bags ready.

robnicholson
robnicholson
7 months ago
Reply to  PeterM

Hmm… haven’t the status symbols just changed to mobile phones?

huxleypiggles
7 months ago

Logged out again.

Come on H, pass this on to Ian please.

Bill Bailey
Bill Bailey
7 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

It was happening to me. I use Brave so I lowered the shield for this site. I keep it raised for most sites but it is a security risk these days, especially with the threat of state terrorism!

huxleypiggles
7 months ago
Reply to  Bill Bailey

Thanks for the info.

huxleypiggles
7 months ago

I must confess I have over the last few years joined the second-handers. Some of our recent furnishings have come from charity shops and lovely items can be picked up for next to nothing compared to buying new. And I enjoy rummaging in the second hand stores. Same with clothes, jackets and blazers can be had from e-bay for a fraction of the new price. Love it. And Primark? My favourite clothes emporium and I always look well dressed.

Currently circling the used shoe market but sizing is an absolute nightmare and so far no success but I am confident I will find used for a quarter to one third of new or £80 quid against £300 plus. And the fun is in the chase.

Marcus Aurelius knew
7 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

Thing about charity shops is that they’re full of good stuff that has stood the test of time. Call it a pre-selected range.

But shoes, no thanks. If they’re obviously never worn, OK, maybe. But my feet need my shoes. No compromises.

huxleypiggles
7 months ago

Logged out AGAIN

1974seasider
1974seasider
7 months ago

I can afford to go shopping. I just refuse to spend anything when at least 20% goes to the government. I delight in paying cash to my Kurdish barbers and the bloke who repairs my bike. I know they won’t be paying all their taxes and I don’t care.

Marcus Aurelius knew
7 months ago
Reply to  1974seasider

Amen to that.

Bill Bailey
Bill Bailey
7 months ago
Reply to  1974seasider

i share your sentiment but it’s way, way more than 20%. If you take into account employees taxes, both employers and employees taxes, business taxes, and taxes on all other services used to get the product to you, then corporation tax. 50% is an underestimate. Then take into account the black economy which the government are importing every day. So basically you are paying for companies to get cheap labour, which also lowers your income and at the same time you are forced to pay for all the dependent families that are being imported etc etc etc.
So the extreme rich are now so rich that even the middle classes are being wiped out. I did read that the comparison of GDP (PPP) per capita is now lower than it was 100 years ago and taking into account that most families now have two members working.

So the past 100 years if socialism have been a disaster for the working classes and sadly Stasi is making matters worse to such a degree that a decent future is now off the cards.

Norfolk-Sceptic
Norfolk-Sceptic
7 months ago
Reply to  Bill Bailey

50% is an underestimate.”

When government sucks that amount of wealth from the public, no wonder the country is in the state it’s in.

If two neighbours do some decorating, for each other, and pay each other £100 for the labour, how much would be left after all deductions?

It’s why we have DIY.

BevGee
BevGee
7 months ago

“…welcome to the real-world morons” Hope the comma has just been misplaced otherwise my inferiority complex is going to kick in… being a Lidl/charity shop shopper an’ all.

Miss Haversham
Miss Haversham
7 months ago
Reply to  BevGee

You sound like a sensible moron which I know is an oxymoron.

hogsbreath
hogsbreath
7 months ago

The middle class could adopt the Japanese attitude and drastically reduce their spending.

happycake78
happycake78
7 months ago

Just what the globalists want!

RTSC
RTSC
7 months ago

I’m not wealthy, but I am lucky to not be struggling financially. l shop in Lidl for all the basics and Sainsbury for items Lidl which don’t stock. Most of my clothing now comes from charity shops. I only ever buy new when it is heavily discounted.

Ten years ago I downsized and moved west, to smaller and cheaper accommodation in a nice part of rural Dorset and I simplified my life.

I’m now on a mission to deprive this appalling Government of as much of my money as I legally can. Since I don’t pay NI or a great deal of income tax, that means reducing all the stealth taxes they’ve imposed, particularly VAT, as much as possible.

It’s quite enjoyable when you get into the way of life.

RTSC
RTSC
7 months ago
Reply to  RTSC

PS I don’t use Shein … because I also avoid Chinese products as much as is reasonably possible. We are enriching them … and making ourselves poorer.

Rowland P
Rowland P
7 months ago
Reply to  RTSC

The trouble is that virtually everything is made in China, even clothing such as sweaters in M&S or Woolovers.

adamcollyer
adamcollyer
7 months ago

It all puts me in mind of the old joke: “I love Sainsbury’s. It keeps the plebs out of Waitrose.” 😉

Phil Warner
Phil Warner
7 months ago

If you haven’t already do browse eBay where advertising clothes is free. I’ve been buying preowned for years. Our spare bedroom is now a wardrobe.

huxleypiggles
7 months ago
Reply to  Phil Warner

Seconded 👍

mike r
mike r
7 months ago

This circular fashion is the proper way to take care of the environment, not Net Zero. At one point I read that something like 60% of fashion good ended up in the bin within 12 months. What a waste of resources. Rather than harking back the old days of dark satanic mills making cloth, we should be innovating and creating new stuff to make life better for everyone. Yet the Labour government is hell bent on stifling innovation, creativity and hence economic growth.

huxleypiggles
7 months ago
Reply to  mike r

Thus Uniparty government is hell bent on destroying this country.

RW
RW
7 months ago

A couple of weeks ago, a charming but probably somwhat short-sighted young lady wanted to see my ID when I was trying to by a bottle of sparkling mineral water. She later claimed to have thought that I must probably be “somewhere in my twenties”. I’ll be 53 in October. Can’t we finally drop this stupid generationing and let the generation generation just f – f – f – fade away?

Gezza England
Gezza England
7 months ago

The whole of Europe is getting poorer in conjunction with the Net Zero fantasy of the mentally challenged leaders. How does make energy more expensie than it should be not make people poorer in every way? Energy underpins our lives.

robnicholson
robnicholson
7 months ago
Reply to  Gezza England

And the stupid decisions made globally during the scamdemic.

Miss Haversham
Miss Haversham
7 months ago

Huge piles of discarded clothes line a beach in Accra, capital of Ghana. The rags started life thousands of miles from the Gulf of Guinea and their coming to rest on this West African coast reflects the shortcomings of a huge global trade buoyed by fast fashion. The Independent This is the problem with the clothing industry – huge amounts of waste and a manufacturing process that generates a great deal of pollution. It is unsustainable so we should really be applauding the Gen Z recycle and re-use philosophy. It is now common practice to praise the ‘make-do-and-mend’ philosophy of the wartime generation. My mother went through the war and was appalled by the wastefulness which became commonplace around the 60s. We became the throw-away society. So we have a real problem now – our economy depends on a wasteful lifestyle of constant consumption of items which previous generations would have kept long enough to pass on to their children. Clothes used to be very well made of good quality material and much more expensive because they were designed to last. Now they are incredibly cheap and wear out quickly. This is unsustainable. So what is the solution? I don’t know.… Read more »

robnicholson
robnicholson
7 months ago
Reply to  Miss Haversham

>It is now common practice to praise the ‘make-do-and-mend’ philosophy of the wartime generation.

Not just the wartime generation – the boomers born during/after the war had this mentality as well. My parents. Part of the reason I’m so good at DIY is that I spent time with my dad doing repairs around the house.

The disposable society really kicked in with the Millennials although we all jumped on the band wagon.

I am, as I type, decommissioning perfectly Windows desktop PCs because Microsoft decided that they’re unable to run Windows 11 – they can run it perfectly if you accept slightly reduced security. This actually offends me as a boomer/gen x.

CazT
CazT
7 months ago
Reply to  robnicholson

Maybe I’m foolish but I’m accepting the reduced security for now, having seen the issues others have had when making the changeover.

CazT
CazT
7 months ago

Well, I’ve got news for them. Even the older generation, professional middle classes have been economising for decades, and still are. There’s this presumption that all older folk, particularly ‘baby boomers’, are so rolling in cash that they wouldn’t dream of shopping below their perceived income level when, in fact, it’s their thrift that has enabled a lot of their later life comforts. Waitrose? Only when it can’t be found in Aldi, and the same goes for many other expensive outlets. The reason is that they were brought up to be thrifty, there wasn’t much choice around in their youth and, despite modern day perceptions, really couldn’t afford to splash out when they were young adults. It’s the types (often non-professionals) who want to demonstrate their status who go for high living and they’re often not as well off as they might appear.